THE WEEK.

September 7.--The birth-day of Dr. Samuel Johnson. He was born in 1709,

in the city of Litchfield, where his father was a bookseller. Having

received the elements of a classical education principally at the

grammar school of his native place, he was sent at the age of nineteen

to Pembroke College, Oxford, by a gentleman who engaged to maintain him

there as a companion to his son. After some time, however, this person

withdrew his aid; and Johnson, having made an ineffectual attempt to

subsist on his own resources, found himself obliged to discontinue his

residence before obtaining a degree. He had already, however, during the

period he spent at the university, obtained a high reputation for

scholarship and abilities. For many succeeding years the life of this

distinguished luminary of English literature was one of those hard

struggles with poverty which learning and genius have so often been

called on to sustain. About the time that he left college, namely, in

1731, his father died, leaving scarcely twenty pounds behind him. Thus

situated, Johnson was constrained to accept the office of usher at the

grammar-school of Market Bosworth. But the treatment to which he was

subjected soon forced him to give up this appointment. He now attempted

in succession various projects of a literary nature, in order to escape

from the extremest indigence. In 1735 he married a Mrs. Porter, the

widow of a mercer, who brought him a fortune of about 800_l._; and with

this money he opened a boarding-school at Edial. But the scheme met with

no success. He then determined to set out for London; and here

accordingly he arrived in March, 1737, accompanied by a young friend,

who had been one of his pupils, David Garrick, who afterwards became the

greatest actor that the modern world had seen. The first employment

which he obtained was from the proprietors of the Gentleman’s Magazine.

But the emoluments he derived from this source were very insufficient to

afford him a respectable subsistence; and he was often without a

shilling to procure him bread during the day, or a lodging wherein to

lay his head at night. These difficulties clung to him for a long while,

but they did not prevent him from gradually working his way to literary

distinction. His reports of parliamentary debates, inserted in the

Gentleman’s Magazine, which were often almost entirely original

compositions of his own, attracted a great deal of notice; but it was

not till long afterwards that their authorship was generally known. The

year after his arrival in the metropolis, he published his poem,

entitled ‘London’, in imitation of the third Satire of Juvenal. This

production had the honour of being commended in very warm terms by Pope.

In 1744 appeared his eloquent and striking life of his friend Savage.

Three years after he was engaged by an association of booksellers to

prepare a new Dictionary of the English Language. This celebrated work

occupied the greater part of his time for seven years, and at last

appeared in 1755, after the money, 1500 guineas, which it had been

agreed he should receive for his labour, was all spent. It brought him,

however, a large share of public applause, and at once placed his name

among the first of the living cultivators of English literature.

Meanwhile, even before the appearance of his Dictionary, he had by

various occasional productions been steadily advancing himself in

reputation, although not in wealth. In 1749 he gave to the world his

imitation of Juvenal’s tenth Satire, under the title of ‘The Vanity of

Human Wishes.’ The same year his tragedy of Irene, which he had brought

with him when he first came to town, was produced at Drury Lane by his

friend Garrick. In March, 1750, he commenced the publication of ‘The

Rambler,’ which he continued for two years at the rate of two papers

every week, the whole, with the exception of only five numbers, being

the production of his own pen. These, and other works, however, failed

in relieving him from the pressure of great pecuniary difficulties, as

is proved by the fact, that in 1756 he was arrested for a debt of about

five pounds, and only obtained his liberty by borrowing the money from a

friend. In 1758 he began a new periodical publication, to which he gave

the name of ‘The Idler,’ and which, like the ‘Rambler,’ he carried on

for about two years. In 1759 his mother, to whom he was tenderly

attached, died at an advanced age; and having gone down to Litchfield to

superintend her funeral, he there wrote his beautiful romance of

Rasselas in a single week, while his parent lay unburied, in order to

obtain the means of defraying the expenses of her interment. This may

well be characterised as the finest anecdote that is to be told of Dr.

Johnson; for the whole range of biography scarcely records anything more

noble or affecting. At last, in 1762, the Crown was advised to bestow

upon him a pension of 300_l._ per annum; an act of bounty which placed

him for the rest of his life in ease and affluence. After this he

distinguished himself as much by the brilliancy and power of his

conversation in the literary circles and general society which he

frequented, as by his labours with his pen; but still he was far from

relinquishing authorship. In 1765 appeared a new edition of Shakspeare,

in the superintendence of which he had been long engaged, and the

splendid preface to which is one of the most celebrated of his

productions. In 1773 he published the well-known account of his ‘Journey

to the Western Isles of Scotland,’ which he had just accomplished in

company with his friend Boswell. In 1775 he received the degree of LL.D.

from the University of Oxford; and in 1781 he brought to a close the

last, and perhaps, upon the whole, the greatest of his works, his ‘Lives

of the Poets,’ in four volumes octavo. He survived this publication only

a few years, and having died on the 13th of December, 1784, in the

seventy-sixth year of his age, he was interred with great solemnity in

Westminster Abbey, in a grave near to that of his friend Garrick.

Notwithstanding considerable heat of temper and arrogance of manner, as

well as some weak prejudices and singularities by which he was marked,

it is impossible to deny that the moral character of Dr. Johnson

abounded in noble points, or to regard it upon the whole with other

feelings than those of admiration and reverence. A scrupulous respect

for virtue, evinced both by the language and scope of all his writings

and by the unvarying tenor of his conduct, a lofty scorn of injustice

and baseness, a spirit of independence and self-reliance which no trials

and sufferings could tame down either to despair or servility, a warm

sympathy with human sorrow wheresoever found or howsoever caused, the

intrepidity to do a good action in the face even of the world’s laugh,

and charity in relieving the unfortunate to the utmost verge of his

means, and even to his own painful inconvenience,--all these

dispositions, based on religious principle, and adorned and crowded by

the most fervid piety, are sufficient to cast into the shade far deeper

traits of frailty than any with which his nature can fairly be said to

have been marked. The question of the intellectual rank properly

belonging to Dr. Johnson has given rise to more difference of opinion.

He was certainly neither a very original nor a very subtle thinker; and

his eminence, indeed, will probably be maintained even by his warmest

admirers on the ground rather of his powers of expression than of

thought. His poetry rarely ascends beyond the height of rhetoric in

rhyme; and his metaphysical and philosophical speculations are

throughout extremely common-place and unrefined. But in what may be

called the _art_ of criticism, the detection of conventional beauties

and defects, and the delineation of the merely _literary_ character of a

writer’s productions, he is a great master. His style is undoubtedly a

bad one in the main; for, to say nothing of its being more Latin than

English, and so studiously regulated on the principle of mere

sonorousness that it almost entirely wants picturesqueness and the other

higher qualities which contribute to effective expression, it is suited

at the best to only one kind of writing, the grave didactic. Still, with

all its faults, even this style has great qualities. Its dignity is

often very imposing, and its inventor is certainly entitled to the

praise of having set the example of a grammatical accuracy and general

finish of composition not to be found in the works of our best authors

before his time, but which have since been copied by all.

[Illustration: Johnson.]

---------------------

_The Firemen’s Dog._--A gentleman connected with one of the principal

London fire-insurance offices has sent us the following account of the

dog whose singular propensities we described in Number 23. Our

correspondent has been induced to make particular inquiries in

consequence of our notice:--“His home, if it can be called so, is in one

of the recesses of Blackfriars Bridge; and it is supposed he has

acquired his taste for blazes in consequence of being noticed by the

firemen who so frequently pass over that bridge. It has been remarked

that he invariably follows close upon the heels of every fireman he sees

until driven away. This induces me to believe that it is for the men and

not for the fires that he entertains so strong a regard. On one occasion

he followed the engines to a fire at Greenwich, and remained there until

the last of the engines had packed up its apparatus to depart. On

another occasion (the fire at Mr. Tyler’s premises, in Warwick Lane) he

remained with the men sixteen days, during which they were employed in

rescuing property from the smouldering ruins. He is perfectly well known

to every fireman in London. He is called ‘Tyke,’ and is exceedingly ugly

in his appearance, being one of the worst formed specimens of the

turnspit breed.”

---------------------

_Division of Time used by the Inhabitants of the Feroe Islands._--They

have one method of dividing time peculiar to themselves: they reckon the

day and night by eight _ökter_ of three hours each; the _ökters_ again

are reduced into halves, and they are named according to the point of

the compass where the sun is at the time: for example, East-North-East

is half past four in the morning; East is six; East-South-East, half

past seven.--_Landt’s Description._

---------------------

The penny magazine of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, issue 27, September 1, 1832 · 第 10 / 14 题