MONEY THE MIDWIFE OF SCIENTIFIC COMMUNISM.

It may be asked here by some simple-minded reader why we should not

resort to crude Communism as the disciples were told to do. This would

be quite practicable in a village where production was limited to the

supply of the primitive wants which nature imposes on all human beings

alike. We know that people need bread and boots without waiting for them

to come and ask for these things and offer to pay for them. But when

civilization advances to the point at which articles are produced that

no man absolutely needs and that only some men fancy or can use, it is

necessary that individuals should be able to have things made to their

order and at their own cost. It is safe to provide bread for everybody

because everybody wants and eats bread; but it would be absurd to

provide microscopes and trombones, pet snakes and polo mallets, alembics

and test tubes for everybody, as nine-tenths of them would be wasted;

and the nine-tenths of the population who do not use such things

would object to their being provided at all. We have in the invaluable

instrument called money a means of enabling every individual to order

and pay for the particular things he desires over and above the things

he must consume in order to remain alive, plus the things the State

insists on his having and using whether he wants to or not; for example,

clothes, sanitary arrangements, armies and navies. In large communities,

where even the most eccentric demands for manufactured articles average

themselves out until they can be foreseen within a negligible margin

of error, direct communism (Take what you want without payment, as

the people do in Morris's News From Nowhere) will, after a little

experience, be found not only practicable but highly economical to an

extent that now seems impossible. The sportsmen, the musicians, the

physicists, the biologists will get their apparatus for the asking as

easily as their bread, or, as at present, their paving, street lighting,

and bridges; and the deaf man will not object to contribute to communal

flutes when the musician has to contribute to communal ear trumpets.

There are cases (for example, radium) in which the demand may be limited

to the merest handful of laboratory workers, and in which nevertheless

the whole community must pay because the price is beyond the means of

any individual worker. But even when the utmost allowance is made for

extensions of communism that now seem fabulous, there will still remain

for a long time to come regions of supply and demand in which men will

need and use money or individual credit, and for which, therefore, they

must have individual incomes. Foreign travel is an obvious instance. We

are so far from even national communism still, that we shall probably

have considerable developments of local communism before it becomes

possible for a Manchester man to go up to London for a day without

taking any money with him. The modern practical form of the communism of

Jesus is therefore, for the present, equal distribution of the surplus

of the national income that is not absorbed by simple communism.

On the Prospects of Christianity Bernard Shaw's Preface to Androcles and the Lion · 第 66 / 91 题