CHAPTER VIII.

A REVOLUTION IN WIND SUPPLY.

Prior to the construction of the above-named organ at Birkenhead,

England, it had been the custom to obtain or regulate the pressure of

wind supplied to the pipes by means of loading the bellows with

weights. Owing to its inertia, no heavy bellows weight can be set into

motion rapidly. When, therefore, a staccato chord was struck on one of

these earlier organs, with all its stops drawn, little or no response

was obtained from the pipes, because the wind-chest was instantly

exhausted and no time was allowed for the inert bellows weights to fall

and so force a fresh supply of air into the wind-chests.

BELLOWS SPRINGS VERSUS WEIGHTS.

In one of Hope-Jones' earliest patents the weights indeed remain, but

they merely serve to compress springs, which in turn, act upon the top

of the bellows.

Before this patent was granted he had, however, given up the use of

weights altogether and relied entirely upon springs.

This one detail--the substitution of springs for weights--has had a

far-reaching effect upon organ music. It rendered possible the entire

removal of the old unsteadiness of wind from which all organs of the

time suffered in greater or less degree. It quickened the attack of

the action and the speech of the pipes to an amazing extent and opened

a new and wider field to the King of Instruments.

In the year 1894 John Turnell Austin, now of Hartford, Conn., took out

a patent for an arrangement known as the "Universal air-chest." In

this, the spring as opposed to the weight is adopted. The Universal

air-chest forms a perfect solution of the problem of supplying prompt

and steady wind-pressure, but as practically the same effect is

obtained by the use of a little spring reservoir not one hundredth part

of its size, it is questionable whether this Universal air-chest,

carrying, as it does, certain disadvantages, will survive.

INDIVIDUAL PALLETS.

Fifty years ago the pallet and slider sound-board was well nigh

universally used, but several of the builders in Germany, and Roosevelt

in this country, strongly advocated, and introduced, chests having an

independent valve, pallet or membrane, to control the admission of wind

to each pipe in the organ.[1]

In almost all of these instances small round valves were used for this

purpose.

A good pallet and slider chest is difficult to make, and those

constructed by indifferent workmen out of indifferent lumber will cause

trouble through "running"--that is, leakage of wind from one pipe to

another. In poor chests of this description the slides are apt to

stick when the atmosphere is excessively damp, and to become too loose

on days when little or no humidity is present.

Individual pallet chests are cheaper to make and they have none of the

defects named above. Most of these chests, however, are subject to

troubles of their own, and not one of those in which round valves are

employed permits the pipes to speak to advantage.

Willis, Hope-Jones, Carlton C. Michell and other artists, after lengthy

tests, independently arrived at the conclusion that the best tonal

results cannot by any possibility be obtained from these cheap forms of

chest. Long pallets and a large and steady body of air below each pipe

are deemed essential.[2]

HEAVY WIND PRESSURES.

As previously stated, the vast majority of organs built fifty years ago

used no higher wind pressure than 3 inches. Hill, in 1833, placed a

Tuba stop voiced on about 11 inches in an organ he built for Birmingham

Town Hall (England), but the tone was so coarse and blatant that such

stops were for years employed only in the case of very large

buildings.[3] Cavaillé-Coll subsequently utilized slightly increased

pressures for the trebles of his flue stops as well as for his larger

reeds. As a pioneer he did excellent work in this direction.

To Willis, however, must be attributed greater advance in the

utilization of heavy pressures for reed work. He was the first to

recognize that the advantage of heavy wind pressure for the reeds lay

not merely in the increase of power, but also in the improvement of the

quality of tone. Willis founded a new school of reed voicing and

exerted an influence that will never die.

In organs of any pretensions it became his custom to employ pressures

of 8 to 10 inches for the Great and Swell chorus reeds and the Solo

Tubas in his larger organs were voiced on 20 or 25 inches.

He introduced the "closed eschallot" (the tube against which the tongue

beats in a reed pipe) and created a revolution in reed voicing. He has

had many imitators, but the superb examples of his skill, left in

English Cathedral and town hall organs, will be difficult to surpass.

Prior to the advent of Hope-Jones (about the year 1887) no higher

pressure than 25 inches had, we believe, been employed in any organ,

and the vast majority of instruments were voiced on pressures not

exceeding 3 inches. Heavy pressure flue voicing was practically

unknown, and in reeds even Willis used very moderate pressures, save

for a Tuba in the case of really large buildings.

Hope-Jones showed that by increasing the weight of metal, bellying all

flue pipes in the centre, leathering their lips, clothing their flues,

and reversing their languids, he could obtain from heavy pressures

practically unlimited power and at the same time actually add to the

sweetness of tone produced by the old, lightly blown pipes. He used

narrow mouths, did away with regulation at the foot of the pipe, and

utilized the "pneumatic blow" obtained from his electric action.

He also inaugurated "an entirely new departure in the science of reed

voicing." [4]

He employs pressures as high as fifty inches and never uses less than

six. His work in this direction has exercised a profound influence on

organ building throughout the world, and leading builders in all

countries are adopting his pressures or are experimenting in that

direction.

Like most revolutionary improvements, the use of heavy pressures was at

first vigorously opposed, but organists and acousticians are now filled

with wonder that the old low-pressure idea should have held sway so

long, in view of the fact that very heavy wind is employed for the

production of the best tone from the human voice and from the various

wind instruments of the orchestra.

Karl Gottlieb Weiglé, of Stuttgart, was a little in advance of many of

his confrères in using moderately heavy pressures, but he departed from

the leather lip and narrow mouth used by Hope-Jones and has obtained

power without refinement.

In employing these heavy pressures of wind, increased purity and beauty

of tone should alone be aimed at. Power will take care of itself.

MECHANICAL BLOWERS.

The "organ beater" of bygone days was invariably accompanied by the

"organ pumper," often by several of them. There is a well-known story

of how the man refused to blow any longer unless the organist said that

"_we_ had done very well to-day." The organ pumper's vocation is now

almost entirely gone, especially in this country, although we know of

organs in England which require four men "to blow the same" unto this

day.

When Willis built the great organ in St. George's Hall, Liverpool, in

1855, he installed an eight-horsepower steam engine to provide the wind

supply. There is a six-horse steam engine in use in Chester Cathedral

(installed 1876).

Gas and petrol (gasoline) engines have been used extensively in

England, providing a cheaper, but, with feeders, a less controllable,

prime mover. By far the commonest source of power has been the water

motor, as it was economical and readily governed, and as water pressure

was generally available, but the decline of the old-time bellows, with

the fact that many cities to-day refuse to permit motors to be operated

from the water mains, have given the field practically to the electric

motor, now generally used in connection with some form of rotary fans.

The principle of fans in series, first introduced by Cousans, of

Lincoln, England, under the name of the Kinetic Blower, is now accepted

as standard. This consists of a number of cleverly designed fans

mounted in series on one shaft, the first delivering air to the second

at, say, 3-inch pressure, to be raised another step and delivered to

the next in series, etc., etc. This plan permits tapping off desired

amounts of air at intermediate pressures with marked economy, and as it

is slow speed, and generally direct connected with its motor on the

same shaft, it is both quiet and mechanically efficient.

[1] One object of this was to prevent what was called "robbing." While

the pressure of the wind might be ample and steady enough with only a

few stops drawn, it was found that when all the stops were drawn the

large pipes "robbed" their smaller neighbors of their due supply of

wind, causing them to sound flat. By giving each pipe a pallet or

valve to itself, the waste of wind in the large grooves was prevented.

Another object was to get rid of the long wooden slides, which in dry

weather were apt to shrink and cause leakage, and in damp weather to

swell and stick.

[2] A striking instance of the difference between the two kinds of

pallet can be seen in All Angels' Church, New York. The organ was

built originally by Roosevelt, with two manuals and his patent

wind-chest. In 1890 the church was enlarged and Jardine removed the

organ to a chamber some thirty feet above the floor and fitted his

electric action to the Roosevelt wind-chest. At the same time he

erected an entirely new Choir organ, in the clerestory, with his

electric action fitted to long pallets. The superiority of attack and

promptness of speech, especially of the lower notes, of the Choir over

the Great and Swell organs is marvelous. The same thing can be seen at

St. James' Church, New York, where the Roosevelt organ was rebuilt with

additions by the Hope-Jones Organ Co. in 1908.

[3] Some congregations could not stand them and had them taken out.

[4] Wedgwood: "Dictionary of Organ Stops," p. 167.

The Recent Revolution in Organ Building Being an Account of Modern Developments · 第 8 / 14 章