Lord St. Aldwyn said--

"That he always had a very strong objection to the system of

Equivalent Grants, because when they had to make a grant for

certain purposes to England, they were obliged to make

proportionate grants to Ireland and Scotland quite irrespective of

whether they needed them or not."[85]

Neither the "Imperial" contribution basis nor the "Population" basis,

which has in some instances been resorted to for grants in aid, is

satisfactory, nor is the method desirable of setting aside a certain

fund raised by some particular tax to finance a particular service. For

instance, the subvention of Education in Ireland out of the "Whisky

money" recently broke down owing to the diminution of the Revenue from

this source. The more sober Ireland became, the less she got for

Education. Chaos was imminent, and finally, after much friction, a

special grant had to be made from the Treasury to save the situation.

There are numerous instances in which great complications have been

caused in dealing with local authorities owing to these methods of

making grants in aid, and the system should be reformed. The true basis

is the basis of each Kingdom's need.... England has her needs, let them

be supplied. Scotland has hers, let them be supplied. Ireland has hers,

and having regard to her present comparative poverty, let them be

supplied "not grudgingly or of necessity," but by the Chancellor of the

Exchequer "as a cheerful giver." This is the constitutional principle

under the Act of Union, and the soundest financial principle to observe

for the United Kingdom.

Against Home Rule: The Case for the Union (1912) · 第 132 / 165 题