Chapter XXXVI.

And now, since we have touched upon the subject of the prophets, what we

are about to advance will be useful not only to the Jews, who believe

that they spake by divine inspiration, but also to the more candid among

the Greeks. To these we say that we must necessarily admit that the Jews

had prophets, if they were to be kept together under that system of law

which had been given them, and were to believe in the Creator of the

world, as they had learned, and to be without pretexts, so far as the

law was concerned, for apostatizing to the polytheism of the heathen.

And we establish this necessity in the following manner. “For the

nations,” as it is written in the law of the Jews itself, “shall hearken

unto observers of times, and diviners;”[1181] but to that people it is

said: “But as for thee, the Lord thy God hath not suffered thee so to

do.”[1182] And to this is subjoined the promise: “A prophet shall the

Lord thy God raise up unto thee from among thy brethren.”[1183] Since,

therefore, the heathen employ modes of divination either by oracles or

by omens, or by birds, or by ventriloquists, or by those who profess the

art of sacrifice, or by Chaldean genealogists—all which practices were

forbidden to the Jews—this people, if they had no means of attaining a

knowledge of futurity, being led by the passion common to humanity of

ascertaining the future, would have despised their own prophets, as not

having in them any particle of divinity; and would not have accepted any

prophet after Moses, nor committed their words to writing, but would

have spontaneously betaken themselves to the divining usages of the

heathen, or attempted to establish some such practices amongst

themselves. There is therefore no absurdity in their prophets having

uttered predictions even about events of no importance, to soothe those

who desire such things, as when Samuel prophesies regarding three

she-asses which were lost,[1184] or when mention is made in the third

book of Kings respecting the sickness of a king’s son.[1185] And why

should not those who desired to obtain auguries from idols be severely

rebuked by the administrators of the law among the Jews?—as Elijah is

found rebuking Ahaziah, and saying, “Is it because there is not a God in

Israel that ye go to inquire of Baalzebub, god of Ekron?[1186]”

Footnote 1181:

Cf. Deut. xviii. 14.

Footnote 1182:

Cf. Deut. xviii. 14.

Footnote 1183:

Cf. Deut. xviii. 15.

Footnote 1184:

Cf. 1 Sam. ix. 10.

Footnote 1185:

Cf. 1 Kings xiv. 12.

Footnote 1186:

Cf. 2 Kings i. 3.

The writings of Origen, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 36 / 71 章