Before 1842 Comte had been in correspondence with our distin

Produced by Paul Murray, Richard J. Shiffer and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

[Transcriber's Note: Every effort has been made to replicate this

text as faithfully as possible, including obsolete and variant

spellings and other inconsistencies. Text that has been changed to

correct an obvious error is noted at the end of this ebook.]

CRITICAL

MISCELLANIES

BY

JOHN MORLEY

VOL. III.

Essay 10: Auguste Comte

London

MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED

NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY

1904

CONTENTS

AUGUSTE COMTE.

PAGE

Introduction 337

Influence of Saint Simon 340

Marriage 343

Serious illness 345

Official work 347

Completion of _Positive Philosophy_ 349

J. S. Mill 350

Question of Subsidy 352

Money 353

Literary method 354

_Hygiene cerebrale_ 356

Madame de Vaux 356

_Positive Polity_ 358

Death 359

Comte's philosophic consistency 360

Early writings 361

Law of the Three States 363

Classification of sciences 366

The double key of Positive Philosophy 368

Criticism on Comte's classification 369

Sociological conceptions 371

Method 371

Decisive importance of intellectual development 373

Historical elucidations 374

Their value and popularity 374

Social dynamics in the _Positive Polity_ 375

The Positivist system 376

The key to social regeneration 377

The Religion of Humanity 377

The Great Being 378

Remarks on the Religion 378

The worship and discipline 380

The priesthood 381

Women 382

Conclusion 383

AUGUSTE COMTE.[1]

Comte is now generally admitted to have been the most eminent and

important of that interesting group of thinkers whom the overthrow of

old institutions in France turned towards social speculation. Vastly

superior as he was to men like De Maistre on the one hand, and to men

like Saint Simon or Fourier on the other, as well in scientific

acquisitions as in mental capacity, still the aim and interest of all

his thinking was also theirs, namely, the renovation of the conditions

of the social union. If, however, we classify him, not thus according

to aim, but according to method, then he takes rank among men of a

very different type from these. What distinguishes him in method from

his contemporaries is his discernment that the social order cannot be

transformed until all the theoretic conceptions that belong to it have

been rehandled in a scientific spirit, and maturely gathered up into a

systematic whole along with the rest of our knowledge. This presiding

doctrine connects Comte with the social thinkers of the eighteenth

century,--indirectly with Montesquieu, directly with Turgot, and more

closely than either with Condorcet, of whom he was accustomed to speak

as his philosophic father.

[1] Reprinted by the kind permission of Messrs. A. and C. Black

from the new edition of the _Encyclopaedia Britannica_.

Isidore-Auguste-Marie-Francois-Xavier Comte was born in January 1798,

at Montpellier, where his father was a receiver-general of taxes for

the district. He was sent for his earliest instruction to the school

of the town, and in 1814 was admitted to the Ecole Polytechnique. His

youth was marked by a constant willingness to rebel against merely

official authority; to genuine excellence, whether moral or

intellectual, he was always ready to pay unbounded deference. That

strenuous application which was one of his most remarkable gifts in

manhood showed itself in his youth, and his application was backed or

inspired by superior intelligence and aptness. After he had been two

years at the Ecole Polytechnique he took a foremost part in a mutinous

demonstration against one of the masters; the school was broken up,

and Comte like the other scholars was sent home. To the great

dissatisfaction of his parents, he resolved to return to Paris (1816),

and to earn his living there by giving lessons in mathematics.

Benjamin Franklin was the youth's idol at this moment. 'I seek to

imitate the modern Socrates,' he wrote to a school friend, 'not in

talents, but in way of living. You know that at five and twenty he

formed the design of becoming perfectly wise, and that he fulfilled

his design. I have dared to undertake the same thing, though I am not

yet twenty.' Though Comte's character and aims were as far removed as

possible from Franklin's type, neither Franklin nor any man that ever

lived could surpass him in the heroic tenacity with which, in the face

of a thousand obstacles, he pursued his own ideal of a vocation.

For a moment circumstances led him to think of seeking a career in

America, but a friend who preceded him thither warned him of the

purely practical spirit that prevailed in the new country. 'If

Lagrange were to come to the United States, he could only earn his

livelihood by turning land surveyor.' So Comte remained in Paris,

living as he best could on something less than L80 a year, and hoping,

when he took the trouble to break his meditations upon greater things

by hopes about himself, that he might by and by obtain an appointment

as mathematical master in a school. A friend procured him a situation

as tutor in the house of Casimir Perier. The salary was good, but the

duties were too miscellaneous, and what was still worse, there was an

end of the delicious liberty of the garret. After a short experience

of three weeks Comte returned to neediness and contentment. He was not

altogether without the young man's appetite for pleasure; yet when he

was only nineteen we find him wondering, amid the gaieties of the

carnival of 1817, how a gavotte or a minuet could make people forget

that thirty thousand human beings around them had barely a morsel to

eat. Hardship in youth has many drawbacks, but it has the immense

advantage over academic ease of making the student's interest in men

real, and not merely literary.

Towards 1818 Comte became associated as friend and disciple with a man

who was destined to exercise a very decisive influence upon the turn

of his speculation. Henry, count of Saint Simon, was second cousin of

the famous duke of Saint Simon, the friend of the Regent, and author

of the most important set of memoirs in a language that is so

incomparably rich in memoirs. He was now nearly sixty, and if he had

not gained a serious reputation, he had at least excited the curiosity

and interest of his contemporaries by the social eccentricities of his

life, by the multitude of his schemes and devices, and by the

fantastic ingenuity of his political ideas. Saint Simon's most

characteristic faculty was an exuberant imagination, working in the

sphere of real things. Scientific discipline did nothing for him; he

had never undergone it, and he never felt its value. He was an artist

in social construction; and if right ideas, or the suggestion of right

ideas, sometimes came into his head, about history, about human

progress, about a stable polity, such ideas were not the products of

trains of ordered reasoning; they were the intuitional glimpses of the

poet, and consequently as they professed to be in real matter, even

the right ideas were as often as not accompanied by wrong ones.

The young Comte, now twenty, was enchanted by the philosophic veteran.

In after years he so far forgot himself as to write of Saint Simon as

a depraved quack, and to deplore his connection with him as purely

mischievous. While the connection lasted he thought very differently.

Saint Simon is described as the most estimable and lovable of men, and

the most delightful in his relations; he is the worthiest of

philosophers. Even after the association had come to an end, and at

the very moment when Comte was congratulating himself on having thrown

off the yoke, he honestly admits that Saint Simon's influence has been

of powerful service in his philosophic education. 'I certainly,' he

writes to his most intimate friend, 'am under great personal

obligations to Saint Simon; that is to say, he helped in a powerful

degree to launch me in the philosophical direction that I have now

definitely marked out for myself, and that I shall follow without

looking back for the rest of my life.' Even if there were no such

unmistakable expressions as these, the most cursory glance into Saint

Simon's writings is enough to reveal the thread of connection between

the ingenious visionary and systematic thinker. We see the debt, and

we also see that when it is stated at the highest possible, nothing

has really been taken either from Comte's claims as a powerful

original thinker, or from his immeasurable pre-eminence over Saint

Simon in intellectual grasp and vigour and coherence. As high a degree

of originality may be shown in transformation as in invention, as

Moliere and Shakespeare have proved in the region of dramatic art. In

philosophy the conditions are not different. _Il faut prendre son

bien ou on le trouve._

It is no detriment to Comte's fame that some of the ideas which he

recombined and incorporated in a great philosophic structure had their

origin in ideas that were produced almost at random in the incessant

fermentation of Saint Simon's brain. Comte is in no true sense a

follower of Saint Simon, but it was undoubtedly Saint Simon who

launched him, to take Comte's own word, by suggesting to his strong

and penetrating mind the two starting-points of what grew into the

Comtist system--first, that political phenomena are as capable of

being grouped under laws as other phenomena; and second, that the true

destination of philosophy must be social, and the true object of the

thinker must be the reorganisation of the moral, religious, and

political systems. We can readily see what an impulse these

far-reaching conceptions would give to Comte's meditations. There were

conceptions of less importance than these, in which it is impossible

not to feel that it was Saint Simon's wrong or imperfect idea that put

his young admirer on the track to a right and perfected idea. The

subject is not worthy of further discussion. That Comte would have

performed some great intellectual achievement, if Saint Simon had

never been born, is certain. It is hardly less certain that the great

achievement which he did actually perform was originally set in motion

by Saint Simon's conversation, though it was afterwards directly

filiated with the fertile speculations of Turgot and Condorcet. Comte

thought almost as meanly of Plato as he did of Saint Simon, and he

considered Aristotle the prince of all true thinkers; yet their vital

difference about Ideas did not prevent Aristotle from calling Plato

master.

After six years the differences between the old and the young

philosopher grew too marked for friendship. Comte began to fret under

Saint Simon's pretensions to be his director. Saint Simon, on the

other hand, perhaps began to feel uncomfortably conscious of the

superiority of his disciple. The occasion of the breach between them

(1824) was an attempt on Saint Simon's part to print a production of

Comte's as if it were in some sort connected with Saint Simon's

schemes of social reorganisation. Comte was never a man to quarrel by

halves, and not only was the breach not repaired, but long afterwards

Comte, as we have said, with painful ungraciousness took to calling

the encourager of his youth by very hard names.

In 1825 Comte married. His marriage was one of those of which

'magnanimity owes no account to prudence,' and it did not turn out

prosperously. His family were strongly Catholic and royalist, and they

were outraged by his refusal to have the marriage performed other than

civilly. They consented, however, to receive his wife, and the pair

went on a visit to Montpellier. Madame Comte conceived a dislike to

the circle she found there, and this was the too early beginning of

disputes which lasted for the remainder of their union. In the year of

his marriage we find Comte writing to the most intimate of his

correspondents:--'I have nothing left but to concentrate my whole

moral existence in my intellectual work, a precious but inadequate

compensation; and so I must give up, if not the most dazzling, still

the sweetest part of my happiness.' We cannot help admiring the

heroism which cherishes great ideas in the midst of petty miseries,

and intrepidly throws all squalid interruptions into the background

which is their true place. Still, we may well suppose that the sordid

cares that come with want of money made a harmonious life none the

more easy. Comte tried to find pupils to board with him, but only one

pupil came, and he was soon sent away for lack of companions. 'I would

rather spend an evening,' wrote the needy enthusiast, 'in solving a

difficult question, than in running after some empty-headed and

consequential millionaire in search of a pupil.' A little money was

earned by an occasional article in _Le Producteur_, in which he began

to expound the philosophic ideas that were now maturing in his mind.

He announced a course of lectures (1826), which it was hoped would

bring money as well as fame, and which were to be the first dogmatic

exposition of the Positive Philosophy. A friend had said to him, 'You

talk too freely, your ideas are getting abroad, and other people use

them without giving you the credit; put your ownership on record.' The

lectures were intended to do this among other things, and they

attracted hearers so eminent as Humboldt the cosmologist, as Poinsot

the geometer, as Blainville the physiologist.

Unhappily, after the third lecture of the course, Comte had a severe

attack of cerebral derangement, brought on by intense and prolonged

meditation, acting on a system that was already irritated by the

chagrin of domestic failure. He did not recover his health for more

than a year, and as soon as convalescence set in he was seized by so

profound a melancholy at the disaster which had thus overtaken him,

that he threw himself into the Seine. Fortunately he was rescued, and

the shock did not stay his return to mental soundness. One incident of

this painful episode is worth mentioning. Lamennais, then in the

height of his Catholic exaltation, persuaded Comte's mother to insist

on her son being married with the religious ceremony, and as the

younger Madame Comte apparently did not resist, the rite was duly

performed, in spite of the fact that the unfortunate man was at the

time neither more nor less than raving mad. To such shocking

conspiracies against common sense and decency does ecclesiastical

zealotry bring even good men like Lamennais. On the other hand,

philosophic assailants of Comtism have not always resisted the

temptation to recall the circumstance that its founder was once out of

his mind,--an unworthy and irrelevant device, that cannot be excused

even by the provocation of Comte's own occasional acerbity. As has

been justly said, if Newton once suffered a cerebral attack without on

that account forfeiting our veneration for the _Principia_, Comte may

have suffered in the same way, and still not have forfeited our

respect for what is good in the systems of Positive Philosophy and

Positive Polity.

In 1828 the lectures were renewed, and in 1830 was published the first

volume of the _Course of Positive Philosophy_. The sketch and ground

plan of this great undertaking had appeared in 1826. The sixth and

last volume was published in 1842. The twelve years covering the

publication of the first of Comte's two elaborate works were years of

indefatigable toil, and they were the only portion of his life in

which he enjoyed a certain measure, and that a very modest measure, of

material prosperity. In 1833 he was appointed examiner of the boys in

the various provincial schools who aspired to enter the Ecole

Polytechnique at Paris. This and two other engagements as a teacher of

mathematics secured him an income of some L400 a year. He made M.

Guizot, then Louis Philippe's minister, the important proposal to

establish a chair of general history of the sciences. If there are

four chairs, he argued, devoted to the history of philosophy, that is

to say, the minute study of all sorts of dreams and aberrations

through the ages, surely there ought to be at least one to explain the

formation and progress of our real knowledge? This wise suggestion,

which still remains to be acted upon, was at first welcomed, according

to Comte's own account, by Guizot's philosophic instinct, and then

repulsed by his 'metaphysical rancour.'

Meanwhile Comte did his official work conscientiously, sorely as he

grudged the time which it took from the execution of the great object

of his thoughts. We cannot forbear to transcribe one delightful and

touching trait in connection with this part of Comte's life. 'I hardly

know if even to you,' he writes in the expansion of domestic

confidence to his wife, 'I dare disclose the sweet and softened

feeling that comes over me when I find a young man whose examination

is thoroughly satisfactory. Yes, though you may smile, the emotion

would easily stir me to tears if I were not carefully on my guard.'

Such sympathy with youthful hope; in union with the industry and

intelligence that are the only means of bringing the hope to

fulfilment, shows that Comte's dry and austere manner veiled the fires

of a generous social emotion. It was this which made the overworked

student take upon himself the burden of delivering every year from

1831 to 1848 a course of gratuitous lectures on astronomy for a

popular audience. The social feeling that inspired this disinterested

act showed itself in other ways. He suffered the penalty of

imprisonment rather than serve in the national guard; his position was

that though he would not take arms against the new monarchy of July,

yet being a republican he would take no oath to defend it. The only

amusement that Comte permitted himself was a visit to the opera. In

his youth he had been a playgoer, but he shortly came to the

conclusion that tragedy is a stilted and bombastic art, and after a

time comedy interested him no more than tragedy. For the opera he had

a genuine passion, which he gratified as often as he could, until his

means became too narrow to afford even that single relaxation.

Of his manner and personal appearance we have the following account

from one who was his pupil:--'Daily as the clock struck eight on the

horologe of the Luxembourg, while the ringing hammer on the bell was

yet audible, the door of my room opened, and there entered a man,

short, rather stout, almost what one might call sleek, freshly shaven,

without vestige of whisker or moustache. He was invariably dressed in

a suit of the most spotless black, as if going to a dinner party; his

white neckcloth was fresh from the laundress's hands, and his hat

shining like a racer's coat. He advanced to the arm-chair prepared for

him in the centre of the writing-table, laid his hat on the left-hand

corner; his snuff-box was deposited on the same side beside the quire

of paper placed in readiness for his use, and dipping the pen twice

into the ink-bottle, then bringing it to within an inch of his nose,

to make sure it was properly filled, he broke silence: "We have said

that the chord AB," etc. For three quarters of an hour he continued

his demonstration, making short notes as he went on, to guide the

listener in repeating the problem alone; then, taking up another

cahier which lay beside him, he went over the written repetition of

the former lesson. He explained, corrected, or commented till the

clock struck nine; then, with the little finger of the right hand

brushing from his coat and waistcoat the shower of superfluous snuff

which had fallen on them, he pocketed his snuff-box, and resuming his

hat, he as silently as when he came in made his exit by the door which

I rushed to open for him.'

In 1842, as we have said, the last volume of the _Positive Philosophy_

was given to the public. Instead of that contentment which we like to

picture as the reward of twelve years of meritorious toil devoted to

the erection of a high philosophic edifice, the author of this great

contribution found himself in the midst of a very sea of small

troubles. And they were troubles of that uncompensated kind that

harass without elevating, and waste a man's spirit without softening

or enlarging it. First, the jar of temperament between Comte and his

wife had become so unbearable that they separated (1842). It is not

expedient for strangers to attempt to allot blame in such cases, for

it is impossible for strangers to know all the deciding circumstances.

We need only say that in spite of one or two disadvantageous facts in

her career which do not concern the public, Madame Comte seems to have

uniformly comported herself towards her husband with an honourable

solicitude for his wellbeing. Comte made her an annual allowance, and

for some years after the separation they corresponded on friendly

terms. Next in the list of the vexations that greeted Comte on

emerging from the long tunnel of philosophising was a lawsuit with his

publisher. The publisher had impertinently inserted in the sixth

volume a protest against a certain foot-note, in which Comte had used

some hard words about M. Arago. Comte threw himself into the suit with

an energy worthy of Voltaire, and he won it. Third, and worst of all,

he had prefixed a preface to the sixth volume, in which he

deliberately went out of his way to rouse the active enmity of the

very men on whom depended his annual re-election to the post of

examiner for the Polytechnic School. The result of this perversity was

that by and by he lost the appointment, and with it one half of his

very modest income. This was the occasion of an episode, which is of

more than merely personal interest.

Before 1842 Comte had been in correspondence with our distinguished

countryman, J. S. Mill. Mr. Mill had been greatly impressed by Comte's

philosophic ideas; he admits that his own _System of Logic_ owes many

valuable thoughts to Comte, and that, in the portion of that work

which treats of the logic of the moral sciences, a radical improvement

in the conceptions of logical method was derived from the _Positive

Philosophy_. Their correspondence, which was extremely full and

copious, and which we may hope will one day be made accessible to the

public, turned principally upon the two great questions of the

equality between men and women, and of the expediency and

constitution of a sacerdotal or spiritual order. When Comte found

himself straitened, he confided the entire circumstances to his

English friend. As might be supposed by those who know the

affectionate anxiety with which Mr. Mill regarded the welfare of any

one whom he believed to be doing good work in the world, he at once

took pains to have Comte's loss of income made up to him, until Comte

should have had time to repair that loss by his own endeavour. Mr.

Mill persuaded Grote, Molesworth, and Raikes Currie to advance the sum

of L240. At the end of the year (that is in 1845) Comte had taken no

steps to enable himself to dispense with the aid of the three

Englishmen. Mr. Mill applied to them again, but with the exception of

Grote, who sent a small sum, they gave Comte to understand that they

expected him to earn his own living. Mr. Mill had suggested to Comte

that he should write articles for the English periodicals, and

expressed his own willingness to translate any such articles from the

French. Comte at first fell in with the plan, but he speedily

surprised and disconcerted Mr. Mill by boldly taking up the position

of 'high moral magistrate,' and accusing the three defaulting

contributors of a scandalous falling away from righteousness and a

high mind. Mr. Mill was chilled by these pretensions; they struck him

as savouring of a totally unexpected charlatanry; and the

correspondence came to an end. For Comte's position in the argument

one feels that there is much to be said. If you have good reason for

believing that a given thinker is doing work that will destroy the

official system of science or philosophy, and if you desire its

destruction, then you may fairly be asked to help to provide for him

the same kind of material freedom that is secured to the professors

and propagators of the official system by the state or by the

universities. And if it is a fine thing for a man to leave money

behind him in the shape of an endowment for the support of a

scientific teacher of whom he has never heard, why should it not be

just as natural and as laudable to give money, while he is yet alive,

to a teacher whom he both knows and approves of? On the other hand,

Grote and Molesworth might say that, for anything they could tell,

they would find themselves to be helping the construction of a system

of which they utterly disapproved. And, as things turned out, they

would have been perfectly justified in this serious apprehension. To

have done anything to make the production of the _Positive Polity_

easier would have been no ground for anything but remorse to any of

the three. It is just to Comte to remark that he always assumed that

the contributors to the support of a thinker should be in all

essentials of method and doctrine that thinker's disciples; aid from

indifferent persons he counted irrational and humiliating. But is an

endowment ever a blessing to the man who receives it? The question is

difficult to answer generally; in Comte's case there is reason in the

doubts felt by Madame Comte as to the expediency of relieving the

philosopher from the necessity of being in plain and business-like

relations with indifferent persons for a certain number of hours in

the week. Such relations do as much as a doctrine to keep egoism

within decent bounds, and they must be not only a relief, but a

wholesome corrective to the tendencies of concentrated thinking on

abstract subjects.

What finally happened was this. From 1845 to 1848 Comte lived as best

he could, as well as made his wife her allowance, on an income of L200

a year. We need scarcely say that he was rigorously thrifty. His

little account books of income and outlay, with every item entered

down to a few hours before his death, are accurate and neat enough to

have satisfied an ancient Roman householder. In 1848, through no fault

of his own, his salary was reduced to L80. M. Littre and others, with

Comte's approval, published an appeal for subscriptions, and on the

money thus contributed Comte subsisted for the remaining nine years of

his life. By 1852 the subsidy produced as much as L200 a year. It is

worth noticing, after the story we have told, that Mr. Mill was one of

the subscribers, and that M. Littre continued his assistance after he

had been driven from Comte's society by his high pontifical airs. We

are sorry not to be able to record any similar trait of magnanimity on

Comte's part. His character, admirable as it is for firmness, for

intensity, for inexorable will, for iron devotion to what he thought

the service of mankind, yet offers few of those softening qualities

that make us love good men and pity bad ones. He is of the type of

Brutus or of Cato--a model of austere fixity of purpose, but

ungracious, domineering, and not quite free from petty bitterness.

If you seek to place yourself in sympathy with Comte it is best to

think of him only as the intellectual worker, pursuing in uncomforted

obscurity the laborious and absorbing task to which he had given up

his whole life. His singularly conscientious fashion of elaborating

his ideas made the mental strain more intense than even so exhausting

a work as the abstract exposition of the principles of positive

science need have been, if he had followed a more self-indulgent plan.

He did not write down a word until he had first composed the whole

matter in his mind. When he had thoroughly meditated every sentence,

he sat down to write, and then, such was the grip of his memory, the

exact order of his thoughts came back to him as if without an effort,

and he wrote down precisely what he had intended to write, without the

aid of a note or a memorandum, and without check or pause. For

example, he began and completed in about six weeks a chapter in the

_Positive Philosophy_ (vol. v. ch. lv.), which would fill forty of the

large pages of the _Encyclopaedia Britannica_. Even if his subject had

been merely narrative or descriptive, this would be a very

satisfactory piece of continuous production. When we reflect that the

chapter in question is not narrative, but an abstract exposition of

the guiding principles of the movements of several centuries, with

many threads of complex thought running along side by side all

through the speculation, then the circumstances under which it was

reduced to literary form are really astonishing. It is hardly possible

for a critic to share the admiration expressed by some of Comte's

disciples for his style. We are not so unreasonable as to blame him

for failing to make his pages picturesque or thrilling; we do not want

sunsets and stars and roses and ecstasy; but there is a certain

standard for the most serious and abstract subjects. When compared

with such philosophic writing as Hume's, Diderot's, Berkeley's, then

Comte's manner is heavy, laboured, monotonous, without relief and

without light. There is now and then an energetic phrase, but as a

whole the vocabulary is jejune; the sentences are overloaded; the

pitch is flat. A scrupulous insistence on making his meaning clear led

to an iteration of certain adjectives and adverbs, which at length

deaden the effect beyond the endurance of all but the most resolute

students. Only the profound and stimulating interest of much of the

matter prevents one from thinking of Rivarol's ill-natured remark upon

Condorcet, that he wrote with opium on a page of lead. The general

effect is impressive, not by any virtues of style, for we do not

discern one, but by reason of the magnitude and importance of the

undertaking, and the visible conscientiousness and the grasp with

which it is executed. It is by sheer strength of thought, by the

vigorous perspicacity with which he strikes the lines of cleavage of

his subject, that he makes his way into the mind of the reader; in the

presence of gifts of this power we need not quarrel with an ungainly

style.

Comte pursued one practice which ought to be mentioned in connection

with his personal history, the practice of what he styled _hygiene

cerebrale_. After he had acquired what he considered to be a

sufficient stock of material, and this happened before he had

completed the _Positive Philosophy_, he abstained deliberately and

scrupulously from reading newspapers, reviews, scientific

transactions, and everything else whatever, except two or three poets

(notably Dante) and the _Imitatio Christi_. It is true that his

friends kept him informed of what was going on in the scientific

world. Still this partial divorce of himself from the record of the

social and scientific activity of his time, though it may save a

thinker from the deplorable evils of dispersion, moral and

intellectual, accounts in no small measure for the exaggerated egoism,

and the absence of all feeling for reality, which marked Comte's later

days.

Only one important incident in Comte's life now remains to be spoken

of. In 1845 he made the acquaintance of Madame Clotilde de Vaux, a

lady whose husband had been sent to the galleys for life, and who was

therefore, in all but the legal incidents of her position, a widow.

Very little is known about her qualities. She wrote a little piece

which Comte rated so preposterously as to talk about George Sand in

the same sentence; it is in truth a flimsy performance, though it

contains one or two gracious thoughts. There is true beauty in the

saying--_'It is unworthy of a noble nature to diffuse its pain.'_

Madame de Vaux's letters speak well for her good sense and good

feeling, and it would have been better for Comte's later work if she

had survived to exert a wholesome restraint on his exaltation. Their

friendship had only lasted a year when she died (1846), but the period

was long enough to give her memory a supreme ascendency in Comte's

mind. Condillac, Joubert, Mill, and other eminent men have shown what

the intellectual ascendency of a woman can be. Comte was as

inconsolable after Madame de Vaux's death as D'Alembert after the

death of Mademoiselle L'Espinasse. Every Wednesday afternoon he made a

reverential pilgrimage to her tomb, and three times every day he

invoked her memory in words of passionate expansion. His disciples

believe that in time the world will reverence Comte's sentiment about

Clotilde de Vaux, as it reveres Dante's adoration of Beatrice--a

parallel that Comte himself was the first to hit upon. It is no doubt

the worst kind of cynicism to make a mock in a realistic vein of any

personality that has set in motion the idealising thaumaturgy of the

affections. Yet we cannot help feeling that it is a grotesque and

unseemly anachronism to apply in grave prose, addressed to the whole

world, those terms of saint and angel which are touching and in their

place amid the trouble and passion of the great mystic poet. Only an

energetic and beautiful imagination, together with a mastery of the

rhythm and swell of impassioned speech, can prevent an invitation to

the public to hearken to the raptures of intense personal attachment

from seeming ludicrous and almost indecent. Whatever other gifts Comte

may have had--and he had many of the rarest kind,--poetic imagination

was not among them, any more than poetic or emotional expression was

among them. His was one of those natures whose faculty of deep feeling

is unhappily doomed to be inarticulate, and to pass away without the

magic power of transmitting itself.

Comte lost no time, after the completion of his _Course of Positive

Philosophy_, in proceeding with the _System of Positive Polity_, to

which the earlier work was designed to be a foundation. The first

volume was published in 1851, and the fourth and last in 1854. In

1848, when the political air was charged with stimulating elements, he

founded the Positive Society, with the expectation that it might grow

into a reunion as powerful over the new revolution as the Jacobin Club

had been in the revolution of 1789. The hope was not fulfilled, but a

certain number of philosophic disciples gathered round Comte, and

eventually formed themselves, under the guidance of the new ideas of

the latter half of his life, into a kind of church. In the years 1849,

1850, and 1851, Comte gave three courses of lectures at the Palais

Royal. They were gratuitous and popular, and in them he boldly

advanced the whole of his doctrine, as well as the direct and

immediate pretensions of himself and his system. The third course

ended in the following uncompromising terms--'In the name of the Past

and of the Future, the servants of Humanity--both its philosophical

and its practical servants--come forward to claim as their due the

general direction of this world. Their object is to constitute at

length a real Providence in all departments,--moral, intellectual, and

material. Consequently they exclude once for all from political

supremacy all the different servants of God--Catholic, Protestant, or

Deist--as being at once behindhand and a cause of disturbance.' A few

weeks after this invitation a very different person stepped forward to

constitute himself a real Providence.

In 1852 Comte published the _Catechism of Positivism_. In the preface

to it he took occasion to express his approval of Louis Napoleon's

_coup d'etat_ of the 2d of December,--'a fortunate crisis which has

set aside the parliamentary system, and instituted a dictatorial

republic.' Whatever we may think of the political sagacity of such a

judgment, it is due to Comte to say that he did not expect to see his

dictatorial republic transformed into a dynastic empire, and, next,

that he did expect from the Man of December freedom of the press and

of public meeting. His later hero was the Emperor Nicholas, 'the only

statesman in Christendom,'--as unlucky a judgment as that which placed

Dr. Francia in the Comtist Calendar.

In 1857 he was attacked by cancer, and died peaceably on the 5th of

September of that year. The anniversary is always celebrated by

ceremonial gatherings of his French and English followers, who then

commemorate the name and the services of the founder of their

religion. Comte was under sixty when he died. We cannot help

reflecting that one of the worst of all the evils connected with the

shortness of human life is the impatience that it breeds in some of

the most ardent and enlightened minds to hurry on the execution of

projects, for which neither the time nor the spirit of their author is

fully ripe.

In proceeding to give an outline of Comte's system, we shall consider

the _Positive Polity_ as the more or less legitimate sequel of the

_Positive Philosophy_, notwithstanding the deep gulf which so eminent

a critic as Mr. Mill insisted upon fixing between the earlier and the

later work.[2] There may be, as we think there is, the greatest

difference in their value, and the temper is not the same, nor the

method. But the two are quite capable of being regarded, and for the

purposes of an account of Comte's career ought to be regarded, as an

integral whole. His letters when he was a young man of one and twenty,

and before he had published a word, show how strongly present the

social motive was in his mind, and in what little account he should

hold his scientific works, if he did not perpetually think of their

utility for the species. 'I feel,' he wrote, 'that such scientific

reputation as I might acquire would give more value, more weight, more

useful influence to my political sermons.' In 1822 he published a

_Plan of the Scientific Works necessary to Reorganise Society_. In

this opuscule he points out that modern society is passing through a

great crisis, due to the conflict of two opposing movements,--the

first, a disorganising movement owing to the break-up of old

institutions and beliefs; the second, a movement towards a definite

social state, in which all means of human prosperity will receive

their most complete development and most direct application. How is

this crisis to be dealt with? What are the undertakings necessary in

order to pass successfully through it towards an organic state? The

answer to this is that there are two series of works. The first is

theoretic or spiritual, aiming at the development of a new principle

of co-ordinating social relations and the formation of the system of

general ideas which are destined to guide society. The second work is

practical or temporal; it settles the distribution of power and the

institutions that are most conformable to the spirit of the system

which has previously been thought out in the course of the theoretic

work. As the practical work depends on the conclusions of the

theoretical, the latter must obviously come first in order of

execution.

[2] The English reader is specially well placed for

satisfying such curiosity as he may have about Comte's

philosophy. Miss Martineau condensed the six volumes of the

_Philosophie Positive_ into two volumes of excellent English

(1853); Comte himself gave them a place in the Positivist

Library. The _Catechism_ was translated by Dr. Congreve in

1858. The _Politique Positive_ has been reproduced in English

(Longmans, 1875-1877) by the conscientious labour of Comte's

London followers. This translation is accompanied by a

careful running analysis and explanatory summary of contents,

which make the work more readily intelligible than the

original. For criticisms, the reader may be referred to Mr.

Mill's _Auguste Comte and Positivism_; Dr. Bridges's reply to

Mr. Mill, _The Unity of Comte's Life and Doctrines_ (1866);

Mr. Herbert Spencer's essay on the Genesis of Science, and

pamphlet on _The Classification of the Sciences_; Professor

Huxley's 'Scientific Aspects of Positivism,' in his _Lay

Sermons_; Dr. Congreve's _Essays Political, Social, and

Religious_ (1874); Mr. Fiske's _Outlines of Cosmic

Philosophy_ (1874); Mr. Lewes's _History of Philosophy_, vol.

ii.

In 1826 this was pushed further in a most remarkable piece called

_Considerations on the Spiritual Power_--the main object of which is

to demonstrate the necessity of instituting a spiritual power,

distinct from the temporal power and independent of it. In examining

the conditions of a spiritual power proper for modern times, he

indicates in so many terms the presence in his mind of a direct

analogy between his proposed spiritual power and the functions of the

Catholic clergy at the time of its greatest vigour and most complete

independence,--that is to say, from about the middle of the eleventh

century until towards the end of the thirteenth. He refers to De

Maistre's memorable book, _Du Pape_, as the most profound, accurate,

and methodical account of the old spiritual organisation, and starts

from that as the model to be adapted to the changed intellectual and

social conditions of the modern time. In the _Positive Philosophy_,

again (vol. v. p. 344), he distinctly says that Catholicism,

reconstituted as a system on new intellectual foundations, would

finally preside over the spiritual reorganisation of modern society.

Much else could easily be quoted to the same effect. If unity of

career, then, means that Comte from the beginning designed the

institution of a spiritual power and the systematic reorganisation of

life, it is difficult to deny him whatever credit that unity may be

worth, and the credit is perhaps not particularly great. Even the

re-adaptation of the Catholic system to a scientific doctrine was

plainly in his mind thirty years before the final execution of the

_Positive Polity_, though it is difficult to believe that he foresaw

the religious mysticism in which the task was to land him. A great

analysis was to precede a great synthesis, but it was the synthesis on

which Comte's vision was centred from the first. Let us first sketch

the nature of the analysis. Society is to be reorganised on the base

of knowledge. What is the sum and significance of knowledge? That is

the question which Comte's first master-work professes to answer.

The _Positive Philosophy_ opens with the statement of a certain law of

which Comte was the discoverer, and which has always been treated both

by disciples and dissidents as the key to his system. This is the Law

of the Three States. It is as follows. Each of our leading

conceptions, each branch of our knowledge, passes successively through

three different phases; there are three different ways in which the

human mind explains phenomena, each way following the other in order.

These three stages are the Theological, the Metaphysical, and the

Positive. Knowledge, or a branch of knowledge, is in the Theological

state, when it supposes the phenomena under consideration to be due

to immediate volition, either in the object or in some supernatural

being. In the Metaphysical state, for volition is substituted abstract

force residing in the object, yet existing independently of the

object; the phenomena are viewed as if apart from the bodies

manifesting them; and the properties of each substance have attributed

to them an existence distinct from that substance. In the Positive

state inherent volition or external volition and inherent force or

abstraction personified have both disappeared from men's minds, and

the explanation of a phenomenon means a reference of it, by way of

succession or resemblance, to some other phenomenon,--means the

establishment of a relation between the given fact and some more

general fact. In the Theological and Metaphysical state men seek a

cause or an essence; in the Positive they are content with a law. To

borrow an illustration from an able English disciple of Comte:--'Take

the phenomenon of the sleep produced by opium. The Arabs are content

to attribute it to the "will of God." Moliere's medical student

accounts for it by a _soporific principle_ contained in the opium. The

modern physiologist knows that he cannot account for it at all. He can

simply observe, analyse, and experiment upon the phenomena attending

the action of the drug, and classify it with other agents analogous in

character' (_Dr. Bridges_).

The first and greatest aim of the Positive Philosophy is to advance

the study of society into the third of the three stages,--to remove

social phenomena from the sphere of theological and metaphysical

conceptions, and to introduce among them the same scientific

observation of their laws which has given us physics, chemistry,

physiology. Social physics will consist of the conditions and

relations of the facts of society, and will have two departments,--one

statical, containing the laws of order; the other dynamical,

containing the laws of progress. While men's minds were in the

theological state, political events, for example, were explained by

the will of the gods, and political authority based on divine right.

In the metaphysical state of mind, then, to retain our instance,

political authority was based on the sovereignty of the people, and

social facts were explained by the figment of a falling away from a

state of nature. When the positive method has been finally extended to

society, as it has been to chemistry and physiology, these social

facts will be resolved, as their ultimate analysis, into relations

with one another, and instead of seeking causes in the old sense of

the word, men will only examine the conditions of social existence.

When that stage has been reached not merely the greater part, but the

whole, of our knowledge will be impressed with one character--the

character, namely, of positivity or scientificalness; and all our

conceptions in every part of knowledge will be thoroughly homogeneous.

The gains of such a change are enormous. The new philosophical unity

will now in its turn regenerate all the elements that went to its own

formation. The mind will pursue knowledge without the wasteful jar and

friction of conflicting methods and mutually hostile conceptions;

education will be regenerated; and society will reorganise itself on

the only possible solid base--a homogeneous philosophy.

The _Positive Philosophy_ has another object besides the demonstration

of the necessity and propriety of a science of society. This object is

to show the sciences as branches from a single trunk,--is to give to

science the ensemble or spirit of generality hitherto confined to

philosophy, and to give to philosophy the rigour and solidity of

science. Comte's special object is a study of social physics, a

science that before his advent was still to be formed; his second

object is a review of the methods and leading generalities of all the

positive sciences already formed, so that we may know both what system

of inquiry to follow in our new science, and also where the new

science will stand in relation to other knowledge.

The first step in this direction is to arrange scientific method and

positive knowledge in order, and this brings us to another cardinal

element in the Comtist system, the classification of the sciences. In

the front of the inquiry lies one main division, that, namely, between

speculative and practical knowledge. With the latter we have no

concern. Speculative or theoretic knowledge is divided into abstract

and concrete. The former is concerned with the laws that regulate

phenomena in all conceivable cases; the latter is concerned with the

application of these laws. Concrete science relates to objects or

beings; abstract science to events. The former is particular or

descriptive; the latter is general. Thus, physiology is an abstract

science; but zoology is concrete. Chemistry is abstract; mineralogy is

concrete. It is the method and knowledge of the abstract sciences that

the Positive Philosophy has to reorganise in a great whole.

Critical Miscellanies (Vol. 3 of 3), Essay 10: Auguste Comte · 第 1 / 3 段