It is needless, of course, to detail the methods of work. They are on a

larger scale, and in more tedious ways, a repetition of the proceedings

in the case of _B_. The results are as follows, starting from the line

_f f_ northwards: The space comprised between the corners (_e_, _e_,

_f_, _f_) forms a rectangle, containing 18 longitudinal rows of 6 rooms

each. These rows are all on the same level, except the most easterly

one, which lies on the slope. The cells, as far as measured and still

measurable, appear to be of the same size in length, namely, 2.87 m.--9

ft. 6 in.,--and their widths are respectively from W. to E., or 2.83 m.,

2.00 m., 3.14 m., 2.70 m., 2.53 m., and 2.53 m.--9 ft., 6 ft. 6 in., 10

ft., 9 ft., 8 ft., and 8 ft. The whole area is therefore 51.66 m. x

15.73 m.--170 ft. x 51 ft. Still, I believe that a sensible narrowing

(possibly of nearly 2.0 m.--6 ft. 6 in.--) may have taken place up to

_ee_; but this is compensated by the strengthening of the corners,

which there are rounded outwards, so that the line _e e_ presents about

the same length as _f f_. Thereupon follows the open passage _E_, which

is 3.40 m.--11 ft. wide, and north of it a rectangle of 3 longitudinal

rows of 3 apartments, _two_ of which rows are on the eastern slope. The

width of the rooms appears to be the same as that in the former section,

whereas their length from N. to S. is respectively 6.10 m., 4.27 m., and

5.44 m.--20 ft., 14 ft., and 18 ft. It is therefore a rectangle of 15.81

m. x 15.73 m.--51 ft. x 51 ft. North of it is an open space marked C,

3.13 m.--10 ft.--wide, in which I could detect no longitudinal

partition, except one closing its western outlet towards the court. I

have therefore left it an open question, and marked it as an alley or

corridor. It may yet prove to have contained six rooms on the ground;

but, as this is uncertain, the rooms that may have existed are not

included in the computation of cells. North of the line _b b_ begins the

section _a B b b_, which is very badly ruined. This forms also the

north-east angle of the whole building, and whose northern line (_a B_)

shows the partitions of six chambers, each 2 m.--6 ft. 6 in. wide, each

one indicating a longitudinal row of 4 rooms, respectively 2.83 m.--9

ft.--each from N. to S. It would indicate a rectangle of 11.32 m. x

12.00 m.--37 ft. x 40 ft. Of its six rows of rooms, three are on the

slope.

From _a_ to A extends the main northern wall of the structure. It is

very strong, .78 m.--2 ft. 6 in.--wide, and constructed as follows, Pl.

V., Fig. IX.:--

_a_, the outer wall, is 0.33 m.--13 in.--wide.

_b_, filling of mud, is 0.17 m.--6 in.--wide (this filling is both earth

and gravel).

_c_, inner wall, is 0.28 m.--11 in.--wide.

The width of the inner wall being the average thickness of all the other

walls in the whole house, the suggestion is not improbable that it was

built first, and the outer one, which is made of larger stones, added

subsequently for additional strength, and the interstice filled up as

the work rose.

The line _a A_ is 17.28 m.--56 ft.--long. From _A_ it runs down to the

south for 8.10 m.--27 ft.--, thence east, 17.28 m.--56 ft.--, to connect

with the north-east corner of the eastern wing. It thus forms an aisle,

and at the same time closes the court to the north. A rectangle of 8.10

m. x 17.28--27 ft. x 56 ft.--consists of 4 longitudinal sections of 3

rooms each, which, while their length is uniformly 2.70 m.--9 ft.--(from

N. to S.), have widths from W. to E. of 5.46 m., 3.18 m., and 3.62

m.--18 ft., 10 ft., and 12 ft. All the rooms are on the same level, and

they are the largest and best preserved of any in the entire area of

ruins. Room _I_ has even an unimpaired roof.

The north wall of _a A_ stands out boldly on the highest crest of the

_mesilla_. Below it northwards, a small hill of stones, from which

timbers occasionally protrude, forms a tumbled and confused slope of

inextricable ruin; and beyond this slope there extend the foundations of

walls on the level _mesilla_ up to 10 m.--33 ft.--from the northern

transverse part of the general circumvallation, which there is 45

m.--148 ft.--from _a A_, and 30 m.--100 ft.--long from W. to E. It thus

appears that the building _A_ had its northern annex as well as the

house _B_. To this annex I shall hereafter return.

West of line _A n_ there runs alongside of it the interesting gateway

_G_, 2 m.--6 ft. 6 in.--wide, its bottom somewhat higher than the floor

of the adjoining rooms,[118] and forming, as before stated, the

north-westerly entrance to the great inner court. It is perfectly

straight on the east as far as _r_; but then a heavy bank of stones and

gravel starts out like a lower continuation of the wall _a A_, and winds

down, curving, till close to the western circumvallation on the edge of

the _mesilla_. It thus forms a northern embankment to the gateway.

Almost parallel to it, on the opposite side of _n r_, the conical

mound or tower H constitutes the western and southern wall of the

passage _G_. This passage is therefore nearly semicircular. It is level

from _n_ to _r_, and thence descends steeply towards the edge of the

_mesilla_.

[Illustration: PLATE X

VIEW OF PASSAGE G, BUILDING A, FROM THE NORTH.]

The mound _H_ describes about two-thirds of a circle. Its base at the

south is 6 m.--20 ft.--from E. to W.; its diameter, 6.85 m.--23 ft; its

actual height, about 1.5 m.--5 ft. It is conical, and appears to be a

round heap of earth and rocks encased with neat and judicious piling of

well-selected stones. This naturally gave the stone-work a slanting

surface; the higher it reaches, however, the more it becomes vertical,

until at last it juts out above the surface of the mound like a circular

breastwork, or a hollow round tower on a conical base. I refer to Pl. X.

for an excellent view of its vertical aspect and structure. This mound,

or tower, while it commands an extensive view to the west, north, and

even north-east, is also the most northerly "spur" of the western wing

of the great house _A_. This wing extends in an unbroken length of 62

m.--203 ft.--from the base line of _H_ to the entrance _N_, and is

divided into 3 transverse sections, all connected, and all having 3

longitudinal rows of rooms or cells. The width of each cell is the same

in every section, to wit, from E. to W. 2.58 m., 2.58 m., and 3.22 m.--8

ft. 6 in., 8 ft. 6 in., and 10 ft. 6 in., respectively.

Section _k l l m_ has 3 x 5 apartments; in length from N. to S., 2.51

m., 3.86 m., 2.35 m., 3.71 m., and 3.72 m.--8 ft., 13 ft., 8 ft., 12

ft., and 12 ft. It was therefore 16.15 m. x 8.38 m.--53 ft. x 27 ft.

Probably all the ground-floor cells were on the same level.

Section _l l h h_ has 3 x 12 apartments, each 2.53 m.--8 ft.--long.

Consequently, it was a rectangle of 30.36 m. x 8.38 m.--100 ft. x 27 ft.

The eastern row of chambers was on the slope.

Section _h h N_ 3 x 4 long, respectively 2.77 m.--9 ft. each, therefore

10.98 m. x 8.38 m.--36 ft. x 27 ft. There were two eastern rows on the

slope.

This entire wing (forming a rectangle of 62 m. x 8.38 m.--203 ft. x 27

ft., if we add to the spaces given the thicknesses of the transverse

partitions, this time not included in the measures) has given me more

trouble than the rest of _A_ and _B_ combined. Nowhere are the walls so

twisted and out of range as here. Besides, there is an unfinished air

about it that is almost bewildering. The height of the stories does not

agree with that of the other sections,--the western wing would be one

story lower. Furthermore, it contains in several places squared beams of

wood inserted in the stone-work lengthwise. These beams (of which there

is also one in the opposite wing similarly embedded) are identical and

apparently of the same age with the (not sculptured) beams still found

in and about the old church. Entire walls of chambers, or rather sides,

appear to be new; the mud or adobe is fresh, whereas almost everywhere

else it has disappeared, out of the crevices even; the stones are almost

laid in courses. As I shall hereafter relate, there are at several

places adobe walls, the adobe containing wheat-straw! And all this right

among chambers showing sides as uncouth and old as any of the pueblo,

though still as high as their more recent and better preserved

neighbors. Here there is evidently patchwork of later date, and

patchwork executed with material unknown to the Indians previous to the

advent of the Spaniards. I am even convinced that it was done after

1680; for the beams evidently came from the church or the convent, which

buildings we know were sacked and fired by the Indians in the month of

August of that year. If this conclusion be correct, the south-western

part of _A_, its entire westerly wall, was somehow destroyed after 1680,

and partly rebuilt with materials unknown to the Indians at the time

when Pecos was first erected.

I say partly, because there is evidence that the western wing, from _H_

to _N_, was originally much broader. As it now appears, the wall _m h_

presents itself as the western line of the structure. But there are,

still further out, although distinctly connected with it, remains of

buildings which were at least attached to it. These are the ruined

enclosures designated on the ground-plan by _I_, _K_, and _L_.

Nothing besides foundations, heaps of stones defining corners, and

upright posts protruding along the western limits of _L_ and _K_ inside,

remain of these structures. _L L_ are of the size of the ordinary

chambers; _K K_ are four times larger. Their interior shows no partition

whatever: the soil is level, somewhat depressed in the centre of each

apartment; and on the whole they present very much the same appearance

as those structures on the "neck," which lie to the west of B, but are

not connected with the latter. Besides, the enclosures are on a lower

level than the two rows of rooms immediately east of the wall _m N_.

This wall itself is a double wall, each single one being of the size of

the ordinary partition; the total width is therefore 0.56 m.--22

in.,--as proven by actual measurement. The idea is therefore

suggested--very naturally--that the entire western wing of the building

_A_ was originally a double house,[119] terraced both towards the east

and the west. In sketching the cross-sections, I have taken due notice

of this very probable, if not positive, fact.

The double wall _m N_ shows no trace of lateral passages. It therefore

divides the whole structure from _H_ to _N_ into two longitudinal

sections. The western one, from _o_ to _p_, consisted of but one row of

5 rooms; from _p_ to _N_ it had two rows of 16 chambers each. The

ground slopes still further to the S. and S.W. outside of the

trapezoidal enclosures, _I I_, and is covered with _debris_; so that I

presume that, from _ll_ to _N_, there was an additional row of 3 rooms

on the outside. The entire division was at one time very completely

razed to the ground, so that its owners never attempted to rebuild it

after the original plan.

The western division was also badly damaged in its southern half, but

the damage was subsequently repaired with the aid of material and

mechanical arts postdating the Spanish conquest of New Mexico. Pl. V.,

Fig. 3, gives a view of the western end, along the line _h h_.

I would recall here the fact already noticed, that the northern part of

building _B_ is also mended in places with adobes of the same make as

those used in repairing the western wing of _A_, and that, while the

squared beams are wanting, the stone-work there in places appears also

of a more recent date. The suggestion may therefore not be uncalled for,

that the same destroying power which spent its main force on _A_,

distinct from the general decay, and moving in a direction from S.W. to

N. E., reflected or glanced off upon the northern portions of _B_. This

question will, however, be discussed hereafter.

The annexes _I I_ are trapezoidal enclosures of stone-work as high as a

man's breast, and respectively of the sizes indicated on the

ground-plan. The northern one is divided lengthwise into two

compartments; the southern is open to the south. Both appear to be new

and unfinished. From the centre of the last one protrude two

well-squared heavy timbers. These timbers are in a singularly unfit

position; they cannot be accounted for, and convey the impression that

they were carried hither from some other totally different construction.

They look almost forlorn. Whence they came, and for what purpose they

were brought,--what was the object in erecting the enclosures _I I_,--I

do not intend to speculate upon, unless they are recently constructed

store-rooms ("Almacenas").

Across the passage-way _N_, both southward from the line _g g_ and

eastward from _I_, fitting into it to the east and barring access to the

great court from the "neck," lies the south wing of _A_,--a rectangle of

27.25 m.--90 ft.--from W. to E., and 13 m.--43 ft.--from N. to S.,

including the walls. It is much decayed and overturned; the northern

side is far less so than the southern; nowhere are there any signs of

repairs. Here the rows of rooms must be taken transversely (from W. to

E.). There are 5, each with 7 chambers, measuring in succession from N.

to S. 2.00 m., 2.00 m., 3.09 m., 2.40 m., and 2.00 m.--6 ft. 6 in., 6

ft. 6 in., 10 ft., 8 ft., and 6 ft. 6 in; and from W. to E. 3.61 m.--12

ft. each. Two of these transverse rows appear to be on the southern

slope, and three on the upper level towards the court.

Here I have again reached the passage-way _R_, my original point of

departure. Before entering into an examination of the other particulars

of the building, as well as of its annexes and surroundings, I shall

make once more a rapid circuit, to give an idea of its size, and also

attempt a rude computation of the number of rooms it contained.

Lengths of the eastern

wing from _f_ to

_B_ (E. side N. and

S.) 51.66 m.--170 ft.

3.40 m.-- 12 ft.

15.81 m.-- 52 ft.

3.13 m.-- 10 ft.

11.32 m.-- 37 ft.

7.84 m.-- 25 ft.

-----------------

Adding 28 walls a 0.28

m.--11 in., total 93.16 m.--306 ft.

_Brought forward_ 93.16 m.--306 ft.

Lengths of the north

side from _B_ to _a_ 12.00 m.-- 40 ft.

from _a_ to _A_ 17.28 m.-- 57 ft.

6 transverse walls a .28

m.--11 in. 1.68 m.-- 6 ft.

----------------

30.96 m.--102 ft.

Length from _A_ to _n_ 8.10 m.-- 27 ft.

_n_ to _m_ 8.38 m.-- 27 ft.

_m_ to _o_ 2.51 m.-- 8 ft.

_o_ to W. corner of _L_

(estimated) 5.00 m.-- 16 ft.

W. corner of _L_. to _p_ 16.17 m.-- 53 ft.

_p_ to _y_ 2.10 m.-- 7 ft.

_y_, southward, to line

_g g_ 33.44 m.--110 ft.

passage-way N .00 m.-- 6 ft. 6 in.

Width of western section

of W. wing

(about) 7.48 m.-- 25 ft.

Length of south wing 13.00 m.-- 43 ft.

28 transverse walls a

.28 m.--11 in. 7.84 m.-- 26 ft.

----------------

106.02 m.--348 ft. 6 in.

Width of S. wing 27.25 m.-- 90 ft.

Passage _R_ 4.00 m.-- 13 ft.

From _R_ to _f_ (about) 4.00 m.-- 13 ft.

Line _f f_ 15.73 m.-- 52 ft.

8 longitudinal walls a

.28 m.--11 in. 2.24 m.-- 7 ft.

----------------

Total length to _f_, my

point of departure 53.22 m.--175 ft.

------------------

Entire length of circuit

of building _A_ 283.36 m.--928 ft.

Adding to this 15 m.--49 ft.--for the probable periphery of mound _H_,

and 64 m.--210 ft.--for the perimeter of a southern annex to the south

wing, which I have not yet described, we reach a perimeter of 362

m.--1,190 ft.--in all. Comparing these figures with those given about

the great ruins of the Rio Chaco by Dr. W. H. Jackson,[120] and of the

pueblo of Las Animas River by my friend the Hon. L. H. Morgan,[121] it

will be seen that this building, _A_, at Pecos is probably the largest

aboriginal structure of stone within the United States so far described,

and that it will even bear comparison with many of the aboriginal ruins

of Mexico and Central America.[122]

The size of the interior court can now be easily determined. It is 64

m.--210 ft.--from N. to S., and 19.28 m.--63 ft.--from E. to W. Its area

covers therefore 1,235 sq. m.--13,230 sq. ft.,--or about one fourth of

an acre; whereas the entire _debris_, measured as well as possible,

scatter over more than two acres of ground.

For the computation of the number of rooms in the whole pile,

cross-sections are necessary. (Pl. V., Figs. 1-8.) The height of each

story is about the same as in _B_, to wit, 2.28 m.--7 ft. 6 in.

Fig. 1, section of west wing about _l l_, from west to east.

Fig. 2, lines _b b_ and _a B_.

Fig. 3, section of west wing along _h h_.

Fig. 4, line _d d_, north, up to south line of _C_.

Fig. 5, section of west wing along line _g g_.

Fig. 6, line _f f_, southern boundary of east wing, and for the

entire rectangle up to _E_.

Fig. 7, cross-section of north wing, line _A n_, from north to

south.

Fig. 8, south wing, from north to south.

It is possible that the second row, from S. to N., had two superposed

chambers, but I am not positive of it, and therefore do not include it

in the computation of rooms which will follow.

[Illustration: PLATE V

SECTIONS OF BUILDING A.]

It will be seen that, according to the ground plan and sections, the

east wing had five stories, the north wing two, the west wing

successively two, three, and four, and the south wing four. Looking at

the buildings from the great court, the south presented an unbroken

front of a two-story wall, the east successively walls of four,

three, and two stories; the north side formed two, and the west side,

from north to south, in succession, two, three, and four terraces. In

this manner, not only was the building remarkably well accommodated to

the great irregularities of the surface, but even a tolerably uniform

height was attained, well agreeing, therefore, with the description of

"Cicuye," as Castaneda saw it in 1540. "The houses have four stories,

terraced roofs all of the same height, along which one can make the

circuit of the entire village without meeting any street to intercept

the passage.[123] Here we must remember that the widest gateway is 4

m.--13 ft.--wide,--an expanse easily spanned by common beams used by the

Indians in their house architecture.

An attempt to compute the number of rooms in _A_ results as follows:--

Rectangle _f f e e_, 18 longitudinal rows of 6 rooms and 5 stories.

1st story 18

2d story 5 x 18 90

3d story 4 x 18 72

4th story 3 x 18 54

5th story 2 x 18 36

--- 270 rooms.

(_d d c c_) 1st story and 2d story on the slope,

and 3 rooms per row.

1st story 3

2d story 3

3d story 4 x 3 12

4th story 3 x 3 9

5th story 2 x 3 6

-- 33 "

---------

_Carried forward_ 303 rooms.

_Brought forward_ 303 rooms.

(_b b a B_) 6 rows of 4 rooms, and 3 stories on

the slope.

1st, 2d, and 3d story, each 4 12

4th story 3 x 4 12

5th story 2 x 4 8

-- 32 "

(North wing) 2 stories, easily computed as 20 "

(_k m l l_) 1st story 5 x 4 20

2d story 5 x 2 10

-- 30 "

(_l l h h K_) Lowest story 12

2d story 12 x 4 48

3d story 12 x 2 24

-- 84 "

(_h h K g g I_) Lowest story 4

2d story 4

3d story 4 x 4 16

4th story 4 x 2 8

-- 32 "

(South wing) From E. to W.

Lowest story 7

2d story 7

3d story 7 x 3 21

4th story 7 x 2 14

-- 49 "

Adding for the southern annex a probable number of 35 "

---------

Building _A_ contained in all not less than 585 cells.

Turning now to the inside of the building itself, I am compelled to

acknowledge here an important omission in my survey of _B_. It relates

to the vertical connection of the walls. They are all, with few

exceptions, as far as their dilapidated condition admits of observation,

continuous from bottom to top; that is, the sides were everywhere

carried up above the ceiling (or floor), and then, after the beams had

been embedded in the stones, another wall was piled up on it as

straight as possible. In this manner it became possible to add each

cell separately.

There are several doors visible in _A_, as marked on the ground-plan.

Those in the eastern and western wings open from east to west, those in

the northern wing from north to south; therefore transversely to the

length of each structure. But I have also seen longitudinal walls

without passages. The tops of the doors are all gone; the rest is

everywhere similar to the sample found in _B_, and already figured. In

some cases even the sills are gone. Windows I could not find, nor

trap-doors or ladders; there was no trace of steps, and, unfortunately,

no clew to any chimney or vent. Of furniture I secured pieces of new

hearth-stones; of other articles, broken "metates," part of a fine maul

of stone, flint chips, celts, stone skin-scrapers, and, of course,

painted pottery and obsidian. But not one specimen is entire; every

striking implement, etc., has been carried off by amateurs, of whose

presence besides broken beer bottles, with the inscription

"Anheuser-Busch Brewing Co., St. Louis, Mo.," give occasional notice.

Room _I_, in the S.W. corner of the north wing is very well preserved:

so well, indeed, that it is nearly certain that there was no entrance to

it from above. On the contrary, the entrance appears to have been from

the front, as shown in Pl. VIII., where this room stands in full view.

It is perfectly plain inside; eight posts of wood, round, and stripped

of all bark, support the ceiling and roof, whose composition I have

elsewhere described. These posts (which are also shown in Pl. VIII.) are

so distributed as to have one in each corner, and two between, on each

longer side of the room. In the S.E. quarter of the ceiling the

splinters covering the rafters or poles are removed, and fresh straw (or

rather very well preserved) protrudes, as having formed a layer with the

brush. I was at first inclined to take it for wheat-straw, but other

parties insisted that it was mountain grass. For the latter it appears

to be very long, and it has a marked head. I have not, as yet, seen any

wheat-plants grown at these elevations.[124]

Otherwise this chamber appears nearly perfect. In the middle of the

north wall a hole is knocked out, but the two coats of plaster (dark and

white) are almost everywhere preserved. Great interest attaches to this

apartment, from the fact that, according to Sr. Mariano Ruiz, the sacred

embers ("braza") were kept here until 1840, in which year the five last

remaining families of Pecos Indians removed to their cognates at Jemez,

and the "sacred fire" disappeared with them. Sr. Ruiz is good authority

on that point, since, as a member of the tribe[125] ("hijo del pueblo"),

he was asked to perform his duty by attending to the embers one year. He

refused, for reasons which I shall hereafter state. The facts--that the

fire was kept in a sort of closed oven, and that the front opening

existed--made it unnecessary to search for any other conduit for smoke

and ventilation. The fire was kept covered, and not permitted to flame.

I now come to one of the most interesting features of the court,--the

three circular depressions marked _P_ on the diagram. Two of them are in

the N. E. corner,--the northern one close to the northern wing, and the

other 2.65 m.--9 ft.--to the S. S. E. of it. Both are perfect circles,

and each has a diameter of 7.70 m.--25 ft. In the S.W. corner, near to

the passage _N_, is the third, with a diameter of only 6 m.--20 ft. They

look like shallow basins, encased by a rim of stone-work piled up in the

usual way, and forming a wall of nearly 0.35 m.--14 in.--in thickness.

This wall is sunk into the ground, but at the northern basin it

certainly, as former excavations plainly show, did not reach the depth

of 1 metre; and it appears that at about that depth there were flat

stones laid, like a rough stone floor. These basins were the "Estufas,"

or council chambers, where, as late as 1840, the meetings of the poor

remnants of the tribe were still held. Although an adopted son of Pecos,

Sr. Ruiz was never permitted to enter the Estufa. Across the northern

one a very large and very old tree, nearly 0.75 m.--2 ft. 6 in.--in

diameter, is lying obliquely. Its thick end is towards the N.E. wall. It

looks as if uprooted and fallen upon the ruins. But how could a tree of

such dimensions ever have grown there? Again, for what purpose, and how,

could the Indians of Pecos have carried it hither?

Outside of the building _A_, the narrow ledge separating its rubbish

from the eastern wall of circumvallation, a rim 150 m.--192 ft.--long by

32 m.--105 ft.--wide at the south, and 12 m.--40 ft.--at the north,

shows the basins _D_ and _F_, respectively 10 m.--33 ft.--and 8 m.--26

ft.--in diameter. They hug the rock of the _mesilla_ very closely, and

look completely like the estufas in the court. These buildings,

according to Sr. Epifanio Vigil, of Santa Fe, were barns or store-houses

(round towers 10 to 11 feet high), in which the Indians preserved their

gathered crops, forage, etc. Still, it is not unlikely that they were

tanks, built for collecting rain-water.

On the south side of the eastern wing, and so close to it that the heaps

of rubbish touch, are two circular depressions surrounded by large

masses of stones. They are marked S S on the plan. Their shape and size

cannot be accurately determined, and their object is unknown.

[Illustration: PLATE VIII

INTERIOR OF BUILDING A, FROM THE SOUTH.]

Historical Introduction to Studies Among the Sedentary Indians of New Mexico; Report on the Ruins of the Pueblo of Pecos Papers Of The Archæological Institute Of America, American Series, Vol. I · 第 5 / 10 段