CHAPTER XII.

THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY.

A MAGAZINE OF LITERATURE, ART, AND POLITICS.

VOL. II.--SEPTEMBER, 1858.--NO. XI.

ELOQUENCE.

It is the doctrine of the popular music-masters, that whoever can

speak can sing. So, probably, every man is eloquent once in his life.

Our temperaments differ in capacity of heat, or we boil at different

degrees. One man is brought to the boiling point by the excitement of

conversation in the parlor. The waters, of course, are not very deep.

He has a two-inch enthusiasm, a pattypan ebullition. Another requires

the additional caloric of a multitude, and a public debate; a third

needs an antagonist, or a hot indignation; a fourth needs a

revolution; and a fifth, nothing less than the grandeur of absolute

ideas, the splendors and shades of Heaven and Hell.

But because every man is an orator, how long soever he may have been a

mute, an assembly of men is so much more susceptible. The eloquence of

one stimulates all the rest, some up to the speaking point, and all

others to a degree that makes them good receivers and conductors, and

they avenge themselves for their enforced silence by increased

loquacity on their return to the fireside.

The plight of these phlegmatic brains is better than that of those who

prematurely boil, and who impatiently break the silence before their

time. Our county conventions often exhibit a small-pot-soon-hot style

of eloquence. We are too much reminded of a medical experiment, where

a series of patients are taking nitrous-oxide gas. Each patient, in

turn, exhibits similar symptoms,--redness in the face, volubility,

violent gesticulation, delirious attitudes, occasional stamping, an

alarming loss of perception of the passage of time, a selfish

enjoyment of his sensations, and loss of perception of the sufferings

of the audience.

Plato says, that the punishment which the wise suffer, who refuse to

take part in the government, is, to live under the government of worse

men; and the like regret is suggested to all the auditors, as the

penalty of abstaining to speak, that they shall hear worse orators

than themselves.

But this lust to speak marks the universal feeling of the energy of

the engine, and the curiosity men feel to touch the springs. Of all

the musical instruments on which men play, a popular assembly is that

which has the largest compass and variety, and out of which, by genius

and study, the most wonderful effects can be drawn. An audience is not

a simple addition of the individuals that compose it. Their sympathy

gives them a certain social organism, which fills each member, in his

own degree, and most of all the orator, as a jar in a battery is

charged with the whole electricity of the battery. No one can survey

the face of an excited assembly, without being apprised of new

opportunity for painting in fire human thought, and being agitated to

agitate. How many orators sit mute there below! They come to get

justice done to that ear and intuition which no Chatham and no

Demosthenes has begun to satisfy.

The Welsh Triads say, "Many are the friends of the golden tongue." Who

can wonder at the attractiveness of Parliament, or of Congress, or the

bar, for our ambitious young men, when the highest bribes of society

are at the feet of the successful orator? He has his audience at his

devotion. All other fames must hush before his. He is the true

potentate; for they are not kings who sit on thrones, but they who

know how to govern. The definitions of eloquence describe its

attraction for young men. Antiphon the Rhamnusian, one of Plutarch's

ten orators, advertised in Athens, "that he would cure distempers of

the mind with words." No man has a prosperity so high or firm, but two

or three words can dishearten it. There is no calamity which right

words will not begin to redress. Isocrates described his art, as "the

power of magnifying what was small and diminishing what was

great";--an acute, but partial definition. Among the Spartans, the art

assumed a Spartan shape, namely, of the sharpest weapon. Socrates

says, "If any one wishes to converse with the meanest of the

Lacedaemonians, he will at first find him despicable in conversation;

but, when a proper opportunity offers, this same person, like a

skilful jaculator, will hurl a sentence worthy of attention, short and

contorted, so that he who converses with him will appear to be in no

respect superior to a boy." Plato's definition of rhetoric is, "the

art of ruling the minds of men." The Koran says, "A mountain may

change its place, but a man will not change his disposition";--yet the

end of eloquence is,--is it not?--to alter in a pair of hours, perhaps

in a half-hour's discourse, the convictions and habits of years. Young

men, too, are eager to enjoy this sense of added power and enlarged

sympathetic existence. The orator sees himself the organ of a

multitude, and concentrating their valors and powers:

"But now the blood of twenty thousand men

Blushed in my face."

That which he wishes, that which eloquence ought to reach, is, not a

particular skill in telling a story, or neatly summing up evidence, or

arguing logically, or dexterously addressing the prejudice of the

company; no, but a taking sovereign possession of the audience. Him we

call an artist, who shall play on an assembly of men as a master on

the keys of the piano,--who, seeing the people furious, shall soften

and compose them, shall draw them, when he will, to laughter and to

tears. Bring him to his audience, and, be they who they may, coarse or

refined, pleased or displeased, sulky or savage, with their opinions

in the keeping of a confessor, or with their opinions in their

bank-safes,--he will have them pleased and humored as he chooses; and

they shall carry and execute that which he bids them.

This is that despotism which poets have celebrated in the "Pied Piper

of Hamelin," whose music drew like the power of gravitation,--drew

soldiers and priests, traders and feasters, women and boys, rats and

mice; or that of the minstrel of Meudon, who made the pallbearers

dance around the bier. This is a power of many degrees, and requiring

in the orator a great range of faculty and experience, requiring a

large composite man, such as Nature rarely organizes, so that, in our

experience, we are forced to gather up the figure in fragments, here

one talent, and there another.

The audience is a constant metre of the orator. There are many

audiences in every public assembly, each one of which rules in turn.

If anything comic and coarse is spoken, you shall see the emergence of

the boys and rowdies, so loud and vivacious, that you might think the

house was filled with them. If new topics are started, graver and

higher, these roisters recede; a more chaste and wise attention takes

place. You would think the boys slept, and that the men have any

degree of profoundness. If the speaker utter a noble sentiment, the

attention deepens, a new and highest audience now listens, and the

audiences of the fun and of facts and of the understanding are all

silenced and awed. There is also something excellent in every

audience,--the capacity of virtue. They are ready to be beatified.

They know so much more than the orator,--and are so just! There is a

tablet there for every line he can inscribe, though he should mount to

the highest levels. Humble persons are conscious of new illumination;

narrow brows expand with enlarged affections: delicate spirits, long

unknown to themselves, masked and muffled in coarsest fortunes, who

now hear their own native language for the first time, and leap to

hear it. But all these several audiences, each above each, which

successively appear to greet the variety of style and topic, are

really composed out of the same persons; nay, sometimes the same

individual will take active part in them all, in turn.

This range of many powers in the consummate speaker and of many

audiences in one assembly leads us to consider the successive stages

of oratory.

Perhaps it is the lowest of the qualities of an orator, but it is, on

so many occasions, of chief importance,--a certain robust and radiant

physical health,--or, shall I say? great volumes of animal heat. When

each auditor feels himself to make too large a part of the assembly,

and shudders with cold at the thinness of the morning audience, and

with fear lest all will heavily fail through one bad speech, mere

energy and mellowness are then inestimable. Wisdom and learning would

be harsh and unwelcome, compared with a substantial cordial man, made

of milk, as we say, who is a house-warmer, with his obvious honesty

and good meaning, and a hue-and-cry style of harangue, which inundates

the assembly with a flood of animal spirits, and makes all safe and

secure, so that any and every sort of good speaking becomes at once

practicable. I do not rate this animal eloquence very highly, and yet,

as we must be fed and warmed before we can do any work well, even the

best, so is this semi-animal exuberance, like a good stove, of the

first necessity in a cold house.

Climate has much to do with it,--climate and race. Set a New Englander

to describe any accident which happened in his presence. What

hesitation and reserve in his narrative! He tells with difficulty some

particulars, and gets as fast as he can to the result, and, though he

cannot describe, hopes to suggest the whole scene. Now listen to a

poor Irish-woman recounting some experience of hers. Her speech flows

like a river,--so unconsidered, so humorous, so pathetic, such justice

done to all the parts! It is a true transubstantiation,--the fact

converted into speech, all warm and colored and alive, as it fell out.

Our Southern people are almost all speakers, and have every advantage

over the New England people, whose climate is so cold, that, 'tis said,

we do not like to open our mouths very wide. But neither can the

Southerner in the United States, nor the Irish, compare with the

lively inhabitant of the South of Europe. The traveller in Sicily

needs no gayer melodramatic exhibition than the _table d'hôte_ of his

inn will afford him, in the conversation of the joyous guests. They

mimic the voice and manner of the person they describe; they crow,

squeal, hiss, cackle, bark, and scream like mad, and, were it only by

the physical strength exerted in telling the story, keep the table in

unbounded excitement. But in every constitution some large degree of

animal vigor is necessary as material foundation for the higher

qualities of the art.

But eloquence must be attractive, or it is none. The virtue of books

is to be readable, and of orators to be interesting, and this is a

gift of Nature; as Demosthenes, the most laborious student in that

kind, signified his sense of this necessity when he wrote, "Good

Fortune," as his motto on his shield. As we know, the power of

discourse of certain individuals amounts to fascination, though it may

have no lasting effect. Some portion of this sugar must intermingle.

The right eloquence needs no bell to call the people together, and no

constable to keep them. It draws the children from their play, the old

from their arm-chairs, and the invalid from his warm chamber; it holds

the hearer fast, steals away his feet, that he shall not depart,--his

memory, that he shall not remember the most pressing affairs,--his

belief, that he shall not admit any opposing considerations. The

pictures we have of it in semi-barbarous ages, when it has some

advantages in the simpler habit of the people, show what it aims at.

It is said that the Khans, or story-tellers in Ispahan and other

cities of the East, attain a controlling power over their audience,

keeping them for many hours attentive to the most fanciful and

extravagant adventures. The whole world knows pretty well the style of

these improvisators, and how fascinating they are, in our translations

of the "Arabian Nights." Scheherzarade tells these stories to save her

life, and the delight of young Europe and young America in them proves

that she fairly earned it. And who does not remember in childhood some

white or black or yellow Scheherzarade, who, by that talent of telling

endless feats of fairies and magicians, and kings and queens, was more

dear and wonderful to a circle of children than any orator of England

or America is now? The more indolent and imaginative complexion of the

Eastern nations makes them much more impressible by these appeals to

the fancy.

These legends are only exaggerations of real occurrences, and every

literature contains these high compliments to the art of the orator

and the bard, from the Hebrew and the Greek down to the Scottish

Glenkindie, who

--"harpit a fish out o' saut water,

Or water out of a stone,

Or milk out of a maiden's breast

Who bairn had never none."

Homer specially delighted in drawing the same figure. For what is the

"Odyssey," but a history of the orator, in the largest style, carried

through a series of adventures furnishing brilliant opportunities to

his talent? See with what care and pleasure the poet brings him on the

stage. Helen is pointing out to Antenor, from a tower, the different

Grecian chiefs. "Antenor said: 'Tell me, dear child, who is that man,

shorter by a head than Agamemnon, yet he looks broader in his

shoulders and breast. His arms lie on the ground, but he, like a

leader, walks about the bands of the men. He seems to me like a

stately ram, who goes as a master of the flock.' Him answered Helen,

daughter of Jove: 'This is the wise Ulysses, son of Laertes, who was

reared in the state of craggy Ithaca, knowing all wiles and wise

counsels.' To her the prudent Antenor replied again: 'O woman, you

have spoken truly. For once the wise Ulysses came hither on an

embassy, with Menelaus, beloved by Mars. I received them, and

entertained them at my house. I became acquainted with the genius and

the prudent judgments of both. When they mixed with the assembled

Trojans and stood, the broad shoulders of Menelaus rose above the

other; but, both sitting, Ulysses was more majestic. When they

conversed, and interweaved stories and opinions with all; Menelaus

spoke succinctly, few but very sweet words, since he was not

talkative, nor superfluous in speech, and was the younger. But when

the wise Ulysses arose, and stood, and looked down, fixing his eyes on

the ground, and neither moved his sceptre backward nor forward, but

held it still, like an awkward person, you would say it was some angry

or foolish man; but when he sent his great voice forth out of his

breast, and his words fell like the winter snows, not then would any

mortal contend with Ulysses; and we, beholding, wondered not

afterwards so much at his aspect." [_Iliad_, III. 192.]

Thus he does not fail to arm Ulysses at first with this power of

overcoming all opposition by the blandishments of speech. Plutarch

tells us that Thucydides, when Archidamus, king of Sparta, asked him,

Which was the best wrestler, Pericles or he? replied, "When I throw

him, he says he was never down, and he persuades the very spectators

to believe him." Philip of Macedon said of Demosthenes, on hearing the

report of one of his orations, "Had I been there, he would have

persuaded me to take up arms against myself"; and Warren Hastings said

of Burke's speech on his impeachment, "As I listened to the orator, I

felt for more than half an hour as if I were the most culpable being

on earth."

In these examples, higher qualities have already entered; but the

power of detaining the ear by pleasing speech, and addressing the

fancy and imagination, often exists without higher merits. Thus

separated, as this fascination of discourse aims only at amusement,

though it be decisive in its momentary effect, it is yet a juggle, and

of no lasting power. It is heard like a band of music passing through

the streets, which converts all the passengers into poets, but is

forgotten as soon as it has turned the next corner; and unless this

oiled tongue could, in Oriental phrase, lick the sun and moon away, it

must take its place with opium and brandy. I know no remedy against it

but cotton-wool, or the wax which Ulysses stuffed into the ears of his

sailors to pass the Sirens safely.

There are all degrees of power, and the least are interesting, but

they must not be confounded. There is the glib tongue and cool

self-possession of the salesman in a large shop, which, as is well

known, overpower the prudence and resolution of housekeepers of both

sexes. There is a petty lawyer's fluency, which is sufficiently

impressive to him who is devoid of that talent, though it be, in so

many cases, nothing more than a facility of expressing with accuracy

and speed what everybody thinks and says more slowly, without new

information, or precision of thought,--but the same thing, neither

less nor more. It requires no special insight to edit one of our

country newspapers. Yet whoever can say off currently, sentence by

sentence, matter neither better nor worse than what is there printed,

will be very impressive to our easily-pleased population. These

talkers are that class who prosper like the celebrated schoolmaster,

by being only one lesson ahead of the pupil. Add a little sarcasm, and

prompt allusion to passing occurrences, and you have the mischievous

member of Congress. A spice of malice, a ruffian touch in his

rhetoric, will do him no harm with his audience. These accomplishments

are of the same kind, and only a degree higher than the coaxing of the

auctioneer, or the vituperative style well described in the

street-word "jawing." These kinds of public and private speaking have

their use and convenience to the practitioners; but we may say of such

collectively, that the habit of oratory is apt to disqualify them for

eloquence.

One of our statesmen said, "The curse of this country is eloquent

men." And one cannot wonder at the uneasiness sometimes manifested by

trained statesmen, with large experience of public affairs, when they

observe the disproportionate advantage suddenly given to oratory over

the most solid and accumulated public service. In a Senate or other

business committee, the solid result depends on a few men with working

talent. They know how to deal with the facts before them, to put

things into a practical shape, and they value men only as they can

forward the work. But some new man comes there, who has no capacity

for helping them at all, is insignificant, and nobody in the

committee, but has a talent for speaking. In the debate with open

doors, this precious person makes a speech, which is printed, and read

all over the Union, and he at once becomes famous, and takes the lead

in the public mind over all these executive men, who, of course, are

full of indignation to find one who has no tact or skill, and knows he

has none, put over them by means of this talking power which they

despise.

Leaving behind us these pretensions, better or worse, to come a little

nearer to the verity, eloquence is attractive as an example of the

magic of personal ascendency;--a total and resultant power,--rare,

because it requires a rich coincidence of powers, intellect, will,

sympathy, organs, and, over all, good-fortune in the cause. We have a

half-belief that the person is possible who can counterpoise all other

persons. We believe that there may be a man who is a match for

events,--one who never found his match,--against whom other men being

dashed are broken,--one of inexhaustible personal resources, who can

give you any odds and beat you. What we really wish for is a mind

equal to any exigency. You are safe in your rural district, or in the

city, in broad daylight, amidst the police, and under the eyes of a

hundred thousand people. But how is it on the Atlantic, in a storm? Do

you understand how to infuse your reason into men disabled by terror,

and to bring yourself off safe then?--how among thieves, or among an

infuriated populace, or among cannibals? Face to face with a

highwayman who has every temptation and opportunity for violence and

plunder, can you bring yourself off safe by your wit, exercised

through speech?--a problem easy enough to Caesar, or Napoleon.

Whenever a man of that stamp arrives, the highwayman has found a

master. What a difference between men in power of face! A man succeeds

because he has more power of eye than another, and so coaxes or

confounds him. The newspapers, every week, report the adventures of

some impudent swindler, who, by steadiness of carriage, duped those

who should have known better. Yet any swindlers we have known are

novices and bunglers, as is attested by their ill name. A greater

power of face would accomplish anything, and, with the rest of their

takings, take away the bad name. A greater power of carrying the thing

loftily, and with perfect assurance, would confound merchant, banker,

judge, men of influence and power, poet, and president, and might head

any party, unseat any sovereign, and abrogate any constitution in

Europe and America. It was said, that a man has at one step attained

vast power, who has renounced his moral sentiment, and settled it with

himself that he will no longer stick at anything. It was said of Sir

William Pepperel, one of the worthies of New England, that, "put him

where you might, he commanded, and saw what he willed come to pass."

Julius Caesar said to Metellus, when that tribune interfered to hinder

him from entering the Roman treasury, "Young man, it is easier for me

to put you to death than to say that I will"; and the youth yielded.

In earlier days, he was taken by pirates. What then? He threw himself

into their ship; established the most extraordinary intimacies; told

them stories; declaimed to them; if they did not applaud his speeches,

he threatened them with hanging,--which he performed afterwards,--and,

in a short time, was master of all on board. A man this is who cannot

be disconcerted, and so can never play his last card, but has a

reserve of power when he has hit his mark. With a serene face, he

subverts a kingdom. What is told of him is miraculous; it affects men

so. The confidence of men in him is lavish, and he changes the face of

the world, and histories, poems, and new philosophies arise to account

for him. A supreme commander over all his passions and affections; but

the secret of his ruling is higher than that. It is the power of

Nature running without impediment from the brain and will into the

hands. Men and women are his game. Where they are, he cannot be

without resource. "Whoso can speak well," said Luther, "is a man." It

was men of this stamp that the Grecian States used to ask of Sparta

for generals. They did not send to Lacedaemon for troops, but they

said, "Send us a commander"; and Pausanias, or Gylippus, or Brasidas,

or Agis, was despatched by the Ephors.

It is easy to illustrate this overpowering personality by these

examples of soldiers and kings; but there are men of the most peaceful

way of life, and peaceful principle, who are felt, wherever they go,

as sensibly as a July sun or a December frost,--men who, if they

speak, are heard, though they speak in a whisper,--who, when they act,

act effectually, and what they do is imitated: and these examples may

be found on very humble platforms, as well as on high ones.

In old countries, a high money-value is set on the services of men who

have achieved a personal distinction. He who has points to carry must

hire, not a skilful attorney, but a commanding person. A barrister in

England is reputed to have made twenty or thirty thousand pounds _per

annum_ in representing the claims of railroad companies before

committees of the House of Commons. His clients pay not so much for

legal as for manly accomplishments,--for courage, conduct, and a

commanding social position, which enable him to make their claims

heard and respected.

I know very well, that, among our cool and calculating people, where

every man mounts guard over himself, where heats and panics and

abandonments are quite out of the system, there is a good deal of

skepticism as to extraordinary influence. To talk of an overpowering

mind rouses the same jealousy and defiance which one may observe round

a table where anybody is recounting the marvellous anecdotes of

mesmerism. Each auditor puts a final stroke to the discourse by

exclaiming, "Can he mesmerize _me_?" So each man inquires if any

orator can change _his_ convictions.

But does any one suppose himself to be quite impregnable? Does he

think that not possibly a man may come to him who shall persuade him

out of his most settled determination?--for example, good sedate

citizen as he is, to make a fanatic of him? or, if he is penurious, to

squander money for some purpose he now least thinks of? or, if he is a

prudent, industrious person, to forsake his work, and give days and

weeks to a new interest? No, he defies any one, every one. Ah! he is

thinking of resistance, and of a different turn from his own. But what

if one should come of the same turn of mind as his own, and who sees

much farther on his own way than he? A man who has tastes like mine,

but in greater power, will rule me any day, and make me love my ruler.

Thus it is not powers of speech that we primarily consider under this

word Eloquence, but the power that, being present, gives them their

perfection, and, being absent, leaves them a merely superficial value.

Eloquence is the appropriate organ of the highest personal energy.

Personal ascendency may exist with or without adequate talent for its

expression. It is as surely felt as a mountain or a planet; but when

it is weaponed with a power of speech, it seems first to become truly

human, works actively in all directions, and supplies the imagination

with fine materials.

This circumstance enters into every consideration of the power of

orators, and is the key to all their effects. In the assembly, you

shall find the orator and the audience in perpetual balance, and the

predominance of either is indicated by the choice of topic. If the

talents for speaking exist, but not the strong personality, then there

are good speakers who perfectly receive and express the will of the

audience, and the commonest populace is flattered by hearing its low

mind returned to it with every ornament which happy talent can add.

But if there be personality in the orator, the face of things changes.

The audience is thrown into the attitude of pupil, follows like a

child its preceptor, and hears what he has to say. It is as if, amidst

the king's council at Madrid, Ximenes urged that an advantage might be

gained of France, and Mendoza that Flanders might be kept down, and

Columbus, being introduced, was interrogated whether his geographical

knowledge could aid the cabinet, and he can say nothing to one party

or to the other, but he can show how all Europe can be diminished and

reduced under the king by annexing to Spain a continent as large as

six or seven Europes.

This balance between the orator and the audience is expressed in what

is called the pertinence of the speaker. There is always a rivalry

between the orator and the occasion, between the demands of the hour

and the prepossession of the individual. The emergency which has

convened the meeting is usually of more importance than anything the

debaters have in their minds, and therefore becomes imperative to

them. But if one of them have anything of commanding necessity in his

heart, how speedily he will find vent for it, and with the applause of

the assembly! This balance is observed in the privatest intercourse.

Poor Tom never knew the time when the present occurrence was so

trivial that he could tell what was passing in his mind without being

checked for unseasonable speech; but let Bacon speak, and wise men

would rather listen, though the revolution of kingdoms was on foot. I

have heard it reported of an eloquent preacher, whose voice is not yet

forgotten in this city, that, on occasions of death or tragic

disaster, which overspread the congregation with gloom, he ascended

the pulpit with more than his usual alacrity, and, turning to his

favorite lessons of devout and jubilant thankfulness, "Let us praise

the Lord," carried audience, mourners, and mourning along with him,

and swept away all the impertinence of private sorrow with his

hosannas and songs of praise. Pepys says of Lord Clarendon, with whom

"he is mad in love," on his return from a conference, "I did never

observe how much easier a man do speak when he knows all the company

to be below him, than in him; for, though he spoke indeed excellent

well, yet his manner and freedom of doing it, as if he played with it,

and was informing only all the rest of the company, was mighty

pretty." [_Diary_, I. 469.]

This rivalry between the orator and the occasion is inevitable, and

the occasion always yields to the eminence of the speaker; for a great

man is the greatest of occasions. Of course, the interest of the

audience and of the orator conspire. It is well with them only when

his influence is complete; then only they are well pleased.

Especially, he consults his power by making instead of taking his

theme. If he should attempt to instruct the people in that which they

already know, he would fail; but, by making them wise in that which he

knows, he has the advantage of the assembly every moment. Napoleon's

tactics of marching on the angle of an army, and always presenting a

superiority of numbers, is the orator's secret also.

The several talents which the orator employs, the splendid weapons

which went to the equipment of Demosthenes, of AEchines, of Demades,

the natural orator, of Fox, of Pitt, of Patrick Henry, of Adams, of

Mirabeau, deserve a special enumeration. We must not quite omit to

name the principal pieces.

The orator, as we have seen, must be a substantial personality. Then,

first, he must have power of statement,--must have the fact, and know

how to tell it. In any knot of men conversing on any subject, the

person who knows most about it will have the ear of the company, if he

wishes it, and lead the conversation,--no matter what genius or

distinction other men there present may have; and in any public

assembly, him who has the facts, and can and will state them, people

will listen to, though he is otherwise ignorant, though he is hoarse

and ungraceful, though he stutters and screams.

In a court of justice, the audience are impartial; they really wish to

sift the statements, and know what the truth is. And, in the

examination of witnesses, there usually leap out, quite unexpectedly,

three or four stubborn words or phrases which are the pith and fate of

the business, which sink into the ear of all parties, and stick there,

and determine the cause. All the rest is repetition and qualifying;

and the court and the county have really come together to arrive at

these three or four memorable expressions, which betrayed the mind and

meaning of somebody.

In every company, the man with the fact is like the guide you hire to

lead your party up a mountain or through a difficult country. He may

not compare with any of the party in mind, or breeding, or courage, or

possessions, but he is much more important to the present need than

any of them. That is what we go to the court-house for,--the statement

of the fact, and the elimination of a general fact, the real relation

of all the parties; and it is the certainty with which, indifferently

in any affair that is well handled, the truth stares us in the face,

through all the disguises that are put upon it,--a piece of the

well-known human life,--that makes the interest of a court-room to the

intelligent spectator.

I remember, long ago, being attracted by the distinction of the

counsel, and the local importance of the cause, into the court-room.

The prisoner's counsel were the strongest and cunningest lawyers in

the Commonwealth. They drove the attorney for the State from corner to

corner, taking his reasons from under him, and reducing him to

silence, but not to submission. When hard-pressed, he revenged

himself, in his turn, on the judge, by requiring the court to define

what salvage was. The court, thus pushed, tried words, and said

everything it could think of to fill the time, supposing cases, and

describing duties of insurers, captains, pilots, and miscellaneous

sea-officers that are or might be,--like a schoolmaster puzzled by a

hard sum, who reads the context with emphasis. But all this flood not

serving the cuttle-fish to get away in, the horrible shark of the

district-attorney being still there, grimly awaiting with his "The

court must define,"--the poor court pleaded its inferiority. The

superior court must establish the law for this, and it read away

piteously the decisions of the Supreme Court, but read to those who

had no pity. The judge was forced at last to rule something, and the

lawyers saved their rogue under the fog of a definition. The parts

were so well cast and discriminated, that it was an interesting game

to watch. The government was well enough represented. It was stupid,

but it had a strong will and possession, and stood on that to the

last. The judge had a task beyond his preparation, yet his position

remained real; he was there to represent a great reality, the justice

of states, which we could well enough see beetling over his head, and

which his trifling talk nowise affected, and did not impede, since he

was entirely well-meaning.

The statement of the fact, however, sinks before the statement of the

law, which requires immeasurably higher powers, and is a rarest gift,

being in all great masters one and the same thing,--in lawyers,

nothing technical, but always some piece of common sense, alike

interesting to laymen as to clerks. Lord Mansfield's merit is the

merit of common sense. It is the same quality we admire in Aristotle,

Montaigne, Cervantes, or in Samuel Johnson, or Franklin. Its

application to law seems quite accidental. Each of Mansfield's famous

decisions contains a level sentence or two, which hit the mark. His

sentences are not always finished to the eye, but are finished to the

mind. The sentences are involved, but a solid proposition is set

forth, a true distinction is drawn. They come from and they go to the

sound human understanding; and I read, without surprise, that the

black-letter lawyers of the day sneered at his "equitable decisions,"

as if they were not also learned. This, indeed, is what speech is for,

to make the statement; and all that is called eloquence seems to me of

little use, for the most part, to those who have it, but inestimable

to such as have something to say.

Next to the knowledge of the fact and its law, is method, which

constitutes the genius and efficiency of all remarkable men. A crowd

of men go up to Faneuil Hall; they are all pretty well acquainted with

the object of the meeting; they have all read the facts in the same

newspapers. The orator possesses no information which his hearers have

not; yet he teaches them to see the thing with his eyes. By the new

placing, the circumstances acquire new solidity and worth. Every fact

gains consequence by his naming it, and trifles become important. His

expressions fix themselves in men's memories, and fly from mouth to

mouth. His mind has some new principle of order. Where he looks, all

things fly into their places. What will he say next? Let this man

speak, and this man only. By applying the habits of a higher style of

thought to the common affairs of this world, he introduces beauty and

magnificence wherever he goes. Such a power was Burke's, and of this

genius we have had some brilliant examples in our own political and

legal men.

Imagery. The orator must be, to a certain extent, a poet. We are such

imaginative creatures, that nothing so works on the human mind,

barbarous or civil, as a trope. Condense some daily experience into a

glowing symbol, and an audience is electrified. They feel as if they

already possessed some new right and power over a fact, which they can

detach, and so completely master in thought. It is a wonderful aid to

the memory, which carries away the image, and never loses it. A

popular assembly, like the House of Commons, or the French Chamber, or

the American Congress, is commanded by these two powers,--first by a

fact, then by skill of statement. Put the argument into a concrete

shape, into an image, some hard phrase, round and solid as a ball,

which they can see and handle and carry home with them, and the cause

is half won.

Statement, method, imagery, selection, tenacity of memory, power of

dealing with facts, of illuminating them, of sinking them by ridicule

or by diversion of the mind, rapid generalization, humor, pathos, are

keys which the orator holds; and yet these fine gifts are not

eloquence, and do often hinder a man's attainment of it. And if we

come to the heart of the mystery, perhaps we should say that the truly

eloquent man is a sane man with power to communicate his sanity. If

you arm the man with the extraordinary weapons of this art, give him a

grasp of facts, learning, quick fancy, sarcasm, splendid allusion,

interminable illustration,--all these talents, so potent and charming,

have an equal power to insnare and mislead the audience and the

orator. His talents are too much for him, his horses run away with

him; and people always perceive whether you drive, or whether the

horses take the bits in their teeth and run. But these talents are

quite something else when they are subordinated and serve him; and we

go to Washington, or to Westminster Hall, or might well go round the

world, to see a man who drives, and is not run away with,--a man who,

in prosecuting great designs, has an absolute command of the means of

representing his ideas, and uses them only to express these; placing

facts, placing men; amid the inconceivable levity of human beings,

never for an instant warped from his erectness. There is for every man

a statement possible of that truth which he is most unwilling to

receive,--a statement possible, so broad and so pungent, that he

cannot get away from it, but must either bend to it or die of it. Else

there would be no such word as eloquence, which means this. The

listener cannot hide from himself that something has been shown him

and the whole world, which he did not wish to see; and, as he cannot

dispose of it, it disposes of him. The history of public men and

affairs in America will readily furnish tragic examples of this fatal

force.

For the triumphs of the art somewhat more must still be required,

namely, a reinforcing of man from events, so as to give the double

force of reason and destiny. In transcendent eloquence, there was ever

some crisis in affairs, such as could deeply engage the man to the

cause he pleads, and draw all this wide power to a point. For the

explosions and eruptions, there must be accumulations of heat

somewhere, beds of ignited anthracite at the centre. And in cases

where profound conviction has been wrought, the eloquent man is he who

is no beautiful speaker, but who is inwardly drunk with a certain

belief. It agitates and tears him, and perhaps almost bereaves him of

the power of articulation. Then it rushes from him as in short, abrupt

screams, in torrents of meaning. The possession the subject has of his

mind is so entire, that it insures an order of expression which is the

order of Nature itself, and so the order of greatest force, and

inimitable by any art. And the main distinction between him and other

well-graced actors is the conviction, communicated by every word, that

his mind is contemplating a whole and inflamed by the contemplation of

the whole, and that the words and sentences uttered by him, however

admirable, fall from him as unregarded parts of that terrible whole

which he sees, and which he means that you shall see. Add to this

concentration a certain regnant calmness, which, in all the tumult,

never utters a premature syllable, but keeps the secret of its means

and method; and the orator stands before the people as a demoniacal

power to whose miracles they have no key. This terrible earnestness

makes good the ancient superstition of the hunter, that the bullet

will hit its mark, which is first dipped in the marksman's blood.

Eloquence must be grounded on the plainest narrative. Afterwards, it

may warm itself until it exhales symbols of every kind and color,

speaks only through the most poetic forms; but, first and last, it

must still be at bottom a biblical statement of fact. The orator is

thereby an orator, that he keeps his feet ever on a fact. Thus only is

he invincible. No gifts, no graces, no power of wit or learning or

illustration will make any amends for want of this. All audiences are

just to this point. Fame of voice or of rhetoric will carry people a

few times to hear a speaker, but they soon begin to ask, "What is he

driving at?" and if this man does not stand for anything, he will be

deserted. A good upholder of anything which they believe, a

fact-speaker of any kind, they will long follow; but a pause in the

speaker's own character is very properly a loss of attraction. The

preacher enumerates his classes of men, and I do not find my place

therein; I suspect, then, that no man does. Every thing is my cousin,

and whilst he speaks things, I feel that he is touching some of my

relations, and I am uneasy; but whilst he deals in words, we are

released from attention. If you would lift me, you must be on higher

ground. If you would liberate me, you must be free. If you would

correct my false view of facts,--hold up to me the same facts in the

true order of thought, and I cannot go back from the new conviction.

The power of Chatham, of Pericles, of Luther, rested on this strength

of character, which, because it did not and could not fear anybody,

made nothing of their antagonists, and became sometimes exquisitely

provoking and sometimes terrific to these.

We are slenderly furnished with anecdotes of these men, nor can we

help ourselves by those heavy books in which their discourses are

reported. Some of them were writers, like Burke; but most of them were

not, and no record at all adequate to their fame remains. Besides,

what is best is lost, the fiery life of the moment. But the conditions

for eloquence always exist. It is always dying out of famous places,

and appearing in corners. Wherever the polarities meet, wherever the

fresh moral sentiment, the instinct of freedom and duty, come in

direct opposition to fossil conservatism and the thirst of gain, the

spark will pass. The resistance to slavery in this country has been a

fruitful nursery of orators. The natural connection by which it drew

to itself a train of moral reforms, and the slight yet sufficient

party organization it offered, reinforced the city with new blood from

the woods and mountains. Wild men, John Baptists, Hermit Peters, John

Knoxes, utter the savage sentiment of Nature in the heart of

commercial capitals. They send us every year some piece of aboriginal

strength, some tough oak-stick of a man who is not to be silenced or

insulted or intimidated by a mob, because he is more mob than

they,--one who mobs the mob,--some sturdy countryman, on whom neither

money, nor politeness, nor hard words, nor eggs, nor blows, nor

brickbats, make any impression. He is fit to meet the bar-room wits

and bullies; he is a wit and a bully himself, and something more; he

is a graduate of the plough, and the stub-hoe, and the bush-whacker;

knows all the secrets of swamp and snow-bank, and has nothing to learn

of labor or poverty or the rough of farming. His hard head went

through in childhood the drill of Calvinism, with text and

mortification, so that he stands in the New England assembly a purer

bit of New England than any, and flings his sarcasms right and left.

He has not only the documents in his pocket to answer all cavils and

to prove all his positions, but he has the eternal reason in his head.

This man scornfully renounces your civil organizations,--county, or

city, or governor, or army,--is his own navy and artillery, judge and

jury, legislature and executive. He has learned his lessons in a

bitter school. Yet, if the pupil be of a texture to bear it, the best

university that can be recommended to a man of ideas is the gauntlet

of the mobs.

He who will train himself to mastery in this science of persuasion

must lay the emphasis of education, not on popular arts, but on

character and insight. Let him see that his speech is not differenced

from action; that, when he has spoken, he has not done nothing, nor

done wrong, but has cleared his own skirts, has engaged himself to

wholesome exertion. Let him look on opposition as opportunity. He

cannot be defeated or put down. There is a principle of resurrection

in him, an immortality of purpose. Men are averse and hostile, to give

value to their suffrages. It is not the people that are in fault for

not being convinced, but he that cannot convince them. He should mould

them, armed as he is with the reason and love which are also the core

of their nature. He is not to neutralize their opposition, but he is

to convert them into fiery apostles and publishers of the same wisdom.

The highest platform of eloquence is the moral sentiment. It is what

is called affirmative truth, and has the property of invigorating the

hearer; and it conveys a hint of our eternity, when he feels himself

addressed on grounds which will remain when everything else is taken,

and which have no trace of time or place or party. Everything hostile

is stricken down in the presence of the sentiments; their majesty is

felt by the most obdurate. It is observable, that, as soon as one acts

for large masses, the moral element will and must be allowed for, will

and must work; and the men least accustomed to appeal to these

sentiments invariably recall them when they address nations. Napoleon,

even, must accept and use it as he can.

It is only to these simple strokes that the highest power belongs,

when a weak human hand touches, point by point, the eternal beams and

rafters on which the whole structure of Nature and society is laid. In

this tossing sea of delusion, we feel with our feet the adamant; in

this dominion of chance, we find a principle of permanence. For I do

not accept that definition of Isocrates, that the office of his art is

to make the great small and the small great; but I esteem this to be

its perfection,--when the orator sees through all masks to the eternal

scale of truth, in such sort that he can hold up before the eyes of

men the fact of today steadily to that standard, thereby making the

great great and the small small,--which is the true way to astonish

and to reform mankind.

All the first orators of the world have been grave men, relying on

this reality. One thought the philosophers of Demosthenes's own time

found running through all his orations,--this, namely, that "virtue

secures its own success." "To stand on one's own feet" Heeren finds

the keynote to the discourses of Demosthenes, as of Chatham.

Eloquence, like every other art, rests on laws the most exact and

determinate. It is the best speech of the best soul. It may well stand

as the exponent of all that is grand and immortal in the mind. If it

do not so become an instrument, but aspires to be somewhat of itself,

and to glitter for show, it is false and weak. In its right exercise,

it is an elastic, unexhausted power,--who has sounded, who has

estimated it?--expanding with the expansion of our interests and

affections. Its great masters, whilst they valued every help to its

attainment, and thought no pains too great which contributed in any

manner to further it, and, resembling the Arabian warrior of fame, who

wore seventeen weapons in his belt, and in personal combat used them

all occasionally,--yet undervalued all means, never permitted any

talent, neither voice, rhythm, poetic power, anecdote, sarcasm, to

appear for show, but were grave men, who preferred their integrity to

their talent, and esteemed that object for which they toiled, whether

the prosperity of their country, or the laws, or a reformation, or

liberty of speech or of the press, or letters, or morals, as above the

whole world, and themselves also.

* * * * *

THE KINLOCH ESTATE, AND HOW IT WAS SETTLED.

[Concluded.]

CHAPTER XII.

The disappearance of Lucy Ransom did not long remain a secret; it rang

through the town, and was accompanied by all sorts of rumors. Some

thought she had eloped; but the prevailing opinion was, that she had

been tempted into a fatal error, and then, in the frenzy of remorse

and shame, had destroyed herself, in order to hide her disgrace from

the world. Slight hints were now recalled by many of the poor girl's

acquaintance,--hints of love, unrequited and hopeless,--of base and

unfeeling treachery,--of remediless sorrow, appealing to the deepest

sympathy, and not the less because her heart found utterance in rude

and homely phrases. This idea of self-destruction gained the more

currency because no one had seen the least trace of the girl after the

twilight of the preceding night, and it was deemed improbable that she

could have made her way on foot the whole distance to the

railway-station without being seen by some one. And when it was

reported that a boy had found a shawl not far from the dam, the public

became so much aroused that it was determined to make a thorough

search. The pond and canal were dragged, and the bank of the river

carefully explored for miles below the town. The search was kept up

far into the night, the leaders being provided with pitch-pine

torches. At every bend, or eddy, or sand-bar, or fallen tree, where it

might be supposed that a drifting body would be stopped, the boldest

breathed faster, and started at the first glimpse of a white stone or

a peeled and bleached poplar-trunk, or other similar object, fearing

it might prove to be what they expected, yet dreaded to see. But it

was in vain. Lucy, whether alive or dead, was not to be found. Her

grandmother hobbled down to the village, moaning piteously; but she

could get little consolation, least of all from Mrs. Kinloch. This

incident made a lasting impression. The village boys, who remembered

the search with shuddering horror, avoided the river, and even Hugh

found means to persuade Mildred to give up the pleasant road on its

bank and take the hill district for their afternoon rides.

Meanwhile the time for the trial of the ejectment suit was rapidly

approaching, and it was difficult to say whether plaintiff or

defendant showed the more signs of anxiety. Mr. Hardwick's life seemed

to be bound up in his shop; it was dear to him in the memory of long

years of cheerful labor; it was his pride as well as his dependence;

he had grown old by its flaming forge, and he could never feel at home

in any other spot. "Young trees may be moved," he would say; "an old

one dies in transplanting." It was noticed by all his friends that the

stoop in his shoulders was more decided, his step less elastic, and

his ordinary flow of spirits checked.

Mrs. Kinloch, too, grew older unaccountably fast. Her soft brown hair

began to whiten, her features grew sharp, and her expression quick,

watchful, and intense. Upon being spoken to, she would start and

tremble in her whole frame; her cheeks would glow momentarily, and

then become waxen again.

Impatient at the slow progress of her son's wooing, and impelled now

by a new fear that all her plans might be frustrated, if Mildred

should happen to hear any rumor touching the cause of Lucy's

disappearance, Mrs. Kinloch proposed to herself to assist him more

openly than she had hitherto done--She was not aware that anything

implicating Hugh had been reported, but she knew enough of human

nature to be sure that some one would be peering into the mystery,--a

mystery which she divined by instinct, but had not herself dared to

explore. So, finding a favorable opportunity, she sat down beside

Mildred, determined to read the secret of her soul; for she made no

question that she could scan her, as she might the delicate machinery

of the French clock, noiselessly moving under its crystal cover.

Mildred shuddered unconsciously, as she felt her step-mother's thin

fingers gently smoothing the hair upon her temples; still more, as the

pale and quivering lips were pressed to her forehead. The caress was

not a feigned tenderness. Mrs. Kinloch really loved the girl, with

such love as she had to bestow; and if her manner had been latterly

abstracted or harsh, it was from preoccupation. She was soon satisfied

that the suspicion she dreaded had not found place in the girl's mind.

Leading the way by imperceptible approaches, she spoke in her softest

tones of her joy at Hugh's altered manners, her hopes of his future,

and especially of her desire to have him leave the navy and settle on

shore.

"How happy we might be, Hugh and we," she said, "if we could live here

in this comfortable home, and feel that nothing but death would break

up the circle! How much your dear father counted on the happiness in

store for him in growing old with his children around him!--and would

he not be rejoiced to see us cling together, bound by ties as strong

as life, and cherishing his memory by our mutual affection?"

Mildred replied in some commonplaces,--rather wondering at the vein of

sentiment, and in no way suspecting the object which her step-mother

had in view.

Mrs. Kinloch continued:--"Hugh needs some new attraction now to detain

him; he is tired of the sea, but he finds the village dull. He is just

of the age to think of looking for some romantic attachment; but you

know how few girls there are here whose manners and education are such

as to please a cultivated man."

Mildred grew uneasy, but remained silent. Mrs. Kinloch was every

moment more eager in her manner; a novice, waiting for the turn of the

cards in _rouge et noir_, would not have manifested a greater anxiety

as to the result. But the girl looked out of the window, and did not

see the compressed lips, dilated nostrils, and glittering eyes, that

gave such a contradiction to the bland words.

"Mildred, my daughter," she continued, "I have no secrets from

you,--least of all about matters that concern us both. Don't you see

what I would say? Don't you know what would make our circle complete,

inseparable? Pardon the boldness of a fond mother, whose only desire

is to see her children happy."

Mildred felt a tear dropping upon the hand which Mrs. Kinloch held

with a passionate grasp. She felt the powerful magnetism which the

woman exerted upon her, and she trembled, but still kept silent.

"It is for Hugh that I speak. He loves you. Has he not told you so?"

"I do not wish to talk with you about it," said Mildred.

"But I have a right, as his mother and your guardian, to know. I

should be wanting in my duty, if I suffered your happiness to be

perilled for want of a clear understanding between you. Hugh is proud

and sensitive, and you bashful and just the least foolish; so that you

are at cross purposes."

"Hugh fully understands my feelings towards him."

"You have given him encouragement?" she asked, eagerly.

"None whatever: it would have been wrong in me to do so."

"Wrong to love him! Why, he is your brother only in name."

"Wrong to encourage him in a love I do not and cannot return," replied

Mildred, with a mighty effort, at the same time disengaging her hand.

Mrs. Kinloch could not repress a feeling of admiration, even in her

despair, as she saw the clear, brave glance, the heightened color, and

the heaving bosom of the girl.

"But, in time, you may think differently," she said, almost piteously.

"I wished to be spared this pain, mother," Mildred replied, trembling

at her own boldness, "but you will not let me; and I must tell you,

kindly, but decidedly, that I never could marry Hugh under any

circumstances whatever."

Her mother did not wince at the rebuff, but followed on even closer.

"And why? Who is there more manly, well-educated, kindly, dutiful,

than Hugh?"

"I don't wish to analyze his character; probably we shouldn't

altogether agree in our judgment; but it is enough that I don't feel

in the least attracted by him, and that I could not love him, if he

were all that you imagine."

"Then you love another!" said Mrs. Kinloch, fiercely.

Mildred was excessively agitated; but, though her knees trembled, her

voice was clear and soft as it had been. "Yes, I do love another; and

I don't hesitate to avow it."

"That blacksmith's upstart?" in a still louder key.

"You mean Mark Davenport, probably, who deserves more respectful

language."

"Brought up in coal-dust,--the spoiled and forward pet of a foolish

old stutterer, who depends for his bread on his dirty work, and who,

if he had only his own, would have to leave even the hovel he works

in." It was fearful to see how these contemptuous words were hissed

out by the infuriated woman.

Mildred was courageous, but she had not passed through the discipline

that had developed her step-mother's faculties. So she burst into

tears, saying, amidst her sobs, that Mark was allowed by all who knew

him to be a young man of promise; that, for herself, she didn't care

how much coal-dust he had been through,--_that_ would wash off; that,

at any rate, she loved him, and would never marry anybody else.

Mrs. Kinloch began to consider. Anger had whirled her away once; a

second explosion might create an irreparable breach between them.

"Don't lay up what I have said, Mildred," she urged, in a mild voice.

"If I object to your choice, it is because I am proud of you and want

you to look high. You can marry whom you choose; no rank or station

need be considered above you. Come, don't cry, dear!"

But Mildred refused to be soothed. She could not sympathize with the

tropical nature, that smiled like sunshine at one moment, and the next

burst into the fury of a tornado. She pushed off the beseeching hand,

turned from the offered endearments, and, with reddened, tear-stained

face, left the room.

Hugh presently passed through the hall. "Well, mother," said he, "I

suppose you think you've done it now."

"Go about your business, you foolish boy!" she retorted. "Go and try

something that you do know about. You can snare a partridge, or shoot

a woodcock, perhaps!"

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 02, No. 11, September, 1858 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 1 / 10 章