clxxjᴸᴵ xjˢ xᵈ ob."

THE GREAT MUSICIANS

PURCELL

The Great Musicians

_Edited by_ FRANCIS HUEFFER

PURCELL

BY WILLIAM H. CUMMINGS

LONDON

SAMPSON LOW, MARSTON, SEARLE, & RIVINGTON

CROWN BUILDINGS, 188, FLEET STREET

1881

[_All Rights Reserved_]

London:

R. CLAY, SONS, AND TAYLOR.

BREAD STREET HILL.

PREFACE.

The attempt to write a Life of Henry Purcell has been beset with many

difficulties. So much information which might have been preserved

for the instruction of after times has been lost, either through the

indifference or culpable neglect of those who had it in their power

to have placed on record details which would have been interesting.

Sir John Hawkins and Dr. Burney are particularly open to censure on

this head. They possessed many opportunities for gaining authentic

knowledge of facts and circumstances now lost for ever. In reading

their histories of music we cannot but feel regret that they neglected

to gather and garner the stores of Purcellian lore which were so

accessible to them, and which they could so easily have rescued from

oblivion.

Both Hawkins and Burney had a personal acquaintance with Leveridge,

the celebrated bass vocalist and actor, who had been on friendly terms

with Purcell, and could have solved many doubts which now perplex

the musical student. Leveridge could have supplied very interesting

details, which would have enriched the meagre narrations handed down to

us respecting the great English musician.

Hawkins was on most intimate terms with the Rev. William Gostling, a

minor canon of Canterbury Cathedral, and son of the "wondrous" bass of

Purcell's day. The Rev. William Gostling possessed a very extensive

library, rich in musical manuscripts, particularly those of Purcell.

Miss Hawkins says of him: "Adding his father's recollections to his

own, his knowledge of facts in the musical world reached back to the

time of King William and Queen Mary, and he talked of Purcell as we do

of Arne."

Hawkins not only corresponded with Gostling, but also frequently

visited him at Canterbury; and at his decease prepared the catalogue

for the sale by auction, in 1777, of his library. There can be little

doubt that Dr. Burney had also a personal acquaintance with the Rev.

W. Gostling. I possess a copy of the catalogue before mentioned, which

belonged to Burney, and in it he has noted the prices the various lots

fetched, himself being the purchaser of several.

Both Hawkins and Burney were well acquainted with Mr. Henry Needler, an

eminent musician and violinist, who had been a pupil of Purcell, and

resided near St. Clement's Church, in the Strand, where he died in 1760.

Among the mis-statements of Hawkins and Burney may be mentioned the one

which has been oft repeated, and caused endless trouble to biographers.

They agree in saying Purcell was elected organist of Westminster Abbey

at the age of eighteen. An examination of the Abbey records, which

Hawkins had access to, would have prevented the promulgation of this

error.

Other mis-statements will be dealt with in their proper place. Enough

has been said to show that the recognised musical historians are not

to be implicitly relied on when dealing with facts and dates.

My endeavour has been to follow an accurate chronological arrangement;

but I am fully sensible that perfection is impossible, and therefore I

shall be grateful for corrections of errors, or additional information

for future use.

My hope is that this little work may be the fore-runner of other

Purcell studies, in which it will be possible to give further details

respecting Purcell's ancestry, descendants, and family, and also to say

something more of his noteworthy contemporaries and pupils.

WILLIAM H. CUMMINGS.

PURCELL.

Music and poetry attained to a high state of cultivation in the

reign of Elizabeth; the Queen herself was an admirable performer

on the virginals, and by her example and authority did all that

was possible to elevate the art of music, and to encourage learned

musicians throughout her dominions. This happy condition of things

was continued by her successors, James I. and Charles I., but with

the establishment of the Commonwealth all music, both of church and

theatre, was rigidly suppressed. We read with horror and indignation of

the wanton destruction of church organs and other musical instruments,

and of the tearing and burning of the various Service-books which

had been in use in the cathedrals and collegiate establishments. At

Canterbury cathedral "the soldiers violated the monuments of the dead,

spoyled the organs, broke down the ancient rails and seats with the

brazen eagle which did support the Bible, forced open the cupboards

of the singing-men, rent some of their surplices, gowns, and Bibles,

and carryed away others, mangled all our Service-books and books of

Common Prayer, bestrewing the whole pavement with the leaves thereof."

At Rochester cathedral, Colonel Sands, hearing the organs, cryed,

"_A devil on those bag-pipes_," and "one of the rebels" discharged a

pistol at the head of Prebend Larken, who interposed and endeavoured to

prevent the spoliation of the cathedral. At Chichester cathedral, the

officers having sacked the plate and vestments, left the "destructive

and spoyling part to be finished by the common soldiers, who brake down

the organs, and dashing the pipes with their pole-axes, scoffingly

said, '_Hark how the organs go!_' They force open all the locks, either

of doors or desks wherein the singing-men laid up their Common Prayer

books, their singing-books, their gowns and surplesses; they rent the

books in pieces, and scatter the torn leaves all over the church, even

to the covering of the pavement." At Winchester "They enter the church

with colours flying, their drums beating, their matches fired, and that

all might have their part in so horrid an attempt, some of their troops

of horse also accompanied them in their march, and rode up through the

body of the church and quire until they came to the altar; there they

begin their work; they rudely pluck down the table and break the rail,

and afterwards carrying it to an ale-house they set it on fire, and in

that fire burnt the books of Common Prayer and all the singing-books

belonging to the Quire; they throw down the organ and break the stories

of the Old and New Testament curiously cut out in carved work. The

troopers ride through the streets in surplesses, carrying Common Prayer

books and some broken organ pipes."

In Westminster Abbey, in 1643, "Soldiers were quartered who brake down

the rail about the altar, and burnt it in the place where it stood;

they brake down the organ and pawned the pipes at several ale-houses

for pots of ale; they put on some of the singing-men's surplesses, and

in contempt of that canonical habit, ran up and down the church; he

that wore the surpless was the hare, the rest were the hounds."

It would be needless to add to these miserable stories; those who care

to read further on the subject, are referred to the quaint old book

_Mercurius Rusticus_, from whence the foregoing extracts have been

taken.

So complete was the destruction of church music-books, that examples of

the pre-Commonwealth time are now most rare.

Not only were the organs and music destroyed, but musicians, organists,

and singers were turned adrift, and had to seek precarious livelihoods

by teaching music to the few who cared or were willing to learn the

art, or else to escape starvation by adopting some less congenial

occupation than that for which they were fitted by nature and education.

If tradition may be relied on, the Protector, Cromwell, was himself a

lover of music, and not unwilling, when opportunity served, to assist

and befriend musicians.

Cromwell's secretary, the poet Milton, was no mean performer on the

organ, and being the son of an eminent composer,[1] would doubtless,

with his passionate love for music, be at all times ready to use his

sympathetic voice and counsel on behalf of any distressed and poor

musician who might petition the Protector for help or redress.

It is well known that the organ which stood in Magdalen College,

Oxford, was saved from destruction through the intervention of

Cromwell, who privately caused it to be removed to Hampton Court, where

it was placed in the great gallery, in order that he might have the

frequent pleasure of hearing it; and he also appointed as his organist

and music-master, at a salary of 100_l._ per annum, John Hingston, who

had been one of the musicians to Charles I. Cromwell was extremely

partial to the Latin _Motets_ composed by Richard Dering, and these

were performed on the organ by Hingston, who was assisted by his pupils

in the vocal parts. The interesting organ which must have often poured

forth its sweet sounds under the fingers of Milton, was, after the

Protector's death, returned to Magdalen College; but subsequently the

College authorities sold it, and it was removed to Tewkesbury Abbey,

where it now stands.

Anthony Wood, who lived during the Protectorate, tells the following

characteristic anecdote of Cromwell:--

"In October, 1659, James Quin, M.A., and one of the senior students

of Christ Church, a Middlesex man born, but son of Walter Quin,

of Dublin, died in a crazed condition. A. W. had some acquaintance

with him, and hath several times heard him sing, with great

admiration. His voice was a bass, and he had a great command of it.

'Twas very strong and exceeding _trouling_, but he wanted skill,

and could scarce sing in consort. He had been turned out of his

student's place by the visitors, but being well acquainted with

some great men of those times that loved music, they introduced him

into the company of Oliver Cromwell, the Protector, who loved a

good voice and instrumental music well. He heard him sing with very

great delight, liquored him with sack, and in conclusion, said:

'_Mr. Quin, you have done very well, what shall I do for you?_' To

which Quin made answer, with great compliments, of which he had

command, with a great grace, that '_Your Highness would be pleased

to restore him to his student's place_,' which he did accordingly,

and so kept it to his dying day."

It must not be forgotten that although during the Commonwealth

musicians found it difficult to earn their bread in consequence of the

prohibition of all public exhibition of their executive skill, yet many

of the learned and erudite musical treatises which have been handed

down to us were published at that time. From this we may be sure that

the musical predilections of Cromwell were regarded with secret hope

by the few musicians who were able privately to pursue their calling;

and indeed public signs were not wanting during the latter years of

the Protector's life, that had he been spared, the art of music would

probably have received more emphatic and distinct assistance at his

hands. In 1656 he granted a licence to Sir William Davenant to open

a kind of theatre[2] for "an entertainment in declamation and music

after the manner of the ancients;" and later on he licensed certain

theatrical performances at the Cockpit, in Drury Lane.

The extreme Puritan party did, however, so effectually destroy and

put down all Church music,[3] deeming organs and service-books

superstitious and ungodly, that at the Restoration, when the

authorities set about re-establishing musical services in the

cathedrals, it was impossible to find either instruments, books, or

singers necessary for the purpose; and, indeed, out of the large

musical establishment of Charles I., only three men--Dr. Wilson,

Christopher Gibbons, and Henry Lawes--came forward at the Restoration

to claim their former appointments.

We get a further insight into the condition of Church music at

the Restoration, from Matthew Locke's _Present Practice of Musick

Vindicated_, published in 1673, wherein he says, "For above a year

after the opening of His Majestie's Chappel, the orderers of the musick

there were necessitated to supply superior parts of the music with

cornets and men's feigned voices, there being not one lad for all that

time capable of singing his part readily."

An examination of the old MS. copies of anthems composed by the

organists and singing-men of the various cathedrals in the reign of

Charles II., shows that a dearth of singing-boys (trebles) was general

throughout the kingdom, the compositions being chiefly for men's voices

only.

From the preceding slight and brief sketch of the state of music during

the Commonwealth, it will be evident that the Puritan rule was most

unpropitious for the art; with its professors banned, and its public

performance well-nigh extinguished, music might perhaps have been

expected to have died an unnatural death; but heaven-born, it retained

a vital spark which needed only the breath of freedom and gentle

encouragement to foster it into a flame.

With the death of Cromwell, the sun of the Puritan world vanished, but

happily at the same time a new star in the musical firmament arose.

Cromwell died in 1658, at Whitehall, and in the same year, within a

bow-shot of the Palace, was born the favoured child of the muses,

destined to raise the musical fame of England to a height it had never

before attained, and by his beautiful creations to make for himself a

name of undying fame.

This welcome prodigy was Henry Purcell, his birth-place St. Ann's Lane,

Old Pye Street, Westminster. The precise day of his birth there is

unknown, but there is no doubt about the year 1658. Some remains of the

house are still standing. A sketch of it and the adjoining premises was

made on the 15th of April, 1845, by R. W. Withall.

The original drawing, of which a reduced copy is given, has the

following note:--

"Three ancient houses in Westminster; in the right-hand one of

which the great H. Purcell was born, 1658, and passed his early

life. They are now in the last state of ruin, and have long been

uninhabited. The houses adjoining that of Purcell are of modern

date, and project before the others, as well as encroach somewhat

on Purcell's doorway, hiding one side of the door-frame. Of the old

houses the windows and doorways are nearly all boarded up in the

roughest manner, under which, however, the original panelled doors

are still to be partly found. The houses are of old red brick. The

first door was the back way into the public-house called the 'Bell

and Fish,' kept by Mr. Oldsworth, who lost his licence. The second

door the entrance to the skittle-ground. The third was Purcell's

house."

[Illustration: PURCELL'S HOUSE.]

Purcell was named Henry after his father, a thoroughly competent and

efficient musician, of whom Pepys made this quaint entry in his diary

on the 21st of February, 1659:--

"After dinner I back to Westminster Hall with him (Mr. Crewe)

in his coach. Here I met with Mr. Lock and Pursell, masters of

musique, and with them to the Coffee House, into a room next the

water, by ourselves, where we spent an hour or two, till Captain

Taylor came and told us that the House had voted the gates of the

city to be made up again, and the members of the city that are

in prison to be set at liberty; and that Sir G. Booth's case be

brought into the House to-morrow. Here we had variety of brave

Italian and Spanish songs, and a canon for eight voices, which Mr.

Lock had lately made on these words, 'Domine salvum fac Regem,'--an

admirable thing. Here out of the window it was a most pleasant

sight to see the city from one end to the other with a glory about

it, so high was the light of the bonfires, and so thick round the

City; and the bells rang everywhere."

We may note here the intimacy which existed between Purcell's father

and Matthew Locke,[4] the celebrated composer, an intimacy and

friendship which was afterwards extended to the son.

Henry Purcell, senior, was a gentleman of the Chapel Royal, and in

that capacity sang in the choir at the coronation of Charles II.[5] He

was also elected a singing-man of Westminster Abbey, and master of the

chorister boys of that church; to these appointments he added that

of music copyist of Westminster Abbey, at that time a very honourable

and important position, in consequence of the wholesale destruction of

Service-books which had taken place during the Commonwealth.

A very interesting official document, now preserved in the British

Museum, of which the following is a copy, gives us information

respecting the appointments held by Henry Purcell, the father, in

Westminster Abbey:--

"Accounts of Richard Busby, D.D., 1664. The money computed by John

Needham (Gent.) receiver of the college.

"Cantator in choro Henry Purcell £8 and 40_s._

In ʳᵉ chorist Henry Purcell £10.

Cantator in choro per stipend et regard--

John Harding, Christopher Chapman,

Henry Purcell, Edwd. Braddock,

William Hutton, Owen Adamson,

Thomas Hughes, Peter Amblett, Thomas Shorter,

Thomas Condy, Thomas Finnell--each £8 and 40_s._

"Choristicus--

Et in denariis solutis Henry Purcell,

Pro datum chorist ad--lxviˢ viyᵈ

Intoto hoc anno xxxiy£ viˢ viyᵈ.

Ac etiam et contess Henᵒ Purcell, pro

Chorist. xx£.

Organista Chr. Gibbons £10.

"To Mr. Chaunter for nine Holly days--

On All Saints day 39_s._ }

The first of November " }

Christmas day " }

Epiphany " } £ _s._

Candlemas day " } 8 12

Lady day " }

Easter day " }

Whitson day " }

St. Peter's day " }

"To George Dalham, for tuning the organ this year, 40_s._[6]

"To John Hill,[7] for playing on the cornett in the church this

year, £4.

"To the organist for rent of his house, £8.

"Given to the organist[8] out of the rents at the taking of his

degree, £5.

"Given by order to the christened Turke--nil.[9]

"Jan. 11, 1664--"J. DOLBEN, _Decanus_.

WAL. JONES, _Sub Decanus_.

H. KILLIGREW.

S. BOLTON.

CHARLES GIBBES.

ROBT. SOUTH.

RIC. PERRINCHIEF."

In addition to the before-mentioned appointments at the Chapel Royal

and Westminster Abbey held by Purcell, senior, we find that he was also

a member of the Royal band. The old cheque-book of the Chapel Royal in

recording his death places the matter beyond doubt:--

"These are to certify that Mr. Henry Purcell, who succeeded Segnor

Angello in his place of the private musicke; that the said Mr.

Henry Purcell took possession of his place in the year 1663, upon

St. Thomas's day; deceased the 11th August, 1664. These are to

certifye the death of Mr. Henry Purcell.

"HENRY COOKE.

THO. PURCELL.

ALPHONSO MARSH.

GREGORY THORNDALE.

EDWARD COLMAN."

It is clear from the foregoing account of the numerous important

musical posts which the father held, that he was a man of considerable

ability, and fully equal to the task of guiding and fostering the

musical predilections of his infant son; and there can be no doubt that

Henry Purcell received his earliest instructions in the art of music

from his father. When the latter died he was buried in the cloisters of

Westminster Abbey; his age has not been ascertained, but presumably he

was but a young man--perhaps he was naturally weak in constitution--and

from him the boy Henry may have inherited the seeds of consumption.

The elder Purcell died in 1664, at which time the young Henry was just

six years old, and with his natural genius he had doubtless already

acquired some considerable skill in music. It is certain that he was

immediately admitted as a chorister of the Chapel Royal. Happily for

him he had been left by his father to the guardianship of his uncle

Thomas Purcell, who most warmly and affectionately endeavoured to

supply the place of the lost parent by adopting the orphan as his own

son.

Thomas Purcell's abilities and professional qualifications well fitted

him for the task which had fallen to his lot. He was a gentleman of

the Chapel Royal and had been associated with his brother Henry at

the coronation of Charles II.; he must have been held in high favour

and regard by the king, for court appointments in various musical

capacities fell to him in rapid succession. Amongst other honourable

positions we find him holding the post of lutenist as described in the

following warrant:--

"Charles R., by the Grace of God, &c., to our trusty and

well-beloved Sr Edward Griffin, Knight, Treasurer of our Chamber,

&c. Whereas wee have made choice of Thomas Purcell to serve us in

the office and place of one of our musitians in ordinary for the

lute and voyce, in the roome of Henry Lawes, deceased, and for this

service and attendance in that place, are pleased to allow him

the wages and livery of six-and-thirty pounds two shillings and

sixpence by the year during his life. Our will and pleasure is, and

We do hereby will and command you to pay, or cause to be paid, unto

the said Thomas Purcell or his assigns, the said wages and livery,

&c. The first payment to commence and begin from the birth of our

Lord, next ensuing the date hereof, and to continue the same during

the natural life of him, the said Thomas Purcell. Given the 29th of

November, in the 14th year of our reign (1662).

"Ex. pr. WARWICK."

In 1672 Thomas Purcell was appointed a "composer in ordinary for the

violins" in conjunction with Pelham Humphries, the warrant which is

extremely curious runs thus:--

"Charles R., by the Grace of God, &c., to our trusty and

well-beloved Sir Edward Griffin, Knight, Treasurer of our Chamber,

now being, &c. Whereas we have been pleased to take into our

service as Composer in Ordinary for the Violins, Thomas Purcell and

Pelham Humphreys, Gents., in the room of George Hudson, deceased,

and for their entertainments in consideration of services done,

and to be done, unto us, we have given and granted, and by these

presents do for us and Our Heirs and Successors, Wee do give and

grant unto the said Thomas Purcell and Pelham Humphreys for their

wages and fee, the sum of fifty-two pounds fifteen shillings and

tenpence, by the year, during their natural lives, and the life of

the longer liver of them, the first payment to commence from the

feast of St. Michael the Archangel, 1672. Given under our Signet at

our Palace of Westminster, the Eighth day of August, in the year of

our Lord God, One thousand six hundred and seventy-two (1672).

"Ex. JOHN NICOLAS."

Thomas Purcell and Pelham Humphries were also associated as masters of

the King's band of "four-and-twenty fiddlers;" but Purcell was chief

and leader, either by virtue of seniority or special appointment.

A curious document in Thomas Purcell's autograph is preserved by the

"Royal Society of Musicians," which gives the names of the gentlemen of

the band and other interesting particulars; it reads as follows:--

"The names of the Genᵗ of his Maᵗᴵᵉˢ Private Musick who are to

attend his Maᵗᴵᵉ at Windsor paid out the Excheker:

£ _s._ _d._

Tho. Mr. Purcell } 200 0 0

Pelham Mr. Humphreys }

Joᴺ. Mr. Hardinge 40 0 0

Wᵐ. Mr. Howes 46 10 10

Tho. Mr. Blagrave, Seigʳ. 40 9 2

Alphonso Mr. March 40 0 0

Joᴺ. Mr. Goodgroome 40 0 0

Nat. Mr. Wattkins 40 0 0

Math. Mr. Lock 40 0 0

Joᴺ. Mr. Clayton 152 13 4

Isaac Mr. Stagins, Seigʳ. 46 10 10

Nich. Mr. Stagings, Junʳ. 46 10 10

Tho. Mr. Battes 90 0 0

John Mr. Lilly 40 0 0

Hen. Mr. Gregory 60 0 0

Theophilus Mr. Hills 46 10 10

Henry Mr. Madge 86 12 8

John Mr. Gombell 46 10 10

Richᵈ. Mr. Dorney 20 0 0

Joᴺ. Mr. Banister, Seigʳ. 100 0 0

Phil. Mr. Beckett 60 2 6

Roᵇ. Mr. Blagrave, Junʳ. 58 14 2

John Mr. Singleton 46 10 10

Robt. Mr. Strange 46 10 10

--------------

"15 May, 1674. These 24 Gent. of his Maᵗᴵᵉˢ private musick are to

attend at Windsore. "T. PURCELL."

In the original of the foregoing document the Christian names were

evidently prefixed after the list had been written out; the spelling of

the surnames is curious; Stagins, father and son are spelt differently;

another proof, if it were required, of the utter indifference to such

matters at that period.

Pepys in his Diary (Dec. 19, 1666) made an entry that "many of the

musique are ready to starve, they being five years behindhand for their

wages." This irregularity of payment of the "King's musique" seems to

have continued, for we find in the accounts of the "Treasurer of the

Chamber," the following record:--

"Paid to Thomas Pursell at xxᴸᴵ pr. ann. for Wages, and

xvjᴸᴵ ijˢ vjᵈ pr. ann. for a Livery, due for fower yeares

and 3 quarters ended at Mic'mas, 1672.

clxxjᴸᴵ xjˢ xᵈ ob."

Thomas Purcell was evidently a popular man, and on the 24th of June,

1672, he was elected "Marshall of the Corporation of Musique in

Westminster," in room of Captain Cooke,[10] who resigned "by reason

of sicknesse." Two years later he received another court appointment

from the King; a state paper preserved in the Record Office tells us

that he succeeded "John Wilson, deceased, to hold during His Majesty's

pleasure, with the fee of £20 per annum, payable quarterly out of the

Exchequer, to commence 25th March, 1674," subscribed by warrant from

the Earl of Burlington, Master of His Majesty's Household.

Another warrant under the signet gives an order to the treasurer of

the chamber for the time being, "to pay unto Thomas Purcell (one of

His Majesty's Musicians in Ordinary, in the place of Dr. John Wilson,

deceased), the wages and fee of £20 by the day, and £16 2_s._ 6_d._

yearly for a livery, payable quarterly, from Lady-day 1674, and to

continue during His Majesty's pleasure."

Thomas Purcell lived till 1682, so that he had the satisfaction of

witnessing the extraordinary development of his nephew's genius, and

could also rejoice to see the general recognition of his merits, and of

the honourable rewards he was so rapidly acquiring. When, at last, full

of years and honours, Thomas departed this life, he was buried near his

brother in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey. We seek in vain for the

musical compositions of either Henry (the elder) or of Thomas: with the

exception of a few chants in common use in our cathedrals, nothing of

their work remains to us.

When Henry Purcell, the younger, became a chorister in the Chapel Royal

at six years of age, the master of the boys was Captain Henry Cooke, an

old musician, who had belonged to the chapel of Charles I., but who, on

the breaking out of civil war, had laid aside the peaceful art of music

to engage in the rough dissonances of battle and strife, and changed

his service from that of a Royal musician to become a Royalist soldier.

In the latter capacity he won a captain's commission, and possibly it

was not less as a reward for his devotion and bravery on behalf of his

king than as a recognition of his musical ability that Charles II.

appointed him "Master of the Children of the Chapel." That he was well

qualified for the post can be shown by reference to the opinions of

his contemporaries, and also to the numerous compositions of his still

extant in manuscript.

Pepys' Diary contains frequent reference to Cooke, and his

compositions:--

"After sermon a brave anthem of Captain Cooke's which he himself

sang, and the king was well pleased with it." (Aug. 12, 1660.)

"A poor dry sermon, but a very good anthem of Captain Cooke's

afterwards." (Oct. 7, 1660.)

"To Whitehall Chapel with Mr. Childe, and there did hear Captain

Cooke and his boys make trial of an anthem against to-morrow, which

was brave musique." (Feb. 23, 1661.)

"Captain Cooke, Mr. Gibbons, and others of the king's musicians,

were come to present my Lord with some songs and symphonys, which

were performed very finely." (May 19, 1661.)

"After dinner Mr. Townsend was called upon by Captain Cooke; so we

three went to a taverne hard by, and there he did give us a song or

two, and without doubt he hath the best manner of singing in the

world." (July 27, 1661.)

"To Whitehall Chapel, where sermon almost done, and I heard Captain

Cooke's new musique. This the first day of having vialls and other

instruments to play a symphony between every verse of the anthems,

but the musique more full than it was last Sunday, and very fine it

is. But yet I could discerne Captain Cooke to overdo his part at

singing, which I never did before." (September 14, 1662.)

"We had an excellent anthem sung by Captain Cooke and another, and

brave musique.... After dinner to chappel again, and there had

another anthem of Captain Cooke's." (May 18, 1662.)

"A most excellent anthem with symphonys between, sung by Captain

Cooke." (Sept. 7, 1662.)

"Captain Cooke, and his two boys, did sing some Italian songs

which, I must in a word say, I think was fully the best musique

that I ever yet heard in all my life." (Dec. 21, 1663.)

Cooke composed a considerable number of pieces of music for various

royal and festal occasions; one curious hymn for a ceremony in

connection with a festival service of the Knights of the Garter at

Windsor was accompanied by "two double sackbuts and two double courtals

placed at convenient distances among the classes of the gentlemen

of both choirs, to the end that all might distinctly hear, and

consequently keep together both in time and tune; for one sackbut and

courtal was placed before the four petty canons who begun the hymn, and

the other two immediately before the prebends of the college."

Captain Cooke's services were frequently required on the stage,[11] and

with his many accomplishments there is no great wonder that he became

conceited. Pepys, from whom so many quotations have already been made,

wrote: "A vain coxcomb he is, though he sings so well;" and this charge

of vanity is supported by other evidence. A contemporary historian

says: "Captain Cooke was the best musician of his time till Mr. Pelham

Humphreys, one of the children of the chapel educated by himself, began

to rival him, after which he died with great discontent."[12]

Cooke was buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey in July, 1672.

During the years that he was master of the children of the chapel

he had as pupils many who won for themselves distinguished names as

musicians, amongst them notably Pelham Humphreys, Wise, Blow, Turner,

and Purcell.

Purcell profited by Captain Cooke's instructions for a period of eight

years--from the age of six to that of fourteen, a very important time

in the life of a clever boy. Historians seem to have forgotten this

fact, and have been disposed to credit the whole of Purcell's musical

education to Pelham Humphreys or to Dr. Blow.

During these early years Purcell had already put forth specimens of his

talent for musical composition. In 1667 Playford published a little

three-part song entitled, "Sweet Tyraness, I now resign," which Dr.

Burney has included in his history under the supposition that it was

composed by Purcell's father; but there is reason to believe that it

was the composition of the boy who, at the date of publication, was

nine years of age. Possibly the music was originally intended as an

air or song for a single voice, as we find it published in this form

in 1678, in a work called _New Ayres and Dialogues_. This collection

contained five other songs by Henry Purcell.

When Purcell was eleven years old, he essayed his powers in the

composition of music for a piece called "The Address of the Children

of the Chapel Royal to the King, and their Master, Captain Cooke, on

his Majesties Birthday, A.D. 1670, composed by Master Purcell, one of

the Children of the said Chapel."[13] It is also probable that in this

youthful time Purcell composed the music to _Macbeth_, now commonly

associated with the name of Matthew Locke. That the latter did compose

music for _Macbeth_ is certain, as some of it is still in existence,

but it does not bear the slightest resemblance to that popularly known

as his. In favour of Purcell, it may be noted that the _Macbeth_ music

has many Purcell-like touches; that a copy of the score in Purcell's

youthful hand is in existence;[14] that many old MS. copies of the

music have his name attached as composer; and that he was entitled to

the credit of it was believed by Dr. William Hayes, Dr. Philip Hayes,

Dr. Arnold, and many other eminent musicians.

The music itself is clearly an elaboration and development of a series

of short movements composed by Robert Johnson for Middleton's play of

_The Witch_.[15]

It must not be forgotten that many of Purcell's anthems now in use

in our cathedrals were the product of his youthful pen and genius

whilst he was still a pupil of Cooke. Captain Cooke, the soldier

musician, died, as previously stated, in 1672, and was succeeded in

his appointment as "Master of the Children of the Chapel" by one whose

nature, genius, and scientific knowledge of music must have stimulated

and excited in a special manner the dawning powers of the youthful

musical company committed to his charge, and the force of whose example

must have proved of the greatest service to Purcell. This man was

Pelham Humphreys;[16] he had been educated in the Chapel Royal under

Captain Cooke, where his abilities and his personal attractions made

a strong impression on Charles II. In Nov., 1663, Pepys made the

following entry in his Diary: "The anthem was good after sermon, being

the fifty-first psalme, made for five voices, by one of Captain Cooke's

boys--a pretty boy. And they say there are four or five of them that

can do as much. And here I first perceived that the king is musicall,

and kept good time with his hand all along the anthem."

The _pretty boy_ was undoubtedly Pelham Humphreys. Clifford's book of

anthems, published in 1664, the year after the incident just recorded,

contains the words of five anthems, "composed by Pelham Humphrey, one

of the Children of His Majesties Chappel;" and in Boyce's _Cathedral

Music_ we find Humphreys' anthem, "Have mercy upon me," the words of

which are taken from the fifty-first psalm. There can be little doubt,

therefore, that this was the very anthem heard and approved by Pepys.

In 1664 the king sent Humphreys to Paris,[17] to study under Lully;

and he also probably went to Italy. During his absence the king gave

him an appointment as one of the Gentlemen of the Chapel Royal; and on

his return to London in October, 1667, he was "sworn in" to the place.

He speedily produced several new compositions, sacred and secular, by

command of the king.

Pepys' entry in his Diary for November 15, 1667, is very quaint. He

says, "Home, and there find, as I expected, Mr. Cæsar and little Pelham

Humphreys, lately returned from France, and is an absolute Monsieur,

as full of form and confidence and vanity, and disparages everything

and everybody's skill but his own. But to hear how he laughs at all the

king's musick here, at Blagrave and others, that they cannot keep time

or tune, nor understand anything: and at Grebus,[18] the Frenchman, the

king's master of musick, how he understands nothing, nor can play on

any instrument, and so cannot compose: and that he will give him a lift

out of his place, and that he and the king are mighty great." On the

following day, the 16th, Pepys notes that there was a performance of

Pelham Humphreys' musick given before the king at Whitehall.

That Humphreys was an admirable musician, possessed of uncommon

genius, is easily discernible from the numerous compositions of his

which have come down to us. He took as his models Lulli and Carissimi;

but fortunately Purcell's genius was stronger and more emphatic than

that of his master: had it been otherwise he would have become a mere

copyist; but, as we shall hereafter see, Purcell looked to Italy for

good musical models, and was not afraid to express his dislike to the

frivolity of the French school.

There exists a very interesting manuscript anthem in Purcell's

handwriting, which was originally composed by Humphreys, but

afterwards altered and improved by Purcell.

Poor Humphreys had but a short career, or we may be sure he would have

accomplished greater things than he did. Two years before he died he

married a very beautiful lady, who followed him to his grave in the

cloisters of Westminster Abbey in 1674, he being only twenty-seven

years of age.

Purcell was then sixteen years old, and his boy-soprano voice must

have been near its breaking--perhaps it had already departed. It was,

however, the good custom of the period to retain as supernumeraries

of the King's Chapel any of the old boys who gave evidence of musical

ability. In 1666 we find "Hen. Cooke, Thomas Purcell, and other

Gentlemen of the Chapel Royal, petition on behalf of themselves, the

pages of the chapel, and _boys whose voices have changed_, for payment,

there being no money assigned to the treasurer of the chamber for those

purposes."

Purcell therefore continued attached to the Chapel Royal, and became a

pupil of Dr. John Blow, the successor to Pelham Humphreys, as "Master

of the Children." That Purcell studied under Blow is certain from

the inscription on Blow's monument in Westminster Abbey, where it is

stated that he was "master to the famous Henry Purcell." Blow was

undoubtedly the very master Purcell then needed, for he was eminent

for his goodness, amiability, and moral character, and combined with

those excellent qualities all the learning and experience of a sound

musician. His compositions are remarkable for their melodies and the

boldness of their harmonical progressions.[19] He held appointments

at the Chapel Royal, Westminster Abbey, St. Paul's Cathedral, and St.

Margaret's, Westminster; and it speaks strongly for his singleness

of heart, and the total absence of envy and jealousy in his nature,

that recognising and proclaiming the remarkable abilities of his

pupils, Purcell and Jeremiah Clarke, he resigned his appointments at

Westminster Abbey and St. Paul's Cathedral, in order that they might

occupy those prominent and advantageous positions. This estimable man,

Blow, survived his dear friend and pupil, Purcell, some years, and so

became his successor at Westminster Abbey, and was eventually laid in

a grave close to him, nearly beneath the organ where they had so often

discoursed sweet music together.

That Blow fully estimated the genius of his pupil Purcell, there

can be no doubt, since many manuscript copies of the compositions

of the latter exist in the handwriting of Blow. Probably it was at

the suggestion of Blow that Purcell was appointed _copyist_[20] to

Westminster Abbey in 1676. He succeeded the Rev. Stephen Byng, one of

the minor canons, who probably resigned the post, as he did not die

till 1681. Purcell was eighteen years of age when he became copyist of

Westminster Abbey; hence arose the mistake made by Burney and Hawkins,

and constantly repeated on their authority, that Purcell was appointed

_organist_ of Westminster Abbey at eighteen. The office of copyist he

held for two years only.

Mention has previously been made of the music to _Macbeth_ as the

composition of Purcell; probably the recognition of the excellence and

effectiveness of this work induced the managers of the theatres to give

him further employment; for in 1676 we find him composing music for at

least three plays--Shadwell's _Epsom-Wells_, Dryden's _Aurenge-Zebe_,

and Shadwell's _Libertine_. The latter contains a four-part chorus,

"In these delightful, pleasant groves," still popular with choral

societies. The whole of the music of _The Libertine_ is very bold, and

would be an interesting work to revive for its merits; it is further

curious from the fact that the libretto is founded on the same story

which was long years afterwards adopted by Mozart for his opera, _Don

Giovanni_. In 1677 Purcell wrote the music for Mrs. Behn's tragedy,

_Abdelazor_, and also the music, solo and chorus, of an ode "On the

death of his Worthy Friend, Mr. Matthew Locke, musick composer in

ordinary to His Majesty, and Organist of Her Majesties Chappel, who

Dyed in August 1677." The words of the ode are as follow:--

"What hope for us remains now he is gone?

He that knew all the power of numbers flown;

Alas! too soon; even he

Whose skilful harmony

Had charms for all the ills that we endure,

And could apply a certain cure.

From pointed griefs he'd take the pain away;

Even ill nature did his lyre obey,

And in kind thoughts his artful hand repay:

His layes to anger and to war could move,

Then calm the tempest they had raised with love,

And with soft sounds to gentle thoughts incline,

No passion reign'd, where he did not combine.

He knew such mystic touches, that in death

Could cure the fear, or stop the parting breath:

And if to die had been his fear

Or life his care,

He with his lyre could call,

And could unite his spirits to the fight,

And vanquish Death in his own field of night.

Pleased with some powerful Hallelujah

He, wrapp'd in the joys of his own harmonie,

Sung on, and flew up to the Deitie."

Of the intimacy which existed between Locke and the Purcell family we

had some indication in the paragraph previously quoted from Pepys,

where he spoke of Purcell's father; and that the son was on similarly

friendly terms with Locke is certain. Locke lived in the Savoy, and

from thence he penned the following letter[21] to Purcell:--

"DEAR HARRY,--Some of the gentlemen of His Majesties musick will

honor my poor lodgings with their company this evening, and I

would have you come and join them: bring with thee, Harry, thy

last anthem, and also the canon we tried over together at our last

meeting. Thine in all kindness,

"M. LOCKE.

"_Savoy, March 16._"

In 1678 Purcell resigned his appointment of _Copyist_ at Westminster

Abbey,[22] doubtless that he might devote more time to study and

composition. In this year he produced the fine music for the masque in

Shadwell's mutilation of Shakespeare's _Timon of Athens_.

In 1679 Purcell does not appear to have composed music for the

theatres, but that he was deeply engrossed in his favourite occupation

appears from the following very curious letter, now printed for the

first time:--

"This ffor Mr. John Gostling, Chaunter of yᵉ quire of Canterbury

Cathedral. London yᵉ 8th of ffeb. 9/78.

"Sir, I have reᵉᵈ yᵉ favor of yours of yᵉ 4th with yᵉ

inclosed for my sonne Henry: I am sorry wee are like to be

without you soe long as yours mentions: but 'tis very likely you

may have a summons to appeare among us sooner than you imagine:

for my sonne is composing wherin you will be chiefly concern'd.

However, your occasions and tyes where you are must be considered

and your conveniences ever complyde withall: in yᵉ meantime assure

yourself I shall be carefull of your concern's heir by minding and

refreshing our master's memory of his Gratious promis when there is

occasion. My wife returns thanks for yᵉ compliment with her servis:

and pray yᵉ give both our respects and humble services to Dr. Belk

and his Lady, and beleeve ever that I am, Sir, your affectionate

and humble servant,

"T. PURCELL.

"Dr. Perce is in toune but I have not seen him since. I have

perform'd yᵉ compliments to Dr. Blow, Will Turner, etc.

"F faut: and E lamy are preparing for you."[23]

The Rev. John Gostling, M.A., to whom the letter is addressed, was at

the time a Minor Canon of Canterbury Cathedral, and was celebrated

for the quality and extraordinary compass of his bass voice. It was

especially for him that most of the bass solos in Purcell's anthems

were written. Evelyn, in his Diary (January 1685,) speaks of that

"stupendous bass, Gosling" singing before his Majesty and the Duke.

We learn from the above interesting letter that Thomas Purcell called

Henry his _son_, and we can estimate his influence with his master,

Charles the Second, by the successful way in which he evidently

refreshed the king's memory; for only a few days after the letter was

written the "Gratious promis" was fulfilled by appointing Gosling to

the Chapel Royal. On the 25th of February, 9/78, Mr. John Gosling was

sworn "Gentleman of his Maᵗᴵᵉˢ Chappel extraordinary," which means that

his was a special or supernumerary appointment; but a vacancy in the

regular staff of the Chapel occurred almost immediately, and we find

the following entry in the cheque-book: "Mr. William Tucker, gent., of

his Maᵗᴵᵉˢ Chappell Royal, departed this life the 28th day of February,

1678,[24] in whose place was admitted in ordinary Mr. John Gostling, a

base from Canterbury, Master of Arts."

The postscript to the letter read in connection with the previous

paragraph "my sonne is composing wherin you will be chiefly concern'd"

is clearly a jocose reference to Gostling's exceptionally low voice.

Purcell not only wrote double F (F faut) and double E (E lamy) for

him, as in the anthem, "Behold I bring you glad tidings," but in

another anthem commencing, "They that go down to the sea in ships," he

carried the bass solo part down to double D.

The history of the composition of the latter anthem is somewhat

remarkable:--

"Charles the Second had given orders for building a yacht, which

as soon as it was finished he named the _Fubbs_, in honour of

the Duchess of Portsmouth, who, we may suppose, was in her

person rather full and plump. The sculptors and painters apply

this epithet to children, and say, for instance, of the boys of

Flammengo, that they are fubby. Soon after the vessel was launched

the King made a party to sail in the yacht down the river and round

the Kentish coast; and to keep up the mirth and good humour of the

company Mr. Gostling was requested to be of the number. They had

got as low as the North Foreland, when a violent storm arose, in

which the King and the Duke of York were necessitated, in order to

preserve the vessel, to hand the sails and work like common seamen.

By good providence, however, they escaped to land: but the distress

they were in made an impression on the mind of Mr. Gostling which

was never effaced. Struck with a just sense of the deliverance,

and the horror of the scene which he had but lately viewed, upon

his return to London he selected from the Psalms those passages

which declare the wonders and terrors of the deep and gave them

to Purcell to compose as an anthem, which he did, adapting it so

peculiarly to the compass of Mr. Gostling's voice, which was a deep

bass, that hardly any person but himself was then, or has since,

been able to sing it; but the King did not live to hear it."

Charles the Second became extremely partial to the singing of

Gostling, and was heard to say, "You may talk as much as you please

of your nightingales, but I have a _gosling_ who excels them all."

At another time he presented Gostling with a silver egg filled with

guineas, saying, "He had heard eggs were good for the voice."

Gostling was a devoted admirer of, and a performer on, the _viol da

gamba_, an instrument which Purcell detested. We can therefore readily

imagine that his musical susceptibilities were frequently severely

taxed by the persistent practice of his friend. He accordingly composed

a round for three voices to the following words,[25] which he presented

to Gostling:--

"Of all the instruments that are,

None with the viol can compare.

Mark how the strings their order keep

With a whet, whet, whet, and a sweep, sweep, sweep.

But above all this still abounds

With a zingle, zingle, zing, and a zit zan zounds."

In 1680 Dr. Blow magnanimously resigned the appointment of organist of

Westminster Abbey in favour of Purcell,[26] who thus became possessed

of one of the most distinguished musical positions in the kingdom at

the early age of twenty-two.

In the same year Purcell composed the music for Lee's tragedy,

_Theodosius, or the Force of Love_. It was performed at the Duke's

Theatre, and the music of the songs was soon after published by Bently

as an Appendix to the play. He also wrote music for D'Urfey's comedy,

_The Virtuous Wife_, and two odes, the first, addressed to the Duke of

York, entitled "An Ode or Welcome Song for his Royal Highness on his

Return from Scotland," and the second called "A Song to Welcome Home

His Majesty from Windsor."

But the most remarkable work of Purcell in this year (1680) was the

composition of the opera _Dido and Æneas_, usually ascribed to his

seventeenth year, 1675, a complete mistake. An original copy of the

libretto still exists, with the following title, "An Opera performed at

Mr. Josias Priest's Boarding-school at Chelsey, by young gentlewomen,

the words made by Mr. Nat. Tate. The musick composed by Mr. Henry

Purcell."

The Great Musicians: Purcell · 第 1 / 8 段