THE LONDON LYCKPENNY.

Within the hall, neither rich nor yet poor

Would do for me ought, although I should die:

Which seeing, I gat me out of the door,

Where Flemings began on me for to cry,

'Master, what will you copen[1] or buy?

Fine felt hats? or spectacles to read?

Lay down your silver, and here you may speed.

Then to Westminster gate I presently went,

When the sun was at high prime:

Cooks to me they took good intent,[2]

And proffered me bread, with ale and wine,

Ribs of beef, both fat and full fine;

A fair cloth they 'gan for to spread,

But, wanting money, I might not be sped.

Then unto London I did me hie,

Of all the land it beareth the price;

'Hot peascods!' one began to cry,

'Strawberry ripe, and cherries in the rise!'[3]

One bade me come near and buy some spice;

Pepper, and saffron they 'gan me beed;[4]

But, for lack of money, I might not speed.

Then to the Cheap I 'gan me drawn,

Where much people I saw for to stand;

One offered me velvet, silk, and lawn,

Another he taketh me by the hand,

'Here is Paris thread, the finest in the land!'

I never was used to such things, indeed;

And, wanting money, I might not speed.

Then went I forth by London Stone,

Throughout all Canwick Street:

Drapers much cloth me offered anon;

Then comes me one cried 'Hot sheep's feet;'

One cried mackerel, rushes green, another 'gan greet,[5]

One bade me buy a hood to cover my head;

But, for want of money, I might not be sped.

Then I hied me unto East-Cheap,

One cries ribs of beef, and many a pie;

Pewter pots they clattered on a heap;

There was harp, pipe, and minstrelsy;

Yea by cock! nay by cock! some began cry;

Some sung of Jenkin and Julian for their meed;

But, for lack of money, I might not speed.

Then into Cornhill anon I yode,[6]

Where was much stolen gear among;

I saw where hung mine ownë hood,

That I had lost among the throng;

To buy my own hood I thought it wrong:

I knew it well, as I did my creed;

But, for lack of money, I could not speed.

The taverner took me by the sleeve,

'Sir,' saith he, 'will you our wine assay?'

I answered, 'That can not much me grieve,

A penny can do no more than it may;'

I drank a pint, and for it did pay;

Yet, sore a-hungered from thence I yede,[7]

And, wanting money, I could not speed.

[1] 'Copen:' _koopen_(Flem.) to buy.

[2] 'Took good intent:' took notice; paid attention.

[3] 'In the rise:' on the branch.

[4] 'Beed:' offer.

[5] 'Greet:' cry.

[6] 'Yode:' went.

[7] 'Yede:' went.

HARDING, KAY, &c.

John Harding flourished about the year 1403. He fought at the battle of

Shrewsbury on the Percy side. He is the author of a poem entitled 'The

Chronicle of England unto the Reign of King Edward the Fourth, in

Verse.' It has no poetic merit, and little interest, except to the

antiquary. In the reign of the above king we find the first mention of

a Poet Laureate. John Kay was appointed by Edward, when he returned from

Italy, Poet Laureate to the king, but has, perhaps fortunately for the

world, left behind him no poems. Would that the same had been the case

with some of his successors in the office! There is reason to believe,

that for nearly two centuries ere this date, there had existed in the

court a personage, entitled the King's Versifier, (versificator,) to

whom one hundred shillings a-year was the salary, and that the title

was, by and by, changed to that of Poet Laureate, _i.e._, Laurelled

Poet. It had long been customary in the universities to crown scholars

when they graduated with laurel, and Warton thinks that from these the

first poet laureates were selected, less for their general genius than

for their skill in Latin verse. Certainly the earliest of the Laureate

poems, such as those by Baston and Gulielmus, who acted as royal poets

to Richard I. and Edward II., and wrote, the one on Richard's Crusade,

and the other on Edward's Siege of Stirling Castle, are in Latin. So

too are the productions of Andrew Bernard, who was the Poet Laureate

successively to Henry VII. and Henry VIII. It was not till after the

Reformation had lessened the superstitious veneration for the Latin

tongue that the laureates began to write in English. It is almost a

pity, we are sometimes disposed to think, that, in reference to such

odes as those of Pye, Whitehead, Colley Cibber, and even some of

Southey's, the old practice had not continued; since thus, in the first

place, we might have had a chance of elegant Latinity, in the absence of

poetry and sense; and since, secondly, the deficiencies of the laureate

poems would have been disguised, from the general eye at least, under

the veil of an unknown tongue. It is curious to notice about this period

the uprise of two didactic poets, both writing on alchymy, the chemistry

of that day, and neither displaying a spark of genius. These are John

Norton and George Ripley, both renowned for learning and knowledge of

their beloved occult sciences. Their poems, that by Norton, entitled

'The Ordinal,' and that by Ripley, entitled 'The Compound of Alchemie,'

are dry and rugged treatises, done into indifferent verse. One rather

fine fancy occurs in the first of these. It is that of an alchymist who

projected a bridge of gold over the Thames, near London, crowned with

pinnacles of gold, which, being studded with carbuncles, should diffuse

a blaze of light in the dark! Alchymy has had other and nobler singers

than Ripley and Norton. It has, as Warton remarks, 'enriched the store-

house of Arabian romance with many magnificent imageries.' It is the

inspiration of two of the noblest romances in this or any language

--'St. Leon' and 'Zanoni.' And its idea, transfigured into a transcen-

dental form, gave light and life and fire, and the loftiest poetry, to

the eloquence of the lamented Samuel Brown, whose tongue, as he talked

on his favourite theme, seemed transmuted into gold; nay, whose lips,

like the touch of Midas, seemed to create the effects of alchymy upon

every subject they approached, and upon every heart over which they

wielded their sorcery.

We pass now from this comparatively barren age in the history of English

poetry to a cluster of Scottish bards. The first of these is ROBERT

HENRYSON. He was schoolmaster at Dunfermline, and died some time before

1508. He is supposed by Lord Hailes to have been preceptor of youth in

the Benedictine convent in that place. He is the author of 'Robene and

Makyne,' a pastoral ballad of very considerable merit, and of which

Campbell says, somewhat too warmly, 'It is the first known pastoral,'

(he means in the Scottish language of course,) 'and one of the best, in

a dialect rich with the favours of the pastoral muse.' He wrote also a

sequel to Chaucer's 'Troilus and Cresseide' entitled 'The Testament of

Cresseide,' and thirteen Fables, of which copies, in MS., are preserved

in the Advocates' Library, Edinburgh. One of these, 'The Town and

Country Mouse,' tells that old story with considerable spirit and

humour. 'The Garment of Good Ladies' is an ingenious and beautiful

strain, written in that quaint style of allegorising which continued

popular as far down as the days of Cowley, and even later.

Specimens with Memoirs of the Less-known British Poets, Volume 1 · 第 65 / 326 题