The valleys which radiate in all directions from the great central

masses of the Alps are admirably adapted for imparting to almost the

whole of Europe a remarkable unity, whilst they offer, at the same

time, an extreme variety of aspects and of physical conditions. The

Po, the Rhone, the Rhine, and the Danube traverse countries having

the most diverse climates, and yet they have their sources in the

same mountain region, and the fertilising alluvium which they deposit

in their valleys results from the disintegration of the same rocks.

Minor valleys cut up the slopes of the Alps and of their dependent

chains, and carry towards the sea the waters of the mountains and

the triturated fragments of their rocks. Running waters are visible,

wherever we cast our eyes. There are neither deserts, nor sterile

plateaux, nor inland lakes and river basins such as we meet with in

Africa and Asia. The rivers of Europe are not flooded as are those of

certain portions of South America, which deluge half the country with

water. On the contrary, in the scheme of her rivers Europe exhibits

a certain degree of moderation which has favoured the work of the

settler, and facilitated the rise of a local civilisation in each river

basin. Moreover, although most rivers are sufficiently large to have

retarded migration, they are not sufficiently so to have arrested it

for any length of time. Even when roads and bridges did not exist,

barbarian immigrants easily made their way from the shores of the Black

Sea to those of the Atlantic.

But Europe, in addition to the advantages due to its framework of

mountains and the disposition of its river basins, enjoys the still

greater advantage of possessing an indented coast-line. It is mainly

the contours of its coasts which impart to Europe its double character

of unity and diversity, which distinguish it amongst continents. It

is “one” because of its great central mass, and “diversified” because

of its numerous peninsulas and dependent islands. It is an organism,

if we may say so, resembling a huge body furnished with limbs. Strabo

compared Europe to a dragon. The geographers of the period of the

revival of letters compared it to a crowned virgin, Spain being the

head, France the heart, and England and Italy the hands, holding the

sceptre and the orb. Russia, at that time hardly known, is made to do

duty for the ample folds of the robe.

The area of Europe is only half that of South America, and one-third

of that of Africa, and yet the development of its coast-lines is

superior to that of the two continents taken together. In proportion

to its area the coasts of Europe have twice the extent of those of

South America, Australia, and Africa; and although they are to a small

extent inferior to those of North America, it must be borne in mind

that the arctic coasts of the latter are ice-bound during the greater

portion of the year. A glance at the subjoined diagrams will show that

Europe, as compared with the two other continents washed by the Arctic

Ocean, enjoys the immense advantage of possessing a coast-line almost

wholly available for purposes of navigation, whilst a large portion

of the coasts of Asia and America is altogether useless to man. And

not only does the sea penetrate into the very heart of {14} temperate

Europe, cutting it up into elongated peninsulas, but these peninsulas,

too, are fringed with gulfs and miniature inland seas. The coasts

of Greece, of Thessaly, and of Thrace are thus indented by bays and

gulfs, penetrating far into the land; Italy and Spain likewise possess

numerous bays and gulfs; and the peninsulas of Northern Europe, Jutland

and Scandinavia, are cut up by the waters of the ocean into numerous

secondary peninsulas.

[Illustration: Fig. 3.—DEVELOPMENT OF COAST-LINES RELATIVELY TO AREA.

Europe. Asia. Africa. N. America. S. America. Australia.

Total area, square miles 4,005,100 17,308,400 11,542,400 9,376,850 6,803,570 3,450,130

Mainland area, square miles 3,758,300 15,966,000 11,293,930 7,973,700 6,731,470 2,934,500

Development of coast-line, 18,600 34,110 16,480 30,890 16,390 10,570

miles

Accessible coasts 17,610 28,200 16,480 26,510 16,390 14,400

Ratio of the geometrical to 1 : 2·5 1 : 2·5 1 : 1·4 1 : 3·1 1 : 1·8 1 : 1·7

the actual contour

The shaded circles represent the various continents; the outer circle

represents the actual extent of coast-line. The blank space between

the two concentric circles represents graphically the difference

between the smallest possible or geometrical contour of a country

having the area of the respective continents, and the actual contour

as exhibited in the existing coast-lines. Europe, being in reality

only a peninsula of Asia, hardly admits of this comparison.]

The islands of Europe must be looked upon as dependencies of that

continent, for most of them are separated from it only by shallow seas.

Candia and the islands scattered broadcast over the Ægean Sea, the

Archipelagos of the Ionian Sea, and of Dalmatia, Sicily, Corsica and

Sardinia, Elba, and the Baleares, are in reality but prolongations,

or maritime out-stations, of neighbouring peninsulas. To the islands

of Sealand and Fyen, at the entrance to the Baltic, Denmark owes {15}

most of her commercial and political importance. Great Britain and

Ireland, which actually formed a portion of the European continent in a

past age, cannot be looked upon otherwise than as dependencies of it,

although the isthmus which once joined them has been destroyed by the

waters of the ocean. England has actually become the grand commercial

emporium of Europe, and plays now the same part in the world’s commerce

that Greece once played in that of the more restricted world of the

Mediterranean.

It is a remarkable fact that each of the European peninsulas should

have enjoyed in turn a period of commercial preponderance. Greece, the

“most noble individuality of the world of the ancients,” came first,

and when at the height of her power governed the Mediterranean, which

at that time meant nearly the whole universe. During the Middle Ages

Amalfi, Genoa, and Venice became the commercial agents between Europe

and the Indies. The discovery of a passage round the Cape and of

America diverted the world’s commerce to Cadiz, Seville, and Lisbon, on

the Iberian peninsula. Subsequently the merchants of the small Dutch

Republic seized a portion of the heritage of Spain and Portugal, and

the wealth of the entire world was floated into the harbours of their

sea-bound islands and peninsulas. In our own days Great Britain, thanks

to its favourable geographical position, in the very centre of great

continental masses, and the energy of its people, has become the great

mart of the world. London, the most populous city of the world, is

also the great centre of attraction for the treasures of mankind; but

there can be no doubt that sooner or later it will be supplanted, in

consequence of the opening of new commercial high-roads, and changes in

the political preponderance of nations. Perhaps some city of the United

States will take the place of London in a future age, and thus the

American belief in the westward march of civilisation will be verified;

or we may possibly return to the East, and convert Constantinople or

Cairo into the world’s emporium and centre of intercourse.

But, whatever may happen in the future, the great changes which have

taken place in the relative importance of the peninsulas and islands

of Europe in the short span of twenty centuries, sufficiently prove

that geographical features exercise a varying influence at different

epochs. That which at one time was looked upon as a great natural

advantage may become, in course of time, a serious disadvantage. Thus

the numerous inlets and gulfs enclosed by mountain chains, which

favoured the rise of the cities of Greece, and gave to Athens the

dominion of the Mediterranean, now constitute as many obstacles to

their connection with the existing system of European communications.

That which in former times constituted the strength of the country

has become its weakness. In primitive times, before man ventured upon

the seas, these bays and gulfs formed insurmountable obstacles to the

migration of nations; at a later date, when the art of navigation had

been acquired, they became commercial high-roads, and were favourable

to the development of civilisation; and at the present time they are

again obstacles in the way of our road-builders and railway engineers.

{16}

V.—CLIMATE.

The influence exercised by the relief of the land and the configuration

of the coasts varies in different ages, but that of climate is

permanent. In this respect Europe is the most favoured region of the

earth, for during a cycle of unknown length it has enjoyed a climate at

once the most temperate, the most equable, and the most healthy of all

continents.

Owing to the inland seas which penetrate far into the land, the whole

of Europe is exposed to the modifying influence of the ocean. With

the exception of Central Russia, no part of Europe is more than 400

miles from the sea, and, as most of the mountains slope from the

centre of the continent towards its circumference, the influence of

the sea breezes is felt throughout. And thus continental Europe, in

spite of its great extent, enjoys the advantages of an insular climate

throughout, the winds passing over the ocean moderating the heat of

summer and tempering the cold of winter.

The continuous north-easterly movement of the waters of the Atlantic

likewise has a favourable effect upon the climate of Europe. After

having been heated by a tropical sun in the Gulf of Mexico, the

gulf-stream issues through the Strait of Florida, and, spreading over

the Atlantic, takes its course towards the coasts of Europe. This

enormous mass of warm water, equal in volume to twenty million rivers

as large as the Rhone, brings the warmth of southern latitudes to the

western and northern shores of Europe. Its influence is felt not only

in the maritime countries of Western Europe, but to some extent as far

as the Caspian and the Ural Mountains.

The currents of the air exercise as favourable an influence upon the

climate of Europe as do those of the ocean. The south-westerly winds

predominating on the coasts pass over the warm gulf-stream, and, on

reaching Europe, they part with the heat stored up by them between

the tropics. The north-westerly, northerly, and even north-easterly

winds, which blow during a portion of the year, are less cold than

might be expected, for they, too, have to cross the warm waters of

the gulf-stream. And lastly, there is the Sahara, which elevates the

temperature of a portion of Europe.

The increase in temperature due to the combined influence of winds

and ocean currents amounts to 40° 50°, and even 60°, if we compare

Europe with other parts of the world lying under the same latitudes.

Nowhere else, not even on the western coast of North America, do the

isothermals, or lines of equal annual temperature, ascend so high

towards the arctic regions. The inhabitants of Europe, though they

may live 900 to 1,200 miles farther away from the equator, enjoy as

mild a climate as do those of America, and the decrease of temperature

on going northward is far less rapid than in any other part of the

globe. This uniformity of temperature constitutes one of the most

characteristic features of Europe. The whole of it lies within the

temperate region bounded by the isothermal lines of 32° F. and 68° F.,

whilst in America and Asia that privileged zone has only half this

extent. {17}

[Illustration: Fig. 4.—THE ISOTHERMAL ZONE OF EUROPE.

Scale 1 : 60,000,000.

Erhard.]

This remarkable uniformity in the climate of Europe is exhibited not

only in its temperature, but likewise in the distribution of its

rains. The seas washing the shores of Europe supply all parts of it

with the necessary amount of moisture. There is no rainless district,

nor, with the exception of a portion of the maritime region of the

Caspian and a small corner of Spain, any district where droughts

occasionally entail the entire loss of the harvest. Rains fall not

only regularly every year, but in most countries they occur in every

season, the only exception being the countries of the Mediterranean,

where autumn and winter are the real rainy seasons. Moreover, in spite

of the great diversity in the physical features of Europe, the amount

of rain is scarcely anywhere excessive, whether it descends as a fine

drizzle, as in Ireland, or in heavy showers, as in Provence and on

the southern slope of the Alps. The annual rainfall scarcely ever

exceeds thirty-nine inches, except on the flanks of certain mountain

ranges which arrest the passage of currents charged with moisture.

This uniformity and moderation in the rainfall exercise a regulating

influence upon the course of the rivers, for even the smallest amongst

them, at all events those to the north of the Pyrenees, the Alps, and

the Balkan, flow throughout the year. They rise and fall generally

within narrow limits, and inundations on a vast scale are as rare as

is want of water for purposes of irrigation. In consequence of this

regularity, Europe is able to derive a greater advantage from its

waters than other continents where the amount of precipitation is more

considerable. The Alps contribute much towards {18} maintaining a

regular flow of the rivers; the excess of humidity which falls to their

share is stored up in the shape of snow and ice, which descend slowly

into the valleys, and melt during the heat of summer. This happens

just at a time when the rivers gain least from rain, and lose most

by evaporation, and some amongst them would dry up if the ice of the

mountains did not come to the aid of the waters descending from the

sky. It is thus that a sort of balance is established in the economy of

European rivers.

The climate of Europe is thus characterized by uniformity as a whole,

and by a compensatory action in its contrasts. Regularity and freedom

from excess, such as are not known in other continents, mark its ocean

currents, its winds, its temperature and rains, and the course of

its rivers. These great advantages have benefited its inhabitants in

the past, and will not cease to do so in the future. Though small in

extent, Europe possesses by far the largest area of acclimation. Man

may migrate from Russia to Spain, or from Ireland to Greece, without

exposing himself to any great risk of life. The inhabitants of the

Caucasus and the Ural Mountains were thus able to cross the plains and

mountains of Europe, and to establish themselves on the shores of the

Atlantic. Soil and climate are equally propitious to man, and enable

him to preserve his physical and intellectual powers wherever he goes.

A migratory people might found new homesteads in any part of Europe.

Their companions of travel—the dog, the horse, and the ox—would not

desert them on the road, and the seed-corn which they carry with them

would yield a harvest wherever confided to the earth.

VI.—INHABITANTS.

A study of the soil and a patient observation of climatic phenomena

enable us to appreciate the general influence exercised by the nature

of the country upon the development of its inhabitants; but it is

more difficult to assign to each race or nation its due share in

the progress of European civilisation. No doubt, in their struggles

for existence, different groups of naked and ignorant savages must

have been acted upon differently, according to their numbers and

physical strength, their inborn intelligence, their tastes and mental

tendencies. But who were those primitive men who first turned to

account the natural resources of the country in which they dwelt? We

know not; for, if we go back for a few thousand years, every fact

is shrouded in darkness. We know nothing even as regards the origin

of the leading nations of Europe. Are we the “sons of the soil,”

and the “shoots of oak-trees,” as told in the poetical language of

ancient tradition, or are we to look upon the inhabitants of Asia as

the ancestors to whom we are indebted for our languages, and for the

rudiments of our arts and sciences? Or did those immigrants from a

neighbouring continent settle down amongst an indigenous population?

Not many years ago the Asiatic origin of European nations was accepted

as an established fact, and the original seats of our forefathers

were pointed out upon the map of Asia. But now most men of science

are agreed to {19} seek our ancestors upon the very soil which we,

their descendants, still occupy. Caverns, the shores of oceans and

lakes, and the alluvial beds of our rivers have yielded the remains

of human industry, and even human skeletons, which clearly prove that

long before these supposed immigrations from Asia there existed in

Europe tribes who had already made some progress in human industry.

Even in the childhood of history there existed tribes who were looked

upon as aborigines, and some of their descendants—as, for instance, the

Basks—have nothing in common with the invaders from the neighbouring

continent. Nor is it universally admitted that the Aryans—that is, the

ancestors of the Pelasgians, the Greeks, the Latins, Celts, Germans,

and Slavs—are of Asiatic origin. Similarity of language may justify

our belief in the common origin of the Aryans of Europe, the Persians,

and the Hindoos, but it does not prove that their ancestral home

should be looked for somewhere near the sources of the Oxus. Many

men of learning[3] look upon the Aryans as aborigines of Europe, but

certainty on this point does not exist. No doubt, in prehistoric times,

intermigrations between the two continents were frequent; but we hardly

know what directions they took, and can speak with certainty only of

those migrations of peoples which are related by history. We thus know

that Europe sent forth to other continents Galatians, Macedonians, and

Greeks, and more recently innumerable emigrants of all nationalities,

and received in turn Huns, Avares, Turks, Mongols, Circassians, Jews,

Armenians, Moors, Berbers, and members of many other nations.

[Illustration: ETHNOGRAPHICAL MAP OF EUROPE]

Leaving out of consideration the smaller families of nations, as well

as the members of races who have not attained a national existence,

Europe may be described as consisting of three great ethnological

divisions, the principal boundary between which is formed by the Alps,

the Carpathians, and the Balkan.

The first of these great families of European nations, the members of

which speak Greco-Latin languages, occupies the southern slopes of the

Balkan and of the Alps, the Iberian peninsula, France, and a portion of

Belgium, as well as a few detached territories within the limits of the

ancient Roman empire, altogether surrounded by alien nations. Such are

the plains of the Lower Danube and a portion of Transylvania, which are

inhabited by the Rumanians, and a few secluded Alpine valleys inhabited

by “Romans.” On the other hand, fragments of two ancient nations have

maintained their ground in the midst of Latinised populations, viz.

the Celtic inhabitants of Brittany, and the Basks of the Pyrenees.

Generally speaking, however, all the inhabitants of South-western

Europe, whether of Celtic, Iberian, or Ligurian race, speak languages

derived from the Latin, and whatever differences existed originally

between these various populations, this community of language has more

or less obliterated them.

The Teutonic nations form the second great group. They occupy nearly

the whole of Central Europe to the north of the Alps, and extend

through Holland and Flanders to within a short distance of the

Straits of Dover. Denmark and the great Scandinavian peninsula, as

well as Iceland, belong to the same group, and {20} the bulk of the

inhabitants of the British Islands are likewise generally included in

it. The latter, however, should rather be described as a mixed race,

for the aboriginal Celtic population of these islands, which now exists

pure only in a few remote districts, has amalgamated with Anglo-Saxon

and Danish invaders, and the language of the latter has become mixed

with mediæval French, the resulting idiom being almost as much Latin as

Saxon. The development of national characteristics has been favoured

by the isolation in which the inhabitants of the British Islands found

themselves, and they differ essentially from continental neighbours—the

Scandinavians, Germans, and Celto-Latins—in language and customs.

The Slavs, or Slavonians, form the third group of European nations.

They are less numerous than the Greco-Latins, but the territories they

occupy are far more extensive, for they spread over nearly the whole

of Russia, over Poland, a large portion of the Balkan peninsula, and

about one-half of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy. All the great plains

to the east of the Carpathians are inhabited by Slavs, either pure or

mixed with Tartars and Mongols. To the west and south of the mountains

the race is split up into numerous small nations, and in the valley

of the Danube these come into contact with Rumanians, as well as with

Turks and Magyars, the two latter being of Asiatic origin, and these

separate the Slavonians of the north from the Slavonians of the south.

In the north, Finns, Livonians, and Lithuanians interpose between the

Slavonians and the Germanic nations.[4]

Race and language, however, are not always identical. Members of one

race frequently speak the language of another, and race and linguistic

boundaries, therefore, differ frequently. As for the political

boundaries, they scarcely ever follow those natural features which

would have been selected had their settlement been intrusted to the

spontaneous action of the different nations. They hardly ever coincide

with the boundaries of races or of languages, except in the case of a

few high mountain ranges or of arms of the sea. On many occasions the

countries of Europe were arbitrarily split up in consequence of wars or

diplomatic arrangements. A few peoples only, protected by the nature

of their country as well as {21} by their valour, have maintained

their independence since the age of great migrations, but many more

have been swept away by successive invasions. Many others, again, have

alternately seen their frontiers expand and contract more than once

even during a generation.

The so-called “balance of European powers,” founded as it is upon the

rights of war and ambitious rivalries between nations, is necessarily

unstable. Nations eminently fit to lead a common political existence

are torn asunder on the one side, whilst the most heterogeneous

elements are thrown together on the other. In these political

arrangements the nations themselves are never consulted, but their

wishes and inclinations must nevertheless prevail in the end, and

the artificial edifice raised by warriors and statesmen will come to

the ground. A true “balance of power” will only be established when

every nation of the continent shall have become the arbiter of its

own destinies, when every pretended right of conquest shall have been

surrendered, and neighbouring nations shall be at liberty to combine

for the management of the affairs they have in common. Our arbitrary

political divisions, therefore, possess but a transitory value. They

cannot altogether be ignored; but in the following descriptions we

shall, as far as possible, adhere to the great natural divisions as

defined by mountains and valleys, and by the distribution of nations

having the same origin and speaking the same language. But even these

natural boundaries lose their importance in countries like Switzerland,

inhabited by nations speaking different languages, but held together by

the strongest of all ties—the common enjoyment of freedom.

The Earth and its inhabitants, Volume 1: Europe. Greece, Turkey in Europe, Rumania, Servia, Montenegro, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. · 第 2 / 53 段