Section 37 provides for a board to revise the army regulations and

report; and declares that the regulations then in force, viz.,

those of 1863, should remain until Congress "shall act on said

report;" and section 38 and last enacts that all laws and parts of

laws inconsistent with the provisions of this act be and the same

are hereby repealed.

Under the provisions of this law my predecessor, General Grant, did

not hesitate to command and make orders to all parts of the army,

the Military Academy, and staff, and it was under his advice that

the new regulations were compiled in 1868 that drew the line more

clearly between the high and responsible duties of the Secretary of

War and the general of the army. He assured me many a time before

I was called here to succeed him that he wanted me to perfect the

distinction, and it was by his express orders that on assuming the

command of the army I specifically placed the heads of the staff

corps here in Washington in the exact relation to the army which

they would bear to an army in the field.

I am aware that subsequently, in his orders of March 26th, he

modified his former orders of March 5th, but only as to the heads

of bureaus in Washington, who have, he told me, certain functions

of office imposed on them by special laws of Congress, which laws,

of course, override all orders and regulations, but I did not

either understand from him in person, or from General Rawlins, at

whose instance this order was made, that it was designed in any way

to modify, alter, or change his purposes that division and

department commanders, as well as the general of the army, should

exercise the same command of the staff as they did of the line of

the army.

I need not remind the Secretary that orders and reports are made to

and from the Military Academy which the general does not even see,

though the Military Academy is specifically named as a part of that

army which he is required to command. Leaves of absence are

granted, the stations of officers are changed, and other orders are

now made directly to the army, not through the general, but direct

through other officials and the adjutant-general.

So long as this is the case I surely do not command the army of the

United States, and am not responsible for it.

I am aware that the confusion results from the fact that the

thirty-seventh section of the act of July 28, 1866, clothes the

army regulations of 1863 with the sanction of law, but the next

section repeals all laws and parts of laws inconsistent with the

provisions of this act. The regulations of 1863 are but a

compilation of orders made prior to the war, when such men as Davis

and Floyd took pleasure in stripping General Scott of even the

semblance of power, and purposely reduced him to a cipher in the

command of the army.

Not one word can be found in those regulations speaking of the

duties of the lieutenant-general commanding the army, or defining a

single act of authority rightfully devolving on him. Not a single

mention is made of the rights and duties of a commander-in-chief of

the army. He is ignored, and purposely, too, as a part of the

programme resulting in the rebellion, that the army without a

legitimate head should pass into the anarchy which these men were

shaping for the whole country.

I invite your attention to the army regulations of 1847, when our

best soldiers lived, among whom was your own father, and see

paragraphs 48 and 49, page 8, and they are so important that I

quote them entire:

"48. The military establishment is placed under the orders of the

major-general commanding in chief in all that regards its

discipline and military control. Its fiscal arrangements properly

belong to the administrative departments of the staff and to the

Treasury Department under the direction of the Secretary of War.

"49. The general of the army will watch over the economy of the

service in all that relates to the expenditure of money, supply of

arms, ordnance and ordnance stores, clothing, equipments,

camp-equipage, medical and hospital stores, barracks, quarters,

transportation, Military Academy, pay, and subsistence: in short,

everything which enters into the expenses of the military

establishment, whether personal or material. He will also see that

the estimates for the military service are based on proper data,

and made for the objects contemplated by law, and necessary to the

due support and useful employment of the army. In carrying into

effect these important duties, he will call to his counsel and

assistance the staff, and those officers proper, in his opinion, to

be employed in verifying and inspecting all the objects which may

require attention. The rules and regulations established for the

government of the army, and the laws relating to the military

establishment, are the guides to the commanding general in the

performance of his duties."

Why was this, or why was all mention of any field of duty for the

head of the army left out of the army regulations? Simply because

Jefferson Davis had a purpose, and absorbed to himself, as

Secretary of War, as General Grant well says, all the powers of

commander-in-chief. Floyd succeeded him, and the last regulations

of 1863 were but a new compilation of their orders, hastily

collected and published to supply a vast army with a new edition.

I contend that all parts of these regulations inconsistent with the

law of July 28, 1866, are repealed.

I surely do not ask for any power myself, but I hope and trust, now

when we have a military President and a military Secretary of War,

that in the new regulations to be laid before Congress next session

the functions and duties of the commander-in-chief will be so

clearly marked out and defined that they may be understood by

himself and the army at large.

I am, with great respect, your obedient servant,

W. T. SHERMAN, General.

[Inclosure.]

WASHINGTON, January 29, 1866.

Hon. E. M. STANTON, Secretary of War:

From the period of the difficulties between Major-General (now

Lieutenant-General) Scott with Secretary Marcy, during the

administration of President Polk, the command of the army virtually

passed into the hands of the Secretary of War.

From that day to the breaking out of the rebellion the general-

in-chief never kept his headquarters in Washington, and could not,

consequently, with propriety resume his proper functions. To

administer the affairs of the army properly, headquarters and the

adjutant-general's office must be in the same place.

During the war, while in the field, my functions as commander of

all the armies was never impaired, but were facilitated in all

essential matters by the Administration and by the War Department.

Now, however, that the war is over, and I have brought my head-

quarters to the city, I find my present position embarrassing and,

I think, out of place. I have been intending, or did intend, to

make the beginning of the New Year the time to bring this matter

before you, with the view of asking to have the old condition of

affairs restored, but from diffidence about mentioning the matter

have delayed. In a few words I will state what I conceive to be my

duties and my place, and ask respectfully to be restored to them

and it.

The entire adjutant-general's office should be under the entire

control of the general-in-chief of the army. No orders should go

to the army, or the adjutant-general, except through the general-

in-chief. Such as require the action of the President would be

laid before the Secretary of War, whose actions would be regarded

as those of the President. In short, in my opinion, the general-

in-chief stands between the President and the army in all official

matters, and the Secretary of War is between the army (through the

general-in-chief) and the President.

I can very well conceive that a rule so long disregarded could not,

or would not, be restored without the subject being presented, and

I now do so respectfully for your consideration.

U. S. GRANT, Lieutenant-General.

General Belknap never answered that letter.

In August, 1870, was held at Des Moines, Iowa, an encampment of old

soldiers which I attended, en route to the Pacific, and at Omaha

received this letter:

LONG BRANCH, New Jersey, August 18,1870.

General W. T. SHERMAN.

DEAR GENERAL: Your letter of the 7th inst. did not reach Long

Branch until after I had left for St. Louis, and consequently is

just before me for the first time. I do not know what changes

recent laws, particularly the last army bill passed, make in the

relations between the general of the army and the Secretary of War.

Not having this law or other statutes here, I cannot examine the

subject now, nor would I want to without consultation with the

Secretary of War. On our return to Washington I have no doubt but

that the relations between the Secretary and yourself can be made

pleasant, and the duties of each be so clearly defined as to leave

no doubt where the authority of one leaves off and the other

commences.

My own views, when commanding the army, were that orders to the

army should go through the general. No changes should be made,

however, either of the location of troops or officers, without the

knowledge of the Secretary of War.

In peace, the general commanded them without reporting to the

Secretary farther than he chose the specific orders he gave from

time to time, but subjected himself to orders from the Secretary,

the latter deriving his authority to give orders from the

President. As Congress has the right, however, to make rules and

regulations for the government of the army, rules made by them

whether they are as they should be or not, will have to govern. As

before stated, I have not examined the recent law.

Yours truly,

U. S. GRANT.

To which I replied:

OMAHA, NEBRASKA, September 2,1870.

General U. S. GRANT, Washington, D. C.

DEAR GENERAL: I have received your most acceptable letter of August

18th, and assure you that I am perfectly willing to abide by any

decision you may make. We had a most enthusiastic meeting at Des

Moines, and General Bellknap gave us a fine, finished address. I

have concluded to go over to San Francisco to attend the annual

celebration of the Pioneers, to be held on the 9th instant; from

there I will make a short tour, aiming to get back to St. Louis by

the 1st of October, and so on to Washington without unnecessary

delay.

Conscious of the heavy burdens already on you, I should refrain

from adding one ounce to your load of care, but it seems to me now

is the time to fix clearly and plainly the field of duty for the

Secretary of War and the commanding general of the army, so that we

may escape the unpleasant controversy that gave so much scandal in

General Scott's time, and leave to our successors a clear field.

No matter what the result, I promise to submit to whatever decision

you may make. I also feel certain that General Belknap thinks he

is simply executing the law as it now stands, but I am equally

certain that he does not interpret the law reviving the grade of

general, and that fixing the "peace establishment" of 1868, as I

construe them.

For instance, I am supposed to control the discipline of the

Military Academy as a part of the army, whereas General Belknap

ordered a court of inquiry in the case of the colored cadet, made

the detail, reviewed the proceedings, and made his order, without

my knowing a word of it, except through the newspapers; and more

recently, when I went to Chicago to attend to some division

business, I found the inspector-general (Hardie) under orders from

the Secretary of War to go to Montana on some claim business.

All I ask is that such orders should go through me. If all the

staff-officers are subject to receive orders direct from the

Secretary of War it will surely clash with the orders they may be

in the act of executing from me, or from their immediate

commanders.

I ask that General Belknap draw up some clear, well-defined rules

for my action, that he show them to me before publication, that I

make on them my remarks, and then that you make a final decision.

I promise faithfully to abide by it, or give up my commission.

Please show this to General Belknap, and I will be back early in

October. With great respect, your friend,

W. T. SHERMAN

I did return about October 15th, saw President Grant, who said

nothing had been done in the premises, but that he would bring

General Belknap and me together and settle this matter. Matters

went along pretty much as usual till the month of August, 1871,

when I dined at the Arlington with Admiral Alder and General

Belknap. The former said he had been promoted to rear-admiral and

appointed to command the European squadron, then at Villa Franca,

near Nice, and that he was going out in the frigate Wabash,

inviting me to go along. I had never been to Europe, and the

opportunity was too tempting to refuse. After some preliminaries I

agreed to go along, taking with me as aides-de-camp Colonel

Audenried and Lieutenant Fred Grant. The Wabash was being

overhauled at the Navy-Yard at Boston, and was not ready to sail

till November, when she came to New-York, where we all embarked

Saturday, November 11th.

I have very full notes of the whole trip, and here need only state

that we went out to the Island of Madeira, and thence to Cadiz and

Gibraltar. Here my party landed, and the Wabash went on to Villa

Franca. From Gibraltar we made the general tour of Spain to

Bordeaux, through the south of France to Marseilles, Toulon, etc.,

to Nice, from which place we rejoined the Wabash and brought ashore

our baggage.

From Nice we went to Genoa, Turin, the Mont Cenis Tunnel, Milan,

Venice, etc., to Rome. Thence to Naples, Messina, and Syracuse,

where we took a steamer to Malta. From Malta to Egypt and

Constantinople, to Sebastopol, Poti, and Tiflis. At Constantinople

and Sebastopol my party was increased by Governor Curtin, his son,

and Mr. McGahan.

It was my purpose to have reached the Caspian, and taken boats to

the Volga, and up that river as far as navigation would permit, but

we were dissuaded by the Grand-Duke Michael, Governor-General of

the Caucasas, and took carriages six hundred miles to Taganrog, on

the Sea of Azof, to which point the railroad system of Russia was

completed. From Taganrog we took cars to Moscow and St.

Petersburg. Here Mr. Curtin and party remained, he being our

Minister at that court; also Fred Grant left us to visit his aunt

at Copenhagen. Colonel Audenried and I then completed the tour of

interior Europe, taking in Warsaw, Berlin, Vienna, Switzerland,

France, England, Scotland, and Ireland, embarking for home in the

good steamer Baltic, Saturday, September 7, 1872, reaching

Washington, D. C., September 22d. I refrain from dwelling on this

trip, because it would swell this chapter beyond my purpose.

When I regained my office I found matters unchanged since my

departure, the Secretary of War exercising all the functions of

commander-in-chief, and I determined to allow things to run to their

necessary conclusion. In 1873 my daughter Minnie also made a trip

to Europe, and I resolved as soon as she returned that I would

simply move back to St. Louis to execute my office there as best I

could. But I was embarrassed by being the possessor of a large

piece of property in Washington on I Street, near the corner of

Third, which I could at the time neither sell nor give away. It

came into my possession as a gift from friends in New York and

Boston, who had purchased it of General Grant and transferred to me

at the price of $65,000.

The house was very large, costly to light, heat, and maintain, and

Congress had reduced my pay four or five thousand dollars a year,

so that I was gradually being impoverished. Taxes, too, grew

annually, from about four hundred dollars a year to fifteen

hundred, besides all sorts of special taxes.

Finding myself caught in a dilemma, I added a new hall, and made

out of it two houses, one of which I occupied, and the other I

rented, and thus matters stood in 1873-'74. By the agency of Mr.

Hall, a neighbor and broker, I effected a sale of the property to

the present owner, Mr. Emory, at a fair price, accepting about half

payment in notes, and the other half in a piece of property on E

Street, which I afterward exchanged for a place in Cite Brilliante,

a suburb of St. Louis, which I still own. Being thus foot-loose,

and having repeatedly notified President Grant of my purpose, I

wrote the Secretary of War on the 8th day of May, 1874, asking the

authority of the President and the War Department to remove my

headquarters to St. Louis.

On the 11th day of May General Belknap replied that I had the

assent of the President and himself, inclosing the rough draft of

an order to accomplish this result, which I answered on the 15th,

expressing my entire satisfaction, only requesting delay in the

publication of the orders till August or September, as I preferred

to make the changes in the month of October.

On the 3d of September these orders were made:

WAR DEPARTMENT, ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S OFFICE, WASHINGTON, September 8,

1874.

General Orders No. 108.

With the assent of the President, and at the request of the

General, the headquarters of the armies of the United States will

be established at St. Louis, Missouri, in the month of October

next.

The regulations and orders now governing the functions of the

General of the Army, and those in relation to transactions of

business with the War Department and its bureaus, will continue in

force.

By order of the Secretary of War:

E. D. TOWNSEND, Adjutant-General.

Our daughter Minnie was married October 1, 1874, to Thomas W.

Fitch, United States Navy, and we all forthwith packed up and

regained our own house at St. Louis, taking an office on the corner

of Tenth and Locust Streets. The only staff I brought with me were

the aides allowed by law, and, though we went through the forms of

"command," I realized that it was a farce, and it did not need a

prophet to foretell it would end in a tragedy. We made ourselves

very comfortable, made many pleasant excursions into the interior,

had a large correspondence, and escaped the mortification of being

slighted by men in Washington who were using their temporary power

for selfish ends.

Early in March, 1676, appeared in all the newspapers of the day the

sensational report from Washington that Secretary of War Belknap

had been detected in selling sutlerships in the army; that he had

confessed it to Representative Blackburn, of Kentucky; that he had

tendered his resignation, which had been accepted by the President;

and that he was still subject to impeachment,--would be impeached

and tried by the Senate. I was surprised to learn that General

Belknap was dishonest in money matters, for I believed him a brave

soldier, and I sorely thought him honest; but the truth was soon

revealed from Washington, and very soon after I received from Judge

Alphonso Taft, of Cincinnati, a letter informing me that he had

been appointed Secretary of War, and should insist on my immediate

return to Washington. I answered that I was ready to go to

Washington, or anywhere, if assured of decent treatment.

I proceeded to Washington, when, on the 6th of April, were

published these orders:

General Orders No. 28.

The following orders of the President of the United States are

hereby promulgated for the information and guidance of all

concerned:

The headquarters of the army are hereby reestablished at Washington

City, and all orders and instructions relative to military

operations or affecting the military control and discipline of the

army issued by the President through the Secretary of War, shall be

promulgated through the General of the Army, and the departments of

the Adjutant-General and the Inspector-General shall report to him,

and be under his control in all matters relating thereto.

By order of the Secretary of War:

E. D. TOWNSEND, Adjutant-General.

This was all I had ever asked; accordingly my personal staff were

brought back to Washington, where we resumed our old places; only I

did not, for some time, bring back the family, and then only to a

rented house on Fifteenth Street, which we occupied till we left

Washington for good. During the period from 1876 to 1884 we had as

Secretaries of War in succession, the Hon's. Alphonso Taft, J. D.

Cameron, George W. McCrary, Alexander Ramsey, and R. T. Lincoln,

with each and all of whom I was on terms of the most intimate and

friendly relations.

And here I will record of Washington that I saw it, under the magic

hand of Alexander R. Shepherd, grow from a straggling, ill-paved

city, to one of the cleanest, most beautiful, and attractive cities

of the whole world. Its climate is salubrious, with as much

sunshine as any city of America. The country immediately about it

is naturally beautiful and romantic, especially up the Potomac, in

the region of the Great Falls; and, though the soil be poor as

compared with that of my present home, it is susceptible of easy

improvement and embellishment. The social advantages cannot be

surpassed even in London, Paris, or Vienna; and among the resident

population, the members of the Supreme Court, Senate, House of

Representatives, army, navy, and the several executive departments,

may be found an intellectual class one cannot encounter in our

commercial and manufacturing cities. The student may, without tax

and without price, have access, in the libraries of Congress and of

the several departments, to books of every nature and kind; and the

museums of natural history are rapidly approaching a standard of

comparison with the best of the world. Yet it is the usual and

proper center of political intrigue, from which the army especially

should keep aloof, because the army must be true and faithful to

the powers that be, and not be subjected to a temptation to favor

one or other of the great parties into which our people have

divided, and will continue to divide, it may be, with advantage to

the whole.

It would be a labor of love for me, in this connection, to pay a

tribute of respect, by name, to the many able and most patriotic

officers with whom I was so long associated as the commanding

generals of military divisions and departments, as well as

staff-officers; but I must forego the temptation, because of the

magnitude of the subject, certain that each and all of them will

find biographers better posted and more capable than myself; and I

would also like to make recognition of the hundreds of acts of most

graceful hospitality on the part of the officers and families at

our remote military posts in the days, of the "adobe," the "jacal,"

and "dug-out," when a board floor and a shingle roof were luxuries

expected by none except the commanding officer. I can see, in

memory, a beautiful young city-bred lady, who had married a poor

second-lieutenant, and followed him to his post on the plains,

whose quarters were in a "dug-out" ten feet by about fifteen, seven

feet high, with a dirt roof; four feet of the walls were the

natural earth, the other three of sod, with holes for windows and

corn-sacks for curtains. This little lady had her Saratoga trunk,

which was the chief article of furniture; yet, by means of a rug on

the ground-floor, a few candle-boxes covered with red cotton calico

for seats, a table improvised out of a barrel-head, and a fireplace

and chimney excavated in the back wall or bank, she had transformed

her "hole in the ground" into a most attractive home for her young

warrior husband; and she entertained me with a supper consisting of

the best of coffee, fried ham, cakes, and jellies from the

commissary, which made on my mind an impression more lasting than

have any one of the hundreds of magnificent banquets I have since

attended in the palaces and mansions of our own and foreign lands.

Still more would I like to go over again the many magnificent trips

made across the interior plains, mountains, and deserts before the

days of the completed Pacific Railroad, with regular "Doughertys"

drawn by four smart mules, one soldier with carbine or loaded

musket in hand seated alongside the driver; two in the back seat

with loaded rifles swung in the loops made for them; the lightest

kind of baggage, and generally a bag of oats to supplement the

grass, and to attach the mules to their camp. With an outfit of

two, three, or four of such, I have made journeys of as much as

eighteen hundred miles in a single season, usually from post to

post, averaging in distance about two hundred miles a week, with as

much regularity as is done today by the steam-car its five hundred

miles a day; but those days are gone, and, though I recognize the

great national advantages of the more rapid locomotion, I cannot

help occasionally regretting the change. One instance in 1866

rises in my memory, which I must record: Returning eastward from

Fort Garland, we ascended the Rocky Mountains to the Sangre-de-

Cristo Pass. The road descending the mountain was very rough and

sidling. I got out with my rifle, and walked ahead about four

miles, where I awaited my "Dougherty." After an hour or so I saw,

coming down the road, a wagon; and did not recognize it as my own

till quite near. It had been upset, the top all mashed in, and no

means at hand for repairs. I consequently turned aside from the

main road to a camp of cavalry near the Spanish Peaks, where we

were most hospitably received by Major A---- and his accomplished

wife. They occupied a large hospital-tent, which about a dozen

beautiful greyhounds were free to enter at will. The ambulance was

repaired, and the next morning we renewed our journey, escorted by

the major and his wife on their fine saddle-horses.

They accompanied us about ten miles of the way; and, though age has

since begun to tell on them, I shall ever remember them in their

pride and strength as they galloped alongside our wagons down the

long slopes of the Spanish Peaks in a driving snow-storm.

And yet again would it be a pleasant task to recall the many

banquets and feasts of the various associations of officers and

soldiers, who had fought the good battles of the civil war, in

which I shared as a guest or host, when we could indulge in a

reasonable amount of glorification at deeds done and recorded, with

wit, humor, and song; these when memory was fresh, and when the old

soldiers were made welcome to the best of cheer and applause in

every city and town of the land. But no! I must hurry to my

conclusion, for this journey has already been sufficiently

prolonged.

I had always intended to divide time with my natural successor,

General P. H. Sheridan, and early, notified him that I should about

the year 1884 retire from the command of the army, leaving him

about an equal period of time for the highest office in the army.

It so happened that Congress had meantime by successive "enactments"

cut down the army to twenty-five thousand men, the usual strength

of a corps d'armée, the legitimate command of a lieutenant-general.

Up to 1882 officers not disabled by wounds or sickness could only

avail themselves of the privileges of retirement on application,

after thirty years of service, at sixty-two years of age; but on

the 30th of June, 1882, a bill was passed which, by operation of

the law itself, compulsorily retired all army officers, regardless

of rank, at the age of sixty-four years. At the time this law was

debated in Congress, I was consulted by Senators and others in the

most friendly manner, representing that, if I wanted it, an

exception could justly and easily be made in favor of the general

and lieutenant-general, whose commissions expired with their lives;

but I invariably replied that I did not ask or expect an exception

in my case, because no one could know or realize when his own

mental and physical powers began to decline. I remembered well the

experience of Gil Blas with the Bishop of Granada, and favored the

passage of the law fixing a positive period for retirement, to

obviate in the future special cases of injustice such as I had seen

in the recent past. The law was passed, and every officer then knew

the very day on which he must retire, and could make his

preparations accordingly. In my own case the law was liberal in

the extreme, being "without reduction in his current pay and

allowances."

I would be sixty-four years old on the 8th of February, 1884, a

date inconvenient to move, and not suited to other incidents; so I

resolved to retire on the 1st day of November, 1883, to resume my

former home at St. Louis, and give my successor ample time to meet

the incoming Congress, But, preliminary thereto, I concluded to

make one more tour of the continent, going out to the Pacific by

the Northern route, and returning by that of the thirty-fifth

parallel. This we accomplished, beginning at Buffalo, June 21st,

and ending at St. Louis, Missouri, September 30, 1883, a full and

most excellent account of which can be found in Colonel Tidball's

"Diary," which forms part of the report of the General of the Army

for the year 1883.

Before retiring also, as was my duty, I desired that my aides-

de-camp who had been so faithful and true to me should not suffer

by my act. All were to retain the rank of colonels of cavalry till

the last day, February 8, 1884; but meantime each secured places,

as follows:

Colonel O. M. Poe was lieutenant-colonel of the Engineer Corps

United States Army, and was by his own choice assigned to Detroit

in charge of the engineering works on the Upper Lakes, which duty

was most congenial to him.

Colonel J. C. Tidball was assigned to command the Artillery School

at Fort Monroe, by virtue of his commission as lieutenant-colonel,

Third Artillery, a station for which he was specially qualified.

Colonel John E. Tourtelotte was then entitled to promotion to

major of the Seventh Cavalry, a rank in which he could be certain

of an honorable command.

The only remaining aide-de-camp was Colonel John M. Bacon, who

utterly ignored self in his personal attachment to me. He was then

a captain of the Ninth Cavalry, but with almost a certainty of

promotion to be major of the Seventh before the date of my official

retirement, which actually resulted. The last two accompanied me

to St. Louis, and remained with me to the end. Having previously

accomplished the removal of my family to St. Louis, and having

completed my last journey to the Pacific, I wrote the following

letter:

HEADQUARTERS ARMY UNITED STATES,

WASHINGTON, D. C., October 8, 1883.

Hon. R. T. LINCOLN, Secretary of War.

SIR: By the act of Congress, approved June 30, 1882, all

army-officers are retired on reaching the age of sixty-four years.

If living, I will attain that age on the 8th day of February, 1884;

but as that period of the year is not suited for the changes

necessary on my retirement, I have contemplated anticipating the

event by several months, to enable the President to meet these

changes at a more convenient season of the year, and also to enable

my successor to be in office before the assembling of the next

Congress.

I therefore request authority to turn over the command of the army

to Lieutenant-General Sheridan on the 1st day of November, 1883,

and that I be ordered to my home at St. Louis, Missouri, there to

await the date of my legal retirement; and inasmuch as for a long

time I must have much correspondence about war and official

matters, I also ask the favor to have with me for a time my two

present aides-de-camp, Colonels J. E. Tourtelotte and J. M. Bacon.

The others of my personal staff, viz., Colonels O. M. Poe and J.

C. Tidball, have already been assigned to appropriate duties in

their own branches of the military service, the engineers and

artillery. All should retain the rank and pay as aides-de-camp

until February 8,1884. By or before the 1st day of November I can

complete all official reports, and believe I can surrender the army

to my successor in good shape and condition, well provided in all

respects, and distributed for the best interests of the country.

I am grateful that my physical and mental-strength remain

unimpaired by years, and am thankful for the liberal provision made

by Congress for my remaining years, which will enable me to respond

promptly to any call the President may make for my military service

or judgment as long as I live. I have the honor to be your

obedient servant,

W. T. SHERMAN, General.

The answer was:

WAR DEPARTMENT,

WASHINGTON CITY, October 10, 1888.

General W. T. SHERMAN, Washington, D. C.

GENERAL: I have submitted to the President your letter of the 8th

instant, requesting that you be relieved of the command of the army

on the 1st of November next, as a more convenient time for making

the changes in military commands which must follow your retirement

from active service, than would be the date of your retirement

under the law.

In signifying his approval of your request, the President directs

me to express to you his earnest hope that there may be given you

many years of health and happiness in which to enjoy the gratitude

of your fellow-citizens, well earned by your most distinguished

public services.

It will give me pleasure to comply with your wishes respecting your

aides-de-camp, and the necessary orders will be duly issued.

I have the honor to be, General, your obedient servant,

ROBERT T. LINCOLN, Secretary of War.

On the 27th day of October I submitted to the Secretary of

War, the Hon. R. T. Lincoln, my last annual report, embracing among

other valuable matters the most interesting and condensed report of

Colonel O. M. Poe, A. D. C., of the "original conception, progress,

and completion" of the four great transcontinental railways, which

have in my judgment done more for the subjugation and civilization

of the Indians than all other causes combined, and have made

possible the utilization of the vast area of pasture lands and

mineral regions which before were almost inaccessible, for my

agency in which I feel as much pride as for my share in any of the

battles in which I took part.

Promptly on the 1st of November were made the following general

orders, and the command of the Army of the United States passed

from me to Lieutenant-General P. H. Sheridan, with as little

ceremony as would attend the succession of the lieutenant-colonel

of a regiment to his colonel about to take a leave of absence:

HEADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY

WASHINGTON, November 1, 1885.

General Orders No. 77:

By and with the consent of the President, as contained in General

Orders No. 71, of October 13, 1883, the undersigned relinquishes

command of the Army of the United States.

In thus severing relations which have hitherto existed between us,

he thanks all officers and men for their fidelity to the high trust

imposed on them during his official life, and will, in his

retirement, watch with parental solicitude their progress upward in

the noble profession to which they have devoted their lives.

W. T. SHERMAN, General.

Official: R. C. DRUM, Adjutant-General.

HEADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY

WASHINGTON, November 1, 1885.

General Orders No. 78:

In obedience to orders of the President, promulgated in General

Orders No. 71, October 13, 1883, from these headquarters, the

undersigned hereby assumes command of the Army of the United

States....

P. H. SHERIDAN, Lieutenant-General.

Official: R. C. DRUM, adjutant-General.

After a few days in which to complete my social visits, and after a

short visit to my daughter, Mrs. A. M. Thackara, at Philadelphia, I

quietly departed for St. Louis; and, as I hope, for "good and all,"

the family was again reunited in the same place from which we were

driven by a cruel, unnecessary civil war initiated in Charleston

Harbor in April, 1861.

On the 8th day of February, 1884; I was sixty-four years of age,

and therefore retired by the operation of the act of Congress,

approved June 30, 1882; but the fact was gracefully noticed by

President Arthur in the following general orders:

WAR DEPARTMENT, ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE,

WASHINGTON, February 8, 1984.

The following order of the President is published to the army:

EXECUTIVE MANSION, February 8, 1884.

General William T. Sherman, General of the Army, having this day

reached the age of sixty-four years, is, in accordance with the

law, placed upon the retired list of the army, without reduction in

his current pay and allowances.

The announcement of the severance from the command of the army of

one who has been for so many years its distinguished chief, can but

awaken in the minds, not only of the army, but of the people of the

United States, mingled emotions of regret and gratitude--regret at

the withdrawal from active military service of an officer whose

lofty sense of duty has been a model for all soldiers since he

first entered the army in July, 1840; and gratitude, freshly

awakened, for the services of incalculable value rendered by him in

the war for the Union, which his great military genius and daring

did so much to end.

The President deems this a fitting occasion to give expression, in

this manner, to the gratitude felt toward General Sherman by his

fellow-citizens, and to the hope that Providence may grant him many

years of health and happiness in the relief from the active duties

of his profession.

By order of the Secretary of War:

CHESTER A. ARTHUR.

R. C. DRUM, Adjutant-General.

To which I replied:

St. Louis, February 9, 1884.

His Excellency CHESTER A. ARTHUR,

President of the United States.

DEAR SIR: Permit me with a soldier's frankness to thank you

personally for the handsome compliment bestowed in general orders

of yesterday, which are reported in the journals of the day. To me

it was a surprise and a most agreeable one. I had supposed the

actual date of my retirement would form a short paragraph in the

common series of special orders of the War Department; but as the

honored Executive of our country has made it the occasion for his

own hand to pen a tribute of respect and affection to an officer

passing from the active stage of life to one of ease and rest, I

can only say I feel highly honored, and congratulate myself in thus

rounding out my record of service in a manner most gratifying to my

family and friends. Not only this, but I feel sure, when the

orders of yesterday are read on parade to the regiments and

garrisons of the United States, many a young hero will tighten his

belt, and resolve anew to be brave and true to the starry flag,

which we of our day have carried safely through one epoch of

danger, but which may yet be subjected to other trials, which may

demand similar sacrifices, equal fidelity and courage, and a larger

measure of intelligence. Again thanking you for so marked a

compliment, and reciprocating the kind wishes for the future,

I am, with profound respect, your friend and servant,

W. T. SHERMAN, General.

This I construe as the end of my military career. In looking back

upon the past I can only say, with millions of others, that I have

done many things I should not have done, and have left undone still

more which ought to have been done; that I can see where hundreds

of opportunities have been neglected, but on the whole am content;

and feel sure that I can travel this broad country of ours, and be

each night the welcome guest in palace or cabin; and, as

"all the world's stage,

And all the men and women merely players,"

I claim the privilege to ring down the curtain.

W. T. SHERMAN, General.

Memoirs of General William T. Sherman — Complete · 第 29 / 29 章