20. _Altho =Glauber=, &c._

Here he contemns my way of extracting _Tartar_ from the lees of wine,

when yet it was a year since clearly and perspicuously describ’d and

published at _Norimberg_, which _Farnner_ cou’d never correct. But he

bragg’d that he had found by a certain position another compendium,

which indeed might be, since it is easier to add something to an Art

once found, than to find the Art it self, but it does not become him to

disswade men from this Art which is already described, and which may

be had gratis, and to despise it and bragge among all men of his own

inventing a better. What good men will think of these bold malignities

may be easily judg’d: but if I had writ nothing of these things, who

would have taught him that there was _Tartar_ in the lees of wine? But

I not only found and writ what was in them, but also largely taught how

they might be usefully extracted.

Yet this trifler dares as impudently, as falsly say, that he had

corrected it, and added to it, and therefore wou’d not let it go

without his price.

After the same manner he deals with my other secrets (which, tho he had

them of me, he braggs that they are his own) with which he proceeds, as

with the lees of wine, namely with my Alkahest, Panacæa, Melioration

of wine, compendious distillation of Corn, preparation of vinegar,

correction of beer and others in many places.

Whence cou’d he have known what was meant by my Alkahest and Panacæa,

or how small wines and and beers should be meliorated, how Corn without

adustion shou’d give plenty of burning spirit, and whether there was

_Tartar_ in the lees of wine or not, and how it might be extracted

thence, except he had seen and learn’d all these things of me? of which

also I had many years since publickly made mention in my writings,

which is so well known that he cannot deny it, how much soever he

opposes the truth.

The works of the highly experienced and famous chymist, John Rudolph Glauber · 第 40 / 235 题