THE I.A.O.S.

The movement which the I.A.O.S. represents was started by Sir Horace

Plunkett, and he has remained the most prominent figure in it ever

since. Sir Horace Plunkett bears an honoured name wherever the rural

problem is seriously studied; but, like other prophets, he has received

perhaps less honour in his own country than elsewhere. At all events, in

the task to which he has devoted his life, he has had to encounter the

tacit, and indeed at times the open opposition, of powerful sections of

Nationalist opinion. Happily he belongs to the stamp of men whom no

obstacles can discourage, and who find in the work itself their

sufficient reward.

Sir Horace Plunkett's leading idea was a simple one, and has become

to-day almost a commonplace. He compared the backward state of

agriculture in Ireland with the great advance that had been made in

various continental countries, where the natural conditions were not

dissimilar to those of Ireland, and asked himself the secret of the

difference. That secret he found in the word _organisation_, and he set

himself to organise. The establishment of co-operative creameries seemed

to afford the most hopeful opening, and it was to this that Sir Horace

Plunkett and a few personal friends, in the year 1889, directed their

earliest missionary efforts. The difficulties to be overcome were at

first very great. "My own diary," writes Sir Horace, "records attendance

at fifty meetings before a single society had resulted therefrom. It was

weary work for a long time. These gatherings were miserable affairs

compared with those which greeted our political speakers."

The experiences[70] of another of the little band of devoted workers,

Mr. R.A. Anderson, now Secretary of the I.A.O.S., throw an interesting

light upon the nature of some of the obstacles which the new movement

had to encounter.

"It was hard and thankless work. There was the apathy of the

people, and the active opposition of the Press and the politicians.

It would be hard to say now whether the abuse of the Conservative

_Cork Constitution_, or that of the Nationalist _Eagle_ of

Skibbereen, was the louder. We were 'killing the calves,' we were

'forcing the young women to emigrate,' we were 'destroying the

industry.' Mr. Plunkett was described as a 'monster in human

shape,' and was adjured to 'cease his hellish work.' I was

described as his 'man Friday,' and as 'Roughrider Anderson.' Once

when I thought I had planted a creamery within the town of

Rathkeale, my co-operative apple-cart was upset by a local

solicitor, who, having elicited the fact that our movement

recognised neither political nor religious differences--that the

Unionist-Protestant cow was as dear to us as her

Nationalist-Catholic sister--gravely informed me that our programme

would not suit Rathkeale. 'Rathkeale,' said he pompously, 'is a

Nationalist town--Nationalist to the backbone--and every pound of

butter made in this creamery must be made on Nationalist

principles, or it shan't be made at all.' This sentiment was

applauded loudly, and the proceedings terminated."

Eventually, however, the zeal of the preachers, coupled with the

economic soundness of the doctrine, prevailed over all difficulties. By

1894 the movement had outgrown the individual activities of the

founders, and the Irish Agricultural Organisation Society was

established in Dublin in order to promote and direct its further

progress. That progress has been rapid and continuous, and to-day the

co-operative societies connected with the I.A.O.S. number nearly 1000,

with an annual turnover of upwards of 2-1/2 millions. They extend over

the length and breadth of the land, and include creameries, agricultural

societies (whose main business is the purchase of seeds and manure for

distribution to the members), credit societies (village banks), poultry

keepers' societies (for the marketing of eggs), flax societies,

industries societies, as well as other societies of a miscellaneous

character.

In 1892 the Liberal Party came into power. During their three years'

tenure of office a Home Rule Bill was introduced and passed through the

House of Commons, but little or nothing was attempted by the Government

for the economic regeneration of the country.

The Unionist Party came back with a large majority in 1896, and the

attention of the new Irish Government, in which the post of Lord

Lieutenant was held by Lord Cadogan and that of Chief Secretary by the

present writer, was from the first directed to the condition of the

Irish farmer. The session of 1896 was largely devoted to the passing of

a Bill for amending the Land Acts, and for further facilitating the

conversion of occupying tenants into owners of their holdings. Time,

however, was also found for a new Light Railways Act, under the

provision of which railway communication has been opened up at the

expense of the State in the poorest parts of North-West Ireland.

It was in the following year that the first attempt was made to

establish an Irish Department of Agriculture. The Bill was not carried

beyond a first reading, because it was ultimately decided that a Local

Government Act should have precedence of it. But the project was only

put aside for a time, and it was always looked upon by me as an integral

part of our legislative programme. In framing the Bill of 1897, and also

the later Bill of 1899, which passed into law, we received the greatest

assistance from the labours of a body known as the Recess Committee,

concerning which a few words must now be said.

Against Home Rule: The Case for the Union (1912) · 第 109 / 165 题