THE BATTLE OF SHREWSBURY (1403).

=Source.=--_Chronicle of Adam of Usk_, edited by Sir E. Maunde

Thompson, pp. 252, 253.

In the next year, on behalf of the crown of England claimed for the

earl of March, a deadly quarrel arose between the King and the house

of Percy of Northumberland, as kin to the same earl, to the great

agitation of the realm...; and a field being pitched for the morrow

of Saint Mary Magdalene (23rd July), the King, by the advice of the

earl of Dunbar of Scotland, because the father of the lord Henry Percy

and Owen Glendower were then about to come against the King with a

great host, anticipating the appointed day, brought on a most fearful

battle against the said lord Henry and the lord Thomas Percy, then

earl of Worcester. And after that there had fallen on either side in

most bloody slaughter to the number of sixteen thousand men, in the

field of Berwick (where the King afterwards founded a hospice for the

souls of those who there fell) two miles from Shrewsbury, on the eve

of the said feast, victory declared for the king who had thus made the

onslaught. In this battle the said lord Percy, the flower and glory of

Christendom, fell, alas! and with him his uncle.... There fell also two

noble knights in the King's armour, each made conspicuous as though a

second King, having been placed for the King's safety in the rear line

of battle. Whereat the earl of Douglas of Scotland, then being in the

field with the said lord Henry, as his captive, when he heard victory

shouted for King Henry, cried in wonder: "Have I not slain two King

Henries (meaning the said knights) with mine own hand? 'Tis an evil

hour for us that a third yet lives to be our victor."

York and Lancaster, 1399-1485 · 第 59 / 133 题