HAS THE DRAMA OF CONTEMPORARY LIFE A ROOT OF ITS OWN?

In watching a play about modern educated people, with its meagre

language and its action crushed into the narrow limits of possibility, I

have found myself constantly saying: 'Maybe it has its power to move,

slight as that is, from being able to suggest fundamental contrasts and

passions which romantic and poetical literature have shown to be

beautiful.' A man facing his enemies alone in a quarrel over the purity

of the water in a Norwegian Spa and using no language but that of the

newspapers can call up into our minds, let us say, the passion of

Coriolanus. The lovers and fighters of old imaginative literature are

more vivid experiences in the soul than anything but one's own ruling

passion that is itself riddled by their thought as by lightning, and

even two dumb figures on the roads can call up all that glory. Put the

man who has no knowledge of literature before a play of this kind and he

will say, as he has said in some form or other in every age at the first

shock of naturalism, 'What has brought me out to hear nothing but the

words we use at home when we are talking of the rates?' And he will

prefer to it any play where there is visible beauty or mirth, where life

is exciting, at high tide as it were. It is not his fault that he will

prefer in all likelihood a worse play although its kind may be greater,

for we have been following the lure of science for generations and

forgotten him and his. I come always back to this thought. There is

something of an old wives' tale in fine literature. The makers of it are

like an old peasant telling stories of the great famine or the hangings

of '98 or his own memories. He has felt something in the depth of his

mind and he wants to make it as visible and powerful to our senses as

possible. He will use the most extravagant words or illustrations if

they suit his purpose. Or he will invent a wild parable, and the more

his mind is on fire or the more creative it is, the less will he look

at the outer world or value it for its own sake. It gives him metaphors

and examples, and that is all. He is even a little scornful of it, for

it seems to him while the fit is on that the fire has gone out of it and

left it but white ashes. I cannot explain it, but I am certain that

every high thing was invented in this way, between sleeping and waking,

as it were, and that peering and peeping persons are but hawkers of

stolen goods. How else could their noses have grown so ravenous or their

eyes so sharp?

The Cutting of an Agate · 第 30 / 89 题