CHAPTER II

Ancient Collections of Proverbs -- The Proverbs of Solomon

-- Ecclesiasticus -- The Work of D'Anvers on Solomon's

Proverbs -- The Collections of De Worde, Trevisis, and Lydgate

-- The "Adagia" of Erasmus -- Tavernar's "Garden of Wisdom"

-- Heywood's Collection of Proverbs -- Camden's "Remaines"

-- Davies, the "Scourge of Folly" -- The "Apophthegms" of

Lord Bacon -- The "Outlandish Proverbs" of G. H. -- Herbert's

"Jacula Prudentum" -- The Work of Howell and Cotgrave

-- The "Gnomologia" of Fuller -- The Difficulties of

Proverb-classification, by Country, by leading Word, by

Subject, etc. -- Ray's "Collection of English Proverbs" -- The

"Paræmiologia" of Walker -- Palmer on Proverbs -- The Sayings

of "Poor Richard"

The collecting of proverbs appears at almost all periods to have

exercised a great fascination, and even in classic times we find writers

either amassing stores of them or introducing them freely into their

writings. Many of these sayings arose, there is no doubt, in the

leisurely and sententious East, and from thence found their way to the

widely-spreading colonies of Greece and Phoenicia, and in due course

to Rome, where a still greater area of diffusion was thrown open for

their dispersal. The Jewish proverbs used by our Saviour, or by St Paul

and the other apostles, can be traced back to India, where they were in

use centuries before they found their way through Babylonia and Persia

to the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Hesiod, Homer, Pindar, Æsop,

Solon, Aristotle, Phædrus, and many other ancient writers introduced

them. Menander made a fine collection of them under the title of

_Sententiæ Monostichæ_. Pythagoras drew up a collection of adages for

his disciples, and Plato, Theophrastus, and Chrysippus accumulated

stores of them. During the Roman Empire collectors of antiquarian tastes

carried on the work, Zenobius and Diogenianus, during the reign of

Hadrian, being perhaps the most notable and enthusiastic in this

pursuit, and to these, though of much later date, we may add the names

of Gregorius, Cyprius, and Macarius.

Zenobius made an epitome of the proverbs collected by two older writers,

Tarraeus and Didymus, in number five hundred and fifty-two, and

Diogenianus, living about the same time, the beginning of the second

century, accumulated seven hundred and seventy-five. Andrew Schott

edited these two lists, plus fourteen hundred from Suidas and some few

others from various sources at Antwerp in the year 1612.

The Biblical book known as the Proverbs of Solomon must certainly not be

overlooked, as it is a collection of quite inestimable worth, having a

counsel for every emergency in the troublous life of man, an

encouragement for the weak, a reproof for the froward. To the conceited

man it cries "Be not wise in thine own eyes," "Cease from thine own

wisdom," while man swollen up with pride is warned that "Pride goeth

before destruction and an haughty spirit before a fall," so that "When

pride cometh there cometh shame." The value of friendship is very fully

enforced: we are warned that "A man who hath friends must show himself

friendly" in turn, that we must not resent the honest counsel proffered,

for "Faithful are the wounds of a friend," and we must not too hastily

assume that all who profess to be our friends are really so, for "Every

man is a friend to him that giveth gifts," and only adversity could

prove their real value. The mischief done by the hasty tongue is

repeatedly dwelt upon--"A fool's mouth is his destruction," "The words

of a tale-bearer are as wounds," and "Death and life are in the power

of the tongue." The man of business is warned that "Divers weights are

an abomination to the Lord," while the man who honestly endeavours is

encouraged to believe that his labours shall not be lost to him, for

"Whoso keepeth the fig-tree shall eat the fruit thereof, while the

slothful man" excuses his idleness and apathy, and "saith there is a

lion without." The vindictive man is admonished that "Whoso diggeth a

pit shall fall therein," while the value of forethought and common-sense

is enforced in the hint, "Surely in vain is the net spread in the sight

of any bird." That we should read those counsels aright, and not draw

false conclusions, we are reminded that "The legs of the lame are not

equal: so is a parable in the mouth of fools."[28:A]

The priceless gift of wisdom, far in value above rubies, is dwelt upon

and enforced, and its saving strength referred to time after time. The

wisdom enshrined in this book, if incorporated in the heart and

illuminating the life, would suffice as a complete _vade mecum_.

The writings of the son of Sirach are worthy of attentive study: they

will be found in the apocryphal book of Ecclesiasticus, and are of very

similar character to the proverbs of Solomon.[28:B] That the one writer

should appreciate the work of the other was most natural, and the wisdom

of Solomon is thus eulogised:--"How wise wast thou in thy youth, and as

a flood filled with understanding. Thy soul covered the whole earth, and

thou filledst with dark parables. Thy name went far into the islands,

and for thy peace thou wast beloved. The countries marvelled at thee for

thy songs, and proverbs, and parables, and interpretations."

"O Salomon, richest of all richesse,

Fulfilled of sapience and worldly glorie,

Ful worthy ben thy wordes to memorie

To every wight that wit and reason can."

CHAUCER, _The Marchantes Tale_.

This book, though spoken of as one and as the work of Solomon, is really

divided into several sections, and was doubtless the work of different

authors and the product of different times. All was finally collected

into a single book, but there is absolutely no clue as to how much is

the fruit of the wisdom of Solomon and how much sprang from the

experience of others. Two other contributors are mentioned in the book,

Lemuel and Agur, writers of whom nothing is elsewhere known. The first

nine chapters are chiefly a description and commendation of wisdom, and

these are followed by others that are largely made up of sentences very

loosely strung together. The proverbs of Agur are much more artificial

in style than the others, while the proverbs of King Lemuel are in

commendation of chastity, temperance and justice, and the praise of the

ideal wife.[29:A]

In the year 1676 one Henry D'Anvers collated these proverbs, and

arranged them in alphabetical sequence as an aid to the memory. He

entitled it "A Presentation of the Proverbs of Solomon in English

Dress." At the opening of the book the writer, as in the Biblical

original, seeks wisdom. His search is at first fruitless:--

"Fare wel (said I), for yet it don't appear,

That Wisdom (whom I seek for) dwelleth here.

So I departed thence with speedy feet,

When as I found that was not Wisdom's seat."

At last, however, he seeks it in the Bible, and his perseverance is here

rewarded:--

"She's glorious within, enlightened eyes

Do see such beauty which they can't but prize.

She hath one room all hung with Pearls (you'll see),

King Solomon's Proverbs, full of dignity."

This simile of the pearls is to the compiler a very attractive one, and

we find it repeated more than once in the book, as, for instance:--

"Who searches oft in small things worth descries.

A Pearl is small and yet of a great price:

A Proverb is a Pearl then, rich though small,

But Scriptural most precious is of all.

King Solomon hath left Posterity

A rich and everlasting Legacy:

A cabinet of Pearls, which all may take

Nor shall they yet their fellows poorer make;

You may perhaps be owner of't, and yet

I also may enjoy the Cabinet.

Who will not then this Cab'net prize and keep?

They're precious Pearls, although they're in a heap.

You'l say, perhap, they're mixt together; well,

Loke here, each Jewell hath its proper Cell;

And as your use requires, you may repair

To such a Cell, and have a Jewell there."

This latter part refers to the alphabetical arrangement under such

headings as honour, diligent, slothful. On the right-hand page all

through his book he gives the same proverbs in Latin.

The definition of proverbs by D'Anvers is a happy one, "Short, wise

sentences, containing much in a little." He goes on to say that "they

are in the Scriptures sometimes called the Sayings of the Antients (1

Sam. xxiv. 13), because delivered by the wise antient Fathers or Elders,

and therefore called the words of the wise (Prov. i. 6); and sometimes

the sayings of old (2 Sam. xx. 18, Ps. lxxviii. 2), because the

approbation and consent of Ages went to make them the usage of a Nation,

being brought by Custom and Tradition to every mouth."

D'Anvers carefully calls attention to a point that is sometimes

overlooked, that such figurative language is sometimes of intent

employed to veil rather than to reveal. Hence sometimes "an obscure and

enigmatical way of speaking," and therefore called "the word of the wise

and their dark sayings," and "dark sayings of old." And therefore it is

said to our Saviour upon His explanation of some teaching that had not

been grasped by His hearers, "Now speakest thou plainly and speakest no

proverb," opposing plain speaking to proverbial and parabolical.

The comprehensiveness of the book of Proverbs is very happily brought

out by D'Anvers when he speaks of it as "containing not only the true

Wisdom (in teaching the fear of the Lord) but all other necessary

learning as well--Ethicks, viz., matters pertaining to moral virtues, as

Prudence, Temperance, Justice. As Oeconomicks, viz., matters of

Domestick and Family-concerns, relating to the duties of Husbands,

Wives, Parents, Children, Masters and Servants, and Politicks, also,

relating to Government and matters of State." We may therefore, on

recognition of this, find no difficulty in assenting to his declaration

that "Plato, Aristotle, Cicero and other Heathenish School-Authors are

not to be named with Solomon who so instructs to every good word and

work."

A manuscript preserved in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge, is

of considerable interest in the bibliography of proverbs. It was

written in the beginning of the thirteenth century and is a translation

into Latin of some of the more popular sayings of the time. Thus, for

example, the well-known adage, "A bird in the hand is worth two in the

bush," appears as "Plus valet in manibus avis unica quam dupla silvis."

"When the dog eats his bone he loves not company," is given as "Dum

canis os rodit, sociari pluribus odit." In an old French collection we

find the equivalent of this, "Chen en cosyn compagnie ne desire"--"The

dog while in the kitchen desires no fellow."

Another is the interesting collection got together by Wynkyn de Worde

and Peter Trevisis early in the sixteenth century. The wording is very

quaint, but we are able to recognise many proverbs that are still in

use, the difference of their wording often making them still more

attention-compelling. How delightful, for example, is the variation on

the well-worn theme as to the impropriety and want of delicacy in

looking in a gift-horse's mouth, "A gyuen hors may not be loked in the

tethe." The fate that may attend unasked-for offers of assistance is

graphically brought before us in the rendering, "Profred seruyce

stynketh." The difference in result between the idle aimless wish and

the strenuous endeavour is excellently brought home to us in "Wysshers

and wolders ben smal housholders." "Be ye dayes neuer so long at ye last

cometh euensonge," when "the ploughman homeward plods his weary way." It

is very refreshing, too, to meet another old friend, "Thou hyttest the

nayle on the heed," though in these latter days we make a point of its

being "the right nail." The collection is entitled "Vulgaria Stambrigi."

The "Prourbes of Lydgate," a black letter-treatise of about the same

date as the book just referred to, may also be consulted. Many of the

proverbs, though some are good, appear to have now passed out of use. We

have for instance a somewhat selfish motto, "Payne thee not eche croked

to redresse," a counsel not to worry over other people's troubles.

"Galle under suger hathe double bytternesse," is expressive and

suggestive. It tells of lost friendship, of confidence treacherously

betrayed, of bright hopes dashed. The advice to look at home and to mind

primarily one's own business is brought out in the line, "Loke in thy

mirrour and deme none other wyghts." There is, as will be noted in the

examples we have given, a certain tone of cynicism and selfishness that

is not a pleasant feature and which we would fain hope is at least one

reason for many of them having gone out of service.

Michael Apostolius of Byzantium in the middle of the fifteenth century

compiled a book of ancient proverbs, on which he made comments and gave

explanations where he deemed it needful. The collection contained 2027

examples. The man, however, who in these earlier days did most in this

direction was Erasmus, and his labours supplied for subsequent writers a

mass of very valuable material, for the work was one of gigantic toil.

Erasmus largely contributed in many ways to the advancement of learning

in Europe. The first edition of his book, the "Adagia," was published in

Paris in the year 1500. The work was at once greeted with acclamation,

and fresh editions were repeatedly called for. On each occasion Erasmus

made additions, until at length the book contained over 4000 examples.

These were mostly the proverbs to be found in the early Greek and Roman

writers. The book is a monument of perseverance and erudition; it still

remains unrivalled, and it became on its issue the medium through which

the knowledge of many proverbs was disseminated throughout Europe: the

similarity of many of the proverbs of England, Holland, Germany, Italy,

Spain, was at least in some measure owing to the fact that the Latin

treatise of Erasmus supplied an abundant store for general

appropriation.

Erasmus was one of the many who sought to reform the Church. The

dissolute were denounced whatever their rank, and abuses were fulminated

against with unsparing zeal, so that the people were prepared for some

great change either of mending or ending. Hence it has been said that

Erasmus laid the egg of the Reformation and Luther hatched it. Great

enmity was aroused, and the divines who had had cause to wince,

endeavoured to persuade the Pope, Leo X., to have the "Adagia"

condemned. The morals and comments added to some of the proverbs told

very heavily against the clergy, and they very naturally did not take

kindly to the issue of such a book. The ecclesiastics, however, in

session at the Council of Trent, before whom the matter was brought,

liberally decided that the book was of too great value to be wholly

suppressed, so they contented themselves with ordering its strict

revision, everything which they deemed offensive to the papal sway and

the influence of the priesthood being under their ban. This garbled

version was published in Florence in the year 1575, the name of the

author being suppressed, but the book had ere this passed through so

many editions and had been scattered so far and wide over Europe that

any action of this kind came altogether too late to be of any efficacy.

Taverner, an Englishman, issued a book of proverbs, axioms, and epigrams

in the year 1539. It is in black-letter, and has avowedly been largely

constructed "with newe addicions" out of the monumental work of Erasmus.

It is "the Garden of Wysdome, conteyning pleasant floures, that is to

saye, propre and quycke sayinges of Princes, Phylosphers, and other

sortes of men, Drawen forth of good Authours by Rycharde Tauerner." His

comments on the various adages are often very shrewd. "Lawes," he says,

"be lyke spyders webbes, wherein the weakest and most feble beastes be

catched and stycke faste, but the strongest breake out. So lawes do

bynde the poore and meane persons but the rich cobbes escape

vnpunyshed"; and again, "An angrye bodye dothe nothynge dyffer from a

mad man, but in the tariannce of tyme, sygnifyeng that wrathe is a short

frensye." Many of his "quycke sayinges"[35:A] are very happy, thus,

"Demanded what is a frend, Zeno answered an other I, sygnifyeng that an

entyer and hartye frende no lesse loveth his frende then hymselfe." We

read, too, with interest, of "a certayne person which rose erly in the

mornynge and found his hose knawen and eaten of the rattes, and being

troubled wyth this syght, thynkyng it a prognosticati[=o] (a tok[=e] of

some misfortune) he cometh to Cato to aske his co[=u]saile and to know

of hym what euyl thys thyng portended. Cato maketh hym thys answere,

Certes my frend it is no m[=o]strouse syght to se rattes eat mens hose,

but yf thy hose had eaten the rattes that had been a monstrouse syght."

This answer was so entirely to the point that one would fain hope that

the man of the knawen hose went on his way rejoicing that he knew the

worst.

Books of like nature with that of Taverner will be found in the works of

Florio--one of these is entitled "Merie proverbes, Wittie Sentences and

golden Sayings," and another is the "Garden of Recreation." This latter

contains some six thousand Italian proverbs. They doubtless passed

through divers editions; the copies that came under our own notice were

dated 1578 and 1591 respectively.

A valuable sixteenth century collection of proverbs may be found in a

rhyming treatise written by John Heywood. The first edition that we have

seen is a black-letter quarto of the year 1547. It is entitled "A

Dialogue, contayning in effect the number of al the Proverbs in the

English tongue, compact in a matter concerning two Marriages." In an

issue in 1598 that has come under our notice the title is, "A dialogue

wherein are pleasantlie contrived the number of all the effectuall

proverbs in our English tongue, compact in a matter concerning two

marriages. Together with three hundred epigrams upon three hundred

proverbs." Heywood always refers to the proverbs as already old sayings

and praises them, though he at times dressed up as proverbs some of his

own ideas, and altered others, depriving them of somewhat of their

rugged directness. He says of them:

"Our common, plaine, pithie proverbes olde

Some sense of some of whiche beying bare and rude,

Yet to fine and fruitfull effect they allude,

And their sentences include so large a reache

That almost in all thinges good lessons they teache.

This write I not to teach but to touch: for why?

Men know this as well or better than I.

But this and that rest: I write for this,

Remembering and considering what the pith is,

That by remembering of these, Proverbs may grow."

This poem on marriage may make an excellent vehicle for the introduction

of these old English sayings, but as a poem it is in itself most

cheerless and disagreeable, the view taken being a most unfavourable

one. One gets no notion of anything like conjugal felicity being

possible, the rhymes being a snarl and a wrangle all through.

John Heywood was a friend of Sir Thomas More. His book at once sprang

into popularity, and was ten times reprinted during the sixteenth

century. He also wrote the "Mery playe betwene the Pardoner and the

Frere, the Curate and Neybour Pratte." The whole tone of this is as

hostile to the clergy as the other to Hymen. Another of his productions

was the "Play of the Wether," where a "gentylman, wynde-miller,

marchaunt, launder," and others all fall foul of the weather, and at

last appeal to Jupiter. The gentleman, for instance, "wants no wynde to

blow for hurt in hys huntynge," while "she that lyveth by laundry must

have wether hot and clere her clothys to dry." He wrote several other

plays and other things.

The following extracts from Heywood give an illustration of his rhyming

treatment:--

"The cat would eat fish and would not wet her feete.

They must hunger in frost that will not worke in heate.

And he that will thrive must aske leave of his wife,

But your wife will give none, by you and her life."

"Haste must provoke

When the pigge is proffered to hold up the poke.

When the sun shineth make hay: which is to say

Take time when time com'th, lest time steale away.

And one good lesson to this purpose I pike

From the smith's forge, when th' iron is hot, strike."

The reasons may be sound enough, but the rhymes are deplorable. Thus

"pike" is no doubt an example of "poetic license," as pick, the word he

really wants, would not rhyme with strike!

"From suspicion to knowledge of yll, for sothe,

Coulde make ye dooe but as the flounder dothe--

Leape out of the frying-pan into the fyre,

And chaunge from yl peyn to wurs is smal hyre."

For badness of rhyme it would be hard to surpass this--

"But pryde she sheweth none, her looke reason alloweth,

She lookth as butter would not melt in her mouth."

That "newe broom swepth cleene" is the text for another atrociously bad

rhyme. It limps as follows:--

"But since all thing is the worse of the wearing

Decay of cleene sweeping folke had in fearing."

In the year 1586 appeared the first edition of Camden's Britannia. The

book was a very popular one, and repeatedly issued. The author

accumulated a vast store of information, more than he found himself able

to utilise in his book, the result being yet another book, the

"Remaines." This, like the first, was received with much favour. The

title was "Remaines concerning Britaine; but especially England and the

Inhabitants thereof, their Languages, Names, Surnames, Allusions,

Anagrams, Armories, Monies, Impresses, Apparell, Artillarie, Wise

Speeches, Prouerbs, Posies, Epitaphs." William Camden was Clarenceaux,

King of Armes, surnamed "the Learned" by some of his contemporaries, and

his heraldic and archæological tastes are clearly seen in his choice of

subjects when dealing with so vast a theme as the thousand and one

interests that divers Englishmen would look for in such a book; the

sportsman, the botanist, the merchant, for example, each having their

special interests quite outside those that seemed to Camden so specially

characteristic and essential to a right comprehension of England.

The book is a very interesting one, and full of valuable matter, but it

is with one section alone, that on proverbs, that we now deal. His

reason for their insertion is as follows:--"Where as proverbs are

concise, witty, and wise Speeches grounded upon long experience,

containing for the most part good caveats, and therefore profitable and

delightfull: I thought it not unfit to set down here, alphabetically,

some of the selectest and most usuall amongst us, as being worthy to

have place amongst the wise Speeches." In the book they immediately

succeed these wise speeches.

We give a selection from these proverbs, held to be worthy of such

commendation. "An ynche in a miss is as good as an ell." "Looke not to

hie least a chip fall in thine eie." "It is euill waking of a sleeping

dogge." "Many stumble at a strawe and leape over a blocke." "Of little

medling commeth great ease." "Poore and proud, fy, fy." "Saue a thiefe

fro the gallowes and heele cut your throat." "So long goes the pot to

the water that at length it comes home broken." "Tread a worme on the

taile and it must turne againe." "Where be no receauers there be no

theeues."[39:A] "When the skye falleth we shall have larkes."

Though the exigencies of space prevent anything like individual comment,

we trust that our readers will not hurry through these as a mere list to

be got through. Each is excellent, and well worthy of quiet thinking

over; while a second theme of interest may, we think, often be

discovered in the recognition of proverbs well known to us in a somewhat

different wording, as, for instance, Camden's version--"A man may well

bring a horse to the water, but he cannot make him drinke without he

will," and "An inche in a misse is as good as an ell,"--proverbs in

common use still, but given here with a certain quaintness of variation

that has a charm.

Other happy utterances in the Camden collection are: "A friend is not so

soon gotten as lost."[39:B] "A leg of a lark is better than the body of

a kyte." "A man far from good is near to harm." "A man may buy golde

too deare." "One piece of a kid is worth two of a cat." "It is a proud

horse that will not bear his own provender." "As good sit still as rise

up and fall." "Blind men should judge no colours." "He that will have a

hare for breakfast must hunt overnight." "It is hard to teach an old dog

tricks." "It is not good to have an oare in every man's boat." "One ill

weede marreth a whole pot of pottage." This latter is in an especial

degree, in its literal wording, a proverb of the past, though its inner

significance will hold good till the end of time. It clearly refers to a

time when the herbs of the field were utilised, and vegetable gardens

did not supply the needful requisites for the table. In these present

days well-ordered ranks of beans, onions, lettuce, and other crops are

to hand, and a mistake is scarcely possible, but in these earlier days,

when the wild growths of the hedgerow were utilised, one can readily see

that a little ignorance in the gathering might contribute an ingredient

that would mar all--a touch of hemlock, for instance, in lieu of

parsley.

It is strikingly true, too, that as on the one hand a soft answer

turneth away wrath, so, on the contrary, "one ill worde asketh another,"

and probably does not ask in vain. It is equally true in one's

experience of life that not uncommonly "One beateth the bush and another

catcheth the birds." The necessity of caution in permitting innovations

is well brought out in, "Once a use then ever a custom"; and the fact

that there is more skill in even the simplest art than the onlooker

quite realises is very effectively brought out in, "There is craft in

daubing." The motto of the Order of the Garter has prepared us for

"Shame take him that shame thinketh." Other happy renderings in the

collection under consideration are, "Such an one hath a good wit if a

wise man had the keeping of it." "No penny, no paternoster." "The

beggar may sing before the thiefe," for, having no property to lose, the

highwayman or the burglar have no terrors for him. "Three may keepe

counsell if two be away." "Who medleth in all things may go shoe the

gostlings." We have by no means exhausted the list. The only one amongst

the whole collection that appears unworthy of a place is "Struggle not

against the streame." This appears to point to a cowardly surrender, a

floating easily down when a stout resistance should be made. A policy of

"Do as the others do; ask no questions; raise no difficulties; make no

protest; keep quiet, or shout with the majority; we are no worse than

other people." We cannot recall the name of any man or woman whose life

shines bright in history whose principles were built up exactly on these

lines.

John Davies, a native of Hereford, in the year 1611 or thereabouts wrote

a book which he called the "Scourge of Folly." The work is now a scarce

one, and the world is no great loser in consequence. He was a versifier

at once prolific and drearily dull. The first edition we have not seen,

but that of 1620 is entitled, "The Scourge of Folly, consisting of

satyricall Epigrams and others in honour of many noble Persons and

worthy Friends, together with a pleasant (though discordant) Descant

upon most English Proverbs and others." The epigrams are, most of them,

of a most offensive character. The references to the names of the

persons satirised carry now no meaning, but at the time they were

written they must have been of the most grossly personal character.

"Against Formias brauery and unceessant prating," "against Cleophus, the

Time observer," "against faint-hearted bragging Bomelio," "against wordy

Classus," are examples of the headings, and the lines that in each case

are appended are grossly insolent. There are two hundred and ninety-two

of these scoundrelisms. His proverbs are four hundred and nineteen in

number, and he adds to each a rhyming comment of his own. They are

mostly very feeble, and many of them much too gross for quotation.

"Fast binde, fast finde, but Rufus, bound as fast

As bonds could do, to pay a debt he ought,

Stole quite away, ere quite the day was past,

And nowhere can be found, though he be sought."

He lengthens and shortens the proverbs as rhythmical exigencies call

for, and his great idea throughout seems to be to show that these old

proverbs were quite absurd and valueless, and that John Davies was the

real fount of wisdom.

We append a few of these couplets, the first line being a proverb and

the second the comment of Davies upon it. Anything more feeble and

pointless than the latter could scarcely be imagined.

"A Mouse may in time bite in two a cable--

That may she at once if she be able."

"No more can we have of the fox but his skin;

Yes, Bones to make dice, which now is no sin."

"Three may keep counsell if two be away,

And so may all three if nothing they say."

"A dead Bee will make no Hony,

But from dead Bees it's had for money."

"Ill newes are commonly true,

Not if a lyer made them new."

"The Cat would eat fish but for wetting her feete,

To eat ere she wash is fowle and unsweete."

"Throw no Guift at the Giver againe;

Yes: if he give me a blow Ile thanke him with twaine."

"A scabb'd Sheepe will marre a whole flocke,

Faith, then the Shepherd's a Knave or a Block."

"Who is worse Shood than the Shoomaker's wife?

Faith, Geese, that never wore Shoes in their life."

About this time also was published a book called "The Crossing of

Proverbs." The copy before us as we write is, we see, dated 1616. It is

on the same lines as the preceding book, except that it is not in

rhymes. "It is far to the bottom of the sea," says the old proverb. "Not

so," says the author, "'tis but a stone's cast." We will spare our

readers any further extracts. To give several extracts from the "Scourge

of Folly" and then to merely add that "The Crossing of Proverbs" is just

such another book, will give a quite sufficient measure of justice to

both.

In the year 1625 the "Apothegms new and old" of Lord Bacon made their

appearance. The study was a favourite one with him, and he often in his

writings and discourses made a very judicious use of the material he had

collected. He affirms that "Apothegms are not only for delight and

ornament but for business also and civil use," for "they are, according

to Cicero, mucrones verborum, pointed speeches." He also calls them

Salinas, salt pits from whence one can draw the salt of discourse. "By

their sharp edge they penetrate the knots of business, and serve to be

interlaced in continued speech or recited upon occasion by themselves."

He regrets greatly that Cæsar's book was lost. "I imagine these

apothegms were collected with judgment and care; for as his history, and

those few letters of his which we have and those apothegms which were

his own excel all others so I suppose would his collection of them have

done. As for those which are collected by other writers either I have no

taste in such matters, or else their choice has not been happy."

Elsewhere he declares that the modern writers on the subject "draw much

of the dregs."

With all possible respect to the erudition of Bacon we find his book a

somewhat heavy one, the subject appearing to call for a lightness and

delicacy of touch that he would very possibly have considered beneath

the dignity of literature. If we turn, for instance, to his comments on

friendship, we are referred to verse 14 of Psalm xxvii. We read, "He

that blesseth his friend with a loud voice, rising early in the morning,

it shall be counted a curse to him," and this calls forth the following

comment: "Moderate and seasonable praises uttered upon occasion, conduce

much to men's fame and fortune; but praises immoderate, noisy, and

importunately poured out, profit nothing: nay rather, do a good deal of

hurt. First, they manifestly betray themselves to proceed either from

excess of love and kindness, or that they are designed and affected, so

that they may rather ingratiate themselves with the person commended by

false encomiums rather than set him off by just and deserved eulogisms.

Secondly, sparing and modest praises commonly invite such as are present

to add something of their own to the commendation; on the contrary,

profuse and immoderate ones detract and take away something. Thirdly,

which is the principal point, too much magnifying a man stirs up envy;

since all immoderate praises seem to tend to the reproach of others, who

are no less deserving." This is quite Baconian, almost Johnsonian, in

its weighty precision and formal enunciation, but a thousand proverbs

thus handed over to the commentator would be a ponderous tome that few

would dare to open, and the _esprit_ and quaintness of these familiar

utterances would be utterly lost, buried, in such a flow of exposition.

In the year 1640 was published a volume entitled, "Outlandish Proverbs."

The name of the author was not given, "selected by Mr G. H." being all

the information vouchsafed. As these proverbs were those in common use,

the title strikes one as being particularly inappropriate. The

collection was a somewhat meagre one. All gross sayings were omitted, or

softened down. That anything objectionable should be left out seems to

our present ideas so entirely a matter of course that the mention of the

fact appears uncalled for, nevertheless this omission differentiated the

labours of Mr G. H. from much that had gone before. The softening down

process is perhaps not quite so justifiable. A proverb, like a hymn,

should not be edited. All that seems fair and justifiable is to accept

it as it stands or else refuse it admission.

Some considerable time after the appearance of this book on "Outlandish

Proverbs" a second edition appeared, but this time the title was "Jacula

Prudentum, or outlandish proverbs, sentences, etc.," and the authorship

was no longer veiled by mere letters but stands revealed--"selected by

Mr George Herbert, Late Orator of the University of Cambridge." This

second issue contains a great many more proverbs than the first, and the

title, Jacula Prudentum, "javelins of the wise," indicates the value

placed by Herbert upon these popular sayings.

The mystery of the anonymous publication, like that of the Waverley

novels, and other cognate cases, excited some little public interest,

one writer of the day advances we see the somewhat startling thesis, "It

is not a thing that, hastily regarded, one would have expected from

Herbert, hence the genuineness is the more probable!" This is a very

sweeping and far-reaching argument, that because a thing appears

well-nigh impossible there is much to be said in favour of its

probability. It seems so unlikely that Bala lake will ever flood out

Westminster that all prudent persons resident there will at once provide

themselves with life-belts.

A well-known proverb warns us against letting the cat out of the bag,

and this seems to have been just what Herbert very nearly did, another

book of his, of more devotional type, "A priest to the Temple,"

supplying to critical eyes a clue. In it he says that "the Country

Parson doth bear in mind in the morning the outlandish proverb that

prayers and provender never hinder a journey." Also in one of his

letters that he wrote to his brother he added, "Take this rule, and it

is an outlandish one, which I commend to you now as being a father, 'The

best bred child hath the best portion.'" The introduction of the title

of the book and the liking for the use of proverbs were held strong

proofs in favour of his being the Mr G. H. who was being sought for. As

we are told that nothing succeeds like success, we are invited to admire

the sapience of the mystery-hunter, but there really seems no reason

why, the title of the book being in men's minds, some other person might

not have thus referred to it and introduced into his book or letters

proverbs that this book had brought before him and that had attracted

his notice.

Most of the proverbs in the Jacula Prudentum are admirably chosen, and

as many of them are now passing away from the minds of men we make no

apology for quoting freely from the book.

The re-appearance of old proverbs in a slightly altered setting than

that we are now familiar with, is a point of interest in these old

collections that we have already referred to, but each author we consult

gives us anew this pleasure. How refreshing, for instance, is Herbert's

version, "Whose house is of glasse must not throw stones at another," or

this, "You may bring a horse to the river, but he will drinke when and

what he pleaseth," or this, yet again, "A feather in hand is better than

a bird in the ayre." A proverb that is often used at the present time

amongst us in its French dress is found here as "It is a poore sport

that's not worth the candle."

How true and how pithily put are these, "He that studies his content

wants it." "Not a long day but a good heart rids worke." "Hearken to

Reason and shee will bee heard." "He that staies does the businesse."

"Prosperity lets go the bridle." "Still fisheth he that catches one."

"Give a clowne your finger and he will take your hand."[47:A] And this

one like unto it, "Let an ill man lie in the strawe, and he looks to bee

thy heire." "The back-dore robs the house." "One sword keeps another in

the sheath." An excellent motto this last. The Peace Society may have

its uses, but there is no doubt that this side the millennium efficient

army corps and magnificent navies supply yet more cogent arguments. "Si

vis pacem pare bellum."

How sound again the teaching, "He is not poor that hath little, but he

that desireth much." "God provides for him that trusteth." "A cheerful

look makes a dish a feast." "Sometimes the best gain is to lose." "He

that sows trusts in God." "Divine ashes are better than earthlie meale."

How excellent the prudence that gives value to the following: "Send a

wise man on an errand and say nothing unto him." "Although it rain cast

not away thy watering-pot." "Who hath no more breade than nede must not

keepe a dog." "The best remedy against an ill man is much ground

between." "Love your neighbour, yet pull not down your hedge." "Send not

a catt for lard." It is well, too, to remember that "Courtesie on one

side only lasts not long," that a commensurate price has to be paid for

everything, and so "a lion's skin is never cheape," that one's position

must be frankly accepted and its duties adequately met, for "he that

serves must serve," that gentle measures will often succeed better than

rough ones, for "he that will take the bird must not skare it." It is at

once a comfort and a warning that "none is a foole alwaies, everyone

sometimes," and that the crafty at last over-reach themselves and in

the end Nemesis awaits them. "At length the fox is brought to the

furrier," and the farmyard knows him no more.

What an excellent lesson against jumping to conclusions is seen in this,

"Stay till the lame messenger come, if you will know the truth of the

thing," against concluding too hastily that the work we are engaged upon

is finished, for "One flower does not make a garland."

The evil wrought by the tongue is a constant and perennial theme of the

moralist, and the makers of proverbs are in complete accord, "The tongue

talks at the head's cost." "More have repented speech than silence."

Those who suffer at the hands, or rather the tongues, of others may

learn how effectually to avenge themselves, for "Pardon and

pleasantnesse are great revengers of slanders," and the experiment is

one that is well worth trial. In any case, "Neither prayse nor disprayse

thyself: thy actions serve the turne." "The effect speakes, the tongue

need not." How full of wisdom is this final cluster of pearls, this

sheaf of javelins: "A gift much expected is paid, not given." "Pleasing

ware is half sould." "The hole calls the thief"--a warning against

putting temptation in the way and thereby causing a brother to offend.

The man who has gone far on the path of reformation is not safe so long

as any relic of the past yet clings round his heart, for "The horse that

draws after him his halter has not altogether escaped." "Whither shall

the oxe goe where he shall not labour?" How can one hope to evade the

responsibilities of his position? The proverb is an interesting reminder

of the custom once common enough, and which we ourselves have seen in

Sussex and Wiltshire, on the heavy down-lands, of ploughing with a yoke

of oxen. There is quaint humour in this, "The chicken is the countrey's,

but the citie eateth it." "If the old dog barke he gives counsell." "A

married man turns his staffe into a stake," his wandering days are over.

A not unpleasant cynicism gives point to the assertion that "Nothing

dries sooner than a teare," while it is equally one's experience of life

that "When the tree is fallen all goe with their hatchet," and that "Men

speak of the fair as things went with them there." It is a rather

touching assertion that "The reasons of the poor weigh not," and it is

too true. Their poverty makes the poor despised and their words unheeded

by many who, richer in this world's goods, treat with contempt the

struggling and the unsuccessful. Poverty is not a crime: it may be a

badge of shame if the result of vice, or it may be a badge of honour

where a man has scorned to stoop to shuffling dishonesties that may have

enriched some who presume to despise him.

In 1659 James Howell issued a series of proverbs, and some of these were

incorporated in Randle Cotgrave's dictionary in the following year. This

latter has been deemed "that most amusing of all dictionary makers." He

quotes many French proverbs, and then gives English adages that more or

less match them. Thus under faim he gives "A la faim il n'y a point de

mauvais pain," which, he explains, means that "To him who is hungry any

bread seems good"--not quite a sufficiently literal translation, we

should have thought, for a dictionary-maker--and adds, "We say hungrie

dogs love durtie pudding."[49:A] Howell's proverbs were, as a whole, not

very judiciously selected, and he had the presumption and bad taste to

spin out of his own imagination a series of what he called "New Sayings

which may serve for Proverbs for posterity." These were very poor, and

posterity has declined to have anything to do with them.

In this same year, 1659, a small volume of adages, compiled by N. R.

(Nathaniel Richards), appeared.

They are all in English, but are mostly of foreign origin, and are of

no great interest or value.

A much more notable book is the "Gnomologia: Adagies and proverbs; wise

sentences and witty sayings, ancient and modern, foreign and British,

collected by Thomas Fuller, M.D." As the compiler gives over six

thousand proverbs, we may regard the book as a fairly adequate one. He

gives in it no indication of the sources from whence the adages are

derived, adds no explanatory notes, and works on no system. This is

equivalent to writing a natural history and leading off with panther and

earwig. It is, as a matter of fact, very difficult to classify a

collection of such disconnected units as proverbs. If we attempt to do

it by countries we may soon find that it is in most cases quite

impossible to guess where the adage originated, and the general

borrowing that has been going on for centuries makes anything like a

local claim to exclusive possession impossible. It would be quite easy

to write out a list of fifty proverbs, illustrating them exclusively by

passages from Cervantes and other Spanish writers, and, on the strength

of this, claiming them as Spanish, but it would be equally easy

afterwards for Dane, Russian, and German, Englishman, Italian, and Greek

to come and each claim so many of these items that the speedy outcome

would be an almost absolute disappearance from our list of anything

purely Iberian.

There is a good deal to be said in favour of the alphabetical

arrangement, but only on condition that the leading word of the adage be

taken. It is a mere absurdity to take the first word. How can we

reasonably put under letter A, "A rolling stone gathers no moss"? It may

be objected that we are putting an extreme case, but extreme cases have

to be considered as much as any others. In one book before us we find

that the old author in scores of instances produces results as

grotesquely inadequate. Under the letter D, for instance, we find, "Do

not spur a willing horse," though surely everyone, with the exception of

the compiler of the list, would at once realise that the pith of the

adage does not in any way rest in "do." We may at once see this if we

take the proverb in another of its popular forms, "Spur not a willing

horse."

The classification of these old saws according to their subject, such as

friendship, pride, industry, and the like, is sometimes adopted, and it

has many advantages; but we very soon find that we come to something

that declines to be thus pigeon-holed. If we take the Russian proverb,

for instance, "The burden is light on the shoulders of another," how

shall we classify it? It will clearly not come under "friendship," and

it is equally not at home in the section on "industry." While some

adages decline to fit into any section, others we find might with almost

equal appropriateness find a home under three or four headings.

Fuller defines a proverb as "much matter decocted into a few words," and

a very good definition it is. He declares that "six essentials are

necessary for the compleating of a perfect Proverb. Namely that it be--

1. Short } { 1. Oration

2. Playne } Otherwise it is not { 2. Riddle

3. Common } a proverb at all { 3. Secret

4. Figurative } but a { 4. Sentence

5. Antient } { 5. Upstart

6. True } { 6. Libel."

As he was evidently a little nervous that some persons might think the

subject a little beneath the dignity of Dr Fuller, he allows an

imaginary objector to have his fling, and then proceeds to demolish him.

The "objection" raised by this anonymous disciple of Mrs Grundy is that

"it is more proper for a person of your profession to imploy himself in

reading of, and commenting on, the Proverbs of Solomon, to know wisdome

and instruction, to perceive words of understanding. Whereas you are now

busied in what may be pleasant, not profitable, yet what may inform the

fleshlie not edifie the inward man." As many proverbs do undoubtedly

build up the inner man this judgment is wanting in charity, and as a

student ourselves in the subject we are gratified to find that the

doctor declines to accept this vote of censure, and is able to make out

a good case for himself. His reply is somewhat longer than a quotation

permits, and one must give all or none.

In his preface, also, he alludes to "snarling persons" who have

deprecated his labours. This preface of his is distinctly interesting.

"All of us," he writes therein, "forget more than we remember, and

therefore it hath been my constant Custom to note down and record

whatever I thought of myself, or received from Men or Books worth

preserving. Amongst other things I wrote out Apothegms, Maxims,

Proverbs, acute Expressions, vulgar Sayings, etc., and having at length

collected more than ever any Englishman has before me I have ventur'd to

send them forth to try their Fortune among the People. In ancient Times,

before methodical Learning had got Footing in the Nations and

instructive Treatises were written, the Observations that were from

Experience were us'd to be gather'd and sum'd up into brief and

comprehensive Sentences, which being so contriv'd as to have something

remarkable in their Expressions might be easily remember'd and brought

into Use on Occasions. They are call'd Adagies or Maxims.

"Also the Men of Business and the common People, that they might in

their Affairs and Conversation signify and communicate this Sense and

Meaning in short, with Smartness and with Pleasantness fell into

customary little Forms of Words and trite Speeches, which are call'd

Proverbs and common Sayings. The former of these are from Judgment, and

are us'd by Men of Understanding and Seriousness; the other are from

Wit, and are accommodate to the Vulgar and Men of Mirth. I conceive it

is not needful for me accurately to determine which are to be call'd

Adagies and Proverbs; nor nicely to distinguish the one from the other.

All that I here take upon me to do is only to throw together a vast

confus'd heap of unsorted Things, old and new, which you may pick over

and make use of, According to your Judgment and Pleasure. Many of these

are only plain bare Expressions, to be taken literally in their proper

Meaning: others have something of the Obscure and Surprize, which, as

soon as understood, renders them pretty and notable.

"It is a matter of no small Pains and Diligence (whatever lazy, snarling

Persons may think) to pick up so many independent Particulars as I have

done, And it is no trifling or useless thing neither: it being what many

of the most learned and wisest Men of the World have in all Ages

employ'd themselves upon. The Son of Syrac will be held in everlasting

Remembrance for his Ecclesiasticus, but, above all, that most glorious

of Kings and wisest of Men, Solomon, wrote by Divine Appointment and

Inspiration, Proverbs, Precepts and Counsels.

"No man ought to despise, ridicule, or any ways discourage the Diligence

and Kindness of those that take Pains to bring home to others without

Price those things of Profit and Pleasure. I picked up these Sentences

and Sayings at several times, according as they casually occurr'd, and

most of them so long ago that I cannot remember the Particulars: and am

now (by reason of great Age and ill Sight) utterly unable to review

them; otherwise I would have struck out all such as are not fit for the

Company, or are indecent to be spoke in the Presence of wise, grave,

virtuous, modest, well-bred people." These closing words one can hardly

accept. Years before age and failing sight had come these various items

had been growing bit by bit, and the striking-out process might well

have been going on at the same time as the collecting.

"Our excellent Mr Ray," as a contemporary writer terms him, was another

great collector of proverbs, and he, too, made a book of them. The first

edition of this work appeared in 1670, and a second in 1678. The first

was altogether too gross, so that the second edition gave an

opportunity, which was embraced, for some little amendment. This is

beyond all doubt the coarsest set of proverbs that has come under our

notice.

Ray was a Master of Arts and a Fellow of the Royal Society. The title of

his book is as follows:--"A Collection of English Proverbs Digested into

a convenient Method for the speedy finding any one upon occasion: with

short Annotations. Wherunto are added Local Proverbs with their

Explications, old Proverbial Rhythemes, Less known or Exotick Proverbial

Sentences and Scottish Proverbs." The second edition was enlarged by the

addition of several hundred more English Proverbs, and by an appendix of

Hebrew sayings. The annotations of Ray on various proverbs are often

very feeble. Thus to the adage, or saw, or whatever it may be, "I would

not trust him though he were my brother," he adds to a thing

sufficiently tame in itself the comment, "This is only a physiognomical

observation." The truth is, our learned author, or compiler, seems to

have heaped together all the old "saws," whether wise or not, and all

the "modern instances" that came in his way, and to have strung at

random the precious gems in company with the worthless beads.

His "convenient method" was the alphabetical one, based on the leading

word of the saying. Thus, under A, for example, we get "Adversity makes

a man wise, not rich," "There is no Alchemy like saving," "He that is

Angry is seldom at ease," "For that thou canst do thyself rely not on

Another," "Make a slow Answer to a hasty question," "The best Armour is

to keep out of gun-shot."

Robert Codrington added yet another to the pile of proverb lore in his

"Collection of many Select and Excellent Proverbs out of Several

Languages." These he declared to be "most useful in all Discourses and

for the Government of Life." He gives no preface or any kind of

introductory matter, but begins at once with number one, and goes

straight on till he gets to fourteen hundred and sixty-five. His adage,

"You may not lose your friend to keep your jest," is a curious variant

on the familiar present-day assertion that some men would rather lose a

friend than a joke. His selection is on the whole a very good one. Such

sayings as, "A young man old maketh an old man young," "A drunkard is

not master either of his soul or his body," and "Curses prove

choke-pears to those that plant them," are thought-compelling, and many

such may be encountered.

A book of somewhat different character is the "Paroemiologia

Anglo-Latina" of William Walker, B.D. The sub-title was "English and

Latin proverbs and proverbial sentences and sayings matched together in

a collection of them made out of Plautus, Petronius, Terentius,

Horatius, and other authors." The particular copy that came under our

notice bore the date of 1676. He concludes his short preface by the

following deprecatory passage: "What will be the advantage and benefit

hereof to the Commonwealth of learning I leave to others to judge and

try, as not willing to show the Sun by the light of a Candle. And so,

that I may not set up a great Gate before a little House I commit the

Work to You, and You to God, and rest your humble Drudge, W. W."

As the author has himself raised the question as to the benefit of his

book to others, one can only reply that the advantage to the

Commonwealth would probably not be very great, since the translation of

the old classic authors is so exceedingly free that it is practically no

translation at all. It gives those who do not know the original writings

no adequate idea of them, while the English is of so very colloquial a

character that all the dignity of the original is lost, the result being

that both the Latin and the English languages suffer in the process.

If we take, for example, "Versutior es quam rota figularis," we find

that he cites three so-called equivalents, and none of them at all

giving the beautiful image of the original; the first of these being,

"You are as inconstant as the wind," the next, "As wavering as the

weathercock," and, thirdly, "One knows not where to have you." The "Non

habet plus sapientiæ quam lapis" of Plautus he renders fairly enough as

"He hath no more wit than a stone," but he adds to this, "No more brains

than a burbout. He is a very cod's head"; while "As wise as Solomon"

cannot at all be accepted as a rendering of "Plus sapit quam Thales."

The striking "Verba fiunt mortuo" has lost all its dignity when we are

invited to accept as a translation, "It is of no purpose to talk to him:

he'll not hear you speak: you may as well talk to the wall."

The well-known "Parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus" is thus

Anglicised by Walker, "Great boast, little roast; Great cry and little

wool, as the fellow said when he shore his hogs"; and the equally

familiar "Ad Græcas calendas" is given as, "At Nevermass, when two

Sundays come together." The striking "Leporis vitam vivit" loses much

when we are invited to accept as an equivalent, "He is afraid of the

wagging of a straw." The absurdity of teaching a fish to swim, "Piscem

natare doces," is scarcely adequately rendered by, "Tell me it snows."

How pleasant a glimpse of ancient customs we get in the "Stylum

invertere." The waxen tablet--the stile at one end sharpened for

writing, at the other flattened for erasing--rise before us. But all

this is entirely lost when we are invited to accept, in place of the

classic allusion, "To turn the cat in the pan," "To sing another tune";

and certainly the pith and rhythm of "A minimo ad maximum" suffers woful

deterioration in such renderings of it as "Every mother's son of them,

tag and rag, all that can lick a dish."

The refining influences that are associated with a study of good classic

writers seem to have rather failed when this ancient schoolmaster came

beneath their sway. Such expressions as, "Your brains are addle," "As

subtle as a dead pig," "Chip of the old block," "Lean as a rake," "A

cankered fellow," "A scurvy crack," scarcely rise to the dignity of his

subject. We cannot help wondering how the school prospered in his hands,

and what sort of boys he turned out after a year or two under his

tuition.

The "Moral Essays on some of the most Curious and Significant English,

Scotch, and Foreign Proverbs," of Samuel Palmer,[57:A] "Presbyter of the

Church of England," deserves some little notice. The edition before us,

we note, is dated 1710. His definition of a proverb strikes one as being

an entirely satisfactory one. He tells us that it is "an Instructive

Sentence, in which more is generally Design'd than is Express'd, and

which has pass'd into Common Use and Esteem either among the Learned or

Vulgar. I take this to be its Genuine Definition, for though the

Incomparable Erasmus takes Elegance and Novelty into the Character of a

Proverb it seems to be an Error: for a Proverb has not only more Honour

and Authority from Antiquity, but a Sentence never comes up to that

Title till it has pass'd for Sterling some Competent time, and receiv'd

its Dignity from the Consent of an Age at least. 'Tisn't in a Single

Author's Power to convey this Reputation to any Saying, but the Dignity

grows up in the Use of it." This appears excellent common-sense, and the

distinction that he draws between the use of a saying by the learned or

the vulgar is a very happy one, and one that no other writer appears to

regard. A proverb need not, to establish its position, be in use by all

classes. There are certain sayings from the classics or elsewhere that

find general acceptance amongst the educated, such as the "Ad calendas

Græcas," "A la Tartuffe," "Aut Cæsar aut nullus," "Facilis est descensus

Averni." These, either in the original tongue or Anglicised, are

current, and have a full claim to recognition as proverbial sayings,

though four-fifths of the population never heard them; while many homely

sayings that come freely to the lips of the carter or the village

blacksmith find no welcome or recognition from the professor, the

bishop, or the banker, and yet are as truly of proverbial rank.

Our old author goes on to say: "'Tis the Use, not the Critical History

or Notion of Proverbs I am concern'd in. To see People throw 'em at each

other by way of Jest or Repartee, without feeling their Weight, tasting

their Wit, or being better'd by the Reflection, wou'd vex a man of any

Spirit, and the Indignation forces him to write somewhat that might

Redeem these Fragments of Wisdom from the Contempt and Ill Treatment of

the Ignorant. For as they are now us'd they make up more of the

Ridiculous Conversation than the Solid and Instructive. To this Abuse

some of our Authors of the first Rank have very much contributed: for

the Modern Poets and Novelists have put 'em in the Mouths of their

lowest Characters. They make Fools and Clowns, little and mean People

speak Sentences in Abundance, string 'em like Necklaces and make Sport

with 'em, and Ridicule the Remains of our Ancestors. By this Means 'tis

esteem'd Pedantry if we find one in the Mouth of a Gentleman, and an

Author of Honour and very fine Parts has made the Reciting an Adage or

Two the Sign of a Coxcomb. Thus they are condemn'd to the Use of the

Mob, thrown out of the Minds of our People of Birth, and the Influence

of 'em lost in the Manage of Education."

While Palmer was engaged upon his book, a work called "English Proverbs,

with Moral Reflections" was published by a writer named Dykes, a poor

production enough. "This," said Palmer, "put me on the Thought of

Suppressing the whole, not doubting but an Ingenious Gentleman whose

Imployment isn't only to teach Hic Hæc Hoc, but to Instruct Youth in

Learning and Vertue, and convey the Notions of Religion and Good Manners

while he is managing the Ferula, wou'd have managed the Proverbs to the

best Purpose and without Exception. But upon a View I find my self

extreamly disappointed: His Collection is so very short, being but Fifty

Two, and most of 'em so Lean, Trite, and Insignificant that the Greatest

Excellence of the Work is that he has been so happy as to fill up Four

or Five pages upon Nothing. 'Tis not my Design to Note all his

Indecencies, but I have scarce seen anything under the Name of Moral

more out of Order. Execrable Rant, Curses, and little dirty Language are

one Part of the Entertainment, and tho' it might perhaps be tolerable

enough to cite Billingsgate when he was speaking of Scolds, yet to

introduce the Dialogue of Two Fish Women, with their Curses, Lewd

Epithets, and Brutish Reflections is Insufferable: 'tis opening a Sink

and spreading the Infection." Palmer therefore saw no cause to

discontinue his labours, the work of Dykes not at all trenching on his

own ideal of what such a book should be.

Palmer is struck with "the Likeness of many which are in Modern Use to

the most Sacred Apophthegms," a similarity which "forces us to show 'em

very great Respect, and engages us to think 'em either of the same

Original, or else deriv'd from Divine Proverbs by Wise and Pious Men,

who have only given 'em a different Turn according to the Language and

Genius of the Nation wherein they liv'd."

These essays of Palmer's are each some three or four pages long, the

page being that of a quarto book. In some of these he takes a single

adage as his theme, but very often he brackets together two of like

sense. Thus, one is based on "A Mouse that has but One Hole is soon

Catch'd," or, "Don't venture all your Eggs in one Basket." Another is,

"Fly the Pleasure that will Bite to Morrow," or, "After Sweet Meat comes

Sour Sauce," while yet another is, "Don't throw away Dirty Water till

you have got Clean," or, "He that changes his Trade makes Soop in a

Basket." One readily sees in each case what the drift of the essay based

on the coupled adages must be.

As an example of Palmer's exposition, we will give that based on two

adages of like import. "A baited Cat may grow as Fierce as a Lyon," or,

"Tread on a Worm and it will Turn." "No Enemy," he tells us, "is so Mean

and Impotent but at One Time or Other he becomes sensible of his own

Force, knows how to Exert It, feels an Injury, and has a proportionable

Resentment: for Nature can't easily be Conquer'd: is very Rarely

Forc'd, but will Struggle after all the Discipline either of Power or

Principles. This made Solomon say that Oppression makes a Wise Man Mad.

Now this shou'd be consider'd, and a Wise Man ought to foresee how far

'tis fit to press the most contemptible Enemy: for though his Opposition

be Wicked or Ridiculous yet it may hit the Pursuer and do him a

Mischief. To drive a Coward to the Wall recovers his Spirits, and fear

of being shot thro' the Back makes him turn his Face. The certainty of

being quite lost by Flight gives a new Turn to the Spirits, and

Naturally prompts to a Sudden and Desperate Defence: and tho' this be

not true Courage, nor don't act up to the Regularity that Valour is

distinguished by: yet it may exceed in Face, and give a Home Thrust. He

that is eager in the Pursuit may be struck through by that Hand which

trembled till it was reinforced by Necessity. In Armies this is a known

Rule. He that Beats a Brave Enemy ought to be glad to be Rid of him. Let

him Retreat as quick as He can, provided the Main Victory be secure. In

Private Quarrels, Just and Vnjust, this must be heeded: in the One Case

to be Implacable is Infamous, and in the other Wicked and Dangerous. In

Both, Rashness: and if Pity don't move us to forbear and abate in our

Revenge, Caution and Regard to our own Safety Shou'd." A rat, if driven

into a corner, will fly at a man.[61:A] And it appears that even in

baiting a cat there is a right and a wrong way of going to work. It is

said by old sportsmen that the fox enjoys the sport as much as anybody,

but there comes a time with baited rats and cats and most other

creatures when they tire of that sort of thing, and have a very definite

way of indicating the fact to all whom it may concern.

The proverbial utterances of "poor Richard" were once in great vogue.

They were written by Benjamin Franklin under the _nom de plume_ of

Richard Saunders. "Poor Richard's Almanack" was issued for twenty-six

years, from 1733 to 1758, and with constantly increased acceptance.

These calendars excellently combined entertainment with useful knowledge

and terse concentrated wisdom. All available spaces that occurred

between notable days in the months were filled in with wisdom-chips,

some of them of true proverbial rank, and others the offspring of the

brains of Dr Franklin.

Franklin was born on January 6th, 1706, at Boston, and there is no doubt

that his sterling common-sense and quaint philosophy must have had a

considerable influence in moulding the character of the early

inhabitants of the United States. These almanacks were largely reprinted

in Great Britain and France, and very freely quoted from, so that the

area of their influence was very extensive. In the preface to the first

of this long series he quaintly gives the reasons that influenced him,

poor Richard, to issue it. "I might, in this place," he writes, "attempt

to gain thy favour by declaring that I write Almanacks with no other

view than that of the publick good, but in this I should not be sincere;

and men are now-a-days too wise to be deceived by pretences. The plain

truth of the matter is, I am extremely poor, and my wife, good woman

is, I tell her, excessive proud; she cannot bear, she says, to sit

spinning in her shift of tow while I do nothing but gaze at the stars,

and has threatened more than once to burn all my books if I do not make

some profitable use of them for the good of my family."

Next year he writes, "Your kind and charitable assistance last year in

purchasing so large an impression of my almanack has made my

circumstances much more easy in the world, and requires my most grateful

acknowledgment. My wife has been enabled to get a pot of her own, and is

no longer obliged to borrow one from a neighbour; nor have we ever since

been without something to put in it. She has also got a pair of shoes

and a nice new petticoat, and for my part I have bought a second-hand

coat, that I am not now ashamed to go to town or be seen there. These

things have rendered her temper so much more pacifick than it used to

be, that I may say I have slept more and more quietly within this last

year than in the three foregoing years put together."

There is much excellent wisdom in the sayings that he got together. How

full of wise warning the utterance, "There is no little enemy," or this,

"There's small revenge in words, but words may be greatly avenged." Or

these warnings against covetousness, "If you desire many things many

things will seem but a few." "Avarice and happiness never saw each

other, how then should they become acquainted?" How quaintly sarcastic

are these, "Lawyers, preachers, and tomtits' eggs, there are more of

them hatched than come to perfection." "None preaches better than the

ant, and she says nothing." How true again that "Poverty wants some

things and luxury many things," and that "No man was glorious who was

not first laborious." How valuable the counsel, "Deny self for self's

sake," and that "It is less discredit to abridge petty charges than to

stoop to petty gettings"; and as a hint as to the value of

concentration, "Don't think to hunt two hares with one dog." Others that

we marked for quotation are, "Ever since follies have pleased, fools

have been able to divert"; "He that can have patience can have what he

will"; "Strange that he who lives by shifts can seldom shift himself,"

and to these many more of equal shrewdness could be added.

We make no claim that this list of ours is complete as a bibliography of

proverb-writers. All references to the works of more recent men, Trench

and others, are entirely omitted, as they are so easily accessible, that

all who care to do so will have no difficulty in consulting them.

Amongst the earlier men's works some are good, and some are good for

nothing, but we trust that our readers will feel that this excursus is

not without interest, while somewhat may be added to the dignity of our

subject when it is seen to how many minds it has been a fascinating

study.

FOOTNOTES:

[28:A] "A wise sentence shall be rejected when it cometh out of a fool's

mouth; for he will not speak it in due season."--_Ecclesiasticus_ xx.

20.

[28:B] The following illustrate the nature of these precepts: "Gold is

tried in the fire, and acceptable men in the furnace of adversity."

"Change not a friend for any good." "Of a spark of fire a heap of coals

is kindled." "How agree the kettle and the earthen pot together?" "He

that can rule his tongue shall live without strife." "As the climbing up

a sandy way is to the aged so is a wife full of words." "The furnace

trieth the potter's vessels." "Better is the life of a poor man in a

mean cottage than delicate fare in another man's house." "He that taketh

away his neighbour's living slayeth him." "Every counsellor extolleth

counsel." "Bountifulness is as a most fruitful garden."

[29:A] Amongst the various commentators on this book the works of Ewald,

Berthean, Hitzig, Elster, Rosenmuller, Hirzel, Stuart, Umbreit, and

Noyes may be commended to the reader who would desire detail and

analysis.

[35:A] Quick is here used in its original sense of having life. These

therefore were lively sayings. In the Apostle's creed the quick and the

dead are referred to, and a quick set hedge is one of growing plants as

contrasted with a mere fencing or line of palings.

[39:A] "It is a comon sayinge, ware there is no ryceyver there shoulde

be no thefe." "A Christian exhortation unto customable swearers," 1575.

[39:B] A more modern utterance shrewdly says, "There is a scarcity of

friendship, but none of friends."

[47:A] Somewhat similar proverbs to this are, "If you play with boys you

must take boy's play," and if you "play with a fool at home he will play

with you abroad."

[49:A] "The messenger (one of those dogs who are not too scornful to eat

dirty puddings) caught in his hand the guinea which Hector chucked at

his face."--"The Antiquary."

[57:A] Our author must not be confused with a namesake, Charles Palmer,

who was Deputy Serjeant of the House of Commons, and who published "A

Collection of Select Aphorisms and Maxims extracted from the most

Eminent Authors." He gives eighteen hundred and thirteen of these: the

copy that came into our hands was dated 1748.

[61:A]

"For a flying foe

Discreet and provident conquerors build up

A bridge of gold."--MASSINGER, _The Guardian_.

"Ouuerez tousiours a voz ennemys toutes les portes et chemins

et plustost leur faictes ung pont d'argent, affin des les

renvoyer."--RABELAIS, _Gargantua_.

See also the Italian proverb--"A nemico che fugge un ponte d'oro." "Le

Comte de Pitillan en parlant de la guerre soulouit dire quand ton ennemy

voudra fuir, fais luy un port d'or."--Extract from _Les divers propos

memorables des Nobles et Illustres Hommes_."--Gilles Corrizot. Paris,

1571.

"Press not a falling man too far."--SHAKESPEARE, _King Henry VIII._

Proverb Lore Many sayings, wise or otherwise, on many subjects, gleaned from many sources · 第 2 / 8 章