PROP. VII.

_The bigness of the component parts of natural Bodies may be conjectured

by their Colours._

For since the parts of these Bodies, by _Prop._ 5. do most probably

exhibit the same Colours with a Plate of equal thickness, provided they

have the same refractive density; and since their parts seem for the

most part to have much the same density with Water or Glass, as by many

circumstances is obvious to collect; to determine the sizes of those

parts, you need only have recourse to the precedent Tables, in which the

thickness of Water or Glass exhibiting any Colour is expressed. Thus if

it be desired to know the diameter of a Corpuscle, which being of equal

density with Glass shall reflect green of the third Order; the Number

16-1/4 shews it to be (16-1/4)/10000 parts of an Inch.

The greatest difficulty is here to know of what Order the Colour of any

Body is. And for this end we must have recourse to the 4th and 18th

Observations; from whence may be collected these particulars.

_Scarlets_, and other _reds_, _oranges_, and _yellows_, if they be pure

and intense, are most probably of the second order. Those of the first

and third order also may be pretty good; only the yellow of the first

order is faint, and the orange and red of the third Order have a great

Mixture of violet and blue.

There may be good _Greens_ of the fourth Order, but the purest are of

the third. And of this Order the green of all Vegetables seems to be,

partly by reason of the Intenseness of their Colours, and partly because

when they wither some of them turn to a greenish yellow, and others to a

more perfect yellow or orange, or perhaps to red, passing first through

all the aforesaid intermediate Colours. Which Changes seem to be

effected by the exhaling of the Moisture which may leave the tinging

Corpuscles more dense, and something augmented by the Accretion of the

oily and earthy Part of that Moisture. Now the green, without doubt, is

of the same Order with those Colours into which it changeth, because the

Changes are gradual, and those Colours, though usually not very full,

yet are often too full and lively to be of the fourth Order.

_Blues_ and _Purples_ may be either of the second or third Order, but

the best are of the third. Thus the Colour of Violets seems to be of

that Order, because their Syrup by acid Liquors turns red, and by

urinous and alcalizate turns green. For since it is of the Nature of

Acids to dissolve or attenuate, and of Alcalies to precipitate or

incrassate, if the Purple Colour of the Syrup was of the second Order,

an acid Liquor by attenuating its tinging Corpuscles would change it to

a red of the first Order, and an Alcali by incrassating them would

change it to a green of the second Order; which red and green,

especially the green, seem too imperfect to be the Colours produced by

these Changes. But if the said Purple be supposed of the third Order,

its Change to red of the second, and green of the third, may without any

Inconvenience be allow'd.

If there be found any Body of a deeper and less reddish Purple than that

of the Violets, its Colour most probably is of the second Order. But yet

there being no Body commonly known whose Colour is constantly more deep

than theirs, I have made use of their Name to denote the deepest and

least reddish Purples, such as manifestly transcend their Colour in

purity.

The _blue_ of the first Order, though very faint and little, may

possibly be the Colour of some Substances; and particularly the azure

Colour of the Skies seems to be of this Order. For all Vapours when they

begin to condense and coalesce into small Parcels, become first of that

Bigness, whereby such an Azure must be reflected before they can

constitute Clouds of other Colours. And so this being the first Colour

which Vapours begin to reflect, it ought to be the Colour of the finest

and most transparent Skies, in which Vapours are not arrived to that

Grossness requisite to reflect other Colours, as we find it is by

Experience.

_Whiteness_, if most intense and luminous, is that of the first Order,

if less strong and luminous, a Mixture of the Colours of several Orders.

Of this last kind is the Whiteness of Froth, Paper, Linnen, and most

white Substances; of the former I reckon that of white Metals to be. For

whilst the densest of Metals, Gold, if foliated, is transparent, and all

Metals become transparent if dissolved in Menstruums or vitrified, the

Opacity of white Metals ariseth not from their Density alone. They being

less dense than Gold would be more transparent than it, did not some

other Cause concur with their Density to make them opake. And this Cause

I take to be such a Bigness of their Particles as fits them to reflect

the white of the first order. For, if they be of other Thicknesses they

may reflect other Colours, as is manifest by the Colours which appear

upon hot Steel in tempering it, and sometimes upon the Surface of melted

Metals in the Skin or Scoria which arises upon them in their cooling.

And as the white of the first order is the strongest which can be made

by Plates of transparent Substances, so it ought to be stronger in the

denser Substances of Metals than in the rarer of Air, Water, and Glass.

Nor do I see but that metallick Substances of such a Thickness as may

fit them to reflect the white of the first order, may, by reason of

their great Density (according to the Tenor of the first of these

Propositions) reflect all the Light incident upon them, and so be as

opake and splendent as it's possible for any Body to be. Gold, or Copper

mix'd with less than half their Weight of Silver, or Tin, or Regulus of

Antimony, in fusion, or amalgamed with a very little Mercury, become

white; which shews both that the Particles of white Metals have much

more Superficies, and so are smaller, than those of Gold and Copper, and

also that they are so opake as not to suffer the Particles of Gold or

Copper to shine through them. Now it is scarce to be doubted but that

the Colours of Gold and Copper are of the second and third order, and

therefore the Particles of white Metals cannot be much bigger than is

requisite to make them reflect the white of the first order. The

Volatility of Mercury argues that they are not much bigger, nor may they

be much less, lest they lose their Opacity, and become either

transparent as they do when attenuated by Vitrification, or by Solution

in Menstruums, or black as they do when ground smaller, by rubbing

Silver, or Tin, or Lead, upon other Substances to draw black Lines. The

first and only Colour which white Metals take by grinding their

Particles smaller, is black, and therefore their white ought to be that

which borders upon the black Spot in the Center of the Rings of Colours,

that is, the white of the first order. But, if you would hence gather

the Bigness of metallick Particles, you must allow for their Density.

For were Mercury transparent, its Density is such that the Sine of

Incidence upon it (by my Computation) would be to the Sine of its

Refraction, as 71 to 20, or 7 to 2. And therefore the Thickness of its

Particles, that they may exhibit the same Colours with those of Bubbles

of Water, ought to be less than the Thickness of the Skin of those

Bubbles in the Proportion of 2 to 7. Whence it's possible, that the

Particles of Mercury may be as little as the Particles of some

transparent and volatile Fluids, and yet reflect the white of the first

order.

Lastly, for the production of _black_, the Corpuscles must be less than

any of those which exhibit Colours. For at all greater sizes there is

too much Light reflected to constitute this Colour. But if they be

supposed a little less than is requisite to reflect the white and very

faint blue of the first order, they will, according to the 4th, 8th,

17th and 18th Observations, reflect so very little Light as to appear

intensely black, and yet may perhaps variously refract it to and fro

within themselves so long, until it happen to be stifled and lost, by

which means they will appear black in all positions of the Eye without

any transparency. And from hence may be understood why Fire, and the

more subtile dissolver Putrefaction, by dividing the Particles of

Substances, turn them to black, why small quantities of black Substances

impart their Colour very freely and intensely to other Substances to

which they are applied; the minute Particles of these, by reason of

their very great number, easily overspreading the gross Particles of

others; why Glass ground very elaborately with Sand on a Copper Plate,

'till it be well polish'd, makes the Sand, together with what is worn

off from the Glass and Copper, become very black: why black Substances

do soonest of all others become hot in the Sun's Light and burn, (which

Effect may proceed partly from the multitude of Refractions in a little

room, and partly from the easy Commotion of so very small Corpuscles;)

and why blacks are usually a little inclined to a bluish Colour. For

that they are so may be seen by illuminating white Paper by Light

reflected from black Substances. For the Paper will usually appear of a

bluish white; and the reason is, that black borders in the obscure blue

of the order described in the 18th Observation, and therefore reflects

more Rays of that Colour than of any other.

In these Descriptions I have been the more particular, because it is not

impossible but that Microscopes may at length be improved to the

discovery of the Particles of Bodies on which their Colours depend, if

they are not already in some measure arrived to that degree of

perfection. For if those Instruments are or can be so far improved as

with sufficient distinctness to represent Objects five or six hundred

times bigger than at a Foot distance they appear to our naked Eyes, I

should hope that we might be able to discover some of the greatest of

those Corpuscles. And by one that would magnify three or four thousand

times perhaps they might all be discover'd, but those which produce

blackness. In the mean while I see nothing material in this Discourse

that may rationally be doubted of, excepting this Position: That

transparent Corpuscles of the same thickness and density with a Plate,

do exhibit the same Colour. And this I would have understood not without

some Latitude, as well because those Corpuscles may be of irregular

Figures, and many Rays must be obliquely incident on them, and so have

a shorter way through them than the length of their Diameters, as

because the straitness of the Medium put in on all sides within such

Corpuscles may a little alter its Motions or other qualities on which

the Reflexion depends. But yet I cannot much suspect the last, because I

have observed of some small Plates of Muscovy Glass which were of an

even thickness, that through a Microscope they have appeared of the same

Colour at their edges and corners where the included Medium was

terminated, which they appeared of in other places. However it will add

much to our Satisfaction, if those Corpuscles can be discover'd with

Microscopes; which if we shall at length attain to, I fear it will be

the utmost improvement of this Sense. For it seems impossible to see the

more secret and noble Works of Nature within the Corpuscles by reason of

their transparency.

Opticks · 第 54 / 77 题