THE PAGEANT OF THE IMMORTALS.

Hi sunt Magistri qui nos instruunt, sine virgis et ferulis, sine

cholorâ, sine pecuniâ. Si accedis, non dormiunt; si inquiris, non se

abscondunt; non obmurmurant, si oberres; cachinos nesciunt, si

ignores.—RICHARD DE BURY.

Pour peu qu’il soit tenu loin du chaud et du frais,

Qu’on y porte une main blanche et respectueuse,

Que le lecteur soit calme et la lectrice heureuse ...

Un livre est un ami qui ne change jamais.

JULES JANIN.

I HAVE two chairs for my reading—a stiff one for books I _have_ to read;

a luxurious one for books I like to read. My luxurious chair is of

dark-green leather, a seat to sink into, modeled after the easy

arm-chair of the Eversley Rectory, known from its seductive properties

as “Sleepy Hollow.” When I find a volume more than usually delightsome,

I call in an extra chair for a foot-rest, so the body may possess the

same ease as the mind. And yet the delight a volume affords depends

largely upon the mood in which the leaves are turned, and the printer

who has turned the leaves.

A fondness for reading the old book catalogues is apt to prove not only

an expensive luxury, but consumes a great deal of time. For no catalogue

may be hastily skimmed through. The least attractive list, composed

largely, it may be, of works on theology, mineralogy, theosophy, or

jurisprudence, may contain the precise book you are searching for. The

most attractive lists must naturally be perused carefully. In fact,

reading catalogues is like reading books—even with attentive reading one

is liable to skip a title, or, at least, overlook its real significance,

just as one may not always grasp the true meanings of an author upon

first perusal. Then, one subject or one title leads to another, and the

catalogue must be reread. Even when you have made out your list, it

occurs to you that half or three quarters of the lot you have selected

will undoubtedly be “sold”; and having left out a number you really

desire, you go over the catalogue still more carefully a third time for

“substitutes.” Not only this, but the catalogue differs from a book in

that it can not wait or be put off. It must be studied immediately it is

received; or some one else gets the advantage, as some one else living

nearer by generally does.

If the business you have on hand prevents your devoting the necessary

time to the catalogue or catalogues, you are haunted with the feeling

that it contains a prize, and that you may not catch the first mail.

Indeed, should any of the lists contain, at anything like a reasonable

figure, that scarce old Herbal, an ancient angling tome, or a certain

edition of Les Caractères, which you have long been searching for, you

ought to telegraph for it without a moment’s delay. You know Smith will

read his list the minute he receives it. He is already far richer in La

Bruyères than you are, and never ceases collecting them. And although he

already has the edition you desire, it is ten to one if he sees it

offered at a bargain in fine antique binding he will duplicate it. There

is no such contingency as his skipping it. He never skips—he secures and

exults. His library shelves groan with La Bruyères. Were he rich he

might be forgiven; but all his prizes have been hooked by careful

angling, and are a triumph to his skill and monumental industry.

Charles Asselineau, in the unique little volume L’Enfer du Bibliophile,

draws a sharp line between the true book-hunter, who makes use of his

own knowledge, patience, and industry, and the hunter by proxy, who bags

his spoils through cunning other than his own-“the rich and lazy amateur

who only hunts by procuration and trusts to the care of an accomplished

professional to whom he gives _carte blanche_, and who despises him—ay,

who despises him, as the game-keeper and poacher always despise the

indolent and unskillful master who triumphs through their skill.” The

opening sentence of the volume is worthy of Sterne: “_Oui ... l’enfer!_

is it not there that one must arrive sooner or later, in this life or in

the other; oh all of you who have placed your joys in voluptuousness

unknown to the vulgar?”

On the other hand, you have the alternative of neglecting your business

and attending to the catalogues. In any case, the book catalogue is an

attraction and a bane. If you are niggardly and only order a volume or

two, you are generally disappointed; if you are in a liberal mood, and

order a number, thinking you will only obtain a few, you are likely to

get a lot of books that will deprive you of getting others you really

require. Then the works one continually sees that one can not afford,

the columns of temptations all crying, “Farewell! thou art too dear for

my possessing”—the Paris catalogues in particular, so rich in their

_embarras de richesses_. There is a stanza of Clough’s that may be cited

as pertinent to book-hunting:

They may talk as they please about what they call pelf,

And how one ought never to think of one’s self,

How pleasures of thought surpass eating and drinking,

My pleasure of thought is the pleasure of thinking

How pleasant it is to have money, heigh-ho!

How pleasant it is to have money!

Possibly the old book catalogues are sent as a lesson in self-control,

and to teach one to endure disappointment as patiently as human nature

will allow.

Not the least interesting volume of my library is my herbarium. Still

every pressed flower retains much of its original color, reviving the

scene of many a pleasant ramble. Commencing with the first cluster of

spring beauty and white shad-blow spray, and ending with the last purple

aster and blue gentian of autumn, it is thus a sentient floral

calendar—a fragrant anthology of the seasons. It is one of my

pleasantest volumes for winter reading, every flower of which is a

chapter written by Nature herself. This involucre of white dogwood, for

instance, becomes a vernal landscape riotous with bloom, while these

feathery mespilus blossoms bring up the April hillsides sprinkled with

hepaticas and violets. This bunch of trilliums recalls a distant

beechwood in early May carpeted with the snowy triangular flowers and

misty with the beech’s unfurling leaves.

And this pink lady’s-slipper!

Once more I trace the sinuous curves of the Wiscoy and am lulled by the

drowsy murmur of the stream. How cool the water swirls beneath the

overarching hemlocks, and how it is churned into foam in the deep, dark

pool at the tail of the rapid, where I know the big trout I hooked and

lost the previous year is waiting for another taste of my “cochybondu”!

It is just at the base of the steep shaded hillside where the sun never

penetrates. If my trout chooses to display his rubies and chrysoberyls

he must thread his way up the current or float down to the meadow far

below. When I have hooked and basketed him, another big fellow will

occupy his place in the same deep, dark pool.

It is the choice spot of the stream within a reach of half a mile, and

invariably holds the strongest fish and most accomplished taker of

_ephemeræ_. His pannier must needs be large, so many flies and midges

and worms and bugs and beetles drift past his lair, and are sucked in by

the eddy into his awaiting maw. The sudden dive of a water-rat proclaims

a rival angler, who may also have his eye on my trout, and bring him to

bag, perchance, if I miss him to-day.

An aroma of mint, mingled with the fragrance of wild flowers and ferns,

follows me along the banks; and there, in the swamp where the partridge

drums, my pink lady’s-slipper gleams. The twisting roots of the hemlock

plunge deep into the pool; and with a slap of his red tail the big trout

rises just beyond them in the foam-flecks of the eddy, precisely where

he rose the previous year. How the water growls round the bank it has

mined, and chafes and scolds at the obtruding prongs! And how

picturesquely, too, the old hemlock leans over the stream, shading the

trout for the last time! Another athlete and trained fly-catcher must

lead the somersault acts hereafter; for a day at least the small fry may

rest secure. But, alas! with a sudden rush, my trout has wound the

leader fast around the hemlock’s roots, as he has wound so many leaders

before; and, with a farewell flash of his encarmined sides, I seem to

hear his parting message: “_Multæ lapsæ inter truttam et bascaudem

sunt!_” The pressed flower remains to remind me of the struggle and my

June holiday.

Looking now at the pink lady’s-slipper from the Wiscoy woods, I am glad,

after all, I did not take my trout, however great a triumph his capture

might have afforded me at the time. For, if the water-rat has not caught

him meanwhile—and the maxim the trout flung at me virtually precludes

this possibility—he is undoubtedly still swimming in his favorite pool.

Granting I had caught him and that a fish of equal size had taken his

place, it would yet be another trout, not _my_ trout which I hooked and

lost. The stream flows more musically and more limpid to me knowing he

is still stemming the current, and that he regained his freedom.

This spike of cardinal flowers carries me a hundred miles away; and once

more am I drifting down the Oswego River on a hazy autumnal afternoon,

indifferent whether the great green bass rise or not, so golden is the

September day. It is enough to be idling beneath the roar of the rapid,

to mark the different hues of the water, the play of the slanting

sunbeams, the undulations of the wooded shores. Surely the landscape

needs no more. Ah, yes! just that bit of color skirting a still bayou,

the flame of cardinal flowers and their reflected images below. What an

illustrated volume! the imperial folio of the seasons! And what a

succession of illuminated pages it discloses from the rubric and the

preface until the last leaf is turned! every subject indexed and paged

by the grand author, Nature; its types as fresh as if they had only run

through one, instead of thousands of editions.

In dreams do I behold in all the great libraries the procession of the

books that nightly emerge from the seclusion of their shelves—countless

flowers from the Muse’s hill and garlands from the meadows of the

classics. At a signal from the most antiquated tome, I see a sudden

movement among their ranks, and hear a rustling of innumerable leaves,

as the souls of the immortals are quickened into life, and the spirits

of old authors assemble for converse. Platoons of majestic folios, some

in calf, some in sheep, and some in stamped pigskin appear, columns of

venerable and vellumed quartos, tiers of tall octavos, troops of lovely

Elzevirs, Aldines, and sedate black-letter editions file by with

measured tread. Volumes black with age move with step as elastic as

those clothed in more modern garb. Indeed, old and young seem to be

indiscriminately mingled, without regard to costume or richness of

attire. Only, I observe that the procession is composed solely of the

dead.

I notice, moreover, that it is only the books of real merit or great

renown that are called to take part in the pageant; and that the

participants vary with each succeeding night, appearing entirely without

regard to chronological order, though all the beautiful world of

_belles-lettres_, philosophy, and science that has charmed and

instructed mankind throughout the ages, forms the processional. Thus a

copy of Plato and a first folio of Shakespeare pass by, side by side,

followed by The Canterbury Tales and the Faerie Queen, hand in hand. Or

is it Goethe’s Faust and Plutarch’s Lives? It is sometimes difficult to

catch the titles, so numerous are the volumes that take part. As the eye

becomes accustomed to the dimness, the titles are more easily traced,

and I distinctly recognize Horace and Virgil, Milton and Keats, Herrick

and Hood, Montaigne and Pascal, Lamb, Thackeray, Cervantes, Molière,

Theocritus, Dante, Schiller, Balzac, Dumas the Elder, Pope, Burns,

Goldsmith, Addison, Hawthorne, Bulwer, Dickens, Irving—until the eye is

dazed at the multitudinous names. Night after night the procession forms

and the participants vary—there are so many volumes to take part, so

many that may not be overlooked. Richard Jefferies, his beautiful

thoughts scarcely dry on the page, I note has just been called forth

from the shelves, and Thoreau has already marched with Walton and

Gilbert White.

Although not assisting in the pageant itself, there are, I perceive,

numerous volumes that, nevertheless, appear to be in communication with

such of their companions as have responded to the signal. Beckoning

glances from those below are answered every now and then by faint

responses from the volumes above, their leaves as yet unfoxed by Time.

Of these latter there are many, and I soon perceive that they bear the

names of living authors of note who must wait until their earthly life

is spent ere they too may answer the roll-call and take rank with the

immortals. How, apparently without volition of their own, as if touched

by an unseen hand, the leaves of In Memoriam rustle and the pages of The

Autocrat flutter!

The only participants I see that seem to be out of place assemble once a

year in solemn conclave, conversing, it is true, but wearing a dejected

look. Countless volumes, these, principally first and rare editions,

many bound in lovely leathers, exquisitely gilded, lettered, and tooled,

bearing innumerable stamps and monograms, coats-of-arms, and ancient

book-plates. Many of them I recognize as having seen before in high

spirits, discoursing with their companions during the hour of the

nightly pageants. This yearly and unusually large gathering,

characterized by its extreme gravity, puzzled me at first, until I

discovered it was composed of the ghosts of borrowed books, unhappy in

their covers, lamenting the loss of their former possessors who had once

cherished them so fondly. I see, too, Boccaccio’s Il Decamerone,

Brantôme’s Dames Galantes, Balzac’s Physiologie du Mariage, La

Fontaine’s Contes with the Eisen, De Hooge, and Fragonard plates, and in

yonder soiled, foul-smelling tome I perceive the smutty old satirist and

Doctor-Franciscan Rabelais. Why he should be called out at all, seems a

mystery, his pitch is so defiling, and his boluses are so nauseating.

Some participants there are which at first baffled my comprehension.

These, though perfectly composed themselves and mingling freely with

their fellows, nevertheless appear to excite an inordinate curiosity

among their companions which is never gratified. The titles they bear

are plainly discernible; but only when the march becomes sufficiently

animated to cause a violent fluttering of the leaves can I catch a

glimpse of the author’s name on the title-page. Then I discover these

numerous tomes invariably reveal the name of a most voluminous and

versatile author, whose personality it is impossible to fathom, an

author writing with equal facility in all languages and on all topics,

in poetry and in prose, persistently preserving his _incognito_ under

the name of “Anon.”

I see, also, participating in the pageant semi-annually, and on these

occasions directing, as it were, the imposing march of the volumes,

numerous men of middle and advanced age that seem to exhale an odor of

musty tomes. Occasionally these pause in their march before some one of

the shelves to take down a volume which I have not before seen in the

procession, handling it with reverential care, as if conscious of the

gems it enshrined. Sometimes it is a volume by a living author of note;

again it is an encyclopædia or concordance, or a special number of some

dusty periodical that has long lain unopened. On inquiry of my

informant, I learned that this human element consists of the painstaking

custodians who had the volumes in keeping, the scholarly and

unappreciated librarians who devoted so much labor to the cataloguing

and classification of their charges.

Abruptly close the clasps of the most venerable tome. Again I hear the

rustling of pages and folding of covers, as each volume returns to its

accustomed place and once more sinks into hallowed slumber. The

librarian of one of the great libraries where the nightly pageant forms

scouted the idea of his charges leaving their retreats. “Would I not

hear them?—besides the dust remains undisturbed!” he replied. But a dead

author makes no noise and leaves no tell-tale traces when he quits his

tenement of print. Books, so eminently human, in the natural course of

things must have their ghosts. Of course, the librarian’s candle would

dissipate them, as mists are dispersed by the sun.

[Illustration]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Illustration]

The story of my house · 第 42 / 43 题