I can not see that anything is gained by this legislation.

If the circumstances should warrant such a course, the authority which

withholds such privileges from any of the places mentioned in the law of

1880 can confer the same without the aid of a new statute. This position

is sustained by an opinion of the Attorney-General, dated in February,

1885.

If the legislation now proposed should become operative, the privileges

extended to the city of Omaha would still be subject to the proviso

attached to the seventh section of the law of 1880, and such newly

granted privileges would be liable to immediate withdrawal by the

Secretary of the Treasury.

Thus, if the design of this bill is to restore to the city named the

privileges permitted by the law of 1880, it seems to be entirely

unnecessary, since the power of such restoration is now fully vested

in the Treasury Department. If the object sought is to bestow such

privileges entirely free from the operation of the proviso above

recited, the language of the bill does not accomplish that result.

I understand that the Government has not now at Omaha "the necessary

officers for the appraisement of merchandise and the collection of

duties," which by such proviso are necessary in order to secure to any

place the advantages of immediate transportation. In the absence of such

officers the proposed legislation would be nugatory and inoperative.

A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 8, part 3: Grover Cleveland, First Term · 第 190 / 872 题