CHAPTER XVI

The Story of Tampu-tocco, a Lost City of the First Incas

It will be remembered that while on the search for the capital of the

last Incas we had found several groups of ruins which we could not

fit entirely into the story of Manco and his sons. The most important

of these was Machu Picchu. Many of its buildings are far older than

the ruins of Rosaspata and Espiritu Pampa. To understand just what we

may have found at Machu Picchu it is now necessary to tell the story

of a celebrated city, whose name, Tampu-tocco, was not used even at

the time of the Spanish Conquest as the cognomen of any of the Inca

towns then in existence. I must draw the reader's attention far away

from the period when Pizarro and Manco, Toledo and Tupac Amaru were

the protagonists, back to events which occurred nearly seven hundred

years before their day. The last Incas ruled in Uiticos between 1536

and 1572. The last Amautas flourished about 800 A.D.

------

FIGURE

Puma Urco, near Paccaritampu

------

The Amautas had been ruling the Peruvian highlands for about sixty

generations, when, as has been told in Chapter VI, invaders came

from the south and east. The Amautas had built up a wonderful

civilization. Many of the agricultural and engineering feats which

we ordinarily assign to the Incas were really achievements of the

Amautas. The last of the Amautas was Pachacuti VI, who was killed by

an arrow on the battle-field of La Raya. The historian Montesinos,

whose work on the antiquities of Peru has recently been translated

for the Hakluyt Society by Mr. P. A. Means, of Harvard University,

tells us that the followers of Pachacuti VI fled with his body to

"Tampu-tocco." This, says the historian, was "a healthy place" where

there was a cave in which they hid the Amauta's body. Cuzco, the

finest and most important of all their cities, was sacked. General

anarchy prevailed throughout the ancient empire. The good old days

of peace and plenty disappeared before the invader. The glory of the

old empire was destroyed, not to return for several centuries. In

these dark ages, resembling those of European medieval times which

followed the Germanic migrations and the fall of the Roman Empire,

Peru was split up into a large number of small independent units. Each

district chose its own ruler and carried on depredations against

its neighbors. The effects of this may still be seen in the ruins of

small fortresses found guarding the way into isolated Andean valleys.

Montesinos says that those who were most loyal to the Amautas

were few in number and not strong enough to oppose their enemies

successfully. Some of them, probably the principal priests,

wise men, and chiefs of the ancient régime, built a new city at

"Tampu-tocco." Here they kept alive the memory of the Amautas and

lived in such a relatively civilized manner as to draw to them,

little by little, those who wished to be safe from the prevailing

chaos and disorder and the tyranny of the independent chiefs or

"robber barons." In their new capital, they elected a king, Titi

Truaman Quicho.

The survivors of the old régime enjoyed living at Tampu-tocco,

because there never have been any earthquakes, plagues, or tremblings

there. Furthermore, if fortune should turn against their new young

king, Titi Truaman, and he should be killed, they could bury him

in a very sacred place, namely, the cave where they hid the body of

Pachacuti VI.

Fortune was kind to the founders of the new kingdom. They had chosen

an excellent place of refuge where they were not disturbed. To their

ruler, the king of Tampu-tocco, and to his successors nothing worth

recording happened for centuries. During this period several of the

kings wished to establish themselves in ancient Cuzco, where the great

Amautas had reigned, but for one reason or another were obliged to

forego their ambitions.

One of the most enlightened rulers of Tampu-tocco was a king called

Tupac Cauri, or Pachacuti VII. In his day people began to write on

the leaves of trees. He sent messengers to the various parts of the

highlands, asking the tribes to stop worshiping idols and animals,

to cease practicing evil customs which had grown up since the fall

of the Amautas, and to return to the ways of their ancestors. He

met with little encouragement. On the contrary, his ambassadors were

killed and little or no change took place. Discouraged by the failure

of his attempts at reformation and desirous of learning its cause,

Tupac Cauri was told by his soothsayers that the matter which most

displeased the gods was the invention of writing. Thereupon he forbade

anybody to practice writing, under penalty of death. This mandate was

observed with such strictness that the ancient folk never again used

letters. Instead, they used quipus, strings and knots. It was supposed

that the gods were appeased, and every one breathed easier. No one

realized how near the Peruvians as a race had come to taking a most

momentous step.

This curious and interesting tradition relates to an event supposed

to have occurred many centuries before the Spanish Conquest. We

have no ocular evidence to support it. The skeptic may brush it

aside as a story intended to appeal to the vanity of persons with

Inca blood in their veins; yet it is not told by the half-caste

Garcilasso, who wanted Europeans to admire his maternal ancestors

and wrote his book accordingly, but is in the pages of that careful

investigator Montesinos, a pure-blooded Spaniard. As a matter of fact,

to students of Sumner's "Folkways," the story rings true. Some young

fellow, brighter than the rest, developed a system of ideographs

which he scratched on broad, smooth leaves. It worked. People were

beginning to adopt it. The conservative priests of Tampu-tocco did

not like it. There was danger lest some of the precious secrets,

heretofore handed down orally to the neophytes, might become public

property. Nevertheless, the invention was so useful that it began to

spread. There followed some extremely unlucky event--the ambassadors

were killed, the king's plans miscarried. What more natural than

that the newly discovered ideographs should be blamed for it? As a

result, the king of Tampu-tocco, instigated thereto by the priests,

determined to abolish this new thing. Its usefulness had not yet

been firmly established. In fact it was inconvenient; the leaves

withered, dried, and cracked, or blew away, and the writings were

lost. Had the new invention been permitted to exist a little longer,

some one would have commenced to scratch ideographs on rocks. Then it

would have persisted. The rulers and priests, however, found that the

important records of tribute and taxes could be kept perfectly well

by means of the quipus. And the "job" of those whose duty it was to

remember what each string stood for was assured. After all there is

nothing unusual about Montesinos' story. One has only to look at the

history of Spain itself to realize that royal bigotry and priestly

intolerance have often crushed new ideas and kept great nations from

making important advances.

Montesinos says further that Tupac Cauri established in Tampu-tocco

a kind of university where boys were taught the use of quipus, the

method of counting and the significance of the different colored

strings, while their fathers and older brothers were trained in

military exercises--in other words, practiced with the sling, the

bolas and the war-club; perhaps also with bows and arrows. Around the

name of Tupac Cauri, or Pachacuti VII, as he wished to be called,

is gathered the story of various intellectual movements which took

place in Tampu-tocco. Finally, there came a time when the skill and

military efficiency of the little kingdom rose to a high plane. The

ruler and his councilors, bearing in mind the tradition of their

ancestors who centuries before had dwelt in Cuzco, again determined to

make the attempt to reestablish themselves there. An earthquake, which

ruined many buildings in Cuzco, caused rivers to change their courses,

destroyed towns, and was followed by the outbreak of a disastrous

epidemic. The chiefs were obliged to give up their plans, although

in healthy Tampu-tocco there was no pestilence. Their kingdom became

more and more crowded. Every available square yard of arable land was

terraced and cultivated. The men were intelligent, well organized,

and accustomed to discipline, but they could not raise enough food

for their families; so, about 1300 A.D., they were forced to secure

arable land by conquest, under the leadership of the energetic ruler

of the day. His name was Manco Ccapac, generally called the first Inca,

the ruler for whom the Manco of 1536 was named.

There are many stories of the rise of the first Inca. When he had grown

to man's estate, he assembled his people to see how he could secure new

lands for them. After consultation with his brothers, he determined

to set out with them "toward the hill over which the sun rose," as

we are informed by Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua, an Indian who was

a descendant of a long line of Incas, whose great-grandparents lived

in the time of the Spanish Conquest, and who wrote an account of the

antiquities of Peru in 1620. He gives the history of the Incas as it

was handed down to the descendants of the former rulers of Peru. In

it we read that Manco Ccapac and his brothers finally succeeded in

reaching Cuzco and settled there. With the return of the descendants

of the Amautas to Cuzco there ended the glory of Tampu-tocco. Manco

married his own sister in order that he might not lose caste and that

no other family be elevated by this marriage to be on an equality with

his. He made good laws, conquered many provinces, and is regarded

as the founder of the Inca dynasty. The highlanders came under his

sway and brought him rich presents. The Inca, as Manco Ccapac now

came to be known, was recognized as the most powerful chief, the most

valiant fighter, and the most lucky warrior in the Andes. His captains

and soldiers were brave, well disciplined, and well armed. All his

affairs prospered greatly. "Afterward he ordered works to be executed

at the place of his birth, consisting of a masonry wall with three

windows, which were emblems of the house of his fathers whence he

descended. The first window was called Tampu-tocco." I quote from

Sir Clements Markham's translation.

------

FIGURE

The Best Inca Wall at Maucallacta, near Paccaritampu

------

------

FIGURE

The Caves of Puma Urco, near Paccaritampu

------

The Spaniards who asked about Tampu-tocco were told that it was at or

near Paccaritampu, a small town eight or ten miles south of Cuzco. I

learned that ruins are very scarce in its vicinity. There are none in

the town. The most important are the ruins of Maucallacta, an Inca

village, a few miles away. Near it I found a rocky hill consisting

of several crags and large rocks, the surface of one of which is

carved into platforms and two sleeping pumas. It is called Puma

Urco. Beneath the rocks are some caves. I was told they had recently

been used by political refugees. There is enough about the caves and

the characteristics of the ruins near Paccaritampu to lend color to the

story told to the early Spaniards. Nevertheless, it would seem as if

Tampu-tocco must have been a place more remote from Cuzco and better

defended by Nature from any attacks on that side. How else would it

have been possible for the disorganized remnant of Pachacuti VI's army

to have taken refuge there and set up an independent kingdom in the

face of the warlike invaders from the south? A few men might have hid

in the caves of Puma Urco, but Paccaritampu is not a natural citadel.

The surrounding region is not difficult of access. There are no

precipices between here and the Cuzco Basin. There are no natural

defenses against such an invading force as captured the capital of

the Amautas. Furthermore, tampu means "a place of temporary abode,"

or "a tavern," or "an improved piece of ground" or "farm far from a

town"; tocco means "window." There is an old tavern at Maucallacta

near Paccaritampu, but there are no windows in the building to

justify the name of "window tavern" or "place of temporary abode"

(or "farm far from a town") "noted for its windows." There is nothing

of a "masonry wall with three windows" corresponding to Salcamayhua's

description of Manco Ccapac's memorial at his birthplace. The word

"Tampu-tocco" does not occur on any map I have been able to consult,

nor is it in the exhaustive gazetteer of Peru compiled by Paz Soldan.

Inca Land: Explorations in the Highlands of Peru · 第 16 / 18 章