LORD CANNING. (1853-4.)
The doubt as to the new Postmaster-General was soon satisfactorily
cleared by the appointment of Lord Canning. Though it was not until a
fortnight later that I had an opportunity of forming a direct opinion
of our new chief, I had heard enough to make me very hopeful as to
my future relations with him. Meantime, I had the satisfaction to
find that I had lost no ground at the Treasury, Mr. Wilson, the new
secretary, having written to ask for my advice and opinion on the
several cases awaiting decision.
"_January 14th._--My interview with Lord Canning was
satisfactory.... I intended to have abstained at this, my first
interview, from all allusions to the disagreeables of my position;
but he entered himself on the subject, and, in the course of a long
conversation, I told him of the expectations, still unfulfilled,
held out by Sir Charles Wood and Lord Clanricarde; of my successful
administration of the Money Order Office; of the division of
duties, which had gradually grown up under Lord Clanricarde; and
of the new arrangements made by Lord Hardwicke, &c. I found that
... as was the case with Lord Hardwicke when he entered office,
he had been led to believe that I and Frederic did nothing but
manage the Money Order Office. At the close of an hour and a-half's
conversation, Lord C. expressed a desire that Lord Hardwicke's
arrangements should be observed till he (Lord C.) was more familiar
with the business of the office, when he would revise them."
At such a time as this every confirmation of my former calculations
and predictions was highly acceptable, and particularly welcome was a
return just then received, which showed that the number of letters had
at length attained that five-fold increase on which I had originally
counted, progress of late having been very rapid.
I soon had the satisfaction to find that I was treated with confidence,
Lord Canning consulting me on various matters which his predecessor had
withdrawn from my charge.
"_March 12th._--The Postmaster-General voluntarily entered on the
subject of my position. He intends to speak to Lord Clanricarde,
and probably to Sir Charles Wood, on the matter."
I saw also fresh evidence of confidence in me at the Treasury:--
"_April 8th._--Mr. John Wood, by direction of the Chancellor of
the Exchequer [Mr. Gladstone], consulted me confidentially on some
points of the intended Budget.... I inquired if I was at liberty
to name the subject to the Postmaster-General, but was told, to my
surprise, that I was not at liberty to do so."
Not _malapropos_ to the present question, I discovered that a serious
obstacle to improvement in our treaty with France had arisen from
a concession heedlessly made to the French Post Office about two
years before, increasing the undue advantages already spoken of.
This concession had been made, not only without my knowledge, but,
improbable as this may appear, without authority from the Treasury.
Although, however, the direct loss produced by this blunder was at the
rate of more than £3,000 a year, the old punctilious notions as to
ostensible economy still stood in the way of the change by which alone
real economy could be obtained, the Postmaster-General informing me
that, though he was ready to listen to any suggestions for facilitating
the desired change, he feared Mr. Gladstone would object to the
expedient of a full retiring allowance to Colonel Maberly on the same
grounds that Sir Charles Wood had done. On the 7th of June, however, he
advised me to prepare a statement for his use at the Treasury; but upon
my speaking of the Parliamentary influence which I could bring to bear
upon the Chancellor of the Exchequer, he deprecated its present use,
promising at the same time to inform the Chancellor as to the fact.
One important article in the statement called for related to economy. I
had the pleasure to find, upon examination, that the amount of saving,
either actually obtained or prospectively secured by my brother and
myself, within the last sixteen months, was nearly £75,000 per annum,
which, added to nearly £60,000 per annum previously economised since
my return to office, gave a total annual saving of nearly £135,000,
effected in the face of constant opposition, amidst divided authority,
and with command of only a most inadequate force.
"_June 18th._--Sent in my letter to the Postmaster-General....
After very carefully considering the question, ... I have intimated
as plainly as I could, without a risk of offence, my intention not
to remain at the Post Office if present arrangements are continued."
The following shows the substance of the letter, which, however, is
given at full length in the Appendix (H).
I gave in the outset, Lord Canning being as yet new to the matter, a
concise history of my proceedings from the time of my dismissal in
1842, mentioning my invitation to office in 1846, my stipulation as to
assurance of sufficient authority, the promises given me on this point
and the expectation of speedy promotion held out, my own reluctance to
accede to office without a more material guaranty, and my concession to
the opinion of my friends, in particular Mr. Warburton, Lord Overstone,
Mr. Hawes, and Mr. Raikes Currie. After observing that even Lord
Clanricarde's kindness and confidence had failed to counteract the
radical badness of the arrangement, I proceeded as follows:--
"Looking then back upon the events of the six years during which my
promised promotion has been delayed, I feel bound to state that, if
in December, 1846, I could have foreseen what has occurred, I could
not have accepted the offer then made, nor do I believe that under
like circumstances my friends would have advised me to the step."
After speaking of the improvements effected by my brother and myself in
the Money Order Department, and showing that this success established
the probability of improvement under the same management in the Post
Office generally, I mentioned that, owing to the rapid augmentation
in the number of letters, no doubt was entertained in the department
that in a short time a most expensive outlay, probably not less than
half-a-million, would be required for a new post office, a necessity
which I did not doubt might, under better arrangements, be averted for
years, if not removed altogether. I grounded my expectation on the
fact that under the management of my brother and myself a similar and
yet more pressing necessity had been so averted in the Money Order
Department. I likewise pointed out that, even supposing a new building
to be afterwards necessary, it was important that its erection should
be delayed until the carrying of the railway system into the heart
of the Metropolis should have shown what site and what arrangements
would best suit the altered state of things. I observed also, that from
overtures made to the department by some of the projectors, I thought
it highly probable that whatever changes in the Post Office might be
rendered necessary or desirable by the new state of things, they would
not have to be made altogether, perhaps not mainly, at the cost of
Government.
After referring to the almost clamorous demand for further facilities
in the transmission of letters, a demand which could not be effectually
met without energetic and cordial co-operation in the higher
departments of the Executive, and ready obedience and zealous activity
in all the subordinates, I concluded as follows:--
"Having written thus far, and having also carefully considered
every statement and every remark I have made, I feel it my
duty to say that, after all the deliberation required by so
grave a question, I have arrived at the settled conviction that
the existing state of things cannot continue; and I therefore
respectfully request that in considering the present application
such continuance may not be regarded as a possible alternative.
"I am sure your lordship will believe me incapable of dealing
lightly with that connection with the Post Office on which I set
so great and just a value: to devise and bring into operation, so
far as it has been effected, my system of Penny Postage, has been
the cherished object of the best years of my life; interest in its
progress, whether I am an instrument or not in promoting it, will
ever retain the firmest hold on my mind, and would suffice to keep
me in any course but one which I feel to be inconsistent alike with
my private and my public duty."
* * * * *
The whole correspondence relative to my position was submitted by Lord
Canning to Mr. Gladstone, who, in turn, as I was informed, consulted
the Premier, Lord Aberdeen. But I again encountered delay, though I
was now assured that, in order to facilitate the desired change, Mr.
Gladstone would arrest certain economical measures which had been
decided on, and to which he attached great importance. The vacancy in
prospect was that of the Chairmanship of the Audit Office (spoken of
long ago by Lord Clanricarde), but no exact information existed as to
the intentions of the incumbent, Sir William Herries. Lord Canning,
however, undertook to inquire. He soon afterwards informed me that
Sir William Herries had, some time before, proposed to retire if
Government would give him a regiment; but, upon a cavalry regiment
being offered, had preferred to wait for one of infantry. Upon my
inquiring whether I might understand that Government would take the
first opportunity of giving Colonel Maberly another appointment, Lord
Canning, after reminding me of the sacrifice already made to that
end, added that Mr. Gladstone had expressed an opinion to the effect,
that if, by so doing, he should succeed in retaining my services, he
should most effectually consult the interests of the Government and the
expectations of the public. I could not but express my gratification at
so high a compliment. I still, however, pressed for a definite answer
to my question, and finally, the Postmaster-General promised again to
consult the higher authorities, and to write me an answer to my letter.
He added, that he should show the draft of his letter to the Chancellor
of the Exchequer, and probably to Lord Aberdeen.
"_August 10th._--Received the following letter from Lord Canning:--
"'Grosvenor Square,
"'August 9th, 1853.
"'MY DEAR SIR,--I have laid your letter of the 18th of June before
Lord Aberdeen and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, who have given
it their attentive consideration.
"'The change of your official position which is urged in it
depends upon matters not altogether in the control of the
Government; and, although I am enabled to say that upon a fitting
opportunity arising it is probable that an offer would be made
by the Government to use Colonel Maberly's services in another
department, I have no knowledge whatever of Colonel Maberly's
wishes or intentions in regard to his own position, nor do I feel
it necessary at present to inquire into them.
"'I trust that you will not be disappointed if I am unable to give
any further or more positive reply to your request.
"'I return the copy of the 'confidential correspondence' which I
received from you, and which has since been seen by the Chancellor
of the Exchequer.
"'I am, my dear Sir,
"'Yours very faithfully,
"'CANNING.
"'ROWLAND HILL, Esq.,
"'&c., &c., &c.'"
I was much disappointed; for with every allowance for official caution,
the letter promised but little, and seemed to imply that, even if a fit
opportunity should occur, there was no intention of _requiring_ Colonel
Maberly to give up his present appointment. If any one regards my
distrust as unwarrantable, I think he will find excuse in considering
the numberless disappointments I had already sustained.
"_August 16th._--Placed the subjoined letter in the hands of the
Postmaster-General. Explained verbally the danger to my health, and
even life, of continuing the present arrangements, described my
sufferings from a tendency of blood to the head, ... and suggested
his seeing Hodgson[101] on the subject. I told him that my object
was to satisfy him of the real difficulties of the case, and that
in saying I _could_ not go on as at present, I did not mean that I
_would_ not. I think the communication will have its effect."
In this letter I repeated the request so often made at an earlier
period, that until the only effectual change could be made I might at
least have such support to my authority as would arise from my being
placed on perfect equality in all respects with my colleague,[102]
and further have definitely assigned to me such departments of the
secretarial duty as his lordship might judge proper, together with
a transfer to my authority of the corresponding portions of the
secretarial staff. An alternative expedient which I suggested was
that I should suspend my present duties, and employ the interval in
personally inspecting the postal arrangements of foreign countries,
and in negotiating, under his lordship's instructions, such changes
as might appear best calculated to facilitate our foreign postal
communications.
Three days later I spoke again to the Postmaster-General, pointing out
that, by the death of Sir F. Adam, there was a vacant colonelcy. He
was aware of the fact, but thought he could not move in the matter. In
this posture of affairs, having first arranged with Mr. Hodgson for a
letter to the Postmaster-General, which the latter had expressed his
willingness to receive, I left town for a holiday, and passed a month
in Scotland.
"_October 13th._--The Postmaster-General came to the office
for the first time since his holiday and mine commenced.... He
entered on the subject of my letter of the 16th August. He told
me that he had received Mr. Hodgson's letter; that immediately
on his return to town he saw the Chancellor of the Exchequer on
the subject, and had, with some reluctance, called also on the
Commander-in-Chief (here he noted the fact, of which I was aware,
that three vacant colonelcies had arisen); that he was not at
liberty to state what had passed at the interview, but that it had
satisfied him of the high probability that, in a few months, if
not weeks, Government would be able to offer Colonel Maberly the
appointment of Chairman of the Board of Audit; and that though he
must be understood as not pledging himself that such would be the
case, and still less that Colonel M. would accept the offer if
made, he had made up his mind to advise me to wait. Incidentally,
he named Christmas as the probable maximum time. He added that
he thought there would be great difficulty in adopting either
of the temporary expedients suggested in my letter of the 16th
August, more especially the first, and that he hoped to obviate
the necessity altogether. After urging the unfairness of making
my position contingent on Colonel M.'s decision, and suggesting
the immediate adoption of the first alternative in my letter,
which, while perfectly fair, would probably make Colonel M. the
more ready to accept the offer, I inquired whether, in the event
of his refusing, the Postmaster-General would be prepared then
to adopt such alternative; to which he replied that he certainly
should; but that he had reason to believe that the offer would not
be refused, accompanied, as it would be, with such addition to
the salary attached to the office as may be required to make up
the amount Colonel M. now receives. In conclusion, I thanked the
Postmaster-General, and promised carefully to consider his advice."
The period of suspense which followed the above communication was
agreeably broken by the visit of the Treasury Commission, which came
to inquire into Post Office salaries, &c. The Commissioners were Lord
Elcho, Sir Stafford Northcote, Sir Charles Trevelyan, and Mr. Hoffay.
My Journal thus describes the mode of my examination:--
"_December 2nd._--The Commissioners concluded my evidence....
Matters are conducted in a very pleasant, though discursive
manner. As regards myself, it has been rather a conversation or
discussion (as though I were a member of the Commission) than an
examination."
Of the results of the investigation I shall speak under the head
"Salaries."
The opening of the year 1854 still found me in the same position,
though, certainly, with a better defined prospect than ever before.
I had now, however, completed the seventh year of my service at
the Post Office, and, perhaps, I may be excused if, in comparing
fulfilment with expectations held out, I thought seven years a rather
free interpretation of six months. Still, being convinced that the
Postmaster-General was as earnest in my favour as even Lord Clanricarde
had been, and also that the Chancellor of the Exchequer and even the
Premier were sincerely desirous of speedily effecting the proposed
change, I could afford to wait a little, though my health would not
admit of a long delay. Fortunately, encouraging information soon came.
"_January 6th, 1854._--The Postmaster-General entered on the
subject of my position at the Post Office. Showed me a letter from
Lord Hardinge, to which he, no doubt, referred on the 13th of
October; it is dated in August. Lord H. states that, at the usual
rate of mortality among colonels, Sir William Herries' turn would
occur before the end of January."
"_January 16th._--Dined at Lord Canning's; a pleasant small party.
I sat next to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with whom I had much
agreeable conversation."
I remember that I returned home with the impression that I had been all
the time upon my trial (in a most friendly spirit, however), first,
before the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and afterwards, though the
notion may seem ridiculous, before Lady Canning, my host having very
perceptibly led me into conversation with this highly-accomplished
lady, and she having, with no little tact and much kindness, drawn
me out. I was so far satisfied, however, with the interview that,
had I but been in even my former health, the remaining interval of
expectation would have seemed short.
"_February 25th._--Went to Brighton for a little rest. The harass
and hard work, so much increased of late by railway irregularities
and by the apparently never-ending delay as to my position in the
office, have made me seriously unwell."
Matters, however, were now steadily advancing towards a conclusion:--
"_March 2nd._--Had some further talk with the Postmaster-General on
the subject of my position. The recent death of Colonel Hay caused
him again to see Lord Hardinge. The next vacancy is to be offered
to Sir William Herries."
It must be admitted that waiting for dead men's shoes has but little
tendency to promote kindly sympathy, and I fear my family, in
consulting the military obituary about this time were not so much
impressed as could be wished with the loss sustained by the country in
the death of its veterans. The desired information, however, did not
come in the expected form.
"_April 8th._--Somewhat startled with the announcement in the
newspapers that Sir William Herries had resigned his appointment
as Chairman of the Audit Office. But the Postmaster-General tells
me that this is a necessary preliminary to his being nominated to
a colonelcy now vacant; that he (the Postmaster-General) has seen
Lord Aberdeen respecting Sir William Herries' successor, and that
'all is right.'"
A week later I was again taken by surprise, not unmingled with alarm:--
"_April 15th._--Yesterday the _Daily News_ announced that Mr.
Edward Romilly had been appointed to succeed Sir William Herries.
This I concluded was a mistake; but this morning a similar
announcement appearing in the _Morning Chronicle_, I sent a note
of inquiry to the Postmaster-General, and received by return of
messenger a note as follows:--'Dear Mr. Hill,--The announcement
in the _Chronicle_ is true, but the fact in nowise affects any
arrangements respecting yourself. Yours, very faithfully, CANNING.'
Later in the day the Postmaster-General came to the office and
explained that the Government was unwilling to place a new man at
the head of the office; they had, therefore, promoted Mr. Romilly,
one of the previous Commissioners, and that Colonel Maberly was to
take Mr. R.'s place; that he had consented so to do, and that the
whole thing was settled.... The Postmaster-General added that the
whole scheme was near being knocked on the head a few days ago by
the breaking-up of the Ministry on the question of postponing the
Reform Bill; for twelve hours they had in effect resigned."
Notwithstanding the announcement that "the whole thing was settled,"
it may well be supposed that, after receiving the last part of Lord
Canning's communication, I retained some little suppressed anxiety
until the necessary forms should be completed; for this, however, ten
days sufficed.
"_April 25th._--The following letter was this morning received from
the Treasury:--
"Treasury Chambers, 24th April, 1854.
"MY LORD,--I am commanded by my Lords Commissioners of Her
Majesty's Treasury to transmit for your information and guidance
a copy of their Lordships' minute of the 21st instant, appointing
Lieut.-Colonel Maberly to a seat at the Board of Audit, and
consolidating the appointments of Secretary to the General Post
Office and Secretary to the Postmaster-General in the person of Mr.
Rowland Hill.
"I am, &c.,
"C. E. TREVELYAN.
"The Right Honourable the Postmaster-General,
"&c., &c., &c."
"Addressed the following letter to the Postmaster-General:--
"G. P. O., 25th April, 1854.
"MY DEAR LORD,--Allow me to tender my sincere and earnest thanks
for the change which has been effected in my position--a change for
which I feel the more indebted because of the persevering kindness
with which, in the midst of your own laborious duties, you have
wrought for it from the moment of my earliest application to you
on the subject, and with which I feel the more deeply gratified
because it affords a promise of seeing those improvements which
have been the main object of my life brought to completion under
your lordship's enlightened administration.
"I have the honour to remain,
"Your Lordship's obliged and faithful servant,
"ROWLAND HILL.
"The Right Honourable VISCOUNT CANNING,
"&c., &c., &c."
I also wrote letters of thanks to Mr. Gladstone and Lord Aberdeen.
Letters of congratulation soon poured in from the many friends in
and out of Parliament, at home and abroad, who had so long and so
steadily supported the cause of postal reform, and so kindly interested
themselves in my favour; amongst others, from Lord Brougham, Lord
Truro, Sir Francis Baring, Mr. Warburton, Mr. Gladstone, Mr. Cobden,
Mr. Hume, Mr. Moffatt, Mr. Raikes Currie, and M. Piron.[103]
Government went further even than I had ever asked for, advancing my
salary at once to the maximum rate of £2,000 a year.
It will be observed that all those to whom I had on this occasion to
render official thanks had been members of the Government by which
twelve years before I had been dismissed from office. I could not but
think that the kind and earnest manner in which these gentlemen now
acted proceeded in some measure from a desire to compensate me for
the injustice of their former leader; and this view made me even more
grateful for their consideration.