V.—SUNDAYS WITH THE PEOPLE.

It is said—and indeed it has been said so often that I feel ashamed of

saying it—that one half the world does not know how the other half lives.

I am sure that whether that is true or not, few of my City readers have

any idea of what goes on in the City while they are sitting comfortably

at home, or are sitting equally comfortably at church or chapel (for of

course the denunciations of the preacher when he speaks of the depravity

of the age do not refer to them). Suppose we take a stroll in the

eastern part of the City, where the dirt is greatest, the population most

intense, and the poverty most dire. We need not rise very early. On a

Sunday morning we are all of us a little later at breakfast than on

ordinary occasions. We sit longer over our welcome meal—our toilette is

a little more elaborate—so that we are in the City this particular Sunday

about half-past nine—a later hour than most of the City-men patronise on

the week-day. In the leading thoroughfares shops are shut and there are

few people about, and in the City, especially these dark winter mornings,

when the golden gleam of sunshine gilds the raw and heavy fog which in

the City heralds the approach of day, very few signs of life are visible,

very few omnibuses are to be seen, and even the cabs don’t seem to care

whether you require their services or whether you let them alone. Here

and there a brisk young man or a spruce maiden may be seen hastening to

teach at some Sunday school; otherwise respectability is either asleep or

away.

As we pass along, the first thing that strikes the stranger is a dense

unsavoury mob to be met outside certain buildings. We shall see one such

assemblage in Bell Alley, Goswell Street; we shall see another in

Artillery Street; there will be another at the Cow Cross Mission Hall,

and another in Whitecross Street, and another in a wretched little hovel,

you can scarcely call it a building, in Thaull Street. Just outside the

City, at the Memorial Hall, Bethnal Green, and at the Rev. W. Tyler’s

Ragged Church in King Edward Street, there will be similar crowds. Let

us look at them. It is not well to go too near, for they are unsavoury

even on these cold frosty mornings. Did you ever see such wretched,

helpless, dirty, ragged, seedy, forlorn men and women in all your life?

I think not. Occasionally on a week-day we see a beggar, shirtless and

unwashed and unkempt, shivering in the street, but here in these mobs we

see nothing else. They have tickets for free breakfasts provided for

them under the care of Mr. J. J. Jones and the Homerton Mission. How

they crowd around the doors, waiting for admission; how sad and

disconsolate those who have not tickets look as they turn away! What a

feast of fat things, you say, there must be inside. My dear sir, it is

nothing of the kind. All that is provided for them is a small loaf of

bread, with the smallest modicum of butter, and a pint of cocoa. Not

much of a breakfast that to you or me, who have two or three good meals a

day, but a veritable godsend to the half-starved and wretched souls we

see outside. Let us follow them inside. The tables and the long forms

on which they are seated are of the rudest kind. The room, as a rule, is

anything but attractive, nor is the atmosphere very refreshing. A City

missionary or an agent of the Christian community, or a devoted Christian

woman or a young man, whose heart is in the work—is distributing the

materials of the feast, which are greedily seized and ravenously

devoured. Let us look at them now they have taken their hats off. What

uncombed heads; what dirty faces; what scant and threadbare garments!

There are women too, and they seem to have fallen lower than the men.

They look as if they had not been to bed for months; as if all pride of

personal appearance had long since vanished; as if they had come out of a

pigstye.

Well, the world is a hard one for such as they, and no one can grudge

them the cheap meal which Christian charity provides. It seems a mockery

to offer these waifs and strays of the streets and alleys and

disreputable slums of the City a Gospel address till something has been

done to assuage the pangs of hunger, and to arouse in them the dormant

and better feelings of their nature. It is thus these mission-halls are

enabled to do a little good, to go down to the very depths, as it were,

in the endeavour to reform a wasted life, and to save a human soul. As

you look at these men and women you shudder. Most of them are in what

may be called the prime of life; able-bodied, ripe for mischief, fearing

not God, regarding not man. It must do them good to get them together at

these Sunday morning breakfasts, where they may realise that Christian

love which makes men and women in the middle and upper classes of society

have compassion on such as they.

Getting out into the open air, or rather into the open street, I heard a

band of singers advance. It is a procession, but not a very dangerous

one. The leader walks with his back to us, an act rarely exercised out

of royal circles. It is thus he guides the vocalists before him, who go

walking arm-in-arm singing with all their might; while at the rear a

pleasant-looking man follows, giving papers to the people. I take one,

and learn that this is Mr. Booth’s Allelujah Band, and that a seat is

kindly offered me in his tabernacle, where I can hear the Gospel. I

don’t accept the invitation; I can hear the Gospel without going to

Whitechapel, and Mr. Booth’s extravagances are not to my taste.

Apparently this Sunday morning the people do not respond to the

invitation. It is evident that in this part of the City the novelty of

the thing has worn off.

I scarce know whether I am in the City or not. I plunge into a mass of

streets and courts leading from Artillery Street to King Edward Street at

one end, and Bethnal Green at the other. Here is a market in which a

brisk provision trade is carried on, and men and women are purchasing all

the materials of a Sunday dinner. Outside Rag-fair a trade similar to

that which prevails there seems also to be carried on. I see no

policemen about, and the people apparently do just as they like; and the

filth and garbage left lingering in some of the narrow streets are

anything but pleasant. As a I rule, I observe the policemen only

patronise the leading thoroughfares, and then it seems to me they act in

a somewhat arbitrary manner. For instance, opposite the Broad Street

Terminus a lad is cleaning a working man’s boots. While he is in the

middle of the operation the policeman comes and compels him to march off.

I move on a dozen steps, and there, up Broad Street—just as you enter the

Bishopsgate Station of the Metropolitan Railway—is another lad engaged in

the same work of shoe or boot cleaning. Him the policeman leaves alone.

I wonder why. Justice is painted blind, and perhaps the policeman is

occasionally ditto. In Bishopsgate Street itself the crowd was large of

idle boys and men, who seemed to have nothing particular to do, and did

not appear to care much about doing that. They took no note of the

Sabbath bells which called them to worship. To them the Sunday morning

was simply a waste of time. They had turned out of their homes and

lodgings, and were simply walking up and down the street till it was time

to open the public-house. In that street, as the reader may be aware,

there is the Great Central Hall, and as its doors were open, I went in.

The audience was very scanty, and apparently temperance does not find

more favour with the British working man than the Gospel. Mr. Ling was

in the chair. There was now and then a hymn sung or a temperance melody,

and now and then a speech. Indeed, the speeches were almost as numerous

as the hearers. It seems the society keeps a missionary at work in that

part of the City, and he had much to say of the cases of reformation

going on under his care. The best speech I heard was that of a working

builder, who said for years he had been in the habit of spending eight

shillings a week in the drink, and how much better off he was now that he

kept the money in his pocket. I wished the man had more of his class to

hear him. Of course he rambled a little and finished off with an attack

on the bishops, which the chairman (Mr. Ling) very properly did not allow

to pass unchallenged, as he quoted Bishop Temple as a teetotaler, and

referred to the hearty way in which many of the clergy of the Church of

England supported the temperance cause.

I hasten to other scenes. I next find myself in Sclater Street, and here

up and down surges a black mob, sufficient at any rate, were it so

disposed, to fill St. Paul’s Cathedral. This mob is composed entirely of

working men—men who are amused with anything, and hurry in swarms to a

hatter’s shop, who simply throws out among them pink and yellow cards,

indicating the extraordinary excellence and unparalleled cheapness of the

wares to be sold within.

Foreigners say Sunday is a dull day; that then there is no business doing

in London; and that everyone is very sad on that day. In Sclater Street

they would soon find out their mistake. There, it is evident, little of

Sunday quiet and Sunday dulness exists. On each side of me are shops

with birds; and if there is not a brisk trade going on, it is certainly

not the fault of the tradesmen. We have just had what the bird-catchers

call the November flight of linnets, and in Sclater Street the market

overflows with them. The London and suburban bird-catchers, who are not

to be put down by Act of Parliament, have had a fine time of it this

year. The principal part of the linnets are bred on the wild gorse

lands, and it is the wild weather such as we have had of late that drives

them into the nets of the suburban fowler, who this year has been so

lucky as to take five dozen of them at one pull of the clap-net.

Goldfinches also are abundant, in consequence of the provision of the

Wild Birds Preservation Act. On Sunday a bird-dealer offers me them at

threepence each, or four for a shilling. It is sad to see the poor

little things shut up in their bits of cages in the dirty shops of

Sclater Street. The proprietor with his unwashed hands takes them out

one by one and holds them out in vain. The British workman crowds round

and admires, but he does not buy, as he is keeping his money in his

pocket till 1 P.M., when the “public” opens its congenial doors, and his

unnatural thirst is slaked. It is really shocking, this display of these

beautiful little songsters. What crime have they committed that they

should be imprisoned in the dirt and bad air and uncongenial fog of

Sclater Street? What are the uses of the Wild Birds Preservation Act if

the only result is the crowding the shops of the bird-dealers in Sclater

Street? I felt indeed indignant at the sight thus permitted, and at the

trade thus carried on. Cocks and hens, ducks and rabbits, are proper

subjects of sale, I admit, though I see no particular reason why, when

other shops are closed, shops for the sale of them are permitted to

remain open; but blackbirds, linnets, thrushes, goldfinches,

bullfinches—the ornaments of the country, the cheerful choristers of the

garden and the grove—deserve kinder treatment at our hands, even if the

result be that Sclater Street does less business and is less of an

attractive lounge to the British operative on a Sabbath morn. Away from

Sclater Street and Bishopsgate Street the crowd thins, and the ordinary

lifeless appearance of the Sunday in London is visible everywhere. Here

and there a gray-headed old gentleman or an elderly female may be seen

peeping out of a first-floor window into the sad and solitary street, but

the younger branches of the family are away. Now and then you catch a

crowd of workmen who are much given to patronise the showy van which the

proprietor of some invaluable preparation of sarsaparilla utilises for

the sale of his specific for purifying the blood and keeping off all the

ills to which flesh is heir. Such shops as are open for the sale of

cheap confectionery I see also are well patronised, and in some quarters

evidently an attempt made to dispose of ginger-beer. On the cold frosty

morning the hot-chestnut trade appears also to be in demand, though I

question whether all who crowd round the vendors of such articles are

_bonâ-fide_ buyers; rather, it seems to me, that under the pretence of

being such they are taking a mean advantage of the little particle of

warmth thrown out by the charcoal fire used for the purpose of roasting

chestnuts. Well, I can’t blame them; it is cold work dawdling in the

streets, and if I were a British workman I fancy I should find a little

more interest in church than in the idle walk and talk of some, or in the

habit others have of standing stock still till The Pig and Whistle or the

Blue Lion open their doors. It is well to be free and independent and

your own master, but that is no reason why all the Sunday morning should

be spent in loafing about the streets.

But what about the many? Well, the public-houses are open, and it is

there the British workman feels himself but too much at home. And then

there is the Hall of Science, in Old Street, which is generally crowded

by an audience who pay gladly for admission to hear Mr. Bradlaugh, who is

a very able man, lecture, in a style which would shock many good people

if they were to hear him. I must candidly admit that in that style he is

far outdone by Mrs. Besant, who takes the Bible to pieces, and turns it

inside out, and holds up to ridicule all its heroes and prophets, and

kings and apostles, and Christ himself, with a zest which seems perfectly

astonishing when we remember how much Christianity has done for the

elevation of the people in general and woman in particular. Mrs. Besant

is a very clever woman, and she means well I daresay, still it is not

pleasant to see the Hall of Science so well filled as it is on a Sunday

night.

The Hall of Science in the Old Street Road is not an attractive place

outside, and internally it is less of a hall and more of a barn than any

public building with which I chance to be familiar. And yet, Sunday

night after Sunday night, it is well filled, though the admission for

each person is from threepence to a shilling, and there is no attempt by

music or ritual to attract the sentimental or the weak. The lectures

delivered are long and argumentative, and it is worth the study,

especially of the Christian minister who complains that he cannot get at

the working man, how it is that the people prefer to pay money to hear

the lectures at Old Street, while he offers them the Gospel without money

and without price and often with the additional attraction of a free tea.

With that view I went to hear Mrs. Besant one Sunday night. I know

little of Mrs. Besant, save that she has been made the subject of a

prosecution which, whatever be its results, whether of fine or

imprisonment to herself or of gain to her prosecutors, is one deeply to

be deplored. If a clergyman of the Established Church of England

established or attempted to establish the fact that mankind has a

tendency to increase beyond the means of existence, a woman, on behalf of

the sex that has the most to suffer from the misery of overpopulation,

has a right in the interests of humanity to call attention to the

subject. In a very old-fashioned couplet it has been remarked of woman—

That if she will, she will, you may depend on’t;

And if she won’t, she won’t, and there’s an end on’t.

To that class of female Mrs. Besant emphatically belongs. She is one of

those rare ones who will say what she thinks. There is a great deal of

firmness in her face. Such a woman always goes her own way. It was a

pleasant change from the strong meat of the Hall of Science—the withering

scorn and contempt there poured on all that the best men in the world

have held to be best—to the mild excitement of a Shakespearian reading in

a public-house. Could there be a fitter teacher for the people who do

not go to church, and, let me add, also for those who do? There could be

no negative reply to such a question, and surely if Shakespeare is quoted

in the pulpit on a Sunday morning, the people may hear him read on a

Sunday evening.

“Sunday evening readings for the people!” Only think of that! What a

gain from the tap-room and the bar-parlour. Such was the announcement

that met my eye the other night in a street not a hundred miles from

King’s Cross railway station. Mr. So-and-So, the bill proceeded to

state, had the pleasure to inform his friends that, with a view to oblige

the public, he had secured the services of a celebrated dramatic reader,

who would on every Sunday evening read or recite passages from

Shakespeare, Thackeray, Dickens, Hood, Thornbury, Sketchley, etc.

Further, the bill stated that these readings would commence at a

quarter-past seven, and terminate at a quarter-past ten. Could I resist

such an intellectual treat? Could I deny myself such an exquisite

gratification? Forgive me, indulgent reader, if for once I made up my

mind I could not. The difficulty was where to find the place, for, in my

delight at finding a publican so public-spirited—so ready to compete with

the attractions of St. George’s Hall—I had unfortunately failed to make a

note of the house thus kindly thrown open to an intelligent public. The

difficulty was greater than would at first sight appear, for on Sunday

night shops are mostly closed, and there are few people in a position to

answer anxious inquirers. Great gin-palaces were flaring away in all

their glory, and doing a roaring trade at the time when church-bells were

ringing for evening service, and decent people were hastening to enter

the sanctuary, and for awhile to forget earth with its care and sin. In

vain I timidly entered and put the query to the customers at the crowded

bar, to potman over the counter, to landlord, exceptionally brilliant in

the splendour of his Sunday clothes. They knew nothing of the benevolent

individual whose whereabouts I sought; and evidently had a poor opinion

of me for seeking his address. Sunday evening readings for the people!

what cared they for them? Why could I not stand soaking like the others

at their bar, and not trouble my head about readings from Shakespeare and

Dickens? Such evidently was the train of thought suggested by my

questions. Just over the way was a police-station. Of course the police

would know; it was their duty to know what went on in all the

public-houses of the district. I entered, and found three policemen in

the charge of a superior officer. I put my question to him, and then to

them all. Alas! they knew as little of the matter as myself; indeed,

they knew less, for they had never heard of such a place, and seemed

almost inclined to “run me in” for venturing to suppose they had. What

wonderful fellows are our police! I say so because all our

penny-a-liners say so; but my opinion is, after all, that they can see

round a corner or through a brick wall just as well as myself or any

other man, and no more. Clearly this was a case in point, for the

public-house I was seeking was hardly a stone’s-throw off, and I was

directed to it by an intelligent greengrocer, who was standing at his

shop-door and improving his mind by the study of that fearless champion

of the wrongs of the oppressed and trodden-down British working man,

_Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper_. It was he who put me on the right scent—not

that he was exactly certain—but he indicated the house at which such

proceedings were likely to take place, and as he was right in his

conjecture, I take this opportunity of publicly returning him my thanks.

Had it not been for him I should have had no Shakespeare, no Thackeray,

no Hood, no Dickens, no feast of reason and flow of soul that Sunday

night. As it was, it turned out as I expected, and I had very little of

either to reward my painful search. As I have said, the nominal hour at

which proceedings commenced was a quarter-past seven; in reality, it was

not till nearly half-past eight that the celebrated dramatic reader

favoured us with a specimen of his powers. It was true he was in the

house, but he was down in the bar with a select circle, indulging in the

luxuries generally to be found in such places. In the meantime I took

stock leisurely of the room upstairs in which we assembled, and of its

occupants. At that early hour the latter were not numerous. A little

foreigner with his wife was seated by the fire, and him she led off

before the dramatic readings commenced. Reasons, which a sense of

delicacy forbids my mentioning, suggested the wisdom and the prudence of

an early retirement from a scene rather dull—at any rate, quite the

reverse of gay and festive. As to the rest of us, I can’t say that we

were a particularly lively lot. A stern regard to truth compels me

reluctantly to remark that we were unprepossessing looking rather than

otherwise. The majority I of us there were lads with billycock hats and

short pipes, who talked little to each other, but smoked and drank beer

in solemn silence. The cheerfulest personage in the room was the potboy,

who, as he stalked about with his apron on and his shirt-sleeves tucked

up, seemed to be quite at home with his customers. Some of the lads had

their sweethearts with them; at any rate I presume they were such from

the retiring way in which they sat—she, after the manner of such young

people in a large room, chiefly occupied in counting the ten fingers of

her red and ungloved hands, while her male admirer sat smoking his short

pipe and spitting on the sanded floor in a way more suggestive of perfect

freedom than of grace. I could see but two decent-looking girls in the

room, which, by the time the entertainment was over, contained as many as

sixty or seventy. Evidently the class of customers expected was a low

one, greengrocers’ and costermongers’ boys apparently, and such like.

The tables were of the commonest order, and we had no chairs, nothing but

long forms, to sit on. In the middle by the wall was a small platform,

carpeted; on this platform was a chair and table, and it was there the

hero of the evening seated himself, and it was from thence that at

intervals he declaimed. As to the entertainment, if such it may be

called, the less said about it the better. A more fifth-rate,

broken-down, ranting old hack I think I never heard. Even now it puzzles

me to think how the landlord could have ever had the impudence to attach

the term “celebrated” to his name. It seemed as if the reader had an

impediment in his speech, so laughable and grotesque was his enunciation,

which, however, never failed to bring down an applause in the way of raps

on the tables which caused the glasses to jingle—to the manifest danger

of spilling their contents. We had a recitation about Robert Bruce, and

other well-known readings; then he bellowed and tossed his arms about and

screamed! How dull were his comic passages! How comic was his pathos!

Surely never was good poetry more mangled in its delivery before. I can

stand a good deal—I am bound to stand a good deal, for in the course of a

year I have to listen to as much bad oratory as most; but at last I could

stand it no longer, and was compelled to beat a precipitate retreat,

feeling that I had over-estimated the public spirit of the landlord and

his desire to provide intellectual amusement for his friends—feeling that

these readings for the people are nothing better than an excuse for

getting boys and girls to sit smoking and drinking, wasting their time

and injuring their constitutions, on a night that should be sacred to

better things, in the tainted atmosphere of a public-house.

Days and Nights in London; Or, Studies in Black and Gray · 第 9 / 23 题