CREDIBILITY OF THE GOSPELS.

It will be noted by the older among my readers, who are sure to be

obsessed more or less by elderly wrangles as to whether the gospels are

credible as matter-of-fact narratives, that I have hardly raised this

question, and have accepted the credible and incredible with equal

complacency. I have done this because credibility is a subjective

condition, as the evolution of religious belief clearly shows. Belief is

not dependent on evidence and reason. There is as much evidence that

the miracles occurred as that the battle of Waterloo occurred, or that a

large body of Russian troops passed through England in 1914 to take part

in the war on the western front. The reasons for believing in the murder

of Pompey are the same as the reasons for believing in the raising

of Lazarus. Both have been believed and doubted by men of equal

intelligence. Miracles, in the sense of phenomena we cannot explain,

surround us on every hand; life itself is the miracle of miracles.

Miracles in the sense of events that violate the normal course of our

experience are vouched for every day: the flourishing Church of Christ

Scientist is founded on a multitude of such miracles. Nobody believes

all the miracles: everybody believes some of them. I cannot tell why

men who will not believe that Jesus ever existed yet believe firmly that

Shakespear was Bacon. I cannot tell why people who believe that angels

appeared and fought on our side at the battle of Mons, and who believe

that miracles occur quite frequently at Lourdes, nevertheless boggle

at the miracle of the liquefaction of the blood of St. Januarius, and

reject it as a trick of priestcraft. I cannot tell why people who will

not believe Matthew's story of three kings bringing costly gifts to the

cradle of Jesus, believe Luke's story of the shepherds and the stable.

I cannot tell why people, brought up to believe the Bible in the old

literal way as an infallible record and revelation, and rejecting that

view later on, begin by rejecting the Old Testament, and give up the

belief in a brimstone hell before they give up (if they ever do) the

belief in a heaven of harps, crowns, and thrones. I cannot tell

why people who will not believe in baptism on any terms believe in

vaccination with the cruel fanaticism of inquisitors. I am convinced

that if a dozen sceptics were to draw up in parallel columns a list

of the events narrated in the gospels which they consider credible

and incredible respectively, their lists would be different in several

particulars. Belief is literally a matter of taste.

On the Prospects of Christianity Bernard Shaw's Preface to Androcles and the Lion · 第 49 / 91 题