HOME RULE FINANCE

By THE RIGHT HON. J. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.

The financial problems connected with the grant of Home Rule in 1912 are

among the most complicated that call for solution, and differ

fundamentally from those which faced the Governments of 1886 and 1893.

And by common consent, the problems are not merely different; they are

immensely more difficult. No clauses in the earlier Bills lent

themselves more readily to destructive criticism; and though the

provisions of the new scheme are still shrouded in mystery, it is

inherent in the conditions under which it must be framed that the

financial clauses will prove to be even less defensible on the grounds

of logic or equity than those of either of its predecessors.

Since the first Home Rule Bill was introduced the interests of

Ireland--social, economic, industrial, and political--have become

increasingly identified with those of the other parts of the United

Kingdom. The commercial, banking, and railway systems of Ireland are

intimately associated with those of the greater and more firmly

established systems of Great Britain. Irish railways are so largely

controlled at the present time by British concerns, and there exist so

many agreements and understandings between them and British companies as

to facilities and rates, that they might be regarded as part of the same

network of communications. Hardly less close are the relations which now

exist between British and Irish banks.

It is not, however, on the commercial side only that greater intimacy

and more firmly established relations exist now than formerly. Irish

industries are agricultural, dairying and manufacturing. In each of

these branches the country is increasingly dependent on the markets of

England and Scotland; while reciprocally the products of the factories

and workshops of Great Britain find in Ireland one of their most

important markets. We do not always sufficiently realise that on the

other side of the St. George's Channel lies a country whose annual

imports amount to sixty-five millions sterling. Even less do we realise

that one-half (thirty-two millions sterling) is the value of the imports

of manufactures, mainly British, into Ireland. This trade in

manufactured goods is not only already enormous; it is rapidly growing.

It has increased by more than four millions in four years. Any

ill-considered legislative measure which interfered with or disturbed

this great volume of trade would no doubt cause serious loss to Ireland;

but it would bring bankruptcy and disaster to many British firms and

their workmen.

It is, nevertheless, in respect of the political changes and the

legislative measures passed in the last quarter of a century that the

most serious obstacles will be found in the way of framing any

satisfactory scheme for financing a measure of Home Rule. The Irish

Local Government system, framed on the British model by the Act of 1898,

the Congested Districts Board, and the Department of Agriculture, have

hitherto depended financially, either wholly or in part, on Imperial

grants in aid. Local taxation payments alone from the Imperial Exchequer

amounted in 1910-11 to £1,478,000. The financial scheme under Home Rule

must obviously contemplate and provide for the continuance of those

grants. Land Purchase schemes have been enacted which have already had

the effect of converting a quarter of a million tenants into owners

under a contingent liability of 120 millions sterling guaranteed by the

Imperial Exchequer. No financial scheme can ignore the fact that the

earliest of the annuities created under the Wyndham Act will not expire

before 1972, so that the Imperial liability for the payment of the bulk

of the annuities already created will continue for at least seventy

years more.

Finally, we are faced with the fact that in the last twenty-five years

the relations of the State to its citizens have been completely

reformed and extended. Social reform is now in the programme of all

parties. Education costs several times as much as in 1885. The aged poor

have been provided with pensions by the State, and the Insurance Act of

last year will shortly call for additional subventions from the Imperial

Treasury.

In addition to the new duties thus undertaken by the State, the cost of

Defence and of the Civil Services has grown by leaps and bounds. We need

not look too closely into the apportionment of these charges whilst we

remain partners in a United Kingdom, but if the partnership is to be

dissolved at the suit of Irish Nationalism, a new balance must be

struck, and on any fair basis the contribution of Ireland under

present-day conditions should far exceed the amount under either of the

schemes for which Mr. Gladstone made himself responsible. Both schemes

recognised the equity of some contribution for these services from

Ireland, and it must be assumed that the same broad principles will be

applied in any scheme which may be framed hereafter.

By way of introduction to any adequate discussion of the possible

financial proposals of any Home Rule measure, it is desirable to set out

in some detail the existing financial relations of Ireland and Great

Britain. The Treasury calculations on this subject are embodied in two

White Papers which have been prepared and published annually during the

last eighteen years. It is true that doubts have from time to time been

cast on the accuracy of these calculations and of the methods by which

the materials on which they are based have been collected. As to this,

it is only necessary to say that the information in the possession of

the Treasury officials is infinitely more voluminous and likely to be

more accurate than any in the possession of private individuals; and

there is no reason to suppose the succession of eminent public servants,

who have been in turn responsible for the preparation of these returns

have been moved in one direction or the other by prepossessions or bias.

Their one attempt has been throughout to present a statement, as

accurate as it is possible to make it on the one hand of the cost of

the existing administration in Ireland and the expenditure incurred

there, and on the other of the revenue derived from persons or property

living or situated in that country. As the Prime Minister said on

November 27 of last year--

"The utmost pains have been taken to make the estimates of 'true'

revenue approximately correct, and it is believed that the total

revenue as given in the revised returns approximates closely to the

facts."[50]

So long as Ireland is an integral part of the United Kingdom, such an

investigation has mainly an academic interest. The State is a

homogeneous entity; the taxes imposed on individuals similarly

circumstanced are the same (with some trifling exceptions--all in favour

of Ireland) in whatever quarter of the United Kingdom the individual

resides. But the case is wholly different when a proposal is made to

split up the State into its constituent parts. It then becomes necessary

to inquire if there is any prospect that the constituent parts will have

resources sufficient for the various services, commitments and

liabilities--present and contingent--which do or will belong to them.

And the beginning of any such inquiry is, as has been already said, the

present Irish revenue and expenditure.

The essential figures for such an investigation are contained in the

following statement. This shows separately the expenditure on the

various items which have been the subject of discussion or special

mention in the different financial schemes proposed in connection with

Home Rule. On the revenue side the effect of the delayed collection of

duties under the Budget of 1909-10 has been eliminated by taking the

average revenue in the two years in certain items. The figures of

expenditure relate to the year 1910-11. The corresponding figures for

both collection and contribution are set out in this table in

consequence of the suggestion made in some quarters that we should

revert to the Gladstonian proposal of 1886 and credit Ireland with the

full revenue as collected. Though any such proposal is patently absurd

it is mentioned here for the sake of completeness.

STATEMENT SHOWING ESTIMATED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE IN IRELAND (BASED ON

WHITE PAPERS 220 AND 221 OF 1911).

Revenue

As collected. As contributed.

£ £

1. Customs[A] 2,922,000 2,866,000

2. Excise (_ex._ licences)[A] 4,872,000 2,952,000

3. Licence Duties[A] 284,000 284,000

4. Estate, etc.[A] 914,000 914,000

5. General Stamps[A] 310,000 333,000

6. Income Tax[A] 1,106,000 1,307,000

7. Postal Services 1,155,000 1,155,000

8. Miscellaneous 139,000 139,000

Against Home Rule: The Case for the Union (1912) · 第 65 / 165 题