CHAPTER III.

[Illustration: I.

ENGLISH JACK--ST. GEORGE'S CROSSE

2

SCOTCH JACK--ST. ANDREW'S CROSSE

3

IRISH JACK--ST. PATRICK'S CROSSE]

HISTORY OF THE

UNION JACK

AND

FLAGS OF THE EMPIRE

Their Origin, Proportions and Meanings as tracing the Constitutional

Development of the British Realm, and with References

to other National Ensigns

BY

BARLOW CUMBERLAND, M.A.

Past President of the National Club, and of the Sons of England,

Toronto; President of the Ontario Historical

Society, Canada

With Illustrations and Nine Coloured Plates

THIRD EDITION, REVISED AND EXTENDED, WITH INDEX

TORONTO

WILLIAM BRIGGS

Booksellers' Row, Richmond Street West

1909

Copyright, Canada, 1909, by

BARLOW CUMBERLAND.

TO

THE FLAG ITSELF

THIS STORY OF THE

Union Jack

IS DEDICATED WITH MUCH RESPECT

BY

ONE OF ITS SONS.

PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION.

This history of the Union Jack grew out of a paper principally

intended to inform my boys of how the Union Jack of our Empire grew

into its present form, and how the colours and groupings of its parts

are connected with our government and history, so that through this

knowledge the flag itself might speak to them in a way it had not done

before.

A search for further information, extended over many varied fields,

gathered together facts that had previously been separated, and grouped

them into consecutive order; thus the story grew, and having developed

into a lecture, was afterwards, at the suggestion of others, launched

upon its public way.

The chapters on the history of the Jacks in the Thirteen American

Colonies and in the United States are also new ground and may be of

novel interest to not a few. The added information on the proper

proportions of our Union Jack, and the directions and reasons for the

proper making of its parts, may serve to correct some of the unhappy

errors which now exist and may interest all in the observation and

study of flags.

An Index has been added, and a record of the "Diamond Anthem" is also

appended.

I would acknowledge the criticisms and kindly assistance of many,

particularly of Mr. James Bain, Public Librarian of Toronto, who

opened out to me the valuable collection in his library; of Mr. J. G.

Colmer, C.M.G., Secretary to the Canadian High Commissioner, London,

who assisted in obtaining material in England; and of Mr. W. Laird

Clowes, Sir James Le Moine, Sir J. G. Bourinot and Dr. J. G. Hodgins,

Historiographer of Ontario, who have made many valuable and effective

suggestions.

BARLOW CUMBERLAND.

TORONTO, _October 1, 1900_.

PREFACE TO THIRD EDITION.

The celebration of EMPIRE DAY and of other National and Historic

Anniversaries, accompanied by appropriate addresses, has greatly

developed at home and abroad. The instructing value of Flags as the

visible evidences of the progressive periods of National history,

and the concentration of patriotic remembrance, having become more

appreciated, have led, no doubt, to the request for a re-issue of this

book, which had been for some time out of print.

For such purposes, and as an assistance to Readers and Teachers, the

material has been practically recast and new matter incorporated,

so that with the collations in the Index the phases of the various

portions of the Flags, both of the British and other nationalities, may

be more conveniently traced and connected.

Much additional information, particularly in the designing and creation

of the Flags, has been sought out and, with additional illustrations,

recorded with a view that the intentions expressed in their forms

may be more clearly evidenced, their meanings realized, and their

connection with Constitutional movements developed.

The suggestions and assistance of many correspondents, to this end, has

been much availed of and is thankfully acknowledged.

During the interval since the last issue the Liberties and Methods

of the British Constitution have still further expanded. Additional

Daughter-Parliaments in the Dominions over-seas have been empowered,

and their Union Flags created. To these, as also added information on

other Ensigns, is due the addition to the Title.

The references in stating the progress of our National Flag are,

of necessity, much condensed, but the writer trusts that with the

instructing aid and narrations of its exponents, the information here

put together may be found of help in causing the study of Flags, and

the stories which they voice, to be of increasing interest, and their

Union Jack and Ensigns more intimately known to our youth as the living

emblems of our British History and Union.

PORT HOPE, _September, 1909_.

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER PAGE

A Poem--The Union Jack 11

Notes on Flags 12

I. Emblems and Flags 13

II. The Origins of National Flags 21

III. The Origin of the Jacks 32

IV. The English Jack 41

V. The Supremacy of the English Jack 53

VI. The Scottish Jack 64

VII. The "Additional" Union Jack of James I. 71

VIII. The English Jack Restored 81

IX. The Evolution of the Red Ensign 92

X. The Sovereignty of the Seas--The Fight for the

Flag 102

XI. The Sovereignty of the Seas--The Fight for the

Trade 111

XII. The Union Jack of Queen Anne, 1707 118

XIII. The Two-Crossed Jack in Canada 132

XIV. The Irish Jack 140

XV. The Jacks in the Thirteen Colonies of North America 153

XVI. The Union Flags of the United States 170

XVII. The Jack and Parliamentary Union in Britain 182

XVIII. The Jack and Parliamentary Union in Canada 189

XIX. The Union Jack of George III., 1801 199

XX. The Lessons of the Crosses 215

XXI. The Proportions of the Crosses 222

XXII. Under the Three Crosses in Canada 235

XXIII. The Flag of Freedom 243

XXIV. The Flag of Liberty 253

XXV. The Union Jack as a Single Flag 264

XXVI. The Jacks in Red, White and Blue Ensigns 272

XXVII. The Union Ensigns of the British Empire 280

Appendix A. The Maple Leaf Emblem 295

Appendix B. Letters from the Private Secretary of His

Majesty King Edward VII. 298

Appendix C. Canadian War Medals 299

Appendix D. A Record of the "Diamond Anthem" 300

Index 313

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.

NO. PAGE

1. Assyrian Emblems 15

2. Eagle Emblems 16

3. Tortoise Totem 18

4. Wolf Totem 18

5. The Hawaiian Ensign 30

6. A Red Cross Knight 35

7. Colours of 10th Royal Grenadiers, Canada 39

8. St. George's Jack 41

9. The Borough Seal of Lyme Regis, 1284 46

10. Brass in Elsing Church, 1347 49

11. The _Henri Grace à Dieu_, 1515 60

12. St. Andrew's Jack 64

13. Scotch "Talle Shippe," 16th Century 67

14. Royal Arms of England, Henry V., 1413, to Elizabeth 71

15. Royal Arms of James I., 1603 72

16. Jack of James I., 1606 74

17. The _Sovereign of the Seas_, 1637 85

18. Commonwealth Twenty-Shilling Piece 87

19. Commonwealth Boat Flag 88

20. The _Naseby_. Charles II. 95

21. Medal of Charles II., 1665 98

22. Whip-lash Pennant, British Navy 108

23. Union Jack of Anne, 1707 118

24. Draft "C," Union Jack, 1707 121

25. The Red Ensign in "The Margent," 1707 125

26. Fort Niagara, 1759 128

27. The Assault at Wolfe's Cove, Quebec, 1759 130

28. St. Patrick's Jack 141

29. Labarum of Constantine 142

30. Harp of Hibernia 143

31. Seal of Carrickfergus, 1605 148

32. Royal Arms of Queen Victoria 148

33. Medal of Queen's First Visit to Ireland 149

34. The Throne of Queen Victoria in the House of Lords, 1900 150

35. Arms of the Fitzgeralds 151

36. Medal of Louis XIV., "_Kebeca Liberata_," 1690 165

37. New England Ensign 166

38. The Louisbourg Medal, 1758 168

39. The First Union Flag, 1776 174

40. The Pennsylvania Flag, 1776 176

41. Arms of the Washington Family 177

42. Washington's Book-Plate 178

43. Washington's Seals 179

44. Fort George and the Port of New York in 1770 187

45. Royal Arms of George II. 190

46. The Great Seal of Upper Canada, 1792 195

47. Upper Canada Penny 198

48. Draft "C" of Union Jack, 1800 200

49. Royal Arms of George III., 1801 202

50. Union Jack of George III., 1801 203

51. Outline Jack--The Proper Proportions of the Crosses 209

52. The Union Jack and Shackleton at Farthest South 213

53. Square Union Jack 219

54. Oblong Union Jack 220

55. Flag of a French Caravel, 16th Century 223

56. The Colonial Jack, 1701 226

57. Jack of England, 1711 227

58. Jack in Carolina, 1739 228

59. The Combat between _La Surveillante_ and the _Quebec_, 1779 229

60. Ensign of 7th Royal Fusiliers, 1775 230

61. "King's Colour," 1781 231

62. The War Medal, 1793-1814 236

63. The Service Medal, Canada, 1866-1870 237

64. The North-West Canada Medal, 1885 240

65. Flag of the Governor-General of Canada 259

66. Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec 260

67. Australian Emblems 283

68. Australian Federation Badge 287

69. Suggested Canadian Union Ensign 297

COLOURED PLATES.

PLATE I. _Frontispiece_

1. English Jack--St. George's Crosse.

2. Scottish Jack--St. Andrew's Crosse.

3. Irish Jack--St. Patrick's Crosse.

PLATE II. 22

1. Germany. 2. Italy.

3. Greece. 4. Hawaii.

5. Champlain, 1608. 6. French from 1794.

PLATE III. 76

1. The Percys' Ensign, 1560.

2. Union Jack of James I., 1606.

3. Colonial Union Jack, 1701.

PLATE IV. 92

1. Commonwealth Ensign, 1648.

2. Cromwell's "Great Union," 1658.

3. Ensign Red--Charles II., 1660.

PLATE V. 118

1. Union Jack of Anne, 1707.

2. Red Ensign of Anne, 1707.

3. Union Jack of George III., 1801.

PLATE VI. 174

1. Grand Union, 1776.

2. United States, 1777.

3. United States, 1909.

PLATE VII. 218

1. Present Union Jack upside down.

2. Jack wrongly made.

3. Jack wrongly made.

PLATE VIII. 272

1. Red Ensign.

2. White Ensign.

3. Blue Ensign.

PLATE IX. 280

1. Canadian Union Ensign.

2. Australian Union Ensign.

3. New Zealand Union Ensign.

[Illustration: ST. GEORGE.]

THE UNION JACK.

"It's only a small bit of bunting,

It's only an old coloured rag,

Yet thousands have died for its honour

And shed their best blood for the flag.

"It's charged with the cross of St. Andrew,

Which, of old, Scotland's heroes has led;

It carries the cross of St. Patrick,

For which Ireland's bravest have bled.

"Joined with these is our old English ensign,

St. George's red cross on white field,

Round which, from King Richard to Wolseley,

Britons conquer or die, but ne'er yield.

"It flutters triumphant o'er ocean,

As free as the winds and the waves;

And bondsmen from shackles unloosened

'Neath its shadows no longer are slaves.

"It floats over Cypress and Malta,

O'er Canada, the Indies, Hong Kong;

And Britons, where'er their flag's flying,

Claim the rights which to Britons belong.

"We hoist it to show our devotion

To our Queen, to our country, and laws;

It's the outward and visible emblem

Of advancement and Liberty's cause.

"You may say it's an old bit of bunting,

You may call it an old coloured rag;

But Freedom has made it majestic,

And time has ennobled the flag."

--"ST. GEORGE."

NOTES ON FLAGS.

NAMES OF PARTS.

Particular names are given to the several parts of a flag.

The part next the flagstaff, or width, Is called the "_hoist_."

The outer part, or length, is termed the "_fly_," and also the

"_field_."

These parts are further divided into "_quarters_," or "_cantons_": two

"_next the staff_," two "_in the fly_."

These descriptive terms should be noted, as they will be in constant

use in the pages which follow.

USAGE.

A flag at half-mast is a sign of mourning.

A flag reversed is a signal of distress.

The lowering of a flag is a signal of surrender.

The raising of the victors' flag in its place is a signal of capture.

The nationality of a country is shown by its flag.

The nationality of a vessel is made known by the flag she flies at the

stern.

To hoist the flag of one nation under that of another nation, on the

same flag-staff, is to show it disrespect.

History of the Union Jack

And Flags of the Empire.

CHAPTER I.

_EMBLEMS AND FLAGS._

There is an instinct in the human race which delights in the flying of

flags--a sentiment which appears to be inborn, causing men to become

enthusiastic about a significant emblem raised in the air, whether as

the insignia of descent, or as a symbol of race, or of nationality;

something which, being held aloft before the sight of other men,

declares, at a glance, the side to which the bearer belongs, and serves

as a rallying point for those who think with him.

The child chortles at a piece of riband waved before him; a boy marches

with head erect and martial stride as bearer of the banner at the

head of his mimic battalion; the man, at duty's call, rallies to his

national standard, and leaving home and all, stakes his life for it in

his country's cause; and when the battle of life is closing and steps

are homeward bound, the gray-beard, lifting his heart-filled eyes,

blesses the day that brings him back within sight of his native flag.

At all ages and in all times has it been the same. The deeper we go

into the records of the past the more evidence do we find that man,

however varied his race or primitive his condition, however cultured

his surroundings or rude his methods, has universally displayed this

innate characteristic instinct of delighting and glorifying in some

personal or national emblem.

To search for and discover the emblems which they bore thus discloses

to us the eras of a people's history, and, therefore, it is that

the study of a nation's flag is something more than a mere passing

interest, and becomes one of real educational value, meriting our

closest investigation, for _the study of Flags is really the tracing of

History by sight_.

In ancient Africa, explorations among the sculptured antiquities on

the Nile have brought to light a series of national and religious

emblem-standards, which had meaning and use among the Egyptians

long before history had a written record. The fans and hieroglyphic

standards of the Pharaohs are the index to their dynasties.

The Israelites, at the time of the Exodus, had their distinctive

emblems, and in the Book of Numbers (ch. ii. 2), it is related how

Moses directed that in their journeyings, "_Every man of the children

of Israel shall pitch by his own standard, with the ensign of their

father's house_."

So it came that to every Jewish child, in all the subsequent centuries,

the emblem on the standard of his tribe recalled the history and the

trials of his ancestors and fortified his faith in the God of their

Deliverance.

From the lost cities of Nineveh have been unearthed the ensign of the

great Assyrian race, the "Twin Bull" (1), sign of their imperial might,

and the records of their warriors are thus identified.

[Illustration: 1. ASSYRIAN EMBLEMS.]

In Europe in later times there were few parts of the continent which

did not become acquainted with the metal ensigns of the great Roman

Empire. The formidable Legions of their armies, issuing from the centre

of the realm, carried the Imperial Eagle at their head, and setting

it in triumph over many a subjugated state, established its supremacy

among the peoples as a sign of the all-conquering power of their mighty

Empire. To this eagle of the Roman legions may be traced back the crop

of eagle emblems (2), which are borne by so many of the nationalities

of Europe at the present day. The golden eagle of the French

battalions, the black eagle of Prussia, the white eagle of Poland, and

the double-headed eagles of Austria and Russia, whose two heads typify

claim to sovereignty over both the ancient Eastern and Western sections

of the Roman Empire, are all descendants from the Imperial Eagle of

ancient Rome.

[Illustration: 2. EAGLE EMBLEMS.

_Austrian._ _Roman._ _Russian._

_Prussian._ _French._]

As these nationalities of modern Europe have successively arisen and

developed into their separate existence, the emblem of their ancient

subjugation has been raised by them as the emblem of their power, just

as the Cross, which was once the emblem of the degradation and death

of the Christ, has been accepted as the signal and glory of the nations

which have come under the Christian sway.

As on the Eastern, so also on the Western hemisphere. On all continents

the rainbow in the heavens is a perpetual memorial of the covenant

made between God and man--the sign that behind the wonders of nature

dwells the still more wonderful First Cause and Author of them all.

The Peruvians, far back in the centuries of existence on the continent

of South America, had preserved a tradition of a great event which,

although it had taken place on another hemisphere, yet had been, by

some means, transmitted to theirs, and, tracing from it the story of

their national origin, they carried this emblem as sign of the lineage

which they claimed as being, as they called themselves, "_The Children

of the Skies_." Thus it was that under the standard of a "_Rainbow_"

the armies of the Incas of Peru valiantly resisted the invasions of

Pizzaro when, in the sixteenth century, the South American Continent

came under the domination of Spain.

National emblems were borne farther north on the Northern continent

by another nation, even yet more ancient than the Peruvians. Embedded

in the ruins of buried cities of the Aztecs, in Mexico, are found the

memorials of a constructive and artistic people, whose emblem of the

"_Eagle with outstretched wings_," repeated with patriotic iteration

in the stone carvings of their buildings, has thus come down to us the

mute declarant of their national aspirations. The nation itself as a

power has long since passed away, but the outlines of their emblem

still preserve the ideals of the vanished race.

[Illustration: 3. TORTOISE TOTEM.]

A living instance of much interest also evidences the adherence to

national emblems among the earlier inhabitants of North America. Long

before the invading Europeans first landed on the shores of the North

Atlantic coasts, the nomad Red Indian, as he travelled from place to

place through the fastnesses of the forests, along the shores of the

great lakes, over the plains of vast central prairies, or amid the

mountains that crown the Pacific slope, everywhere attested the story

of his descent by the "Totem" of his family. This sign of the Tortoise

(3), the Wolf (4), the Bear, or the Fish, painted or embroidered on

his trappings or carved upon his weapons, was displayed as evidence of

his origin, and whether he came as a friend or advanced as a foe, its

presence nerved him to maintain the reputation of his family and the

honour of his tribe.

[Illustration: 4. WOLF TOTEM.]

To-day the Red Man slowly yields to the ever-advancing march of the

dominant and civilizing white; his means of sustenance by the chase,

or of livelihood by his skill as a trapper, have been destroyed. The

Indian tribes are, under the Indian treaties, required to remain

within large blocks of territory called "Reserves," so that now in

his poverty he is maintained upon these "reservations" solely by the

dole of the peoples by whom his native country has been absorbed;

yet, though so changed in their circumstances, his descendants still

cling with resolute fortitude and pathetic eagerness to these ancient

insignia of their native worth. These rudely-formed emblems, in outline

and shape mainly taken from the animals and birds of the plain and

forest, are the memorials in his decadence of the long past days

when his forefathers were the undisputed monarchs of all the wilds

and possessors of its widest domains. They are the Indian patents of

nobility, and thus are clung to with all the pride of ancient race.

This Instinct in man to attach a national meaning to some vital emblem,

and to display it as evidence of his patriotic fervour, is thus found

to be all-pervading. The accuracy of its form may not be exact--it may,

indeed, be well-nigh indistinguishable in its outlines--but whenever

it be raised aloft, the halo of patriotic meaning, with which memory

has illumined it, is answered by the flutterings of the bearer's

heart; self is lost in inspiring recollection; clanship, absorbing the

individual, enfolds him as one of a mighty whole, and the race-blood

that is deep within him springs quick into action, obedient to the

stirring call.

The fervour of this manifestation was eloquently expressed by Lord

Dufferin in narrating some incidents which had occurred during one

of his official tours through Canada, when Governor-General of the

country, the greatest daughter-nation among the children of the Union

Jack:

"Wherever I have gone, in crowded cities, in the remote hamlets, the

affection of the people for their Sovereign has been blazoned forth

against the summer sky by every device which art could fashion or

ingenuity invent. Even in the wilds and deserts of the land, the most

secluded and untutored settler would hoist some cloth or rag above

his shanty, and startle the solitude of the forest with a shot from

his rusty firelock and a lusty cheer from himself and his children

in glad allegiance to his country's Queen. Even the Indian in his

forest and on his reserve would marshal forth his picturesque symbols

of fidelity in grateful recognition of a Government that never broke

a treaty or falsified its plighted word to the Red Man, or failed to

evince for the ancient children of the soil a wise and conscientious

solicitude."[1]

[1] Lord Dufferin, Toronto Club, 1874.

Of all emblems, a Flag is the one which is universally accepted among

men as the incarnation of their intensest sentiment, and when uplifted

above them, concentrates in itself the annals of a nation and all the

traditions of an empire.

A country's flag becomes, therefore, of additional value to its people

in proportion as its symbolism is better understood and its story

is more fully known. Its combinations should be studied, its story

unfolded--for in itself a flag is nothing, but in its meaning it is

everything.

"What is a riband worth?

Its glory is priceless!"[2]

[2] Bulwer Lytton.

So long, then, as pride of race and nation exists among men, so long

will a waving flag command all that is strongest within them, and stir

their national instincts to their utmost heights.

CHAPTER II.

_THE ORIGINS OF NATIONAL FLAGS._

With such natural emotions stirring within the breasts of its people,

one can appreciate the fervid interest taken by each nation in its own

national flag, and understand how it comes that the associations which

cluster about its folds are so ardently treasured up.

Flags would at first sight appear to be but gaudy things, displaying

contrasts of colour or variations of shape or design, according to the

mood or the fancy of some enterprising flagmaker. This, no doubt, is

the case with many signalling or mercantile flags. On the other hand,

there is, in not a few of the flags known as "national flags," some

particular combination of form or of colourings which, if they were

but known, indicates the reason for their origin, or which marks some

historic memory. There has been, perhaps, some notable occasion on

which they were first displayed, or they may have been formed by the

joining together of separate designs united at some eventful epoch, to

signalize a victorious cause, or to perpetuate the memory of a great

event. These great stories of the past are thus brought to mind and

told anew by the coloured folds each time they are spread open by the

breeze; for of most national flags it can be said, as was said by an

American orator[3] of his own, "It is a piece of bunting lifted in the

air, but it speaks sublimity, and every part has a voice." It is to see

these colours and hear these voices in the British national flags that

is our present undertaking.

[3] Sumner.

Before tracing the history of our British Union Jack, some instances

may be briefly mentioned in which associations connected with the

history of some other nations are displayed in the designs of their

national flags.

The colours of the German national banner are black, white and red

(Pl. II., fig. 1). Since 1870, when, at the conclusion of

the French war, the united German Empire was formed, this has been

the general Standard for all the states and principalities that were

then brought into imperial union; although each of these lesser states

continues to have, in addition, its own particular flag. This banner

of United Germany introduced once more the old German colours, which

had been displayed from 1184 until the time when, in 1806, the empire

was broken up by Napoleon I. Tradition is extant that these colours

had their origin as a national emblem at the time of the crowning of

Frederic I. (Barbarossa) in 1152, as ruler of the countries which are

now largely included in Germany. On this occasion the pathway to the

cathedral at Aix-la-Chapelle was laid with a carpeting of black, gold

and red, and the story goes that after the ceremony this carpet was cut

by the people into strips which they then displayed as flags. Thus by

the repetition of these historic colours in their ensign the present

union of the German Empire is connected with the early history of more

than seven centuries before.

[Illustration: PLATE II.

1

GERMANY

2

ITALY

3

GREECE

4

HAWAIIAN

5

CHAMPLAIN 1608

6

FRENCH FROM 1794]

The national ensign of United Italy (Pl. II., fig. 2) is a

flag having three parallel vertical stripes, green, white and red, the

green being next the flagstaff. Upon the central white stripe there

is shown a red shield, having upon it a white cross. This national

flag was adopted in 1870, after the Italian peoples had risen against

their separate rulers, and the previously separated principalities and

kingdoms had, under the leadership of Garibaldi, been consolidated into

one united kingdom under Victor Emmanuel, the then reigning king of

Sardinia. The red shield here displayed on the centre of the Italian

flag designates the arms of the House of Savoy, to which the Royal

House of Sardinia belonged, and which had been gained by the following

ancient and honourable event:

The island of Rhodes, an Italian colony in the Eastern Mediterranean,

had, in 1311, been in deadly peril from the attacks of the Turks. In

their extremity the then Duke of Savoy came to the aid of the Knights

Hospitallers of St. John, who were defending the island, and with his

help they were able to make a successful resistance. In record and

acknowledgment of this great service the Knights of St. John granted to

the House of Savoy the privilege of wearing upon their royal arms the

white cross on a red shield, which was the badge of their order of St.

John.

So it happened when, nearly six centuries afterwards, the Sardinians

again came to the aid of their southern brethren, and the King of

Sardinia was crowned as ruler over the new united Italian kingdom, the

old emblem won in defence of ancient liberties was further perpetuated

on the banner of the new kingdom of liberated and united Italy.

The colours of the Greek flag preserve the memory of a dynasty. In

1828, the Greeks, after rising in successful rebellion, had freed

their land from Mohammedan domination and the power of the Sultan of

Turkey. The several States formed themselves into one united kingdom,

and seeking a king from among the royal houses of Europe, obtained, in

1832, Otho I., a scion of the ruling house of Bavaria. The dynasty at

that time set upon the throne of Greece has since been changed, the

Bavarian having parted company with the kingdom in 1861. The throne

was then offered to Prince Alfred of England, but declined by him. The

present king, chosen in 1863, after the withdrawal of his predecessor,

is a member of the Royal House of Denmark; yet, notwithstanding this

change in the reigning family, the white Greek Cross upon a light blue

ground in the upper quarter, and the four alternate stripes of white

on a light blue ground in the field, which form the national flag of

Greece (Pl. II., fig. 3), still preserve the blue and white

colours of Bavaria, from whence the Greeks had obtained their first

king.

The Tri-colour as displayed by the present Republic in France (Pl.

II., fig. 6) has been credited with widely differing

explanations of its origin, as its plain colours of blue, white and red

admit of many different interpretations.

One story of its origin is, that its colours represent those of

the three flags which had been carried in succession in the early

centuries of the nation. The early kings of France carried the plain

blue banner of St. Martin. To this succeeded, in A.D. 1124, the flaming

red flag, or Oriflamme, of St. Denis, to be afterwards superseded, in

the fifteenth century, by the white "Cornette Blanche," the personal

banner of the heroic Joan of Arc.

It was under this royal white flag (Pl. II., fig. 5), bearing upon it

the lilies of ancient France, that Cartier, in 1534, had sailed up the

St. Lawrence, and Champlain, in 1608, had founded Quebec. Under this

flag Canada was colonized; to it belonged the glories of the Jesuit

Fathers and Dollard; with it La Salle and Marquette explored the far

West, planting three _fleur-de-lis_ as the sign of their discoveries.

Under it Frontenac, Montcalm and Levis[4] achieved their renown, and

all the annals of early Canada are contained under its régime until, in

1759, after the assault by Wolfe, it was exchanged, at the cession of

Quebec, for the British Union Flag.

[4] The colours carried by the Royal French regiments are described by

Capt. Knox to have been: "A white silk flag with three _fleur-de-lis_

within a wreath or circlet in the centre part of gold." ("The Fall of

New France"--HART.)

The tri-colour of Republican France was never carried by the

forefathers of the French Canadians of the Province of Quebec, nor has

it any connection with the French history of Canada. In fact, it did

not make its appearance as an emblem until the time of the revolution

in France in 1789, or thirty years after the original French régime in

Canada had closed its eventful period.

More detailed evidence of the origin of this flag states that the

creation of the tri-colour arose from the incident that, when the

revolutionary militia were first assembled in the city of Paris, at

the revolution of 1789, they had adopted blue and red, which were the

ancient colours of the city of Paris, for the colours of their cockade;

between these they placed the white of the soldiery of the Bourbon

régime, who afterwards joined their forces, and thus they had combined

the blue, white and red in the "tri-colour" as their revolutionary

signal.[5]

[5] Thiers: "History of the French Revolution," Vol. I., p. 74.

Whether or not its colours record those of the three ancient

monarchical periods, or those of the revolution, the tri-colour as a

French ensign for use by the people of France, as their national flag

both on land and sea, was not regularly established until a still later

period, in 1794. Then it was that the Republican Convention passed the

first decree[6] authorizing an ensign and directing that the French

national flag (Pl. II., fig. 6) shall be formed of the three

colours placed vertically in equal bands--that next the staff being

blue, the centre white, and the fly red.

[6] Decree of Feb. 15, 1794.

This was the flag under which Napoleon I. won his greatest victories,

both as General and Emperor; but whatever glories may have been won

for it by France, yet many years before it had been even designed, or

the prowess of Napoleon's armies had created its renown, the French

Canadian had been fighting under the Union Jack as his patriotic

ensign and adding to the history of its valiant glory by victory won

by himself in defence of his own Canadian home.[7] When in Canada the

tri-colour is seen flying it is raised solely out of compliment and

courtesy to the French-speaking friends in modern France. The fact that

the tri-colour has received any acceptance with the French-speaking

Canadian may have arisen from the reason that, side by side with the

Union Jack, it had participated in all the struggles and glories of the

Crimea, when the two flags, the tri-colour and the Union Jack, were

raised together above Sebastopol.

[7] Defence of Quebec, 1775.

It is interesting to note how it is stated to have first arrived.[8]

The _Canadiens-Français_ being, by lineage and temperament,

Monarchists, had shown no regard or liking for the early Revolutionary

and Republican emblem, and had never raised it in Canada.

[8] Benjamin Suite: "Le Drapeau Tri-colore en Canada."

In 1853, under Victoria and Napoleon III., an _entente cordiale_ had

been established between England and France, and in that same year

arrangements had been completed with the Allan Line to build new

steamers and perform a regular service direct between Liverpool and

Montreal. Actuated, no doubt, by the prevailing fervour, they had

selected as the distinguishing, or "house," flag of their line one of

the same shape and colours as the French flag, but with the broad bands

reversed, the red being next the mast instead of the blue as in the

French ensign.

In the spring of 1854, as their first steamer was seen entering the

St. Lawrence, this flag so nearly resembled the French ensign as to

cause surprise to be expressed. "What," said the older heads, "the flag

of the Revolution on an English ship!" It was a novel sight, but great

were the rejoicings over the establishment of the new line.

Their second ship came in dressed with many French and English flags,

for war had been declared by the alliance of England and France against

Russia, this being the first announcement in Canada, for there were no

telegraph cables in those days.

Following this came the exploits of the allied armies in the Crimea,

bringing with them the consequent profusion and intertwining of the

English and French flags with which ships and business buildings were

decorated to celebrate their combined victories.

Such was the entry of the tri-colour into Canada, not being introduced

by the Canadians, speaking French, but by their English friends.

A quaint suggestion has been made to the writer by no less an authority

than Sir James Le Moine, the historian of Quebec: "The French Canadian

is very partial to display, but is primarily economical. While the

simple colours of the tri-colour can be conveniently made by the most

inexperienced, the details of the Union Jack are very difficult to cut

and to correctly sew together. The _bonne mère_ can easily provide

out of her household treasures the materials for the one, but she

must purchase the other, and this, therefore, is the reason why the

tri-colour is so frequently seen in French-speaking Quebec."

The tri-colour, having never been the flag of his forefathers, carries

neither allegiance nor loyalty to the French Canadian. His people have

never fought under it, while many a gallant French Canadian son has

poured out his blood for the Union Jack at home in defence of Canada

or upon foreign shores in service in the British armies. It has never

brought him liberty or protection as has his Union Jack, which has been

his British flag for a century and a half, and for more than a quarter

of a century before the tri-colour of the European French ever came

into existence.

Another flag--although it has ceased to be a national flag, and is now

the flag of a possession of the United States--should yet be mentioned

by reason of the history which was told in its folds.

The Hawaiian national ensign (5) was at first composed of nine

horizontal stripes of equal width, alternating white, red and blue, the

top stripe being white and the bottom blue.[9]

[9] Preble: "History of the Flag of the United States," p. 85.

Afterwards the lowest stripe was taken off and the new flag (Pl.

II., fig. 4) adopted, in which there are eight stripes, the

bottom stripe being red and the British Union Jack placed in the upper

corner.

The Sandwich Islands, made known to the world mainly by the tragic

death of Captain Cook, in 1778, and now known as the Hawaiian Islands,

had been fused into a single monarchy by the impetuous valour of King

Kamehama, who, in 1794, admitted Christian missionaries to his kingdom.

Its existence as an independent monarchy was thereafter maintained and

was recognized by the great powers.

Internal difficulties having arisen in the kingdom and an insult been

given to a British consul, the islands were ceded and the sovereignty

offered to Great Britain in 1843, when, on 12th February, the Union

Jack was raised on all the islands, the understanding being that the

natives were to be under the protection of the flag of Great Britain,

and internal order to be guaranteed pending the final disposition which

might be arrived at in England between the representatives of the

Hawaiians and the British Government.[10]

[10] The Annual Register, 1843, Vol. 85.

[Illustration: 5. THE HAWAIIAN ENSIGN.]

The British did not accept the proffered transfer of the islands, but

returned the sovereignty to the native government, which was thereafter

to continue as an independent monarchy under the protection of Great

Britain; and by an accompanying treaty all British manufactures and

produce were to be admitted duty free. On July 31st, 1843, the British

flag was lowered and the new Hawaiian ensign raised in its place.[11]

It was in recognition of this event that the Union Jack was placed in

the Hawaiian ensign.

[11] Bird: "Six Months among the Sandwich Islands," 1875.

In the same year France and England agreed never to take possession of

the islands either by protectorate or in any other form.

The natives steadily decreased in number and in power, and the trade

and commerce of the islands had passed almost entirely into American

hands.

Dissensions had afterwards arisen under the subsequent native

sovereigns, and in 1893 the Queen, Liliuokalani, was deposed by a

revolution, and a republican government formed under President Dole, an

American citizen.

Cession of the islands was offered in 1896 to the American Government

and was refused, but in 1898 the islands were finally annexed to the

United States and the American ensign raised; but the Hawaiian flag,

with its Union Jack in the upper corner, continued as a local flag, and

was so displayed on June 14th, 1900, at the inauguration of President

Dole as Governor of the new-formed "Territory of Hawaii," among the

Territories of the United States.

These instances of the origin of some of the national flags of other

nations show how history is interwoven in their folds, and how they

perpetuate the memories of past days or of the men who have dominated

vital occasions. A singularly similar origin is associated with the

creation of the Stars and Stripes, the ensign of the United States

of North America (Pl. VI., fig. 3), which is treated of in

Chapter XVI.

CHAPTER III.

_THE ORIGIN OF THE JACKS._

It is quite evident, then, that national flags are not merely a

haphazard patchwork of coloured bunting, nor by any means "meaningless

things." Their combinations have a history, and, in many cases, tell a

story; but of all the national flags there is none that bears upon its

folds so interesting a story, nor has its history so plainly written in

its parts and colourings, as has our British "Union Jack."

Our present enterprise is to search out whence it got its name, how it

was built up into its present form, and what is the meaning of each of

its several parts. This is not only an enquiry of deepest interest, but

is of practical and educational value, for to trace the story of the

successive combinations of our national flags is to follow the history

of the British race.

The flags of other nations have mostly derived their origin from

association with some dominant personage, or with a particular epoch.

They are, as a rule, the signal of a dynasty or the record of some

revolution; but our British Union Jack records in its folds the steady

and continuous growth of a great nation, and traces, by the changes

made in it during centuries of adventure and progress, and by the flags

in which it has been successively combined, the gradual extension of

its union and methods of Constitutional Government over a world-wide

Empire.

The origin of the name "Union Jack" has given rise to considerable

conjecture and much interesting surmise; in the proclamation of Charles

I., 1634, it is called the "Union Flagge"; in the treaty of peace made

with the Dutch in 1674, in the reign of Charles II., it is mentioned as

"His Majesty of Great Britain's flag or Jack," and in the proclamation

of Queen Anne, in 1707, as "Our Jack, commonly called the Union Jack."

The most generally quoted suggestion given for the origin of the name

is that it was acquired from the fact that the first proclamation

which authorized a flag, in which the national crosses of England and

Scotland were for the first time combined, was issued by James VI. of

Scotland, after he had become James I. of England, and that as King

James frequently signed his name in the French manner as "Jacques,"

this was abbreviated into "Jac," and thus his new flag came to be

called a "Jack."

The derivation suggested is ingenious and interesting, but cannot be

accepted as correct, for the simple reason that there were "Jacks" long

before the time and reign of James I., and that their prior origin may

be clearly traced.

In the earliest days of chivalry, long before the time of the Norman

conquest of England, both the knights on horseback and the men on foot

of the armies in the field wore a surcoat or "Jacque" (whence our

word "Jacket"), extending over the body from the neck to the thighs,

bearing upon it the blazon or sign either of their lord or of their

nationality. Numberless examples of these are to be seen in early

illuminated manuscripts, or on monuments erected in many cathedrals and

sanctuaries.

In the time of the Crusaders, during the eleventh and twelfth

centuries, when the Christian nations of Europe were combined together

to rescue Jerusalem and the Holy Land from the rule of the Mohammedan,

the warrior pilgrims, recruited from the different countries, wore

crosses of different shapes and colours upon their surcoats, to

indicate the nationalities to which they belonged, and to evidence

the holy cause in which they were engaged. It was from wearing these

crosses that they gained their name of "Crusaders," or cross-bearers.

The cross worn by each of the nationalities was of a different

colour--that of France being red; Flanders, green; Germany, black, and

Italy, yellow.

In the earlier crusades the cross worn by the English was white, but in

later expeditions the red cross of St. George was adopted and worn upon

the Jacque as the sign of the English, in the same way as shown in the

accompanying knightly figure (6).

The continuing use of this St. George cross, and the reason for

wearing it as an identification of English forces is well shown in the

following extracts from the "Ordnaunces," issued to the army with which

Richard II. of England invaded Scotland in 1386:

"... Also that everi man of what estate, condicion or nation thei

be of, so that he be of oure partie, bere a signe of the armes of

Saint George, large, bothe before and behynde upon parell, that yf

he be slayne or wounded to deth, he that has so doon to hym shall

not be putte to deth for defaulte of the crosse that he lacketh, and

that non enemy do here the same token or crosse of Saint George,

notwithstanding yf he be prisoner upon payne of deth."[12]

[12] Harleian MSS.

[Illustration: 6. A RED CROSS KNIGHT.]

A fuller understanding is afforded of the character of this "parell,"

as also of the early adoption of its name by references to it given in

1415:

"At those days the yoemen had their lymmes at lybertie, and their

jackes were longe and easy to shote in."[13]

[13] Fabyan, 1415.

The sailors of the "Cinque Ports" of Hastings, Sandwich, Hythe, Romney

and Dover, on the east of England, to which Winchelsea and Rye were

subsequently added, and by whose municipalities, in consideration of

certain privileges granted them, the royal navies were in early days

principally manned, are recorded to have worn as their uniform, in

1513, "_a cote of whyte cotyn, with a red crosse and the armes of ye

Ports underneathe_."

In the time of Queen Mary the continuation of the custom is further

evidenced by entries in a contemporary diary of 1588:

"... The x day of January hevy news came to London that the French had

won Cales _(Calais)_, the whyche was the hevest tydings to England

that ever was herd of.

"The xj day of January the Cete of London took up a thousand men and

made them whytt cotes and red crosses and every ward of London found

men.

* * * * *

"The xviij day of May there was sent to the shyppes men in whytt cotes

and red crosses, and gones to the Queen's shyppes."[14]

[14] Machyn's Diary.

These "surcoats" or "Jacques" came in time to be known as the "Jacks"

of the various nationalities they represented, and it was from the

raising of one of these upon a lance or staff at the bow of a ship, in

order that the nationality of those on board might be made known, that

a single flag bearing on it only the cross of St. George, or the cross

of St. Andrew, came to be known as a "Jack." From this origin, too, the

small flag-pole at the bow of a ship is still called the "Jack-staff,"

and similarly the short flag-pole at the stern of vessels, upon which

the distinguishing Ensign of the nationality of the ship is displayed,

is called the "Ensign-staff."

This custom of wearing the national Jack at the bow had not only been

early established by usage, but had also been officially recognized.

On the great seal of the first Lord Admiral of England, in 1409, under

Henry IV., a one-masted galley is shown.[15] At the stern of the ship is

the Royal Standard of the King, and at the bow a staff bearing on it

the square banner or Jack of St. George, the sign of England.

[15] Bloomfleld: "The National Flag."

Another instance of the use of these national Jacks as a sign of

national union is to be noted.

During the feudal period of European history, when armed forces were

called into the field, each of the nobles and leaders, as in duty

bound, furnished to the cause his quota of men equipped with complete

armament. These troops bore upon their arms and banners the heraldic

device or coat-of-arms of their own liege lord, as a sign of "the

company to which they belonged"; and in such way the particular

locality from which they came, and the leadership under which they were

marshalled could at once be recognized.

The Sovereigns also in their turn displayed the banner of the kingdom

over which each reigned, such as the fleur-de-lis for France, the cross

of St. George for England, the cross of St. Andrew for Scotland; and

this banner of the king formed the ensign under which the combined

forces of the royal adherents and their supporters served.

As the forces collected together came to be more the national army

of the nation and less the personal adherents of their chief, it was

provided in England that the liege lord of each local force should bear

on his banner the cross of St. George, as well as his own coat-of-arms,

the ordinance being:

"Every Standard, or Guydhome, is to hang in the chiefe the crosse of

St. George and to conteyne the crest or supporter and devise of the

owner."[16]

[16] Harleian MSS.

An excellent example of this is given in the standard or ensign

of the forces of the Earls of Percy in the sixteenth century (Pl.

III., fig. 1). In the chief is the red cross of St. George,

as the sign of allegiance to King and nation; in the fly is the crest

of the Percys, a blue lion with other insignia, and their motto,

"_Esperance en Dieu_," the signs of their liege lord and local country.

This flag declared its bearers to be the men of the Percy contingent,

Englishmen, and soldiers of the King.

[Illustration: 7. COLOURS OF THE 10TH ROYAL GRENADIERS,

CANADA.]

A survival of this ancient custom exists to this day in our British

military service, both in the Colonial and Imperial forces. Rifle

regiments do not carry "colours," but all infantry regiments are

entitled, upon receiving the royal warrant, to carry two flags, which

are called "Colours" (7).

The "First," or "King's Colour," is the plain "Union Jack," in sign

of allegiance to the Sovereign, and upon this, in the centre, is the

number or designation of the regiment, surmounted by a royal crown. The

"Second," or "Regimental Colour," has a small Union Jack in the upper

corner. The body of the flag is of the local colour of the facings of

the regiment. If the facings are blue, as in all "Royal" regiments,

the flag is blue; if they are white, then the flag is white, having

on it a large St. George's cross in addition to the small Union Jack

in the upper corner. On the body of this colour are embroidered the

regimental badge, the names of actions in which it has taken part,

and any distinctive emblems indicating the special history of the

regiment itself, and in territorial regiments the locality from which

they are recruited. In this way both the national and local methods of

distinction are to-day preserved and displayed in the same way as they

were in original times; the Union Jack of the present day having been

substituted for the St. George's cross of the first period.

Such, then, was the origin of the name Jack, and it is from the

combination of the three national "Jacks" of England, Scotland and

Ireland, at successive periods in their history, into one flag, that

the well-known "Union Jack" of our British nation has gradually grown

into its present form.

History of the Union Jack and Flags of the Empire · 第 1 / 15 章