WHETHER THE PRINCIPLE OF ACTION IN ANIMALS IS FREE

There is a principle of action in man and in every animal, just

as there is in every machine; and this first mover, this ultimate

spring, is necessarily eternally arranged by the master, otherwise

all would be chaos, and there would be no world.

Every animal, like every machine, necessarily and irresistibly

obeys the power that directs it. That is evident, and sufficiently

familiar. Every animal is possessed of will, and one must be a

fool to think that a dog following its master has not the will to

follow him. No doubt, it follows him irresistibly; but it follows

voluntarily. Does it follow freely? Yes, if nothing prevents it; that

is to say, it can follow, it wills to follow, and it follows. The

freedom to follow is not in its will, but in the power to walk that

is given to it. A nightingale wills to make its nest, and makes it

when it has found some moss. It had the freedom to construct this

cradle, just as it had freedom to sing when it desires, and has not

a chill. But was it free to have the desire? Did it will to will to

make its nest? Had it that absurd “liberty of indifference” which

theologians would describe as follows: “I neither will to make my

nest nor the contrary; it is a matter of complete indifference to

me; but I am going to will to make my nest solely for the sake of

willing, and without being determined to do it in any way, merely

to prove that I am free”? Such is the absurdity we find taught in

the schools. If the nightingale could speak, it would say to these

doctors: “I am irresistibly determined to nest, I will to nest, and I

nest; you are irresistibly determined to reason badly, and you fulfil

your destiny as I do mine.”

We will now see if man is free in any other sense.

Toleration and other essays · 第 76 / 107 题