VII.--THE HOUSEWIFE

Though frugal by temperament, and instinctively aware that her sterling

nature was the bank in which the national wealth was surely deposited,

she was of benevolent disposition; and when, as occasionally happened,

a man in the street sold her one of those jumping toys for her

children, she would look at him and say:

“How much? You don’t look well!” and he would answer: “Tuppence, lidy.

Truth is, lidy, I’ve gone ’ungry this lawst week.” Searching his face

shrewdly, she would reply: “That’s bad--a sin against the body. Here’s

threepence. Give me a ha’penny. You don’t look well.” And, taking the

ha’penny, she would leave the man inarticulate.

Food appealed to her, not only in relation to herself, but to others.

Often to some friend she would speak a little bitterly, a little

mournfully, about her husband. “Yes, I quite like my ‘hubby’ to go

out sometimes where he can talk about art, and war, and things that

women can’t. He takes no interest in his food.” And she would add,

brooding: “What he’d do if I didn’t study him, I really don’t know.”

She often felt with pain that he was very thin. She studied him

incessantly--that is, in due proportion to their children, their

position in society, their Christianity, and herself. If he was her

“hubby,” she was his “hub”--the housewife, that central pivot of

society, that national pivot, which never could or would be out of

gear. Devoid of conceit, it seldom occurred to her to examine her own

supremacy, quietly content to be “integer vitæ, scelerisque pura”--just

the one person against whom nobody could say anything. Subconsciously,

no doubt, she _must_ have valued her worth and reputation, or she would

never have felt such salutary gusts of irritation and contempt toward

persons who had none. Like cows when a dog comes into a field, she

would herd together whenever she saw a woman with what she suspected

was a past, then advance upon her, horns down. If the offending

creature did not speedily vacate the field, she would, if possible,

trample her to death. When, by any chance, the female dog proved too

swift and lively, she would remain sullenly turning and turning her

horns in the direction of its vagaries. Well she knew that, if she

once raised those horns and let the beast pass, her whole herd would

suffer. There was something almost magnificent about her virtue,

based, as it was, entirely on self-preservation, and her remarkable

power of rejecting all premises except those familiar to herself. This

gave it a fibre and substance hard as concrete. Here, indeed, was

something one could build on; here, indeed, was the strait thing. Her

husband would sometimes say to her: “My dear, we don’t know what the

poor woman’s circumstances were, we really don’t, you know. I think

we should try to put ourselves in her place.” And she would fix his

eye, and say: “James, it’s no good. I can’t imagine myself in that

woman’s place, and I won’t. Do you think that _I_ would ever leave

_you_?” And, watching till he shook his head, she would go on: “Of

course not. No. Nor let you leave me.” And, pausing a second, to see

if he blinked, because men were rather like that (even those who had

the best of wives), she would go on: “She deserves all she gets. I have

no personal feeling, but, if once decent women begin to get soft about

this sort of thing, then good-bye to family life and Christianity, and

everything. I’m not hard, but there are things I feel strongly about,

and this is one of them.” And secretly she would think: “That’s why

he keeps so thin--always letting himself doubt, and sympathise, where

one has no right to. Men!” Next time she passed the woman, she would

cut her deader than the last time, and, seeing her smile, would feel

a sort of divine fury. More than once this had led her into courts of

law on charges of libel and slander. But, knowing how impregnable was

her position, she almost welcomed that opportunity. For it was ever

transparent to judge and jury from the first that she was that crown of

pearls, a virtuous woman, and so she was never cast in damages.

On one such occasion her husband had been so ill-advised as to remark:

“My dear, I have my doubts whether our duty does not stop at seeing to

ourselves, without throwing stones at others.”

“Robert,” she had answered, “if you think that, just because there’s a

chance that you may have to pay damages, I’m going to hold my tongue

when vice flaunts itself, you make a mistake. I always put your

judgment above mine, but this is not a matter of judgment--it is a

matter of Christian and womanly conduct. I can’t admit even your right

to dictate.”

She hated that expression, “The grey mare is the better horse”; it was

vulgar, and she would never recognise its truth in her own case--for a

wife’s duty was to submit herself to her husband, as she had already

said. After this little incident she took the trouble to go and open

her New Testament and look up the story of a certain woman. There was

not a word in it about women not throwing stones; the discouragement

referred entirely to men. Exactly! No one knew better than she the

difference between men and women in the matter of moral conduct.

Probably there _were_ no men without that kind of sin, but there were

plenty of women, and, without either false or true pride, she felt that

she was one of them. And there the matter rested.

Her views on political and social questions--on the whole, very

simple--were to be summed up in the words, “That _man_--!” and, so

far as it lay in her power, she saw to it that her daughters should

not have any views at all. She found this, however, an increasingly

hard task, and on one occasion was almost terrified to find her first

and second girls abusing “that man--,” not for going too fast, but

for not going fast enough. She spoke to William about it, but found

him hopeless, as usual, where his daughters were concerned. It was

her principle to rule them with good, motherly sense, as became a

woman in whose hands the family life of her country centred; and it

was satisfactory on the whole to find that they obeyed her whenever

they wished to. On this occasion, however, she spoke to them severely:

“The place of woman,” she said, “is in the home.” “The whole home--and

nothing but the home.” “Ella! The place of women is by the side of

man; counselling, supporting, ruling, but never competing with him.

The place of woman is in the shop, the kitchen, and--” “The--bed!”

“_Ella!_” “In the soup!” “Beatrice! I wish--I do wish you girls would

be more respectful. The place of woman is in the home. Yes, I’ve said

that before, but I shall say it again, and don’t you forget it! The

place of woman is--the most important thing in national life. If you

want to realise that, just think of your own mother; and--” “Our own

father.” “Ella! The place of woman is in the--!” She left the room,

feeling that, for the moment, she had said enough.

In disposition sociable, and no niggard of her company, there was one

thing she liked to work at alone--her shopping, an art which she had

long reduced to a science. The principles she laid down are worth

remembering: Never grudge your time to save a ha’penny. Never buy

anything until you have turned it well over, recollecting that the

rest of you will have turned it over too. Never let your feelings of

pity interfere with your sense of justice, but bear in mind that the

girls who sell to you are paid for doing it; if you can afford the

time to keep them on their legs, they can afford the time to let you.

Never read pamphlets, for you don’t know what may be in them about

furs, feathers, and forms of food. Never buy more than your husband can

afford to pay for; but, on the whole, buy as much. Never let any seller

see that you think you have bought a bargain, but buy one if you can;

you will find it pleasant afterward to talk of your prowess. Shove,

shove, and shove again!

In the perfect application of these principles, she had found, after

long experience, that there was absolutely no one to touch her.

In regard to meat, she had sometimes thought she would like to give

it up, because she had read in her paper that being killed hurt the

poor animals; but she had never gone beyond thought, because it was

very difficult to do that. Henry was thin, and distinctly pale; the

girls were growing girls; Sunday would hardly seem Sunday without;

besides, it did not do to believe what one read in the paper, and it

would hurt her butcher’s feelings--she was sure of that. Christmas,

too, stood in the way. It was one’s duty to be cheerful at that season,

and Christmas would seem so strange without the cheery butchers’ shops

and their appropriate holocaust. She had once read some pages of a

disgraceful book that seemed going out of its way all the time to

prove that _she_ was just an animal--a dreadful book, not at all nice!

And if she would eat those creatures if they were really her brother

animals, and not just sent by God to feed her. No; at Christmas she

felt especially grateful to the good God for his abundance, for all the

good things he gave her to eat. For all these reasons she swallowed

her scruples religiously. But it was very different in regard to dairy

produce; for here there was, she knew, a real danger--not, indeed, to

the animals, but to her family and herself. She was for once really

proud of the thoroughness with which she dealt with that important

nourishment--milk. None came into her house except in sealed bottles,

with the name of the cow, spiritually speaking, on the outside. Some

wag had suggested, in her hearing, that hens should be compelled to

initial their eggs when they were delivered, as well as to put the

dates on them. This she had thought ribald; one could go too far.

She was, before all things, an altruist; and in nothing more so than

in her relations with her servants. If they did not do their duty,

they went. It was the only way, she had found, to really benefit

them. Country girls and town girls, they passed from her in a stream,

having learned, once for all, the standard that was expected from

them. She christened and educated more servants, perhaps, than any

one in the kingdom. The Marthas went first, being invariably dirty;

the Marys and Susans lasted, on an average, perhaps four months, and

then left for many reasons. Cook seldom hurried off before her year

was over, because it was so difficult to get her before she came, and

to replace her after she was gone; but when she did go it was in a

gale of wind. The “day out” was, perhaps, the most fruitful source

of disillusionment--girls of that class, no matter how much they

protested their innocence, seemed utterly unable to keep away from

man’s society. It was only once a fortnight that she required them to

exercise their self-control and self-respect in that regard, for on the

other thirteen days she took care that they had no chance, suffering

no male footstep in her basement. And yet--would you believe it?--on

those fourteenth days, she was never able to be easy in her mind.

But, however kindly and considerate she might be in her dealings with

those of lowly station, she found ever the same ingratitude, the same

incapacity, or, as she had reluctantly been forced to believe, the

same deliberate unwillingness to grasp her point of view. It was as if

they were always rudely saying to themselves: “What do you know of us?

We wish you’d leave us alone!” The idea! As if she could, or would!

As if it were not an almost sacred charge on her in her station, with

the responsibilities that attached to it, to look after her poorer

neighbours and see that they acted properly in their own interests.

The drink, the immorality, the waste amongst the poor was notorious,

and anything she could do to lessen it she always did, dismissing

servants for the least slip, and never failing to point a moral. All

that new-fangled talk about the rich getting off the backs of the poor,

about the law not being the same for both, about how easy it was to

be moral and clean on two thousand a year, she put aside as silly. It

was just the sort of thing that discontented people would say. In this

view she was supported daily by her newspaper and herself, wherever she

might be. No, no! If the well-to-do did not look after and control the

poor, no one would, which was just what they would like. They were, in

her estimation, incurable; but, so far as lay in her power, she would

cure them, however painful it might be.

A religious woman, she rarely missed the morning, and seldom went

to evening, service, feeling that in daylight she could best set an

example to her neighbours.

God knew her views on art, for she was not prodigal of them--her

most remarkable pronouncement being delivered on hearing of the

disappearance of the “Monna Lisa”: “Oh, that dreadful woman! I remember

her picture perfectly. Well, I’m glad she’s gone. I thought she would

some day.” When asked why, she would only answer: “She gave me the

creeps.”

She read such novels as the library sent, to save her daughters from

reading a second time those which did not seem to her suitable, and

promptly sent them back. In this way she preserved purity in her home.

As to purity outside the home, she made a point of never drawing

Frederick’s attention to female beauty; not that she felt she had any

real reason to be alarmed, for she was a fine woman; but because men

were so funny.

There were no things in life of which she would have so entirely

disapproved, if she had known about them, as Greek ideals, for she

profoundly distrusted any display of the bare limb, and fully realised

that, whatever beauty may have meant to the Greeks, to her and George

it meant something very different. To her, indeed, Nature was a

“hussy,” to be tied to the wheels of that chariot which she was going

to keep as soon as motor-cars were just a little cheaper and really

reliable.

It was often said that she was a vanishing type, but she knew better.

Pedantic fools murmured that Ibsen had destroyed her, but she had not

yet heard of him. Literary folk and artists, socialists and society

people, might talk of types, and liberty, of brotherhood, and new

ideas, and sneer at Mrs. Grundy. With what unmoved solidity she dwelt

among them! They were but as gadflies, buzzing and darting on the

fringes of her central bulk. To those flights, to that stinging she

paid less attention than if she had been cased in leather. In the

words of her favourite Tennyson: “They may come, and they may go,

but--whatever you may think--I go on forever!”

Abracadabra & other satires · 第 29 / 46 题