SERMON

My brethren, religion is the secret voice of God speaking to men.

It ought to unite men, not divide them; hence every religion that

belongs to one people only is false. Ours is, in principle, that of

the whole universe; for we worship a supreme being as all nations do,

we practise the justice which all nations teach, and we reject all

the untruths with which the nations reproach each other. At one with

them in the principle which unites them, we differ from them in the

things about which they are in conflict.

The point on which all men of all times agree must be the centre of

truth, and the points on which they all differ must be standards

of falsehood. Religion must conform to morality, and, like it, be

universal; hence every religion whose dogmas offend against morality

is certainly false. It is under this twofold aspect of perversity

and falseness that we will, in this discourse, examine the books of

the Hebrews and of those who have succeeded them. Let us first see

if these books conform to morality; we shall then see if they have

any shade of probability. The first two points will deal with the Old

Testament; the third will discuss the New.

_First Point_

You know, my brethren, what horror fell on us when we read together

the writings of the Hebrews, confining our attention to those

features which offend against purity, charity, good faith, justice,

and reason--features which one not only finds in every chapter, but,

unhappily, one finds consecrated in them.

First, to say nothing of the extravagant injustice which they

venture to ascribe to the supreme being, in endowing a serpent with

speech in order to seduce a woman and her innocent posterity, let

us run over in succession all the historical horrors which outrage

nature and good sense. One of the patriarchs, Lot, the nephew of

Abraham, receives in his house two angels disguised as pilgrims; the

inhabitants of Sodom entertain impure desires of these angels; Lot,

who had two daughters promised in marriage, offers to abandon them

to the people instead of the two strangers. These young women must

have been strangely familiar with evil ways, since the first thing

they do after the destruction of their town by a rain of fire, and

after their mother has been changed into a pillar of salt, is to

intoxicate their father on two consecutive nights, in order to sleep

with him in succession. It is an imitation of the ancient Arabic

legend of Cyniras and Myrrha. But in this more decent legend Myrrha

is punished for her crime, while the daughters of Lot are rewarded

with what is, in Jewish eyes, the greatest and dearest blessing: they

become the mothers of a numerous posterity.

We will not insist on the falsehood of Isaac, the father of the just,

who says that his wife is his sister; whether he was merely repeating

the falsehood of Abraham, or Abraham was really guilty of taking his

sister to wife. But let us dwell for a moment on the patriarch Jacob,

who is offered to us as a model man. He compels his brother, who is

dying of hunger, to give up his birthright for a dish of lentils. He

afterwards deceives his aged father on his death-bed. After deceiving

his father, he deceives and robs his father-in-law Laban. Not content

with wedding two sisters, he lies with all his servants; and God

blesses this licentiousness and trickery. Who are the children of

such a father? His daughter Dinah pleases a prince of Sichem, and

it is probable that she loves the prince, since she lies with him.

The prince asks her in marriage, and she is promised on condition

that he and all his people are circumcised. The prince accepts the

condition; but as soon as he and his people undergo this painful

operation--which, nevertheless, leaves them strong enough to defend

themselves--Jacob’s family murder all the men of Sichem and enslave

their women and children.

We have in our infancy heard the story of Pelopæus. This incestuous

abomination is repeated in Judah, the patriarch and father of the

first tribe. He lies with his daughter-in-law, and then wishes to

have her killed. The book declares that then Joseph, a child of this

vagabond family, is sold into Egypt, and that, foreigner as he is,

he is made first minister as a reward for explaining a dream. What a

first minister he was, compelling a whole nation to enslave itself,

during a time of famine, to obtain food! What magistrate among us

would, in time of famine, dare to propose so abominable a bargain,

and what nation would accept it? Let us not stay to examine how

seventy members of the family of Joseph, who settled in Egypt, could

in two hundred and fifteen years increase to six hundred thousand

fighting men, without counting the women, old men, and children,

which would make a total of more than two millions. Let us not

discuss how it is that the text has four hundred and thirty years,

when the same text has given two hundred and fifteen. The infinite

number of contradictions, which are the seal of imposture, is not

the point which we are considering. Let us likewise pass over the

ridiculous prodigies of Moses and of Pharaoh’s magicians, and all the

miracles wrought to give the Jewish people a wretched bit of poor

country, which they afterwards purchase by blood and crime, instead

of giving them the fertile soil of Egypt, where they were. Let us

confine ourselves to the frightful iniquity of their ways.

Their God had made a thief of Jacob, and he now makes thieves of the

entire people. He orders his people to steal and take away with them

all the gold and silver vessels and utensils of the Egyptians. Behold

these wretches, to the number of six hundred thousand fighting men,

instead of taking up arms like men of spirit, flying like brigands

led by their God. If their God had wished to give them a good

country, he might have given them Egypt. He does not, however; he

leads them into a desert. They might have fled by the shortest route,

yet they go far out of their way to cross the Red Sea dry-foot. After

this fine miracle Moses’ own brother makes them another god, and this

god is a calf. To punish his brother Moses commands certain priests

to kill their sons, brothers, and fathers; and they kill twenty-three

thousand Jews, who let themselves be slain like cattle.

After this butchery it is not surprising to hear that this abominable

people sacrifices human victims to its god, whom it calls Adonai,

borrowing the name of Adonis from the Phœnicians. The twenty-ninth

verse of chapter xxvii. of _Leviticus_ expressly forbids the

redemption of those who are destined for sacrifice, and it is in

virtue of this cannibalistic law that Jephthah, some time afterwards,

offers up his own daughter.

It was not enough to slay twenty-three thousand men for a calf; we

have again twenty-four thousand sacrificed for having intercourse

with idolatrous women. It is, my brethren, a worthy prelude and

example of persecution on the ground of religion.

This people advances in the deserts and rocks of Palestine. Here is

your splendid country, God says to them. Slay all the inhabitants,

kill all the male infants, make an end of their married women, keep

the young girls for yourselves. All this is carried out to the

letter, according to the Hebrew books; and we should shudder at the

account, if the text did not add that the Jews found in the camp

of the Midianites 675,000 sheep, 62,000 cattle, 61,000 asses, and

32,000 girls. Happily, the absurdity undoes the barbarism. Once

more, however, I am not concerned here with what is ridiculous and

impossible; I select only what is execrable. Having passed the Jordan

dry-shod, as they crossed the sea, we find our people in the promised

land.

The first person to let in this holy people, by an act of treachery,

is Rahab, a strange character for God to associate with himself.

He levels the walls of Jericho at the sound of the trumpet; the

holy people enters the town--to which it had no right, on its own

confession--and slays the men, women, and children. Let us pass over

the other carnages, the crucifixion of kings, the supposed wars

against the giants of Gaza and Ascalon, and the murder of those who

could not pronounce the word “Shibboleth.”

Listen to this fine story.

A Levite, with his wife, arrives on his ass at Gibeah, in the tribe

of Benjamin. Some of the Benjamites, who are bent on committing

the sin of sodomy with the Levite, turn their brutality upon the

woman, who dies of the violence. Were the culprits punished? Not

at all. The eleven tribes slaughtered the whole tribe of Benjamin;

only six hundred men escaped. But the eleven tribes are afterwards

sorry to see a tribe perish, and, to restore it, they exterminate

the inhabitants of one of their own towns in order to take from it

six hundred girls, whom they give to the six hundred Benjamites who

survive to perpetuate this splendid race.

How many crimes committed in the name of the Lord! We will give

only that of the man of God (Ehud). The Jews, having come so far to

conquer, are subject to the Philistines. In spite of the Lord, they

have sworn obedience to King Eglon. A holy Jew, named Ehud, asks

permission to speak in private with the king on the part of God. The

king does not fail to grant the audience. Ehud assassinates him,

and his example has been used many times by Christians to betray,

destroy, or massacre so many sovereigns.

At length this chosen nation, which had thus been directed by God

himself, desires to have a king; which greatly displeases the priest

Samuel. The first Jewish king renews the custom of immolating men.

Saul prudently enjoined that his soldiers should not eat on the day

they fought the Philistines, to give them more vigour; he swore to

the Lord that he would immolate to him any man who ate. Happily, the

people were wiser than he; they would not suffer the king’s son to

be sacrificed for eating a little honey. But listen, my brethren, to

this most detestable, yet most consecrated, act. It is said that Saul

takes prisoner a king of the country, named Agag. He did not kill his

prisoner; he acted as is usual in humane and civilised nations. What

happened? The Lord is angry, and Samuel, priest of the Lord, says to

Saul: “You are reprobate for having spared a king who surrendered to

you.” And the priestly butcher at once cuts Agag into pieces. What

would you say, my brethren, if, when the Emperor Charles V. had a

French king in his hands, his chaplain came and said to him: “You

are damned for not killing Francis I.,” and proceeded to cut the

French king to pieces before the eyes of the emperor?

What will you say of the holy King David, the king who found favour

in the eyes of the God of the Jews, and merited to be an ancestor

of the Messiah? This good king is at first a brigand, capturing and

pillaging all he finds. Among others, he despoils a rich man named

Nabal, marries his wife, and flies to King Achish. During the night

he descends upon the villages of King Achish, his benefactor, with

fire and sword. He slaughters men, women, and children, says the

sacred text, lest there be any one left to take the news. When he is

made king he ravishes the wife of Uriah, and has the husband put to

death; and it is from this adulterous homicide that the Messiah--God

himself--descends. What blasphemy! This David, who thus becomes an

ancestor of God as a reward of his horrible crime, is punished for

the one good and wise action which he did. There is no good and

prudent prince who ought not to know the number of his people, as

the shepherd should know the number of his flock. David has them

enumerated--though we are not told what the number was--and for

making this wise and useful enumeration a prophet comes from God to

give him the choice of war, pestilence, or famine.

Let us not linger, my dear brethren, over the numberless barbarities

of the kings of Judah and Israel--their murders and outrages, mixed

up always with ridiculous stories; though even the ridiculous in

them is always bloody, and not even the prophet Elisha is free from

barbarism. This worthy devotee has forty children devoured by bears

because the innocent youngsters had called him “bald.” Let us leave

this atrocious nation in the Babylonian captivity and in its bondage

to the Romans, with all the fine promises of their god Adonis or

Adonai, who had so often promised the Jews the sovereignty of the

earth. In fine, under the wise government of the Romans, a king is

born to the Hebrews. You know, my brethren, who this king, _shilo_,

or Messiah is; it is he who, after being at first numbered among

the prophets without a mission, who, though not priests, made a

profession of inspiration, was, after some centuries, regarded as a

god. We need go no farther; let us see on what pretexts, what facts,

what miracles, what prophecies--in a word, on what foundation, this

disgusting and abominable history is based.

_Second Point_

O God, if thou thyself didst descend upon the earth, and didst

command me to believe this tissue of murders, thefts, assassinations,

and incests committed by thy order and in thy name, I should say to

thee: No; thy sanctity cannot ask me to acquiesce in these horrible

things that outrage thee. Thou seekest, no doubt, to try me.

How, then, my virtuous and enlightened hearers, could we accept this

frightful story on the wretched evidence which is offered in support

of it?

Run briefly over the books that have been falsely attributed to

Moses. I say falsely, since it is not possible for Moses to have

written about things that happened long after his time. None of us

would believe that the memoirs of William, Prince of Orange, were

written with his own hand if there were allusions in these memoirs

to things that happened after his death. Let us see what is narrated

in the name of Moses. First, God created the light, which he calls

“day”; then the darkness, which he calls “night,” and it was the

first day. Thus there were days before the sun was made.

On the sixth day God makes man and woman; but the author, forgetting

that woman has been made already, afterwards derives her from one of

Adam’s ribs. Adam and Eve are put in a garden from which four rivers

issue; and of these rivers there are two, the Euphrates and the

Nile, which have their sources a thousand miles from each other. The

serpent then spoke like a man; it was the most cunning of animals.

It persuades the woman to eat an apple, and so has her driven from

paradise. The human race increases, and the children of God fall in

love with the daughters of men. There were giants on the earth, and

God was sorry that he had made man. He determined to exterminate him

by a flood; but wished to save Noah, and ordered him to make a vessel

of poplar wood, three hundred cubits in length. Into this vessel were

to be brought seven pairs of all the clean animals, and two pairs of

the unclean. It was necessary to feed them during the ten months that

the water covered the earth. You can imagine what would be needed to

feed fourteen elephants, fourteen camels, fourteen buffaloes, and

as many horses, asses, deer, serpents, ostriches--in a word, more

than two thousand species.[62] You will ask me whence came the water

to cover the whole earth and rise fifteen cubits above the highest

mountains? The text replies that it came from the cataracts of

heaven. Heaven knows where these cataracts are. After the deluge God

enters into an alliance with Noah and with all the animals; and in

confirmation of this alliance he institutes the rainbow.

Those who wrote these things were not, as you perceive, great

physicists. However, here is Noah with a religion given to him by

God, and this religion is neither Jewish nor Christian. The posterity

of Noah seeks to build a tower that shall reach to heaven. A fine

enterprise! But God fears it, and causes the workers suddenly to

speak several different tongues, and they disperse. The whole is

written in this ancient oriental vein.

A rain of fire converts towns into a lake; Lot’s wife is changed into

a salt statue; Jacob fights all night with an angel, and is hurt in

the leg; Joseph, sold as a slave into Egypt, is made first minister

because he explains a dream. Seventy members of the family settle in

Egypt, and in two hundred and fifteen years, as we saw, multiply into

two millions. It is these two million Hebrews who fly from Egypt, and

go the longest way in order to have the pleasure of crossing the sea

dry-shod.

But there is nothing surprising about this miracle. Pharaoh’s

magicians performed some very fine miracles. Like Moses, they changed

a rod into a serpent, which is a very simple matter. When Moses

changed water into blood, they did the same. When he brought frogs

into existence, they imitated him. But they were beaten when it came

to the plague of lice; on that subject the Jews knew more than other

nations.

In the end Adonai causes the death of each first-born in Egypt in

order to allow his people to leave in peace. The sea divides to let

them pass; it was the least that could be done on such an occasion.

The remainer is on the same level. The people cry out in the desert.

Some of the husbands complain of their wives; at once a water is

found which causes any woman who has forfeited her honour to swell

and burst. They have neither bread nor paste; quails and manna are

rained on them. Their garments last forty years, and grow with the

children. Apparently clothes descend from heaven for the new-born

children.

A prophet of the district seeks to curse the people, but his ass

opposes the project, together with an angel, and the ass speaks very

reasonably and at great length to the prophet.

When they attack a town, the walls fall at the sound of trumpets;

just as Amphion built walls to the sound of the flute. But the

finest miracle is when five Amorite kings--that is to say, five

village sheiks--attempt to oppose the ravages of Joshua. They are

not merely vanquished and cut to pieces, but the Lord sends a great

rain of stones upon the fugitives. Even that is not enough. A few

escape, and, in order to give the Israelites time to pursue them,

nature suspends its eternal laws. The sun halts at Gibeon, and the

moon at Aijalon. We do not quite understand how the moon comes in,

but the books of Joshua leave no room for doubt as to the fact. Now

let us pass to other miracles, and go on to Samson, who is depicted

as a famous plunderer, a friend of God. Samson routs a thousand

Philistines with the jawbone of an ass, because he is not shaved, and

ties by the tails three hundred foxes which he found in a certain

place.

There is hardly a page that does not contain similar stories. In one

place it is the shade of Samuel appearing in response to the voice

of a witch; in another it is the shadow on a sun-dial (assuming that

these miserable folk had sun-dials) receding ten degrees at the

prayer of Hezekiah, who prudently asks for this sign. God gives him

the alternatives of advancing or retarding the hour, and Dr. Hezekiah

thinks that it is not difficult to put the shadow on, but very

difficult to put it back.

Elias rises to heaven in a fiery chariot; children sing in a fiery

furnace. I should never come to an end if I wished to enter into all

the details of the unheard-of extravagances that swarm in this book.

Never was common-sense assailed with such indecency and fury.

Such is, from one end to the other, the Old Testament, the father

of the New, a father who disavows his child and regards it as a

rebellious bastard; for the Jews, faithful to the law of Moses,

regard with detestation the Christianity that has been reared on the

ruins of their law. The Christians, however, have with great subtlety

sought to justify the New Testament by the Old. The two religions

thus fight each other with the same weapons; they invoke the same

prophets and appeal to the same predictions.

Will the ages to come, which will have seen the passing of these

follies, yet may, unhappily, witness the rise of others not less

unworthy of God and men, believe that Judaism and Christianity

based their claims on such foundations and such prophecies? What

prophecies! Listen. The prophet Isaiah is summoned by Ahaz, king

of Judah, to make certain predictions to him, in the vain and

superstitious manner of the East. These prophets were, as you know,

men who earned more or less of a living by divination; there were

many like them in Europe in the last century, especially among the

common people. King Ahaz, besieged in Jerusalem by Shalmaneser, who

had taken Samaria, demanded of the soothsayer a prophecy and a sign.

Isaiah said to him: This is the sign:

“A girl will conceive, and will bear a child who shall be called

Emmanuel. He shall eat butter and honey until the day when he shall

reject evil and choose good; and before this child is of age, the

land which thou detestest shall be forsaken by its two kings; and the

Lord shall hiss for the flies that are on the banks of the streams of

Egypt and Assyria; and the Lord will take a razor, and shave the King

of Assyria; he will shave his head and the hair of his feet.”

After this splendid prophecy, recorded in _Isaiah_, but of which

there is not a word in _Kings_, the prophet orders him first to

write on a large roll, which they hasten to seal. He urges the king

to press to the plunder of his enemies, and then ensures the birth

of the predicted child. Instead of calling it Emmanuel, however, he

gives it the name of Maher Salabas. This, my brethren, is the passage

which Christians have distorted in favour of their Christ; this is

the prophecy that set up Christianity. The girl to whom the prophet

ascribes a child is incontestably the Virgin Mary.[63] Maher Salabas

is Jesus Christ. As to the butter and honey, I am unaware what it

means. Each soothsayer promises the Jews deliverance when they are

captive; and this deliverance is, according to the Christians,

the heavenly Jerusalem, and the Church of our time. Prophecy is

everything with the Jews; with the Christians miracle is everything,

and all the prophecies are figures of Jesus Christ.

Here, my brethren, is one of these fine and striking prophecies. The

great prophet Ezekiel sees a wind from the north, and four animals,

and wheels of chrysolite full of eyes; and the Lord says to him:

“Rise, eat a book, and then depart.”

The Lord orders him to sleep three hundred and ninety days on the

left side, and then forty on the right side. The Lord binds him with

cords; he was certainly a man that needed binding. What follows in

Ezekiel is very distasteful.

But we need not waste our time in assailing all the disgusting and

abominable dreams which are the subject of controversy between the

Jews and Christians. We will be content to deplore the most pitiful

blindness that has ever darkened the mind of man. Let us hope that

this blindness will pass like so many others, and let us proceed to

the New Testament, a worthy sequel to what has gone before.

_Third Point_

Vain was it that the Jews were a little more enlightened in the time

of Augustus than in the barbaric ages of which we have spoken. Vainly

did the Jews begin to recognise the immortality of the soul, a dogma

unknown to Moses, and the idea of God rewarding the just after death

and punishing the wicked, a dogma equally unknown to Moses. Reason

none the less penetrated this miserable people, from whom issued the

Christian religion, which has proved the source of so many divisions,

civil wars, and crimes; which has caused so much blood to flow; and

which is broken into so many sects in the corner of the earth where

it rules.

There were at all times among the Jews people of the lowest order,

who made prophecies in order to distinguish themselves from the

populace. We deal here with the one who has become best known, and

has been turned into a god; we give a brief account of his career, as

it is described in the books called the gospels. We need not seek to

determine when these books were written; it is evident that they were

written after the fall of Jerusalem. You know how absurdly the four

authors contradict each other. It is a demonstrative proof that they

are wrong. We do not, however, need many proofs to demolish this

miserable structure. We will be content with a short and faithful

account.

In the first place, Jesus is described as a descendant of Abraham and

David, and the writer Matthew counts forty-two generations in two

thousand years. In his list, however, we find only forty-one, and

in the genealogical tree which he borrows from _Kings_ he blunders

clumsily in making Josiah the father of Jechoniah.

Luke also gives a genealogy, but he assigns forty-nine generations

after Abraham, and they are entirely different generations. To

complete the absurdity, these generations belong to Joseph, and the

evangelists assure us that Jesus was not the son of Joseph. Would one

be received in a German chapter on such proofs of nobility? Yet there

is question here of the son of God, and God himself is the author of

the book!

Matthew says that when Jesus, King of the Jews, was born in a stable

in the town of Bethlehem, three magi or kings saw his star in the

east, and followed it, until it halted over Bethlehem; and that King

Herod, hearing these things, caused all the children under two years

of age to be put to death. Could any horror be more ridiculous?

Matthew adds that the father and mother took the child into Egypt,

and remained there until the death of Herod. Luke says precisely the

contrary; he observes that Joseph and Mary remained peacefully at

Bethlehem for six weeks, then went to Jerusalem, and from there to

Nazareth; and that they went every year to Jerusalem.

The evangelists contradict each other in regard to the time of

the life of Jesus, his miracles, the night of the supper, and the

day of his death--in a word, in regard to nearly all the facts.

There were forty-nine gospels composed by the Christians of the

first few centuries, and these were still more flagrant in their

contradictions. In the end, the four which we have were selected.

Even if they were in harmony, what folly, what misery, what puerile

and odious things they contain!

The first adventure of Jesus, son of God, is to be taken up by the

devil; the devil, who makes no appearance in the books of Moses,

plays a great part in the gospels. The devil, then, takes God up a

mountain in the desert. From there he shows him all the kingdoms of

the earth. Where is this mountain from which one can see so many

lands? We do not know.

John records that Jesus goes to a marriage-feast, and changes water

into wine; and that he drives from the precincts of the temple those

who were selling the animals of the sacrifices ordered in the Jewish

law.

All diseases were at that time regarded as possession by the devil,

and Jesus makes it the mission of his apostles to expel devils. As

he goes along, he delivers one who was possessed by a legion of

devils, and he makes these devils enter a herd of swine, which cast

themselves into the sea of Tiberias. We may suppose that the owners

of the swine, who were not Jews apparently, were not pleased with

this comedy. He heals a blind man, and the blind man sees men as if

they were trees. He wishes to eat figs in winter, and, not finding

any on a tree, he curses the tree and causes it to wither; the text

prudently adds: “For it was not the season of figs.”

He is transformed during the night, and causes Moses and Elias to

appear. Do the stories of romancers even approach these absurdities?

At length, after constantly insulting the Pharisees, calling them

“races of vipers,” “whitened sepulchres,” etc., he is handed over by

them to justice, and executed with two thieves; and the historians

are bold enough to tell us that at his death the earth was darkened

at midday, and at a time of full moon. As if every writer of the time

would not have mentioned so strange a miracle.

After that it is a small matter to make him rise from the dead and

predict the end of the world; which, however, has not happened.

The sect of Jesus lingers in concealment; fanaticism increases.

At first they dare not make a god of this man, but they soon take

courage. Some Platonic metaphysic amalgamates with the Nazaræan sect,

and Jesus becomes the logos, the word of God, then consubstantial

with God his father. The Trinity is invented; and, in order to have

it accepted, the first gospels are falsified.

A passage is added in regard to this truth, and the historian

Josephus is falsified and made to speak of Jesus, though Josephus is

too serious an historian to mention such a man. They go so far as

to forge sibylline books. In a word, there is no kind of trickery,

fraud, and imposture that the Nazaræans do not adopt. At the end of

three years they succeeded in having Jesus recognised as a god. Not

content with this extravagance, they go so far as to locate their god

in a bit of paste. While their god is eaten by mice and digested,

they hold that there is no such thing as bread in the host; that God

has, at the word of a man, put himself in the place of the bread. All

kinds of superstitions flood the Church; plunder is predominant in

it; indulgences, benefices, and all kinds of spiritual things are put

up for sale.

The sect splits into a multitude of sects; age after age they fight

and slaughter each other. At every dispute kings and princes are

massacred.

Such, my dear brethren, is the fruit of the tree of the Cross, the

power that has been declared divine.

For this they have dared to bring God upon the earth; to commit

Europe for ages to murder and brigandage. It is true that our fathers

have in part shaken off this frightful yoke, and rid themselves of

some errors and superstitions. But how imperfect they have left

the work! Everything tells us that it is time to complete it; to

destroy utterly the idol of which we have as yet broken only a finger

or two. Numbers of theologians have already embraced Socinianism

(Unitarianism), which comes near to the worship of one God, freed

from superstition. England, Germany, and the provinces of France are

full of wise doctors, who ask only the opportunity to break away.

There are great numbers in other countries. Why persist in teaching

what we do not believe, and make ourselves guilty before God of this

great sin?

We are told that the people need mysteries, and must be deceived.

My brethren, dare any one commit this outrage on humanity? Have not

our fathers already taken from the people their transubstantiation,

auricular confession, indulgences, exorcisms, false miracles, and

ridiculous statues? Are not the people accustomed to the deprivation

of this food of superstition? We must have the courage to go a few

steps farther. The people are not so weak of mind as is thought;

they will easily admit a wise and simple cult of one God, such as

was professed, it is said, by Abraham and Noah, and by all the sages

of antiquity, and as is found among the educated people of China.

We seek not to despoil the clergy of what the liberality of their

followers has given them; we wish them, since most of them secretly

laugh at the untruths they teach, to join us in preaching the truth.

Let them observe that, while they now offend and dishonour the

Deity, they would, if they follow us, glorify him. What incalculable

good would be done by that happy change? Princes and magistrates

would be better obeyed, the people would be tranquil, the spirit

of division and hatred would be expelled. They would offer to God,

in peace, the first fruits of their work. There would assuredly be

more righteousness on the earth, for many weak-minded folk who hear

contempt expressed daily for the Christian superstition, and know

that it is ridiculed by the priests themselves, thoughtlessly imagine

that there is no such thing as religion, and abandon themselves to

excesses. But when they learn that the Christian sect is really only

a perversion of natural religion; when reason, freed from its chains,

teaches the people that there is but one God; that this God is the

common parent of all men, who are brothers; that, as brothers, they

must be good and just to each other, and practise every virtue; that

God, being good and just, must reward virtue and punish crime; then

assuredly, my brethren, men will gain in righteousness as they lose

in superstition.

We begin by giving this example in secret, and we trust that it will

be followed in public.

May the great God who hears me--a God who certainly could not be born

of a girl, nor die on a gibbet, nor be eaten in a morsel of paste,

nor have inspired this book with its contradictions, follies, and

horrors--may this God, creator of all worlds, have pity on the sect

of the Christians who blaspheme him. May he bring them to the holy

and natural religion, and shower his blessing on the efforts we make

to have him worshipped. Amen.

Toleration and other essays · 第 51 / 107 题