But we have lingered by the side of this northern lake, with its noble

curtain of mountains, and the sun meanwhile has sunk in a glory of

flame beneath the faint outline of the Hebrides; the last flush of

crimson has faded from the sky and the twilight is deepening into night

adown the valley. In leaving the scene, if I have succeeded in showing

how we have it in our own power to quicken the influence of scenery

on the imagination, we may I trust take with us the full conviction

that there is no landscape so fair which may not be endued with fresh

interest if the light of scientific discovery be allowed to fall upon

it. Bearing this light with us in our wanderings, whether at home or

abroad, we are gifted, as it were, with an added sense and an increased

power of gathering some of the purest enjoyment which the face of

Nature can yield.

FOOTNOTES:

[7] _Fortnightly Review_, April, 1893.

[8] Herodotus, vii. 129.

[9] Diod. Sic., iv. 18. See also Lucan, _Pharsalia_, vi. 345.

[10] Diod. Sic., iv. 18, who allows his readers to choose which version

of the legend they prefer.

[11] See Strabo, x. 458. Diodorus also (iv. 35), giving a similar

interpretation of the legends, tells us how Hercules hollowed out a new

bed for the Achelous, thereby reclaiming a vast tract of exceedingly

fertile land.

[12] Diod. Sic., iv. 18.

[13] Fouqué, _Santorin et ses Eruptions_, chap. iii.

[14] _Carm._ I., iv. 7.

[15] See this subject fully discussed by Grote, _History of Greece_,

vol. i.

[16] Book vii. 129, see _ante_ p. 37.

[17] Book ix. 429.

[18] See Grimm's _Deutsche Mythologie_, i. 502.

[19] _Tour in the Hebrides_, p. 346.

III

Landscape and Literature[20]

The several races of mankind are marked off from each other by certain

bodily and mental differences which, there can be no doubt, have been

largely determined by the diverse geographical conditions of the

surface of the globe. We may be disposed to put aside the first origin

of these racial differences, as a problem which may for ever remain

insoluble. Yet we cannot refuse to admit that in the disposition of

land and sea, in the form and trend of coast-lines, in the grouping of

mountains, valleys, and plains, in the disposition and flow of rivers,

in the arrangement of climates, and in the distribution of vegetation

and animals, a series of influences must be recognized which have

unquestionably played a large part in the successive stages of human

development.

Though no record of the earliest of these stages has probably survived,

some of the later steps in the progress of advancement may not be

beyond the reach of investigation. The connection, for example,

between the circumscribing topography and geology of a country, and

the mythological creed of its inhabitants offers a tempting field of

inquiry, in which much may yet be gleaned. Who can doubt that the

legends and superstitions of ancient Greece took their form and colour

in no small measure from the mingled climates, varied scenery, and

rocky structure of that mountainous land, or that the grim titanic

mythology of Scandinavia bears witness to its birth in a region of

rugged snowy uplands, under gloomy and tempestuous skies?[21]

If the primeval efforts of the human imagination were thus stimulated

by the more impressive features of the outer world, it is natural to

believe that the same external influences would continue to exert their

power during the later mental development of a people. In particular,

it seems reasonable to anticipate that such potent causes would more

or less make themselves felt in the growth of a national literature.

The songs and ballads of the plains might be expected to present some

marked diversities from those of the mountains. There may, of course,

be risks of error in generalisations of this kind, especially where the

writings of distinct races are compared with each other. But the risks

may be reduced if we confine ourselves to the consideration of a single

country and a single literature. Such at least is the task which I have

undertaken on the present occasion. I propose to discuss the leading

types of scenery that distinguish the British Isles, and to inquire how

far it may be possible to trace from each of them an influence upon

the growth of English literature as shown in our poetry.

Under the term scenery may be included those variations in the general

aspect of the land that arise from the combined effects of three main

geographical elements--topography, climate, and vegetation. Of these

three factors, we are mainly concerned with the first, but the other

two will necessarily obtrude themselves continually on our attention.

Although geological details are not essential for the inquiry before

us, nevertheless some knowledge of them will be found of service

in enabling us to recognise more clearly the essential features of

a landscape, and to discriminate the real nature and extent of the

diversities between the landscapes of different parts of the country.

The fundamental elements of the scenery depend upon the nature and

structure of the rocks that come to the surface, and the manifold

varieties of external form arise from the constant succession of

different geological formations.

The evolution of the scenery of these islands has been a long-continued

process, wherein the chief part has been played by the air, rain,

rivers, frost, and the other superficial agencies which are continually

at work in wearing down the surface of the land. Each different kind

of rock has yielded in its own fashion to the agents of destruction.

Those rocks which have offered least resistance have been worn down

into hollows and plains. Those of a more durable nature have been

left standing up as ridges, hills, or mountains. The composition of

the rocks has likewise governed the nature of the soils and the

distribution of vegetation. Chalk, for instance, forms long ridges

of grassy and bushless down. Sandy and gravelly tracts are marked by

heather and pine-trees. Volcanic rocks often rise into isolated crags

with verdant slopes below. Granite lifts itself into mountains and

rocky moorlands, with cliffs, corries and 'tors' and long trails of

naked scree.

For the purposes of the present Lecture, I will arrange the scenery of

this country in three leading types:

I. LOWLANDS.

II. UPLANDS.

III. HIGHLANDS.

These types are not always separable from each other by any definite

lines of boundary. The lowlands, for example, include ranges of

hills, and here and there gradually rise into uplands, which in turn

occasionally mount into lofty, rugged ground that may well be called

highland. Moreover, each type presents a number of local varieties,

dependent on geological structure. Thus the English lowlands differ in

many respects from the Scottish, and both from the Irish.

The arrangement now proposed, though not strictly scientific, is for

the proposed discussion convenient. We shall find, I think, that

each of the three main types has had a perceptible influence on our

literature, and not only so, but that even the local variations of each

type have left their impress on our literary history. To treat the

subject as fully as it deserves to be treated would require a course

of lectures. I can only attempt to illustrate it by selecting a few

instances from our poets where the relation that I wish to establish

seems to be most readily perceptible.

I. THE LOWLANDS OF BRITAIN. If a line be drawn across England from

the mouth of the Humber through the Midlands to the Bristol Channel,

it will divide the country into two sharply contrasted portions. To

the west of it, the older, harder, and therefore more durable rocks

rise into the high grounds of Wales, the Pennine Chain, and the

Lakes. To the east of it, on the other hand, the younger, softer,

and consequently more destructible, formations occupy the whole of

the territory, giving a characteristic lowland topography to the

districts that have been longest settled and cultivated, which include

the greater portion of what is most familiar and typical in English

landscape.

The eastern Lowlands of England consist of a succession of gently

undulating ridges, separated from each other by winding vales or

plains. These features have a general trend across the country from

south-west or west to north-east or east--a direction determined by the

successive outcrops of the different formations. But the denudation

of the surface has been so great and so unequal that, despite the

continuity and parallelism of the formations, their outcrops have

been worn into endless diversities of topographical detail, producing

abundant variety among the gentle profiles of the landscapes.

As examples of the ridges, we may take the North and South Downs, and

the chain of heights that stretches from Wiltshire into Norfolk. The

intervening plains may be illustrated by the Weald of Sussex, and by

the lower basin of the Thames.

The differences between the successive geological formations of the

English lowlands never pass a restricted limit in regard to composition

and structure. Essentially soft and easily decomposable, the rocks

include no thick bands of much harder material than the rest, such as

might project in prominent features. The prevailing characteristic

of the topography is therefore unbroken placidity. Nowhere does any

ruggedness obtrude itself. No part of the ground towers abruptly above

or sinks suddenly beneath the general level. The successive ranges of

low hills have rounded summits and smooth slopes, which, even when

steep, seldom allow naked rock to appear, but conceal it everywhere

under a carpet of herbage. So gentle is the inclination of the ground,

from the watersheds to the coast, that the drainage winds in sluggish

streams that often hardly seem to flow. 'Purling brooks' are scarcely

ever to be found. Since the running waters of the country have played

no inconsiderable part in the inspiration of our poets, it is well

worthy of remark that in the east and south-east of England the streams

are, for the most part, silent. We shall see how strongly they are thus

contrasted with the brooks that traverse the lowlands of the north.

Since the rocks of these eastern and southern districts decay into

soils that are on the whole fertile, the surface, well watered by the

rains from the western ocean, is clothed with meadows, corn-fields,

and gardens, while trees have been planted along the roads and

fields, and in abundant patches of coppice and woodland. The country

thus wears a verdant park-like aspect, which at once impresses the

eye of a stranger who comes here either from the European continent

or from America. Undoubtedly cultivation has in the course of long

centuries considerably altered the primeval landscapes; the progress of

agriculture having gradually narrowed the area of the once predominant

open heaths, while the ancient forests, formerly so abundant and

extensive, have wellnigh vanished. There can be little doubt, however,

that the general enclosed and cultivated character of the landscapes

has, over much of the ground, remained nearly the same as now for

hundreds of years.

One further feature of these English lowlands should be borne in

mind. They are washed by the sea along the whole of their eastern

and southern borders. Even the most inland part of them is not more

than one hundred miles from the coast. Their long lines of ridge

and down stretch to the very margin of the land, where they plunge

in picturesque cliffs to the sea-level, as in the headlands of

Flamborough, Dover, and Beachy. Moreover the coast-line is indented

by numerous bays, creeks, and inlets, which, as they allow the sea

to penetrate far into the land, furnish many admirable natural

harbours. There can be no doubt that this feature in our topography

has powerfully fostered that love of the sea which has always been a

national characteristic, and has contributed to the development of that

maritime power which has led to the establishment of our world-wide

empire.[22] To the same cause may be traced that appreciation of the

poetry of the sea so noticeable in our literature.

We may now inquire how far the placid scenery of these eastern lowlands

may have had an influence on the literary progress of the nation. It

is of course chiefly among the poets that traces of such an influence

may be expected to be discoverable. Not until comparatively late times

did prose-writers deal with scenery, save as a mere background for the

human incidents which they had to describe. It is impossible, within

the prescribed limits of a single lecture, to follow the gradual

development of an appreciation of landscape among the writers who have

lived on these English lowlands. The simple child-like delight in

Nature, so characteristic of Chaucer, and the influence of cultivated

scenery, so conspicuous in him, are readily traceable among his

successors. Shakespeare throughout his plays presents us with not a few

reminiscences of his youth among the Warwickshire woodlands. In Milton

we see how the placid rural quiet of the Colne valley inspired the two

finest lyrics in the English tongue. For a century after Milton's time,

poetry in this country ceased to have any living hold on outer nature,

but became with each generation more polished and artificial. When at

last a reaction set in, the impulse that led to the most momentous

revolution that has marked the history of English poetry came in

large measure from the writings of three poets, each of whom drew his

inspiration from lowland scenery. As illustrations therefore of the

part played by this scenery in our literature, I will cite Cowper,

Thomson, and Burns.

The retreat in the valley of the Ouse, to which Cowper escaped from the

noise and distractions of city-life, was eminently fitted by its quiet

seclusion to soothe his spirit, and to fill his eye and his imagination

with images of rural peacefulness and gentle beauty. If the choice of

such a home was of infinite service to the poet, it was hardly less

momentous in the progress of English literature.

The scenery of that valley, around Olney and Weston, is thoroughly

characteristic of the southern lowlands. The ground lies on limestones

and clays, belonging to the Oolitic series, which, though they have

been greatly denuded, have yielded in a general equable manner to the

progress of decay. They possess no such differences of structure as

to allow one part of them to project in crag or scar above the rest.

They have been worn down into a gently undulating plateau or plain,

covered with corn-fields and pastures, and dotted with occasional woods

and 'spinnies,' or patches of trees. Farms and villages diversify the

landscape, while to the north lies the forest-like expanse of Yardley

Chase. Through this champaign the River Ouse has cut for itself a

winding valley, the bottom of which, quite flat and from a few hundred

yards to upwards of a mile in breadth, lies rather more than a hundred

feet below the general level of the country. Along the flat alluvial

plain, the stream, sluggishly flowing among rushes and sedges, curves

in circuitous bends, often dividing so as to enclose insular patches of

meadow, which it entirely overspreads in times of flood. The slopes

rise softly from the river-plain, now projecting, now retreating, as

the valley winds from side to side. A gentle ascent brings us from the

banks of the Ouse up to the highest part of the ground in the vicinity,

and places before our eyes a wide sweep of rich agricultural country,

with peeps of village spires and gleams of the winding river.

Such were the simple elements of Cowper's landscape. They have no

special attraction that is not shared by hundreds of other similar

scenes in the Oolitic tracts of England. To the cursory visitor

they may even seem tame and commonplace. And yet for us, apart from

any mere beauty they may possess, they have been for ever glorified

and consecrated by the imagination of the poet. We see in them the

natural features which soothed his sorrow and gladdened his heart,

and which became the sources of an inspiration that breathed fresh

life into the poetry of England. The lapse of time has left the scene

essentially unchanged. We may take the same walks that Cowper loved,

and see the same prospects that charmed his eyes and filled his verse.

In so following his steps, we note the accuracy and felicity of his

descriptions, and appreciate more vividly the poetic genius which, out

of such simple materials, could work such a permanent change in the

attitude of his countrymen towards nature. As an illustration of his

treatment of landscape let me cite the well-known passage descriptive

of the walk between Olney and Weston--

'How oft upon yon eminence our pace

Has slackened to a pause, and we have borne

The ruffling wind, scarce conscious that it blew,

While admiration, feeding at the eye,

And still unsated, dwelt upon the scene.

Thence with what pleasure have we just discerned

The distant plough slow-moving, and beside

His labouring team, that swerved not from the track,

The sturdy swain diminished to a boy!

Here Ouse, slow-winding through a level plain

Of spacious meads with cattle sprinkled o'er,

Conducts the eye along his sinuous course

Delighted. There, fast rooted in their bank,

Stand, never overlooked, our favourite elms,

That screen the huntsman's solitary hut;

While far beyond, and overthwart the stream,

That, as with molten glass, inlays the vale,

The sloping land recedes into the clouds;

Displaying, on its varied side, the grace

Of hedge-row beauties numberless, square tower,

Tall spire, from which the sound of cheerful bells

Just undulates upon the listening ear,

Groves, heaths, and smoking villages remote.'[23]

No scene could have been more thoroughly congenial to such a

temperament as that of Cowper. He never wearied of the sights and

sounds of that peaceful landscape. He watched its changes from hour to

hour, from day to day, and from season to season. Every change awakened

new joy in his breast, and gave fresh inspiration to his verse. And so

year after year he lived in closest communion with nature. Well might

he say that

'Scenes must be beautiful which, daily viewed

Please daily, and whose novelty survives

Long knowledge and the scrutiny of years.'[24]

Cowper's poetic vision was like his landscape, limited, though within

its range it was searching and accurate. His timid nature shrank from

what was rugged and wild. He found his consolation in

'Nature in her cultivated trim

And dressed to his taste.'[25]

But no one before him had revealed to men the infinite variety and

beauty and charm to be seen by the contemplative eye even in these

everyday surroundings. The calm of evening--

'With matron step slow moving, while the Night

Treads on her sweeping train,'[26]

or the river shining in the moonlight beneath the 'wearisome but

needful length' of Olney bridge, or the creep of autumn over wood and

field and weedy fallow, or the advent of winter and the shrouding of

the valley under snow, or the coming of spring, when--

'The primrose ere her time

Peeps through the moss that clothes the hawthorn root,'[27]

--every mood of nature in this sequestered vale is painted with a

vividness and skill that evoke our admiration, and with a sympathy and

grace which win our heart. That quiet valley has thus become classic

ground, for as long as English poetry is read, the affections of men

will be drawn to the home of Cowper by the banks of the Ouse.

The other two lowland writers whom I have selected were contemporaries

of Cowper, though Thomson died when Cowper was only seventeen years

old. In dealing with their influence, we turn to the Scottish lowlands

where they both were born, and from which came their poetic impulse.

A traveller, familiar with the low grounds of England, when he first

enters the northern lowlands is at once impressed by their much more

limited extent. He finds them to occupy comparatively restricted spaces

between uplands and highlands, their largest expanse lying in the broad

depression between the southern border of the Highland mountains and

the great tract of high pastoral land in the southern counties. Another

considerable area of them intervenes between these southern uplands

and the flanks of the Cheviot Hills. A further contrast to the English

type is to be seen in the broken character of the surface. There are

no extensive level flats like those of the English midlands, nor any

continuous bands of gentle ridge like those of the English downs. The

ground is separated into detached districts by ranges of hills, which

sometimes even become sufficiently high and broad to deserve the name

of uplands. A third characteristic arises from the great diversity of

geological structure, and especially the intercalation of abundant

volcanic rocks among the other formations. As a consequence of this

intermingling of hard and durable materials with others more easily

abraded, the topography is diversified by endless crags and hills

rising picturesquely out of the surrounding lower country, and often

crowned with ancient castles or ruined peels.

Such a disposition of the elements of the landscape is accompanied

with a much greater diversity in the mantle of vegetation than is

seen among the English lowlands. The surrounding uplands and hills,

for the most part bare of trees, are clothed with pasture, save where

they support a covering of heathy herbage or dark peat-moss. The lower

grounds have in large measure been brought under cultivation, but still

retain tracts of moorland, haunted by lapwing and curlew. Though the

ancient natural wood has mostly disappeared, hard-wood trees are now

abundant, while sombre plantations of fir give a northern character to

the landscapes.

But perhaps the feature in these Scottish lowlands which more

particularly deserves notice here, is the contrast to be found between

their streams and those of south-eastern England. Owing to the uneven

forms and steeper slopes of the ground, the drainage runs off rapidly

to the sea. The brooks are full of motion, as they tumble over

waterfalls, plunge through rocky ravines, and sweep round the boulders

that cumber their channels. They furnish, moreover, countless dells and

dingles where the native copsewoods find their surest shelter. There

the gorse and the sloe come earliest into bloom, and the wild flowers

linger longest. There too the birds make their chief home. These strips

of wild nature, winding through cultivated field or bare moor, from the

hills to the sea, offer in summer scenes of perfect repose. But they

furnish too, from time to time, pictures of tumult and uproar, when

rain-clouds have burst upon the uplands, and the streams come down in

heavy flood, pouring through the glens with a din that can be heard

from far.

Brooks and rivers have always had a fascination for poets. Their

banks supply secluded spots for reverie and communion with nature.

Under their shade and shelter, bird and blossom and flower are

guarded from the blasts around, while the sparkle and murmur of their

waters give a sense of life and companionship even in the depths of

solitude. Constant familiarity with such a type of stream as that of

the Scottish lowlands can hardly fail to strike the imagination in a

different way from that which has attended the slow-creeping and silent

brooks of the south-east of England. The Scottish poets, even in the

earlier centuries, show traces of the influence of their more rugged

surroundings; but not till the eighteenth century did this influence

manifest itself in such a manner as to affect the general flow of

English literature.

Landscape in History, and Other Essays · 第 5 / 23 段