W. R. ARROWSMITH.

P.S.--In article of No. 180. p. 353., a rather important misprint occurs,

viz. date of 4to. _King Richard II._ with unusual title-page, which should

be 1608, not 1605. Other little errors the reader may silently amend for

himself.

[Footnote 1: In a passage from L. L. L., lately winnowed in the pages of

"N. & Q.," divers attempts at elucidation (whereof not one, in my judgment,

was successful) having been made, it was gravely, almost magisterially

proposed by one of the disputants, to corrupt the concluding lines (MR.

COLLIER having already once before corrupted the preceding ones by

substituting a plural for a singular verb, in which lay the true key to the

right construction) by altering "their" the pronoun into "there" the

adverb, because (shade of Murray!) the commentator could not discover of

what noun "their" could possibly be the pronoun in these lines following:

"When great things labouring perish in their birth,

Their form confounded makes most form in mirth."

And it was left to MR. KEIGHTLEY to bless the world with the information

that it was "things."]

* * * * *

Notes and Queries, Number 189, June 11, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 6 / 124 题