FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: Written at sixteen years of age.--POPE.

This sensible and judicious discourse written at so early an age is a

more extraordinary production than the Pastorals that follow it. Our

author has chiefly drawn his observations from Rapin, Fontenelle, and

the preface to Dryden's Virgil. A translation of Rapin's Discourse had

been some years before prefixed to Creech's translation of Theocritus,

and is no extraordinary piece of criticism. And though Hume highly

praises the Discourse of Fontenelle, yet Dr. Hurd thinks it only rather

more tolerable than his Pastorals.--WARTON.

Hume had said that there could not be a finer piece of criticism than

Fontenelle's Dissertation on Pastorals, but that the Pastorals

themselves displayed false taste, and did not exemplify the rules laid

down in the criticism.]

[Footnote 2: Fontenelle's Discourse of Pastorals.--POPE.]

[Footnote 3: Heinsius in Theocr.--POPE.]

[Footnote 4: Rapin de Carm. Past., P. 2.--POPE.]

[Footnote 5: I cannot easily discover why it is thought necessary to

refer descriptions of a rural state to the golden age, nor can I

perceive that any writer has consistently preserved the Arcadian manners

and sentiments. The only reason that I have read on which this rule has

been founded is that, according to the customs of modern life, it is

improbable that shepherds should be capable of harmonious numbers, or

delicate sentiments; and therefore, the reader must exalt his ideas of

the pastoral character by carrying his thoughts back to the age in which

the care of herds and flocks was the employment of the wisest and

greatest men. These reasoners seem to have been led into their

hypothesis by considering pastoral, not in general, as a representation

of rural nature, and consequently as exhibiting the ideas and sentiments

of those, whoever they are, to whom the country affords pleasure or

employment, but simply as a dialogue or narrative of men actually

tending sheep, and busied in the lowest and most laborious offices; from

whence they very readily concluded, since characters must necessarily be

preserved, that either the sentiments must sink to the level of the

speakers, or the speakers must be raised to the height of the

sentiments. In consequence of these original errors, a thousand precepts

have been given, which have only contributed to perplex and

confound.--JOHNSON.]

[Footnote 6: Rapin, Reflex. sur l'Art. Poet. d'Arist., P. ii. Refl.

xxvii.--POPE.]

[Footnote 7: Pope took this remark from Dr. Knightly Chetwood's Preface

to the Pastorals in Dryden's Virgil: "Not only the sentences should be

short and smart, but the whole piece should be so too, for poetry and

pastime was not the business of men's lives in those days, but only

their seasonable recreation after necessary hours." The rule is purely

fanciful. By continuing the same subject from week to week, a shepherd

could as easily find leisure to compose a single piece of a thousand

lines as ten pieces of a hundred lines each. Most of the laws of

pastoral poetry which Pope has collected are equally unfounded.]

[Footnote 8: Pref. to Virg. Past. in Dryd. Virg.--POPE.]

[Footnote 9: Fontenelle's Disc. of Pastorals.--POPE.]

[Footnote 10: See the forementioned Preface.--POPE.]

[Footnote 11: [Greek: THERISTAI], Idyl. x. and [Greek: ALIEIS], Idyl.

xxi.--POPE.

Pope's definition of Pastoral is too confined. In fact, his Pastoral

Discourse seems made to fit _his_ Pastorals. For the same reason he

would not class as a true Pastoral the most interesting of all Virgil's

Eclogues,--I mean the first, which is founded on fact, which has the

most tender and touching strokes of nature, and the plot of which is

entirely pastoral, being the complaint of a shepherd obliged to leave

the fields of his infancy, and yield the possession to soldiers and

strangers. Pope says, because it relates to soldiers, it is not

pastoral; but how little of a military cast is seen in it. The soldier

is mentioned, but only as far as was absolutely necessary, and always in

connection with the rural imagery from whence the most exquisite touches

are derived. Pope's pastoral ideas, with the exception of the Messiah,

seem to have been taken from the least interesting and poetic scenes of

the ancient eclogue,--the Wager, the Contest, the Riddle, the alternate

praises of Daphne or Delia, the common-place complaint of the lover, &c.

The more interesting and picturesque subjects were excluded, as not

being properly pastoral according to his definition.--BOWLES.

In saying that Pope would not allow Virgil's first eclogue to be "a true

pastoral," Bowles refers to the paper in the Guardian, where the design

was to laugh at the strict definition which would exclude a poem from

the pastoral class on such frivolous grounds. In the same jesting tone,

Pope asserts that the third eclogue must be set aside, because it

introduces "calumny and railing, which are not proper to a state of

concord," and the eighth, because it has a shepherd "whom an inviting

precipice tempts to self-destruction."]

[Footnote 12: The tenth and twenty-first Idyll here alluded to contain

some of the most exquisite strokes of nature and true poetry anywhere to

be met with, as does the beautiful description of the carving on the

cup, which, indeed is not a cup, but a very large pastoral vessel or

cauldron.--WARTON.]

[Footnote 13: In what does the great father of the pastoral excel all

others? In "simplicity, and nature." I admit with Pope, but more

particularly in one circumstance, which seems to have escaped general

attention, and that circumstance is the picturesque. Pope says he is too

long in his descriptions, particularly of the cup. Was not Pope, a

professed admirer of painting, aware that the description of that cup

contains touches of the most delightful and highly-finished landscape?

The old fisherman, and the broken rock in one scene; in another, the

beautiful contrast of the little boy weaving his rush-work, and so

intent on it, that he forgets the vineyard he was set to guard. We see

him in the foreground of the piece. Then there is his scrip, and the fox

eyeing it askance; the ripe and purple vineyard, and the other fox

treading down the grapes whilst he continues at his work. Add to these

circumstances the wild and beautiful Sicilian scenery, and where can

there be found more perfect landscapes in the works, which these

pictures peculiarly resemble, of Vernet or Gainsborough? Considered in

this view, how rich, wild, and various are the landscapes of the old

Sicilian, and we cannot but wonder that so many striking and original

traits should be passed over by a "youthful bard," who professed to

select from, and to copy the ancients.--BOWLES.]

[Footnote 14: He refines indeed so much, as to make him, on this very

account, much inferior to the beautiful simplicity of his

original.--WARTON.]

[Footnote 15: It is difficult to conceive where is the "wonderful

variety" in Virgil's Eclogues which "the Greek was a stranger to." Many

of the more poetical parts of Virgil are copied literally from

Theocritus; but are weakened by being made more general, and often lose

much of their picturesque and poetical effect from that

circumstance.--BOWLES.]

[Footnote 16: Rapin. Refl. on Arist., P. ii. Refl. xxvii. Pref. to the

Ecl. in Dryden's Virgil.--POPE.]

[Footnote 17: The Aminta of Tasso is here erroneously mentioned by Pope

as the very first pastoral comedy that appeared in Italy. But it is

certain that Il Sacrificio of Agostino Beccari was the first, who boasts

of it in his prologue, and who died very old in 1590.--WARTON.

"There were," says Roscoe, "several writers of pastoral in Italy prior

to those mentioned either by Pope or Warton." Roscoe mistook the

question, which was, who was the first author of the pastoral _drama_?

None of the prior pastoral writers he enumerates produced a drama, and

Warton was right in giving the precedency to Beccari.]

[Footnote 18: Dedication to Virg. Ecl.--POPE.]

[Footnote 19: In the manuscript Pope had added, "Some of them contain

two hundred lines, and others considerably exceed that number."]

[Footnote 20: Johnson remarks that while the notion that rustic

characters ought to use rustic phraseology, led to the adoption in

pastorals "of a mangled dialect which no human being ever could have

spoken," the authors had the inconsistency to invest their personages

with a refinement of thought which was incompatible with coarse and

vulgar diction. "Spenser," he continues, "begins one of his pastorals

with studied barbarity:

Diggon Davie, I bid her good day;

Or Diggon her is, or I missay.

_Dig._ Her wus her while it was day-light,

But now her is a most wretched wight.

What will the reader imagine to be the subject on which speakers like

these exercise their eloquence? Will he not be somewhat disappointed

when he finds them met together to condemn the corruptions of the church

of Rome? Surely at the same time that a shepherd learns theology, he may

gain some acquaintance with his native language."]

[Footnote 21: "It was from hence," the poet went on to say in his

manuscript, "I took my first design of the following eclogues. For,

looking upon Spenser as the father of English pastoral, I thought myself

unworthy to be esteemed even the meanest of his sons, unless I bore some

resemblance of him. But, as it happens with degenerate offspring, not

only to recede from the virtues, but to dwindle from the bulk of their

ancestor; so I have copied Spenser in miniature, and reduced his twelve

months into four seasons." When Pope published his Pastorals he stated

that three of them were imitated from Virgil and Theocritus, which

occasioned his cancelling this passage where he speaks as if he had

taken Spenser alone for his model.]

The Works of Alexander Pope, Volume 1 Poetry - Volume 1 · 第 171 / 307 题