Whatever were the purposes of the Nuraghe, almost all writers on

Sardinia consider these ancient structures of Eastern origin. Father

Bresciani attributes them to Canaanitish or Phœnician colonies, which

migrated to the west in early times; and he takes great pains, but, I

consider, without much success, to establish their identity, or, at

least, their analogy, with the religious or sepulchral erections,—the

altars, and “high places,” and tombs,—of which notices are found in the

Old Testament. No doubt exists that extensive migrations, favoured by

the enterprise of the earliest maritime people of whom we have any

record, took place, perhaps both before and after the age of Moses, from

the shores of Syria to the islands and shores of the West of Europe.

There is reason to think that the island of Sardinia, if not the first

seat, was, from its peculiar situation, the very centre, of a

colonisation, embracing in its ramifications the coasts of Africa and

Spain, with Malta, Sicily, and the Balearic islands. It appears singular

that Corsica, the sister island to Sardinia, should not have shared in

this movement of settlers from the East; perhaps from its lying out of

the direct current, while, in its onward course, the wave flowing

through the Straits of Hercules bore forward on the ocean the “merchants

of many isles,” for commerce if not for settlement, as far as the

Cassiterides, our own Scilly Isles.

Though there is little historical evidence of the Phœnician colonisation

of Sardinia, and even that of the early Greek settlements in the island

is obscure and conflicting, we have abundant traces of the former, more

imperishable than written records, still lingering in the manners and

customs of the modern Sardes, and in the great number of those

extraordinary antiquities known as the Sarde idols. The greater part of

these, as Mr. Tyndale undertakes to show, were symbols of Canaanitish

worship, the miniature representations of the gods adored by the Syrian

nations, especially of Moloch, Baal, Astarte or Astaroth, Adonis or

Tammuz, the very objects of that idolatry so frequently and emphatically

denounced in the Old Testament, to which we have already referred. Mr.

Tyndale, however, justly observes, that “so distinct and peculiar is the

character of these relics, that their counterparts are no more to be met

with out of Sardinia than the Nuraghe themselves.” From this

circumstance, in conjunction with the fact of the images being often

found in and near those buildings, he infers that they may have been,

directly or indirectly, connected with each other, in either a

religious, sepulchral, or united character.

The inquiry would be incomplete unless it were extended to other Sarde

remains, of equal or greater antiquity, for the purpose of discovering

whether they have any affinity with, or can throw any light on, the

mysterious origin of the Nuraghe. We propose devoting another chapter to

this investigation.

CHAP. XXXV.

_Sardinian Monoliths.—The Sepolture, or “Tombs of the

Giants.”—Traditions regarding Giant Races.—The Anakim, &c., of

Canaan.—Their supposed Migration to Sardinia.—Remarks on

Aboriginal Races.—Antiquity of the Nuraghe and Sepolture.—Their

Founders unknown._

We can hardly be mistaken in supposing that, among the relics of

antiquity still existing in Sardinia, the monoliths, of somewhat similar

character with the Celtic remains at Carnac, Avebury, and Stonehenge,

and common also in other countries, belong to the earliest age. These

Sarde monoliths are found in several parts of the island, being, as the

name expresses, single stones, or obelisks, set upright in the ground.

In Sardinia they are called _Pietra-_ or _Perda-fitta_, and

_Perda-Lunga_. We generally find them rounded by the hammer, but

irregularly, in a conical form tapering to the top, but with a gradual

swell in the middle; and their height varies from six to eighteen feet.

They differ from the Celtic monuments, in being generally thus worked

and shaped; in not being often congregated on one spot beyond three in

number—a _Perda-Lunga_ with two lesser stones; and in there not being

any appearance of their ever having had, like the Trilithons of

Stonehenge, any impost horizontal stone.

Father Bresciani finds the prototype of all these rude pillars

scattered throughout the world, in the Beth-El of Jacob and other

Bethylia, sepulchral or commemorative, mentioned in the Hebrew

Scriptures. By Mr. Tyndale, the Sarde _Perda-Lunga_ is considered a

relic of the religion common to all the idolatrous Syro-Arabian nations,

which, deifying the powers and laws of nature, considers the male sex to

be the type of its active, generative, and destructive powers, while

that passive power of nature, whose function is to conceive and bring

forth, is embodied under the female form. And this worship, he

conceives, was introduced into Sardinia, with the symbols just

described, by the Phœnician or Canaanitish immigrants.

[Illustration: SEPOLTURA DE IS GIGANTES.]

The _Sepolture de is Gigantes_, the tombs of the giants, as they are

called, form another class of Sarde antiquities of the earliest age. The

structures to which the popular traditions ascribe this name, may be

described as a series of large stones placed together without any

cement, inclosing a foss or hollow from fifteen to thirty-six feet long,

from three to six wide, and the same in depth, with immense flat stones

resting on them as a covering. Though the latter are not always found,

it is evident, by a comparison with the more perfect Sepolture, that

they have once existed, and have been destroyed or removed.[79]

The foss runs invariably from north-west to south-east; and at the

latter point there is a large upright headstone, averaging from ten to

fifteen feet high, varying in its form, from the square, elliptical, and

conical, to that of three-fourths of an egg; and having in many

instances an aperture about eighteen inches square at its base.

[Illustration: SEPOLTURA DE IS GIGANTES.]

On each side of this stele, or headstone, commences a series of separate

stones, irregular in size and shape, but forming an arc, the chord of

which varies from twenty to twenty-six feet; so that the whole figure

somewhat resembles the bow and shank of a spur.

“The shape of the foss and headstone,” observes Mr. Tyndale, “of these

remains, fairly admits of the probability that they were graves, as some

of the earliest forms of sepulchres on record are the upright stones

with superincumbent slabs, such as the Druidical cistvaens and some

tombs in Greece. Still, like the ‘Sarde Idols’ and the Nuraghe, the

_Sepolture_ are peculiar to the island, being entirely different in

point of size and character from any other sepulchral remains. Judging

from the many remains of those partially destroyed, their numbers must

have been considerable. The Sardes believe them to be veritable tombs of

giants; and that there may be legends of their existence in the island

is undeniable, as a similar belief is found in almost all countries.”

Mr. Tyndale, in speaking of the supposed connexion between the _Nuraghe_

and the _Sepolture_, observes that, “if a Canaanitish race migrated

here, nothing is more probable than that the tradition and worship of

the giants would be also imported; and that it is even possible that

some of the actual gigantic races of the Rephaim, Anakim, and others

mentioned in Scripture, might have actually arrived in Sardinia.” Father

Bresciani goes further: he fixes the era of this migration, points out

the event which caused it[80], and traces its route by the Isthmus of

Suez, through Egypt, and along the coast of Africa, which they are also

said to have colonised; and whence he considers they could easily

navigate to Sardinia and other islands in that part of the

Mediterranean.

This immigration, however, of the Canaanitish giants rests upon very

slender evidence; and it may be questioned whether the oldest Sardinian

monuments do not belong to an age far anterior to that of any Phœnician

or Canaanitish colonisation of the island whatever. That such there was,

undoubted proofs have already been gathered; but the statuettes of

Phœnician idols, forming part of those proofs, with the arts and skill

required for the maritime enterprise it required, betray the

civilisation of a period more advanced than that to which we should be

disposed to attribute such rude structures as the Nuraghe and the

Sepolture. In this uncertainty, it may be worth an inquiry, whether

these ancient monuments did not exist before the colonists landed on the

shores of Sardinia,—in short, whether they were not the works of an

aboriginal race. The question is raised by M. Tyndale: “We may reduce

the inquiry,” he says, “to the simple question, Were the Nuraghe built

by the autochthones of the island, of whom we have no knowledge, or by

the earliest colonists, of whom we have but little information?” On the

former alternative the author is silent; nor is the question even raised

by any other writer on Sardinian antiquities within our knowledge.

Yet surely, independently of its bearing on the origin of the Nuraghe

and the early population of Sardinia, the subject of indigenous races is

interesting in a general point of view. And it is worthy of notice, that

the accounts handed down to us of the earliest colonists of the ancient

world, speak of an aboriginal population existing in the countries to

which they migrated, just as the European adventurers and

circumnavigators of the last three centuries found indigenous races on

the continents and islands they discovered, except on some few islands

of the Pacific Ocean, recently emerged from the state of coral reefs.

The parallel may be carried further. The ancient, as well as the modern,

colonists carried the arts of a superior civilisation in their train;

but the indigenous races of the New World were destined to gradual decay

and extinction, leaving some ancient monuments as the records of their

existence, just as the primitive children of the soil in the West of

Europe, whose relics we endeavour to decipher, disappeared and were

lost; so uniform is the order of events in the designs of Providence.

Poetical legends, generally founded on, and blended with, traditionary

facts, help us to form some idea of the character and habits of the

aboriginal races; but history, and even tradition, seldom carry us

further back in the review of past ages than the arrival of colonists,

generally of Eastern origin, to form settlements on the shores and the

islands washed by the Mediterranean. Did they find these shores and

islands uninhabited? To say nothing of countries more remote and less

accessible, many considerations would induce us to imagine that these

fair regions were not all deserts; that, even at this early period, they

were already peopled.

In Sardinia, where, as already observed, the manners, the superstitions,

and the traditions of the earliest ages, are more faithfully preserved

than in any other European country, we find, among the most ancient

existing structures, some which, to this day, are pointed out by the

natives as “the Tombs of the Giants.” And who were the “giants,” of whom

we read much, both in sacred and profane history? The very term is

significant. It is formed from two Greek words—γῆ and γένω, and

signifies earth-born, sons of the earth.[81] The word αὐτόχθνονες

(autochthones) has a cognate meaning; Liddell and Scott render it, “of

the land itself; Latin, _terrigenæ, aborigines, indigenæ_, of the

original race, _not settlers_.” The mythical account of the origin of

the “giants” concurs with this etymology. It paints them as the sons of

Cœlus and Terra—Heaven and Earth. In the poetry of Hesiod, they spring

from the earth imbued with the blood of the gods. Traces and traditions

of this aboriginal race are found in all parts of the world, and in

sacred as well as profane history. We are told that there were giants in

the days before the flood[82]; and Josephus considers them the offspring

of the union, mysteriously described by the sacred writer, of “the sons

of God with the daughters of men;” for, as might be supposed, there were

females also of the race of the earth-born. So the poets sang. Such was

Cybele, daughter of Heaven and Earth, pictured as crowned with a diadem

of towers, as the patroness of builders. We read of the giants, in the

Old Testament, under the names of Rephaim, Emim, Zamzummim, and Anakim.

In the time of Abraham, these tribes dwelt in the country beyond Jordan,

in about Astaroth-Karnaim[83], and it is now the received opinion of

biblical archæologists, that they were the most ancient, or aboriginal,

inhabitants of Palestine; prior to the Canaanites, by whom they were

gradually dispossessed of the region west of the Jordan, and driven

beyond that river. Some of the race, however, remained in Palestine

Proper so late as the invasion of the land by the Hebrews, and are

repeatedly mentioned as “the sons of Anak,” and “the remnant of the

Rephaim;”[84] and a few families existed as late as the time of

David.[85]

In the most ancient legends we find the giant race located in all parts

of the then known world. In Thessaly, under the name of Titans, poetic

fiction records their deeds of prowess in piling mountain on mountain,

and hurling immense rocks in their battles with the gods. Writers of

credit have transmitted to us accounts of the discovery of their remains

on the coast of Africa, from Bona to Tangier, in Sicily, and in Crete.

The earliest navigators who touched on the shores and islands of the

Mediterranean, brought back romantic tales, receiving their colouring

from the terrors of the narrators, of the barbarity and the stature of

the races they found on those then inhospitable shores. They were

robbers, and even cannibals; enemies of the gods and men. Such tales are

not without their parallels in the annals of modern maritime discovery.

Before the fall of Troy, Sicily was peopled by a giant or aboriginal

people, called Cyclopes; that insular race being said to be descended

from Neptune and Amphitrite, just as the giant Antæus, the founder of

Tangier on the African coast, was called the son of Neptune and Terra.

If we take Polyphemus, the chief of a tribe of the Cyclops, for a type

of this cognate race, what do we find in his story, divested of the

fiction with which it was clothed by tradition, transmuted into the

poetry of the Odyssey and the Æneid? The Grecian and Trojan heroes,

successively land on the eastern coast of Sicily, near the base of Mount

Ætna, whose throes and thunders lend horror to the scene. There dwelt

this Cyclop chief, in a cavern of the rocks. The race were Troglodytes,

as were the aboriginal Sardes, Baleares, Maltese, Libyans, &c. In

Sardinia, their caverns are still to be seen in an island of the

territory of Sulcis. Caves were probably the first habitations of

primitive man, before emerging from a condition hardly superior to that

of the savage beasts, his competitors for such rude shelter.

Irrespective of climate, in these we find his home, whether among the

Celts of the frozen regions of the North, or the Arabs of the stony

wastes bordering on the Erythrean Sea, in the Libyan deserts, or in the

sandstone rocks of Southern Africa. There one still sees the pygmy

Bushmen, perhaps the last existing Troglodyte race, the very reverse of

the Cyclops in stature, but, like them, their hand against every man's,

unchanged by ages in the midst of African tribes of considerable

civilisation, neither sowing nor pasturing, but living on roots,

berries, and grubs, like other aboriginal races, which sprang into

existence with the forests through which they roam, and the various

brutes which shared with them the possession of the soil:

“Cum prorepserunt primis animalia terris,

Mutum et turpe pecus.” HOR. _Sat._ i. 3.

But the traditions of Polypheme and his Cyclops represent them as

advanced beyond this first rude stage of society, though they still

adhered to their ancestral caves. They were robbers, no doubt; at least,

they plundered and made captive unfortunate mariners thrown on their

shores. Perhaps they feasted on their captives, as American Indians and

South-Sea islanders are reported to have done. This may be doubted; but

at least the cannibal feasts of the Sicilian aborigines were but _bonnes

bouches_ occasionally thrown in their way. They had better means of

subsistence. Polypheme was a shepherd, and so were all his clan. Picture

him, as described by Virgil[86], descending from the mountains,

probably at eventide, leaning on his staff, with his shepherd's pipe

hanging on his bosom, surrounded by his flocks, and leading them to the

shelter of some cavern on the shore; and we have a pleasant scene of

pastoral life. Such were all his tribe, a pretty numerous one,

comprising one hundred males, with their families, each having a flock

as large as their chiefs. They led a nomad life, “_errantes_” between

the mountain pastures and the plains on the coast[87].

Now, if we may be allowed to separate these facts, which seem genuine,

from the fictions with which they are blended, we find the aborigines of

Sicily, though barbarous, in a somewhat advanced stage of social life

beyond that when we are told they roamed in the woods and fed on acorns.

Such we may justly presume, divested of poetical fiction, was the

condition of the aborigines of the neighbouring island of Sardinia, the

largest in the Mediterranean except Sicily, when the first foreign

colonists landed on its coast. And such, after the lapse of more than

thirty centuries, are the Sarde shepherds of the present day, generally

lawless, sometimes robbers, making the caves of the rocks their shelter,

and their flocks and herds providing them with food and clothing.

Tenacious, above all other European races, of the traditions and customs

of their forefathers, when they point to structures of the highest

antiquity scattered on their native soil, and call them “_Sepolture de

is Gigantes_”—as we now have some idea what these giants were,—may we

not find reason to accept their tradition, and consider these monuments

as the tombs of the chiefs and first founders of their aboriginal race.

Still, it may be objected that the ancient legends relating to giants

are too fabulous to admit of any sound theories being built on them; and

some have even gone so far as to reject all the received accounts of

families or tribes of men of gigantic stature, as worthy only of the

belief of credulous ages. It may indeed be difficult to imagine whole

districts and countries peopled with gigantic races so formidable that

we can hardly conceive any other people subsisting in contact with them.

But that individuals, and even families, of extraordinary stature and

strength existed in the earliest ages cannot be denied, except by those

who regard the narrative of Scripture as equally fabulous with the

fictions of the poets; although the statements are literal and exact,

occur in a variety of incidental notices, and are confirmed by

discoveries related by authors of good repute.[88]

A solution of the difficulty may, perhaps, be found in the

consideration, that, as even now we find families and races exceeding in

stature and strength the average of mankind, there is still more reason

to believe in the existence of such phenomena in the youth of the

generations of man, when a simple mode of life, abundance of nutritious

food, and a salubrious atmosphere, gave to all organic beings huge and

sinewy forms. Such might be the special privilege of the Rephaim, and

other tribes of which we read. But while the rank and file, as we may

call them, of the nation, though tall and robust, might not much exceed

the average height of the human species, the chiefs and heroes who took

their posts in the van of battle may have attained the extraordinary

dimensions recorded of them; and, their numbers being magnified by

terror and tradition, the attributes of the class were extended to the

whole tribe. Thus the poets gave the name of Cyclops to all the

aboriginal inhabitants of Sicily, though the Cyclops, properly so

called, are represented by them as a single family, sons, as before

mentioned, of Neptune and Amphitrite.

That the _Sepolture de is Gigantes_ may be considered the tombs of the

chiefs or heroes of the aboriginal inhabitants of Sardinia seems to be

generally allowed; and the opinion receives some confirmation from a

passage in Aristotle's “Physics,” where, treating of the immutability of

time, notwithstanding our perception or unconsciousness of what occurs,

he incidentally illustrates his argument by the expression:—“So with

those who are fabulously said to sleep with the heroes in Sardinia, when

they shall rise up.”[89]

The best authorities being thus led to the conclusion that the Sarde

aborigines were a giant race, the question remains whether the Nuraghe

had the same origin as the Sepolture; and, passing by some trivial

objections to this hypothesis, we are disposed to adopt Mr. Tyndale's

conclusion, that—“the coincidence of two such peculiar monuments in the

same island, their non-existence elsewhere, and their being both

indicative of some abstract principle of grandeur and power, practically

carried out in their construction, are strong reasons for the

presumption that they may have had some mutual reference to each

other,—as burying places, temples, and altars, and consequently were

works of the same times and the same people.”

Perhaps it may be objected, with some show of reason, that a people so

rude and so primitive as the aborigines, could not have possessed the

skill required for the construction of such buildings as the Nuraghe; so

that they must be assigned to a later age. But we are informed in

Genesis that, among some families of mankind, not only useful, but

ornamental, arts were taught before Noah's flood![90] and, without

instituting an inquiry how soon the inventive and mechanical faculties

of mankind were more or less developed in various countries, we may

venture to assume that, before the historical period, before navigation

had conveyed the higher arts of civilisation to distant shores, the

aboriginal races, generally, were not incapable of erecting the massive

structures attributed to them by universal tradition, and which, defying

the ravages of time, still remain the sole monuments of lost races, on

which the puzzled antiquary can hope to decipher the records of their

existence and condition.

To rear the lofty perpendicular monolith, to set up the tall stele as

the headstone of a grave, to lift and poise the ponderous rocking-stone,

to raise and fix the massive impost of the trilithon, or the slab

covering a sepoltura, a cromlech, or a cistvaen; (for the remark applies

to Celtic as well as Mediterranean antiquities), to heap up, not Pelion

on Ossa, but untold loads of earth and stone to form the conical tumulus

over the chambers of the dead, to build “Cyclopean” walls, and

construct the cone of rude but solid masonry, with its cavernous

recesses,—all these are the works we should just expect from races of

mankind when emerging from primitive barbarism, in the youth of the

species, and possessed of enormous strength of limb.[91] Those who

reared these works are supposed to have been in possession of some

knowledge of the pulley, the lever, and the incline; but, after all,

giant strength must have been the main fulcrum for such operations. Had

there been ornament, sculpture, or inscriptions on these primeval

monuments, our thoughts might have been carried forward to a later age,

when colonisation from the East brought in its train the arts which

there first undoubtedly flourished.

That the Sardinian antiquities of the earliest age are unique, that this

is the case in other parts of the world, every primitive people having,

with certain resemblances, a peculiar style in its ancient monuments,

that none such as these are found in the countries from whence the first

colonists migrated, nor are described in their records, are facts

strengthening the argument for their being of indigenous origin. That

the forms of these structures scattered over the world are generally

pyramidal, often rounded, and sometimes spiral, tells nothing to the

contrary. The cone, as Father Bresciani observes, was more graceful to

the eye, more easy of construction, more durable, and, perhaps,

connected with some mysterious ideas of Eternity, or the circling course

of the heavenly bodies. Such was the form of the first great building on

record, the Tower of Babel, as we have it represented; the type in many

respects of the Sarde Nuraghe. Nor is it an unreasonable conjecture that

the alien people, mysteriously alluded to in Genesis, as mixing with the

children of God, having seduced the most froward of the chosen race,

were the instigators and planners of the profane enterprise. “Go to ——,”

said a man to his neighbour, as the marginal translation renders the

passage,—“let us make bricks, let us build a tower whose top may reach

to heaven.”[92]

Rambles in the islands of Corsica and Sardinia · 第 25 / 30 段