SOLUTION OF TRANSIT PROBLEM IMPOSSIBLE UNDER HOME RULE.

It is true that the nationalisation of the Irish railways has in past

years found the keenest advocates amongst individual members of the Home

Rule Party; that the Majority Report of the late Viceregal Commission

favouring State purchase of the Irish railways was formally approved of

by the Parliamentary Party, and that Mr. Redmond has named "transit" as

one of the special matters that should be left to be dealt with by an

Irish Legislature. But there the matter ends. We are not given the

slightest inkling what is proposed to be done on this matter, or how it

will be done, or the slightest proof that under any system of Home Rule,

the financial difficulties of the problem can be solved at all.

The Reports of both the Commissions referred to are based, first on the

continuance of the present system of laws and government, and secondly,

on the use of Imperial credit to the tune of many millions. Yet amongst

the shoals of literature on Home Rule problems and finance, I can find

no enlightenment as to how the transit problem is to be solved under the

new conditions; _i.e._ how any Home Rule Government, whether it has

control of Customs and Excise or not, and however it economises, is to

find the money necessary to buy out the Irish railways and canals. A

Government that is faced with the problems of poverty and congestion, of

housing, of increased educational grants, of afforestation, and of

arterial land drainage, will have an almost impossible task in raising

money for these purposes alone. And, let those who can, inform us how an

Irish Parliament and Executive (with all else they will have in hand),

will be able to raise even the £5,000,000 necessary to improve the Irish

Light Railway System; not to speak of the sum at least tenfold greater

which will be required for a complete purchase scheme.

So far we are without that information. The Irish Parliamentary leaders

have not touched upon the point. The pamphleteers are almost equally

silent. Professor Kettle, in his "Home Rule Finance," mentions the

"Nationalisation of Railways" in one line of print, merely stating that

"the project will have to be financed by loans and not out of annual

revenue" (p. 41); and he further remarks, generally (p. 72), "that for

the development of any future policy, approved by her own people,

Ireland relies absolutely on her own fiscal resources." What fiscal

resources, and under what conditions are they obtainable?

In the volume entitled "Home Rule Problems" issued by the Liberal Home

Rule Committee, with a preface by Viscount Haldane, not one word is said

on the subject, though there are chapters on Irish finance, and on Irish

commercial and industrial conditions. Neither has Mr. Stephen Gwynn a

single word on the subject in his "Case for Home Rule," though he makes

the large assertion that "there is no country in the world where

resources are more undeveloped than those of Ireland."

Mr. Erskine Childers[93] merely refers to the Irish railway problem as

one that is "obvious and urgent," "which no Parliament but an Irish

Parliament can deal with, and which calls aloud for settlement."

Against Home Rule: The Case for the Union (1912) · 第 154 / 165 题