And some lines of a very familiar hymn by Dr. Watts ran thus:--

"Whene'er I take my walks abroad,

How many poor I see.

. . . . . . . . . . . .

"How many children in the street

Half naked I behold;

While I am clothed from head to feet,

And sheltered from the cold."

Now a ragged, half-clothed child, or one that could really be called

poor, in the extreme sense of the word, was the rarest of all sights in

a thrifty New England town fifty years ago. I used to look sharply for

those children, but I never could see one. And a beggar! Oh, if a real

beggar would come along, like the one described in

"Pity the sorrows of a poor old man,"

what a wonderful event that would be! I believe I had more curiosity

about a beggar, and more ignorance, too, than about a king. The poem

read:--

"A pampered menial drove me from the door."

What sort of creature could a "pampered menial" be? Nothing that had

ever come under our observation corresponded to the words. Nor was it

easy for us to attach any meaning to the word "servant." There were

women who came in occasionally to do the washing, or to help about

extra work. But they were decently clothed, and had homes of their own,

more or less comfortable, and their quaint talk and free-and-easy ways

were often as much of a lift to the household as the actual assistance

they rendered.

I settled down upon the conclusion that "rich" and "poor" were

book-words only, describing something far off, and having nothing to do

with our every-day experience. My mental definition of "rich people,"

from home observation, was something like this: People who live in

three-story houses, and keep their green blinds closed, and hardly ever

come out and talk with the folks in the street. There were a few such

houses in Beverly, and a great many in Salem, where my mother sometimes

took me for a shopping walk. But I did not suppose that any of the

people who lived near us were very rich, like those in books.

Everybody about us worked, and we expected to take hold of our part

while young. I think we were rather eager to begin, for we believed

that work would make men and women of us.

I, however, was not naturally an industrious child, but quite the

reverse. When my father sent us down to weed his vegetable-garden at

the foot of the lane, I, the youngest of his weeders, liked to go with

the rest, but not for the sake of the work or the pay. I generally gave

it up before I had weeded half a bed. It made me so warm! and my back

did ache so! I stole off into the shade of the great apple-trees, and

let the west wind fan my hot cheeks, and looked up into the boughs, and

listened to the many, many birds that seemed chattering to each other

in a language of their own. What was it they were saying? and why could

not I understand it? Perhaps I should, sometime. I had read of people

who did, in fairy tales.

When the others started homeward, I followed. I did not mind their

calling me lazy, nor that my father gave me only one tarnished copper

cent, while Lida received two or three bright ones. I had had what I

wanted most. I would rather sit under the apple-trees and hear the

birds sing than have a whole handful of bright copper pennies. It was

well for my father and his garden that his other children were not like

me.

The work which I was born to, but had not begun to do, was sometimes a

serious weight upon my small, forecasting brain.

A New England Girlhood, Outlined from Memory (Beverly, MA) · 第 28 / 50 题