THE CONTINENT AND ELSEWHERE

=Joseph Conrad: Colonial Politics and Revolution=

Joseph Conrad’s _Nostromo_ (1904) may be read as a history if one

interprets it as a typical case of government-making by foreign

industrial interests in late-nineteenth-century South America. With

the American Holroyd as his silent partner and financial backer,

British-educated Charles Gould uses the wealth of his San Tomas silver

mine to finance the successful revolt of Occidental Province from

the Republic of Costaguana, which is in the grip of the tyrannical

Montero brothers. A good deal of actual history is injected through

the reminiscences of old Giorgio Viola, who had fought under

Garibaldi across South America to Italy. But it was in _The Secret

Agent_ and _Under Western Eyes_ that Conrad recorded more memorable

history. Both books give extensive accounts of revolutionary and

counter-revolutionary activities. A superb artist, Conrad did not

need to go to a series of actual events and people. His imaginative

synthesis of the factors which produce them created, however,

a true pattern of this whole complex of revolutionary activity.

Besides the sensitive exploration of the characters of Razumov,

Nathalia, and Victorovitch, one finds actions which characterized the

movement in which they were swept up. Conrad presents the espionage

and counter-espionage, the bomb plots, and the abortive revolts.

Though he wrote out of revulsion at revolutionary activity, his

point of view did not blind him to the miseries of Czarist Russia.

With artistic integrity, he described the repressive commissions,

their imprisonments, exiles, and executions. His account of the fate

of Mikulin, chief of Czarist counter-espionage, makes extremely

interesting reading in 1954. For Mikulin one could almost substitute

Koestler’s Rubashov:

Later on, the larger world first heard of him in the very hour

of his downfall, during one of those State trials which astonish

and puzzle the average man who reads the newspapers by a glimpse

of unsuspected intrigues. And in the stir of vaguely seen

monstrosities, in that momentary, mysterious disturbance of muddy

waters, Councilor Mikulin went under, dignified, with only a calm,

emphatic protest of his innocence--nothing more. No disclosures

damaging to a harassed autocracy, complete fidelity to the secret

of the miserable _arcana imperii_, deposited in his patriotic

breast a display of bureaucratic stoicism in a Russian official’s

ineradicable, almost sublime contempt for truth; stoicism of

silence understood only by very few of the initiated, and not

without a certain cynical grandeur of self-sacrifice on the part

of a Sybarite. For the terribly heavy sentence turned Councilor

Mikulin civilly into a corpse, and actually into something very

much like a common convict.

It seems that the savage autocracy, any more than the divine

democracy, does not limit its diet exclusively to the bodies of its

enemies. It devours its friends and servants as well.

=The Soviet State: Its Roots and Growth=

It was this same Czarist Russia of which Turgenev wrote in _Fathers

and Sons_. Examining Nihilism, he also looked at contemporary events

such as the emancipation of serfs and the attempts of some landowners

to improve the lot of their workers despite agrarian disturbances.

Violently anti-revolutionary, Dostoyevsky replied in _The Possessed_ to

what appeared to him to be Turgenev’s advocacy of revolution. In his

massive and powerful novel he showed the agitation produced by groups

such as the “quintets” organized by Pyotr Verhovensky, themselves the

forerunners of the Communist cells.

In Koestler’s _Darkness at Noon_ Dostoyevsky’s nightmare becomes an

even more terrible actuality. In his introductory note Koestler writes:

The characters in this book are fictitious. The historical

circumstances which determined their actions are real. The life of

the man N. S. Rubashov is a synthesis of the lives of a number of

men who were victims of the so-called Moscow Trials. Several of

them were personally known to the author. This book is dedicated to

their memory.

Through flashbacks the reader sees Stalin, Lenin, and the members of

the First International Congress. Not only does he witness the breaking

of Rubashov for his trial, but also the series of cold and merciless

acts of expediency which have eroded the soul of the old Bolshevik

and left him ready for his final service to the Party. Koestler

describes the agonizing process by which the confession is extracted.

Gletkin, his interrogator, supplies the rationale for the whole

performance and for most of the repressive acts of the state as well.

In some ways, Rubashov is reminiscent of Trotsky, with his pince-nez,

his record as a commander in the Revolution, his extensive service

outside Russia, and his onetime rank as a top Communist. (A closer

resemblance to Trotsky is that of the Party’s fictitious scapegoat in

1984. Emmanuel Goldstein, with his fuzzy hair and small goatee, is the

arch counter-revolutionary, the author of _The Theory and Practice

of Oligarchical Collectivism_.) _Darkness at Noon_ is a stark and

brilliant book. Artistically satisfying, it also presents a record of a

characteristic phenomenon of Russian Communism.

=Marie-Henri Beyle [Stendhal]: Napoleonic Panorama=

Thirty-nine years after he followed Napoleon’s armies into Italy,

Stendhal published a sweeping novel of that era. _The Charterhouse of

Parma_ follows the career of Fabrizio Valserra, Marchesino del Dongo,

from birth to death. It shows the influence upon his life of his

beautiful, devoted, and scheming aunt, the Contessa Gina Pietranera.

We meet her lover, Conte Mosca della Rovere Sorezana, Minister to

Prince Ernesto IV of Parma and politician extraordinary, and become

privy to the intrigues of the court. This large novel is crammed with

incident--duels, assignations, affairs, prison-breaks, and even the

assassination of a monarch. Besides all this, Stendhal relates some of

the major events in French and Italian history during nearly thirty

years. In particular, we see Napoleon’s triumphal entries into Italy

in 1796, 1801, and 1815. Fabrizio even participates on the fringes of

the battle of Waterloo. With each arrival and departure, Napoleon’s

adherents and those of the Austrian Emperor play musical chairs

for the positions of power. Even after Napoleon has been banished

to Elba a struggle goes on between Liberals (or Jacobins) and the

proponents of absolute monarchy. The Liberal cause is perverted in

Parma by the rascally General Fabio Conti, who ironically serves as

Ernesto’s political jailer, but the temper of this movement in Europe

is reflected in the thoughts and actions of many of the characters.

Describing authoritarian government and the struggles against it, as

well as the interrelation of a corrupt church and a corrupt state,

Stendhal’s classic successfully fuses the lives of his people with the

times in which they lived.

=André Malraux: Comintern v. Kuomintang=

Nearly a hundred years later André Malraux wrote of a time of

political chaos in _Man’s Fate_. But the span of his novel was four

months rather than thirty years. Malraux gives a detailed account

of Chiang Kai-shek’s military victory of 1927 in Shanghai and his

subsequent crushing of the Chinese Communist forces which fought him.

Not only does he examine the roles of the immediate participants--the

White Guards, the governmental army, the “Reds” and “Blues” of the

Kuomintang--but also the intervention of outside forces as well--the

Russian Communists, the Shanghai bankers, the French Chamber of

Commerce, and the Franco-Asiatic Consortium. Malraux explores both the

military and economic aspects of the struggle. Kyo Gisors feels that

triumph here will mean “the U.S.S.R. increased to six hundred million

men.” Ferral, head of the Chamber and the Consortium, realizes that it

will also mean the end of his group’s commercial penetration of the

Yangtze basin. _Man’s Fate_ may be read for these insights into the

uprising of 1927 and also for background on the formulation of the

Communist decision which kept the armies of Mao Tse-tung, Chu Teh,

and others within the Kuomintang until they gained enough strength to

defeat it.

=Jean-Paul Sartre: The Shadow of Munich=

Jean-Paul Sartre’s technique in _The Reprieve_ (1947) may remind one of

a photographer whose camera mechanism has gone awry. What he is trying

to do is clear, but it does not quite come off. Covering the week of

September 23-30, 1938, the novel is kaleidoscopic. Using more than nine

distinct couples or groups, Sartre jumps from the activities of one

to another with no transition. The scene may change from sentence to

sentence or even within a sentence. He obviously does this to portray

events which are happening simultaneously. He also uses this technique,

apparently, to give some sense of the chaos that reigned during the

week when Europe was on the verge of war. To show the impact of these

events upon France, he has selected his people from many strata

of French society. Interspersed between all these semi-fragmented

stories and incidents are dialogues between the politicians: Hitler

and his aides, Daladier and Bonnet, Chamberlain and Halifax, Sir

Nevile Henderson and Sir Horace Wilson. Through its characters the

novel ranges over Europe from England to the Sudetenland, finally

arriving at Munich. The book’s last two paragraphs serve as an example

of this technique which has a cumulative effect but which can be

extremely troublesome to a reader accustomed to conventional narration.

Daladier’s plane lands at Le Bourget as Milan Hlinka, a loyal Sudeten

Czech, hears of his country’s dismemberment:

A vast clamor greeted [Daladier], the crowd surged through the

cordon of police and swept the barriers away; Milan drank and said

with a laugh: “To France! To England! To our glorious allies!” Then

he flung the glass against the wall; they shouted: “Hurrah for

France! Hurrah for England! Hurrah for peace!” They were carrying

flags and flowers. Daladier stood on the top step and looked at

them dumbfounded. Then he turned to Leger and said between his

teeth:

“The God-damned fools!”

=Fascism through Italian Eyes=

Collectively, the novels of Ezio Taddei, Alberto Moravia, and Ignazio

Silone present a history of Italy during the years that saw Mussolini’s

rise, reign, and ruin. Taddei’s _The Pine Tree and the Mole_ (1945)

is set in Livorno in 1919. On one social level the novel follows

the career of Michele Pellizari, whose political odyssey leads him

from the Italian Socialist Party to the Fascist Party, and eventually

to a return to the land of his peasant people. On another level the

novel relates the rise of Rubachiuchi from jailbird to Fascist agent

provocateur and party official. There are many long passages throughout

the book in which Taddei drops his characters to go directly to a

recital of the events which led to the triumph of the Fascists. He

describes the return of war veterans filled with unrest and plagued

with unemployment. He records the failure of the Socialists as the

Fascists deliberately fill their Black Shirt squads with convicted

criminals. He sets down the workers’ capture of the factories and

finally the Fascist march on Rome.

In _The Conformist_ (1951) Alberto Moravia is more concerned with

a psychological portrait of Marcello Clerici than he is with the

description of the period. But in analyzing the trauma-inspired desire

for conformity which led to his job in Mussolini’s secret police,

Moravia tells a good deal about the political climate of Italy of

yesterday--from the palmy days of the Ethiopian campaign to the time

of the retribution which leaves Marcello and his family dead by the

roadside from the bullets of a strafing Allied plane.

Three of Ignazio Silone’s powerful novels, _Fontamara_, _Bread and

Wine_, and _A Handful of Blackberries_, deal with Italian political

history from the middle thirties to the years immediately following

World War II. Writing from exile when the Fascists were in power,

Silone consistently dealt with the repression of the Italian peasant.

Although he always focuses on small places such as Fontamara,

Pietrasecca, and San Luca, his characters are in a sense generic,

representing the non-Fascists who want only enough bread and wine to

live life decently with a little comfort and security. Silone describes

the regimentation of Italian life in the city as well as the village.

He also shows, as does Koestler in _Darkness at Noon_, the destruction

of the Communist Party after the rise to power of a dictatorship of the

Right. _A Handful of Blackberries_ has as its background the resurgence

of the Italian Communist Party after the fall of Mussolini. But Silone

preserves a continuity with his earlier books by a continuing account

of the struggle of the peasants against the landed families. In this

book the Tarocchi family is the equivalent of Prince Torlonia in

Fontamara. Fascism has been crushed, but the great landowner is still

the force which the peasant must fight to keep his small plot.

=Alan Paton: The Trek of the Boers=

Alan Paton’s _Cry, the Beloved Country_ and _Too Late the Phalarope_

detail the bases of South Africa’s explosive contemporary political

life. The anti-Negro legislation, the segregation, the police control

of the native peoples are all set forth. Paton’s moving novels record

the individual tragedies which transpire in this climate of tears and

violence. They also show their historical antecedents. The red flashes

which Pieter Van Vlaanderen wore on his shoulders during the war meant

that he would fight anywhere in Africa. To some this made him

a Smuts man, a traitor to the language and struggle of the

Afrikaner people, and a lickspittle of the British Empire and the

English King, fighting in an English war that no true Afrikaner

would take part in.

Here is a historical fact that illustrates the division between the

peoples of South Africa. Another is the Immorality Act of 1927, which

typifies another great source of conflict and causes Pieter’s ruin.

=Richard Kaufmann: The Third Reich=

Richard Kaufmann’s _Heaven Pays No Dividends_ (1951) is one of the

better books to come out of post-war Germany although it is not, as

its cover enthusiastically declares, the “modern _All Quiet on the

Western Front_.” Roderich Stamm is a completely non-political young

art historian who drifts into Nazi organizations because life is made

rather unpleasant for one outside them. His father, however, is an

economist who becomes attracted to the Nazi movement, lectures at

meetings, and eventually rises to an important post in Hitler’s Foreign

Ministry. As a gunner in a flak battery, Stamm fights in France,

Russia, and Germany. He emerges from the war minus several teeth,

an arm, and all his illusions. Each of the girls he has loved has

married or died. Through his eyes the reader sees the events leading

to victory in Paris and defeat on the road from Stalingrad. But one

also meets Gestapo men like Alfred Karawan and officials like Heinrich

Himmler. This novel chronicles the sound and fury of politics and war

as it explores the effects on the German people of the rise and fall

of the Third Reich. Less political than most novels in this study,

Kaufmann’s book has a good deal in common with many of them. The lives

of its people are played out against a backdrop of local, national, and

international affairs. And the novelist records not only the comings

and goings of the individuals he creates, but also the events of the

world in which they live.

chapter four

The Novel as Mirror of National Character

A political novel invariably reveals the attitude of its author toward

the national groups from which its characters come. Often the author

may seek to draw a national portrait by describing political behavior

which he believes is peculiarly characteristic of Spaniards or Greeks

or Englishmen. Two novels which thus portray the Russians are _Under

Western Eyes_ and _The Possessed_. The reader may work with a body

of novels which do not deliberately attempt to delineate national

character, and yet he will still arrive at some conception of national

behavior patterns. He can do this by assessing the subjects treated. If

most of the novels deal with underground activities, coups d’état, or

revolutions, he is justified in assuming that this is a people which

takes its politics seriously, and emotionally. If most of the novels

concern parliamentary give and take, clever use of rules, strategic

marches and countermarches, he has a right to conclude that this

national group has achieved some degree of political sophistication.

In dealing with the American novel one has to draw conclusions in this

way. There is a great deal of close attention to tactical and strategic

moves, but there is not too much scrutiny of larger behavior patterns.

The appraiser must use whatever materials seem capable of giving

insight: detailed discussion which is precisely in point, a recurrent

basic situation, or a group of themes whose frequency of appearance is

a good indication of their importance and relevance.

Enough American and English novels are included here to justify drawing

some conclusions. Some of the other national literatures discussed,

however, are represented by relatively few books. Since they constitute

a small sample, one can draw only tentative conclusions. But almost

all these novels are by very talented writers whose work is considered

representative of the best in this genre within their national

literatures. They are novels which offer skilled portrayals of life by

artists entitled to a hearing on their own merits. In order to extract

as much from the novel as possible in this area, comments on nations

have been accepted from foreigners where they seem valid.

The political novel · 第 31 / 51 题