EXECUTIVE MANSION, _September 6, 1888_.
_To the House of Representatives_:
I herewith return without approval House bill No. 2507, entitled "An act
granting a pension to Russel L. Doane, of Peck, Sanilac County, Mich."
It is proposed by this bill to pension the beneficiary therein named as
the dependent father of the late Demster Doane, late Company D,
Thirty-fifth New York Volunteers.
The only information I have concerning this case is furnished by the
report of the committee of the House to whom the bill was referred.
There is nothing alleged in the report except that Demster Doane, who
was a second lieutenant in the company and regiment named, died at Peck,
Mich., on the 22d day of September, 1881, and that the deceased up to
the time of his death supported his father, the claimant, who is now
over 81 years of age, incapable of manual labor, and destitute of the
means of support.
There is no intimation that the death of the son sixteen years after
the close of the war was caused or in any way related to his military
service. I do not understand that it has ever been claimed that a parent
should be pensioned for the death of a son who had been in the Army
unless his death could be traced in some way to his army service.
While this case is probably one where the exercise of generosity would
be pleasant and most timely to the recipient, I can not think that such
a precedent should be established.