To determine the most proper parts of America for new settlers, is a

proposition interesting in its nature, but one that cannot be solved

with precision. This general fact is to be kept in view, that, in the

old populous settlements, land is already too dear to admit of that

spontaneous increase in value so profitable in back-wood districts.

The sea-board then is to be rejected by those who would go in search

of the most profitable investment of their capital, and some part of

the interior country is to be selected. The vast migration from the

eastern States to the western, is satisfactory evidence of this state

of the land market; and, besides, countenances the opinion, that the

country first peopled by Europeans is not destined to such population

and wealth as that rationally anticipated in the more fertile western

States.

In the most inland parts of the old States, there are still abundance

of good woodlands reserved for future cultivation, embracing an

extensive range of climate, and a great diversity of vegetable

products; but the natives of the temperate climes {157} of Europe

will, for the most part, be averse to live under the scorching sun of

Georgia, or the intense frosts of the province of Maine. Somewhere

between the extremes, probably between Hudson River and Chesapeake

Bay, affords the best approximation. At Philadelphia, for example, the

mean temperature of the year may be stated at 53.66°, that quantity

being a mean of the results obtained by the observations of Dr. Rush,

Dr. Cox,[86] and Mr. Legoux;--a determination nearly coinciding with

that of Mr. Playfair,[87] (53.58°) for the mean temperature of the

vegetative season, from the 20th of March to the 20th of October, at

Edinburgh, and only 5.86° higher than the mean temperature of the

latter place for the whole year. It is true that the extreme variations

are much greater at Philadelphia than at Edinburgh, but it will be in

vain to search for a situation in the United States, possessing that

equability of heat, that characterizes the British islands.

From the tract of country under consideration, Maryland and Delaware

will be deducted, as ineligible to the man who does not wish to live

amongst slaves. He may, indeed, live in either of these parts without

employing the involuntary labourer, but the man of acute sensibility

will usually be unwilling to injure the feelings of his neighbours, who

may conceive that his abstaining from the detested practice implies a

practical censure on their conduct. Slaves being addicted to theft and

other immoralities, form a strong objection against settling amongst

them. The whole stretch of country on the coast, including Maryland,

Delaware, part of Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, may be rejected, on

account of the high price of land. The inland parts of Pennsylvania

and New York States remain free from the objections just mentioned,

and {158} are believed to possess comparative advantages in respect of

climate and soil.

The winter of New York State is the more severe of the two, and seems

to point out Pennsylvania as preferable. With the single defect of

distance from market, Western Pennsylvania possesses great advantages.

The most prominent are, a healthy climate, a good soil, abundance of

coal, iron-ores, limestone, sandstone, and salt springs, circumstances

that render this country susceptible of a dense population, and a very

high state of improvement.

It being assumed that Pennsylvania lies between parallels of latitude,

the most temperate of any on the eastern coast, the inference is

natural, that the States Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and part of Kentucky,

must have a climate of similar warmth, slightly modified, no doubt, by

the elevation and prevalent winds of particular parts. Accordingly,

observations made at Cincinnati, (which lies fifty minutes south

of Philadelphia) show, that its annual mean temperature is only

six-tenths of a degree higher than that of the latter place.[88]

The lands of the State of Ohio are understood to be more fertile than

those of Pennsylvania.--With good culture, from sixty to a hundred

bushels of maize per acre, are produced. On an acre of land, near

the mouth of the Little Miami, one of the first settlers raised the

extraordinary quantity of one hundred and fourteen bushels. The

advanced state of population, in the southern part of the State, has

withdrawn the most choice tracts of ground from the land-office; good

lots, however, may still be bought from private individuals at a

moderate price. The higher country, lying nearly {159} equidistant from

the river Ohio and lake Erie, is understood to be healthy, fertile,

abounding in springs of water, and possessing a good navigation

downward, in wet seasons of the year, by means of the rivers Muskingum,

Scioto, and Miamis. The northern part of the State is described as

having many large prairies, of a rich quality, but unhealthy.

Kentucky, and the western part of Virginia, have much land of the first

rate quality; but the influx of new settlers is greatly prevented by

the insecurity of titles. Surveyed at an early period, when the country

was in the possession of the hostile aborigines, and before the new

method of laying out public lands was adopted, much confusion as to

boundaries prevails.[89] Many conflicting claims are frequently made

on the same tract, and a degree of litigation has ensued that appears

to be almost interminable. There is another cause tending to retard the

ingress of new comers which it would be invidious to repeat.

Indiana is a State more recently settled than any of the foregoing.

The part where the Indian title was extinguished, was, till lately,

comparatively small. Non-resident purchasers have shut up a large

proportion of it from immediate cultivation; some judicious entries

may still be made in the land-office, particularly by White River, and

in some other parts at a considerable distance from the Ohio. The land

office map for Jeffersonville district has many more vacancies in it

than that at Cincinnati, showing that it contains much more land not

yet appropriated by individuals. Here, as in Ohio State, the high lands

are considered the most healthy. A recent purchase from the Indian

tribes will make a valuable addition to the State of Indiana.[90] The

tract is supposed to contain about six {160} millions of acres, and

is to be soon abandoned by the natives. Already upwards of a hundred

families have entered it, for the purpose of rearing cattle and hogs.

These will have excellent opportunities for selling their stock when

purchasers take possession of the newly acquired territory, and will

have the advantage of becoming acquainted with the most valuable lands

previous to the sales. The surveyors, and other persons, who have

visited the new purchase, represent it to be rich, diversified in

surface, with the advantage of navigable waters in spring and autumn;

and that it is much better adapted to pasturage than the country

adjoining to the Ohio.

In the State of Illinois there are vast quantities of land to be

disposed of by the Government, besides the residuary of former

sales, standing open in the land-office maps at Shawneetown[91] and

Edwardsville.[92] The recent surveys bring about 3,730,000 acres into

the market. A great portion of this land lies on the Sangamon, a

southern branch of Illinois river; and I am informed by a gentleman

who has lately been there, that the country is the best that he is

acquainted with. At a period not far distant, a communication between

Lake Erie and Illinois river may be opened through the river Plein,

which empties itself into the lake.[93] Craft are said to have

already passed out of the one river into the other. A large portion

of Illinois, lying between Illinois river and the Mississippi, is a

military grant given to the troops who fought in the late war, and

divided amongst them at the rate of a hundred and sixty acres to each

man.[94] Shares of this land have been sold since its partition at a

dollar, and even so low as half a dollar per acre. The military grant

is chiefly low and flat. The soil is rich, and interspersed with {161}

prairies[95] but subject to agues: this, with a great proportion

of non-resident owners, must greatly retard the improvement of the

district. The northern parts of Illinois are understood to possess a

healthy climate.

In the Missouri Territory, large surveys are just completed, these

consist of about a million of acres near Osage river, and about two

millions toward the Mississippi, including the old settlements. The

reports of the Missouri country which I have heard, convince me, that

it contains a large quantity of good lands, and that it is favoured

with a fine climate. A gentleman who wintered at St. Louis, near the

mouth of the river Missouri, assured me that the cold is more severe

there than in the Ohio country. Although his opinion was formed from

his sense of feeling, without reference to the thermometer, it is

probably just, as the situation of St. Louis is relatively high, and

as much of the neighbouring country is without wood, admitting a free

circulation of winds, from higher and more northerly parts.

In the countries adjoining to Arkansau and Red rivers, about two

millions of acres are laid out for sale. The former of these rivers is

understood to be larger than the Ohio, and passes through a fertile

country. The post of Arkansau is situated a little northward of

latitude 34°.[96] A parallel that must be felt uncomfortably hot by

most Europeans. Cotton is the most profitable product; a vegetable

that has hitherto been almost exclusively cultivated by involuntary

labourers.

Michigan and north-west territories are understood to be fertile, and

well adapted to rearing cattle. Detroit is the capital of Michigan.[97]

In {162} the north-west territory there are two settlements; one at

Fort Howard, and the other Prairie du Chiens.[98] A military post is

to be formed at the mouth of St. Peter’s river, below the Falls of St.

Anthony.[99] These extensive regions lie in a latitude corresponding

with that of the New England States; and will probably be peopled by a

hardy race of freemen, when the lands of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois,

can be no longer procured at a low rate.

Those who would go in search of healthy situations may keep in view,

that their object can only be attained, at a distance from swamps,

and rivers which overflow their banks; it being well known, when the

former are dried up, and when the latter recede within their low-water

boundaries, vast quantities of mud and vegetable matters are exposed to

the heat of the sun, and a rapid decomposition immediately commences.

The gaseous constituents evolved give a perceptible taint to the air,

and are understood to form the miasmata that occasion agues, bilious

fevers, and liver complaints. The best navigable waters, and the most

healthy parts of the country, are, in some measure, incompatible,

and seldom admitting of immediate proximity to one another. Happily,

a moderate height of land is usually sufficient to prevent the

accumulation of stagnant waters, and to promote a motion in rivers,

that lessens the scope of their inundations, or retains them altogether

within their banks. A degree of elevation conducive to a comparatively

healthy climate, may be usually found within two or three miles of

the river; but as the contaminated air is liable to be transported by

winds, and probably not sufficiently diluted with the atmosphere in

passing over such small spaces; a greater distance from the source of

contagion {163} is no doubt preferable. I have, on various occasions,

seen persons from the higher country, about forty miles north of this

place, whose complexions are apparently more healthy than those of

the people who live on the banks of the Ohio; and several of late who

profess to have a reluctance to come down to the river on business, at

the present season of the year.

In the preceding part of this letter I mentioned the high country

lying near the heads of the northern tributaries of the Ohio, as having

a good climate. That part of it watered by the Muskingum, the two

Sciotas, and the two Miamis, possesses a downward navigation in spring,

and in the latter end of autumn, but as these rivers enter the Ohio

above the falls at Louisville, the upward navigation is interrupted

there during the summer months. This single circumstance amounts to

a weighty objection against the eastern part of the country under

consideration.

The western part has two great navigable streams, the Wabash, and

the Illinois. The Wabash is navigable for boats drawing three feet

of water, to the distance of about 400 miles from its mouth, and in

floods about 200 miles farther. Its largest tributary is White River,

which is navigable to a great distance upward. It waters a fertile

and delightful country, and joins the Wabash below all its rapids

except one run, which forms no great obstruction to the navigation.

The new seat of government is to be erected on the bank of one of

the streams of White River.[100] The Illinois is esteemed one of the

best navigations in western America. So early as 1773, a Mr. Kennedy

sailed upward to the distance of 268 miles from its confluence with the

Mississippi.[101] Sangamon river, one {164} of its principal streams,

is said to be navigable for 180 miles by small craft.

From the best information that I can procure, this western division of

the country, north of the Ohio, appears to be highly eligible to new

settlers. It unites the advantages of having high lands and navigable

waters in immediate contact, and a shorter and a better communication

with the ocean than any part of western America, that is to be

exclusively cultivated by freemen.

The country on Missouri river, has been already noticed as possessing

advantages in soil and climate, but the difficulty of the navigation

upward, amounts to a considerable objection against adopting that

territory. A convention of the people formed a constitution, and laid

before Congress their claim for being admitted as a State in the

Federal Union. The new constitution asserts the right of the people

to hold slaves, and of admitting more negroes from other parts of

the United States. Towards the conclusion of last Session of the

legislature, this question of right was warmly discussed, most of

the members from the Southern States maintained, that Congress have

no right to dictate to the people of any new State on this subject,

viewing it as a matter of internal policy, and one that does not

come under the jurisdiction of the general government,--and the

treaty of Session stipulated, that the Spanish colonists remaining

in the country, should retain their former rights and privileges. In

opposition to these doctrines, the members from Northern States argued,

that Congress has a constitutional right to interfere, and urged as a

precedent, the act prohibiting the introduction of slavery into the

country north-west of Ohio river, with other arguments too numerous

to be recapitulated here. It is painful {165} to learn that the

representatives of the nation are so much divided on this interesting

question, and, in the present instance, to reflect, that in most cases

their proceedings are expressions of the will of their constituents.

The affair waits the decision of next Session, and, in the meantime,

much solicitude prevails with regard to it. The most intelligent

citizens are at a loss to anticipate the result, and the members of

the Legislature are probably equally uncertain, whether the new State

shall become a receptacle of slaves, and its representatives the future

advocates of a Slave keeping interest. The slave keeping States,

and those which have prescribed the practice, commonly called free

States, seem to be struggling for predominance. There are now eleven

Slave keeping, and eleven free States, so that Missouri must give a

sort of numerical preponderance to one of the parties. The number of

representatives for free States, are apportioned according to the

number of free persons in each, and in Slave keeping States, they are

regulated by the number of free persons added to three-fifths of the

slaves, a method that has the effect of strengthening the influence of

the Southern party.

When the Missouri question is set at rest,[102] the people of the

United States will no doubt reflect on the singular line of demarkation

which they have drawn. Supposing that the _internal frontier_ was

produced to the Stony Mountains, or to the Pacific Ocean, every

speculative mind must contemplate it, not merely as a topographical

division, but also as a sort of moral boundary, separating a great

nation into two parts, very dissimilar in the habits and jurisprudence

of their people, and will seriously meditate on the possible

consequences of the unhappy difference. I do not {166} wish to make

any disagreeable reflection on the patriots who have already done so

much in circumscribing the boundaries of human misery; but regret,

that such a wide field still remains for their benevolent labours, and

that their opponents are pursuing a course imminently dangerous to

themselves, and ill calculated to promote the future tranquillity of

the republic. Many disagreeable incidents have already been occasioned

by the collision of principle and interest. Negroes frequently desert

from their masters, and fly into neighbouring free States. It may be,

that the people amongst whom they seek refuge, do not always show

much anxiety that the owners shall recover their property; and it is

perhaps partly on account of this indifference, that the pursuers of

slaves adopt forcible means instead of the legal redress prescribed by

free States. Peaceful communities are thus invaded by small parties

of armed men, who carry off blacks without certifying their right to

them. In two late instances, two free blacks in Indiana were kidnapped

by people from Kentucky, and the remonstrances made on the part of

the former State, were not followed by any satisfactory concession

on the part of the latter. The laws of free States, on this subject,

are in disagreement with the usages of slave-holders; a source of

contention that may not be easily removed. Hitherto no popular rupture

has been occasioned by affairs of this kind; but, it may be asked,

where is there any guarantee that similar discordances may not become

more frequent when a more numerous population of both colours shall

be crowded along the neighbourhood of the slave-line? And may not the

heart-burnings and provincial pride, now manifest, be wrought up to a

higher pitch at a period, perhaps not far distant, when the United

States will become confident of a degree of strength that cannot

require such a {167} complete co-operation as heretofore in repelling

the attacks of foreign force?

If the slave-holding party persist in the extension of the abuse,

it would well become them to give up their constitutional claims

for calling forth the militia of northern states “to suppress

insurrections,” and for protecting them “against domestic violence,” so

far as slaves may be the future disturbers of the peace. Whether they

make such a fair concession or not, it is for them to reflect whether

their northern neighbours, who have so uniformly and so wisely opposed

the evil, and who have so humanely laboured to eradicate it from

amongst themselves, will be willing to imbrue their hands in the blood

of the injured people who have never excited any of their feelings

except pity.

So long as the Missouri question remains unsettled, a hope may be

entertained that liberal sentiments may prevail. The northern people

seem to be almost universally in favour of the restriction, and a part

of the finest feelings, and the brightest talents in the Southern

States, are ranged on the side of humanity.

FOOTNOTES:

[86] Benjamin Rush (1745-1813), a signer of the Declaration of

Independence and member of the state convention of 1787, was the

most eminent American physician of his day, and by his theories

regarding the nature of yellow fever won recognition abroad. Serving

as physician-general in the Revolutionary army, for twenty-nine years

surgeon in the Pennsylvania Hospital, and throughout his life a

practicing physician, he nevertheless found time to become identified

with many public measures, notably the abolition of slavery, and the

extension of public schools, and was a member of nearly every important

literary and philanthropic society in Philadelphia.

John Redman Cox (1773-1864) was, like Rush, a Philadelphia physician,

being trained at the University of Edinburgh. He was for many years

professor of chemistry at the University of Pennsylvania, and edited

several medical journals; but is best known as an early and pronounced

advocate of vaccination.--ED.

[87] John Playfair (1748-1819), an eminent Scottish mathematician and

astronomer.--ED.

[88] Dr. Drake’s Picture of Cincinnati, page 116.--FLINT.

[89] In Virginia and Kentucky the state made no surveys before

disposing of its lands. The settlers or speculators sought out a tract,

made a survey, generally marking it by “blazing” the trees, and had

it recorded in the state land-office. Areas of all shapes and sizes

were patented, and unpatented strips of irregular shape lay between.

Moreover, there was no limit to the number of patents that could be

taken out on the same piece of land, the land-office concerning itself

not at all with controversies over titles, merely guaranteeing an

entry if no previous title was valid. The original claim to hundreds

of thousands of acres in Kentucky was never settled, the land being

eventually held under possession titles.--ED.

[90] This refers to the Miami cession made at St. Mary’s, Ohio, October

6, 1818. By this treaty the Delaware and Miami Indians ceded all

central Indiana between the Wabash and White rivers.--ED.

[91] For the early history of Shawneetown, see Croghan’s _Journals_,

volume i of our series, note 108.--ED.

[92] Edwardsville, on Cahokia Creek, twenty miles north-east of St.

Louis, was founded in 1816, and named in honor of Ninian Edwards, first

governor of Illinois Territory.--ED.

[93] A canal connecting Illinois River with Lake Michigan was first

suggested by Jolliet in 1673, when he and Marquette returned by that

route from their exploration of the Mississippi River. Such a canal

was included in Gallatin’s system of internal improvements, proposed

in 1808. President Madison laid the matter before Congress in 1814;

Calhoun, as secretary of war, again called attention to it, in 1819;

and for twenty years it found a place in the governor’s annual message.

Finally (1836), its construction was undertaken by the state, aided by

large congressional land grants. The Illinois-Michigan Canal, extending

from La Salle, on the Illinois, to Lake Michigan, at the mouth of

Chicago River, one hundred miles in all, was completed in 1848, and

opened with much ceremony. In 1882 the state ceded the property to the

United States, in the hope that the latter would enlarge it for a ship

canal. But the next step was taken by the Chicago Sanitary District,

which at a cost of about $35,000,000 has completed the Chicago Drainage

Canal for the better disposal of the sewage of Chicago. This canal was

opened January 2, 1900, after seven years spent in its construction.

Flint’s reference is to the Des Plaines (Plein) River.--ED.

[94] The Illinois military grant was the peninsula between the

Mississippi and Illinois rivers, as far north as a line drawn west from

the confluence of the Illinois and Vermilion rivers. The value of the

land began to appreciate soon after Flint’s journey, and ten counties

were erected within it in 1824-25.--ED.

[95] Van Zandt’s description of the military grant.--FLINT.

_Comment by Ed._ Nicholas Biddle Van Zandt, _A full description of the

soil, water, timber, and prairies ... of the military lands between the

Mississippi and Illinois rivers_ (Washington, 1818). The author, the

title-page shows, was “Late, a clerk in the General Land Office of the

United States, Washington City.”

[96] For the Arkansas Post, see Cuming’s _Tour_, volume iv of our

series, note 195.--ED.

[97] For the early history of Detroit, see Croghan’s _Journals_, volume

i of our series, note 18.--ED.

[98] For Fort Howard, see Evans’s _Tour_, volume viii of our series,

note 82.

Flint's Letters from America, 1818-1820 · 第 12 / 23 段