GENIUS.

* * * * *

It was quite a study to watch the phases through which Margaret

passed, in one of these assemblies. There was something in the air

and step with which she chose her place in the company, betokening

an instinctive sense, that, in intellect, she was of blood royal and

needed to ask no favors. And then she slowly gathered her attention

to take in the significance of the scene. Near-sighted and habitually

using an eye-glass, she rapidly scanned the forms and faces, pausing

intently where the expression of particular heads or groups suggested

thought, and ending her survey with some apt home-thrust to her next

neighbors, as if to establish full _rapport_, and so to become a

medium for the circulating life. Only when thus in magnetic relations

with all present, by a clear impress of their state and place, did

she seem prepared to rise to a higher stage of communion. Then she

listened, with ear finely vibrating to every tone, with all

capacities responsive in sympathy, with a swift and ductile power of

appreciation, that made her feel to the quick the varying moods of

different speakers, and yet the while with coolest self-possession.

Now and then a slight smile, flickering over her countenance, as

lightning plays on the surface of a cloud, marked the inward process

whereby she was harmonizing in equilibrium opposing thoughts. And,

as occasion offered, a felicitous quotation, pungent apothegm, or

symbolic epithet, dropped unawares in undertone, showed how swiftly

scattered rays were brought in her mind to a focus.

When her turn came, by a graceful transition she resumed the subject

where preceding speakers had left it, and, briefly summing up their

results, proceeded to unfold her own view. Her opening was deliberate,

like the progress of some massive force gaining its momentum; but as

she felt her way, and moving in a congenial element, the sweep of her

speech became grand. The style of her eloquence was sententious,

free from prettiness, direct, vigorous, charged with vitality.

Articulateness, just emphasis and varied accent, brought out most

delicate shades and brilliant points of meaning, while a rhythmical

collocation of words gave a finished form to every thought. She was

affluent in historic illustration and literary allusion, as well as

in novel hints. She knew how to concentrate into racy phrases the

essential truth gathered from wide research, and distilled with

patient toil; and by skilful treatment she could make green again the

wastes of common-place. Her statements, however rapid, showed breadth

of comprehension, ready memory, impartial judgment, nice analysis of

differences, power of penetrating through surfaces to realities, fixed

regard to central laws and habitual communion with the Life of

life. Critics, indeed, might have been tempted to sneer at a certain

oracular grandiloquence, that bore away her soberness in moments of

elation; though even the most captious must presently have smiled at

the humor of her descriptive touches, her dexterous exposure of

folly and pretension, the swift stroke of her bright wit, her shrewd

discernment, promptitude, and presence of mind. The reverential,

too, might have been pained at the sternness wherewith popular men,

measures, and established customs, were tried and found guilty, at

her tribunal; but even while blaming her aspirations as rash,

revolutionary and impractical, no honest conservative could fail

to recognize the sincerity of her aim. And every deep observer of

character would have found the explanation of what seemed vehement

or too high-strung, in the longing of a spirited woman to break every

trammel that checked her growth or fettered her movement.

In conversations like these, one saw that the richness of Margaret's

genius resulted from a rare combination of opposite qualities. To her

might have been well applied the words first used as describing George

Sand: "Thou large-brained Woman, and large-hearted Man." She blended

in closest union and swift interplay feminine receptiveness with

masculine energy. She was at once impressible and creative,

impulsive and deliberate, pliant in sympathy yet firmly self-centred,

confidingly responsive while commanding in originality. By the vivid

intensity of her conceptions, she brought out in those around their

own consciousness, and, by the glowing vigor of her intellect, roused

into action their torpid powers. On the other hand, she reproduced a

truth, whose germ had just been imbibed from others, moulded after her

own image and quickened by her own life, with marvellous rapidity. And

the presence of congenial minds so stimulated the prolific power of

her imagination, that she was herself astonished at the fresh beauty

of her new-born thoughts. 'There is a mortifying sense,' she writes,

'of having played the Mirabeau after a talk with a circle

of intelligent persons. They come with a store of acquired

knowledge and reflection, on the subject in debate, about

which I may know little, and have reflected less; yet, by

mere apprehensiveness and prompt intuition, I may appear their

superior. Spontaneously I appropriate all their material, and

turn it to my own ends, as if it was my inheritance from

a long train of ancestors. Rays of truth flash out at the

moment, and they are startled by the light thrown over their

familiar domain. Still they are gainers, for I give them new

impulse, and they go on their way rejoicing in the bright

glimpses they have caught. I should despise myself, if I

purposely appeared thus brilliant, but I am inspired as by a

power higher than my own.'

All friends will bear witness to the strict fidelity of this sketch.

There were seasons when she seemed borne irresistibly on to the verge

of prophecy, and fully embodied one's notion of a sibyl.

Admirable as Margaret appeared in public, I was yet more affected by

this peculiar mingling of impressibility and power to influence,

when brought within her private sphere. I know not how otherwise

to describe her subtle charm, than by saying that she was at once a

clairvoyante and a magnetizer. She read another's bosom-secret, and

she imparted of her own force. She interpreted the cipher in the

talisman of one's destiny, that he had tried in vain to spell alone;

by sympathy she brought out the invisible characters traced by

experience on his heart; and in the mirror of her conscience he might

see the image of his very self, as dwarfed in actual appearance, or

developed after the divine ideal. Her sincerity was terrible. In her

frank exposure no foible was spared, though by her very reproof she

roused dormant courage and self-confidence. And so unerring seemed

her insight, that her companion felt as if standing bare before a

disembodied spirit, and communicated without reserve thoughts and

emotions, which, even to himself, he had scarcely named.

This penetration it was that caused Margaret to be so dreaded, in

general society, by superficial observers. They, who came nigh

enough to test the quality of her spirit, could not but perceive how

impersonal was her justice; but, contrasted with the dead flat of

conventional tolerance, her candor certainly looked rugged and sharp.

The frivolous were annoyed at her contempt of their childishness, the

ostentatious piqued at her insensibility to their show, and the decent

scared lest they should be stripped of their shams; partisans were

vexed by her spurning their leaders; and professional sneerers,--civil

in public to those whom in private they slandered,--could not pardon

the severe truth whereby she drew the sting from their spite. Indeed,

how could so undisguised a censor but shock the prejudices of the

moderate, and wound the sensibilities of the diffident; how but enrage

the worshippers of new demi-gods in literature, art and fashion, whose

pet shrines she demolished; how but cut to the quick, alike by silence

or by speech, the self-love of the vain, whose claims she ignored?

So gratuitous, indeed, appeared her hypercriticism, that I could not

refrain from remonstrance, and to one of my appeals she thus replied:

'If a horror for the mania of little great men, so prevalent

in this country,--if aversion to the sentimental exaggerations

to which so many minds are prone,--if finding that most men

praise, as well as blame, too readily, and that overpraise

desecrates the lips and makes the breath unworthy to blow the

coal of devotion,--if rejection of the ----s and ----s, from

a sense that the priestess must reserve her pæans for

Apollo,--if untiring effort to form my mind to justice and

revere only the superlatively good, that my praise might be

praise; if this be to offend, then have I offended.'

Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli, Volume II · 第 27 / 167 题