CHAPTER II.

Mrs Norton had known William Hare all her life. She was the youngest

daughter, he the youngest son of equal Yorkshire families. Separated by

about a mile of pasture and woodland, these families had for generations

lived unanimous lives. In England the hunting field, the grouse moor,

the croquet and tennis lawn, with its charming adjunct the five-o'clock

tea-table, have made life in certain classes almost communal; and Mrs

Norton and William Hare had stood in white frocks under Christmas trees

and shared sweetmeats. He often thought of the first time he saw her,

wearing a skirt that fell below her ankles, with her hair done up. And

she remembered his first appearance in evening clothes, and how

surprised and delighted she was to hear him ask her if he might have the

pleasure of a waltz.

He went to Oxford to take his degree; she was taken to London for the

season, and towards the end of the third year she married Mr Norton, and

went to live at Thornby Place. Through the excitement of the marriage

arrangements, and the rapid impressions of her honeymoon, the thought of

having for neighbour the playmate of her youth had flitted across, but

had not rested in, her mind, and she did not realize the charm that it

was for her until one afternoon, now more than twenty years ago, a young

curate, bespattered with the grey mud of the downs, had startled her and

her husband by addressing her as Lizzie. Lizzie she had remained to him,

he was William to her, and henceforth their lives had been indissolubly

linked. Not a week had passed without their seeing each other. There

were visits to pay, there was hunting, and then habit intervened; and

for many years, in suffering, in joy, in hope, their thoughts had

instinctively looked to each other for reflective sympathy, and every

remembrable event was full of mutual associations. He had sat by her

when, after the birth of her first and only child, she lay pale,

beautiful, and weak on a sofa by a window blown by the tide of summer

scent; and the autumn of that same year he had walked with her in the

garden, where the leaves fell like the last illusion of youth under the

tears of an incurable grief; and staying in their walk they looked on

the house which was to be for evermore one of widowhood.

Had she ever loved him? Had he ever loved her? In moments of passionate

loneliness she had yearned for his protection; in moments of deep

dejection he had dreamed of the happiness he might have found with her;

but in the broad day of their lives they had ever thought of each other

as friends. He had advised her on the management of her estate, on the

education of her son; and in his afflictions--in his widowerhood--when

his children quickly followed their mother to the grave, Mrs Norton's

form, face, and words had steadied him, and had helped him to bear with

a life of crumbling ruin. Kitty was now the only one that remained to

him.

Mrs Norton had had projects of wealth and title for her son, but his

continued disdain of women and the love of women had long since forced

her to abandon her hopes, and now any one he might select she would

gladly welcome; but she whom Mrs Norton would have preferred to all

others was the daughter of her old friend. Her son had deserted her, and

now all her affections were centred in Kitty. Kitty was as much at

Thornby Place as at the Rectory, and in the gaiety of her bright eyes,

and in the shine of her gold-brown hair--for ever slipping from the gold

hair-pins in frizzed masses--Mrs Norton continued her dreams of her

son's marriage.

Mr Hare thought it harsh that his daughter should be so constantly taken

from him, but the parsonage was so lonely for Kitty, and there were

luncheon and tennis parties at Thornby Place, and Mrs Norton took the

girl out for drives, and together they visited all the county families.

A suspicion of matchmaking sometimes crossed Mr Hare's mind, but it

faded in the knowledge that John was always at Stanton College; and to

send this fair flower to his great--to his only--friend, was a joy, and

the bitterness of temporary loss was forgotten in the sweetness of the

sharing. He had suffered much; but these last years had been quiet, free

from despair at least, and he wished to drift a little longer with the

tide of this time. Why strive to hasten events? If this thing was to be,

it would be. So he had thought of his daughter's marriage. Fancies had

long hung about the confines of his mind, but nothing had struck him

with the full force of a thought until suddenly he understood the exact

purport of his mission to Stanton College. He leaned forward as if he

were going to tell the driver to return, but before he could do so the

lodge-keeper opened the great gate, and the hansom cab rattled under the

archway.

Then he viewed the scheme in general outline and in remote detail. It

was very simple. Lizzie had been to Shoreham, and had taken Kitty away

with her; he had been sent to Stanton College to beg John Norton to

return to Thornby Place, and to say what he could in favour of marriage

generally. This was very compromising. He had been deceived; Lizzie had

deceived him. She had no right to do such a thing; and, striving to

determine on a line of conduct, Mr Hare examined abstractedly the place

he was passing through.

In large and serpentine curves the road wound through a wood of small

beech trees--so small that in the November dishevelment the plantations

were like so much brushwood; and, lying behind the wind-swept opening,

gravel walks appeared in grey fragments, and the green spaces of the

cricket field with a solitary divine reading his breviary. The drive

turned and turned again in great sloping curves; more divines were

passed, and then there came a long terrace with a balustrade and a view

of the open country, now full of mist. And to see the sharp spire of

the distant church you had to look closely, and slanting slowly upwards

the great plain drew a long and melancholy line across the sky. The

lower terrace was approached by an imposing flight of steps, there were

myriads of leaves in the air, and the college bell rang in its high red

tower.

The high red walls of the college faced the dismal terraces, and the

triple line of diamond-paned and iron-barred windows stared upon the

ugly Staffordshire landscape. A square tower squatted in the middle of

the building, and out of it rose the octagon of the bell tower, and in

the tower wall was the great oak door studded with great nails.

"How Birmingham the whole place does look," thought Mr Hare, as he laid

his hand on an imitation mediaeval bell-pull.

"Is Mr John Norton at home?" he asked when the servant came. "Will you

give him my card, and say that I should like to see him."

On entering, Mr Hare found himself in a tiled hall, around which was

built a staircase in varnished oak. There was a quadrangle, and from

three sides the interminable latticed windows looked down on the green

sward; on the fourth there was an open corridor, with arches to imitate

a cloister. All was strong and barren, and only about the varnished

staircase was there any sign of comfort. There a virgin in bright blue

stood on a crescent moon; above her the ceiling was panelled in oak, and

the banisters, the cocoa nut matting, the bit of stained glass, and the

religious prints, suggested a mock air of hieratic dignity. And the room

Mr Hare was shown into continued this impression. Cabinets in carved oak

harmonised with high-backed chairs glowing with red Utrecht velvet, and

a massive table, on which lay a folio edition of St Augustine's "City of

God" and the "Epistolae Consolitoriae" of St Jerome.

The bell continued to clang, and through the latticed windows Mr Hare

watched the divines hurrying along the windy terrace, and the tramp of

the boys going to their class-rooms could be heard in passages below.

Then a young man entered. He was thin, and he was dressed in black. His

face was very Roman, the profile especially was what you might expect to

find on a Roman coin--a high nose, a high cheek-bone, a strong chin, and

a large ear. The eyes were prominent and luminous, and the lower part of

the face was expressive of resolution and intelligence, but above the

eyes there were many indications of cerebral distortions. The forehead

was broad, but the temples retreated rapidly to the brown hair which

grew luxuriantly on the top of the head, leaving what the phrenologists

call the bumps of ideality curiously exposed, and this, taken in

conjunction with the yearning of the large prominent eyes, suggested at

once a clear, delightful intelligence,--a mind timid, fearing, and

doubting, such a one as would seek support in mysticism and dogma, that

would rise instantly to a certain point, but to drop as suddenly as if

sickened by the too intense light of the cold, pure heaven of reason to

the gloom of the sanctuary and the consolations of Faith. Let us turn to

the mouth for a further indication of character. It was large, the lips

were thick, but without a trace of sensuality. They were dim in colour,

they were undefined in shape, they were a little meaningless--no, not

meaningless, for they confirmed the psychological revelations of the

receding temples. The hands were large, powerful, and grasping; they

were earthly hands; they were hands that could take and could hold, and

their materialism was curiously opposed to the ideality of the eyes--an

ideality that touched the confines of frenzy. The shoulders were square

and carried well back, the head was round, with close-cut hair, the

straight-falling coat was buttoned high, and the fashionable collar,

with a black satin cravat, beautifully tied and relieved with a rich

pearl pin, set another unexpected but singularly charmful detail to an

aggregate of apparently irreconcilable characteristics.

"And how do you do, my dear Mr Hare? and who would have expected to see

you here? I am so glad to see you."

These words were spoken frankly and cordially, and there was a note of

mundane cheerfulness in the voice which did not quite correspond with

the sacerdotal elegance of this young man. Then he added quickly, as if

to save himself from asking the reason of this very unexpected visit--

"But you have never been here before; this is the first time you have

seen our college. And seeing it as it now is, you would not believe all

the delightful detail that a ray of sunlight awakens in that hideous

brown monotony, soaked with rain and bedimmed with mist."

"Yes, I can quite understand that the college is not looking its best on

a day like this. We have had very wet weather lately."

"No doubt, and I am afraid these late rains have interfered with the

harvest. The accounts from the North are very alarming, but in Sussex, I

suppose, everything was over at least two months ago. Still even there

the farmers have been losing money for some time back. I have had to

make some very heavy reductions. Pearson declared he could not possibly

continue at the present rent with corn as low as eight pounds a load.

This is very serious, but it is very difficult to arrive at the truth. I

want to talk to you; but we shall have plenty of time presently; you'll

stay and dine? And I'll show you over the college: you have never been

here before, and now I come to reckon it up, I find I have not seen you

for nearly five years."

"It must be very nearly that; I missed you the last time you were at

Thornby Place, and that was three years ago."

"Three years! It sounds very shocking, doesn't it? to have a beautiful

place in Sussex and not to live there: to prefer an ugly red-brick

college--Birmingham Tudor; my mother invented the expression. When she

is in a passion she hits on the very happiest concurrence of words; and

I must say she is right,--the architecture here is appallingly ugly;

and I don't think anything could be done to improve it, do you?"

"I can't say that I can suggest anything for the moment, but I thought

it was for the sake of the architecture, which I frankly confess I don't

in the least admire, that you lived here."

"You thought it was for the sake of the architecture...."

"Then why do you not come home and spend Christmas with your mother!"

"Christmas! Well, I suppose I ought to. But it will be hard to bear with

the plain Protestantism, the smug materialism of Sussex at such a

season; and when one thinks what the day is commemorative of--"

"You surely do not mean that you would prefer to see the people

starving? If your dislike of Protestantism rests only on roast beef and

plum pudding...."

"No, you don't understand. But I beg your pardon--I had really

forgotten...."

"Never mind," said Mr Hare smiling; "continue: we were talking of roast

beef and plum pudding--"

"Well, roast beef and plum pudding, say what you like, is a very

complete figuration of the Protestant ideal. Now let us think of

Sussex.... The villas with their gables, and railings, and laurels, the

snug farm-houses, the market-gardening, but especially the villas, so

representative of a sleepy smug materialism.... Oh, it is horrible; I

cannot think of Sussex without a revulsion of feeling. Sussex is utterly

opposed to the monastic spirit. Why, even the downs are easy, yes, easy

as one of the upholsterer's armchairs of the villa residences. And the

aspect of the county tallies exactly with the state of soul of its

people. In that southern county all is soft and lascivious; there is no

wildness, none of that scenical grandeur which we find in Scotland and

Ireland, and which is emblematic of the yearning of man's soul for

something higher than this mean and temporal life."

There was rapture in John's eyes. With a quick movement of his hands he

seemed to spurn the entire materialism of Sussex. After a pause, he

continued:

"There is no asceticism in Sussex, there is no yearning for anything

higher or better. You--yes, you and the whole place are, in every sense

of the word, Conservative--that is to say, brutally satisfied with the

present ordering of things."

"Now, now, my dear John, by your own account Pearson is not by any means

so satisfied with the present condition of things as you yourself would

wish him to be."

John laughed loudly, and it was clear that the paradox in no way

displeased him.

"But we were speaking," he continued, "not of temporal, but of spiritual

pains and penalties. Now, anyone who did not know me--and none will ever

know me--would think that I had not a care in the world. Well, I have

suffered as horribly, I have been tortured as cruelly, as ever poor

mortal was.... I have lain on the floor of my room, my heart dead

within me, and moaned and shrieked with horror."

"Horror of what?"

"Horror of death and a worse horror of life. Few amongst men ever

realise the truth of things, but there are rare occasions, moments of

supernatural understanding or suffering (which are two words for one and

the same thing), when we see life in all its worm-like meanness, and

death in its plain, stupid loathsomeness. Two days out of this year live

like fire in my mind. I went to my uncle Richard's funeral. There was

cold meat and sherry on the table; a dreadful servant asked me if I

would go up to the corpse-room. (Mark the expression.) I went. It lay

swollen and featureless, and two busy hags lifted it up and packed it

tight with wisps of hay, and mechanically uttered shrieks and moans.

"But, though the funeral was painfully obscene, it was not so obscene as

the view of life I was treated to last week....

"Last week I was in London; I went to a place they call the 'Colonies.'

Till then I had never realised the foulness of the human animal, but

there even his foulness was overshadowed by his stupidity. The masses,

yes, I saw the masses, and I fed with them in their huge intellectual

stye. The air was filled with lines of the most inconceivable flags,

lines upon lines of pale yellow, and there were glass cases filled with

pickle bottles, and there were piles of ropes and a machine in motion,

and in nooks there were some dreadful lay figures, and written

underneath them, 'Indian corn-seller,' 'Indian fish-seller.' And there

was the Prince of Wales on horseback, three times larger than life; and

there were stuffed deer upon a rock, and a Polar bear, and the Marquis

of Lome underneath. In another room there were Indian houses, things in

carved wood, and over each large placards announcing the popular dinner,

the _buffet_, the _table d'hôte_, at half-a-crown; and there were oceans

of tea, and thousands of rolls of butter, and in the gardens the band

played 'Thine alone' and 'Mine again.'

"It seemed as if all the back-kitchens and staircases in England had

that day been emptied out--life-tattered housewives, girls grown stout

on porter, pretty-faced babies, heavy-handed fathers, whistling boys in

their sloppy clothes, and attitudes curiously evidencing an odious

domesticity....

"In the Greek and Roman life there was an ideal, and there was a great

ideal in the monastic life of the Middle Ages; but an ideal is wholly

wanting in nineteenth century life. I am not of these later days. I am

striving to come to terms with life."

"And you think you can do that best by folding vestments and reviling

humanity. I do not see how you reconcile these opinions with the

teaching of Christ--with the life of Christ."

"Oh, of course, if you are going to use those arguments against me, I

have done; I can say no more."

Mr Hare did not answer, and at the end of a long silence John said:

"But, what do you say, supposing I show you over the college now, and

when that's done you will come up to my room and we'll have a smoke

before dinner?"

Mr Hare raised no objection, and the two men descended the staircase

into the long stony corridor. The quadrangle filled the diamond panes

of the latticed windows with green, and the divine walking to and fro

was a spot of black. There were pictures along the walls of the

corridor--pictures of upturned faces and clasped hands--and these drew

words of commiseration for the artistic ignorance of the College

authorities from John's lips.

"And they actually believe that that dreadful monk with the skull is a

real Ribera.... The chapel is on the right, the refectory on the left.

Come, let us see the chapel; I am anxious to hear what you think of my

window."

"It ought to be very handsome; it cost five hundred, did it not?"

"No, not quite so much as that," John answered abruptly; and then,

passing through the communion rails, they stood under the multi-coloured

glory of three bishops. Mr Hare felt that a good deal of rapture was

expected of him; but in his efforts to praise, he felt he was exposing

his ignorance. John called attention to the transparency of the

green-watered skies; and turning their backs on the bishops, the blue

ceiling with the gold stars was declared, all things considered, to be

in excellent taste. The benches in the body of the church were for boys;

the carved chairs set along both walls between the communion rails and

the first steps of the altar were for the divines. The president and

vice-president knelt facing each other. The priests, deacons, and

sub-deacons followed according to their rank. There were slenderer

benches, and these were for the choir; and from a music-book placed on

wings of the great golden eagle, the leader conducted the singing.

The side altar, with the rich Turkey carpet spread over the steps, was

St George's, and further on, in an addition made lately, there were two

more altars, dedicated respectively to the Virgin and St Joseph.

"The maid-servants kneel in that corner. I have often suggested

that they should be moved out of sight. You do not understand me.

Protestantism has always been more reconciled to the presence of women

in sacred places than we. We would wish them beyond the precincts. And

it is easy to imagine how the unspeakable feminality of those

maid-servants jars a beautiful impression--the altar towering white with

wax candles, the benedictive odour of incense, the richness of the

vestments, treble voices of boys floating, and the sweetness of a long

day spent about the sanctuary with flowers and chalices in my hands,

fade in a sense of sullen disgust, in a revulsion of feeling which I

will not attempt to justify."

Then his thoughts, straying back to sudden recollections of monastic

usages and habits, he said:

"I should like to scourge them out of this place." And then, half

playfully, half seriously, and wholly conscious of the grotesqueness,

he added:

"Yes, I am not at all sure that a good whipping would not do them good.

They should be well whipped. I believe that there is much to be said in

favour of whipping."

Mr Hare did not answer. He listened like one in a dark and unknown

place. But, as if unconscious of the embarrassment he was creating, John

told of the number of masses that were said daily, and of the eagerness

shown by the boys to obtain an altar. Altar service was rewarded by a

large piece of toast for breakfast. Handsome lads of sixteen were chosen

for acolytes, the torch-bearers were selected from the smallest boys,

the office of censer was filled by John Norton, and he was also the

chief sacristan, and had charge of the altar plate and linen and the

vestments. He spoke of the organ, and he depreciated the present

instrument, and enlarged upon some technical details anent the latest

modern improvements in keys and stops.

They went up to the organ loft. John would play his setting of St

Ambrose's hymn, "Veni redemptor gentium," if Mr Hare would go to the

bellows, and feeling as if he were being turned into ridicule, Mr Hare

took his place at the handle; and he found it even more embarrassing

to give an opinion on the religiosity of the music, than on the

archaeological colouration of the bishops in the window. But John did

not court any very detailed criticism on his hymn, and alluding to the

fact that even in the fourth century accent was beginning to replace

quantity, he led the way to the sacristy.

And it was impossible to avoid noticing that the opening of the carved

oaken presses, smelling sweet and benignly of orris root and lavender,

acted on John almost as a physical pleasure, and also that his hands

seemed nervous with delight as he unfolded the jewelled embroideries,

and smoothed out the fine linen of the under vestments; and his voice,

too, seemed to gain a sharp tenderness and emotive force, as he told how

these were the gold vestments worn by the bishop, and only on certain

great feast-days, and that these were the white vestments worn on days

especially commemorative of the Virgin. The consideration of the

censers, candlesticks, chalices, and albs took some time, and John was a

little aggressive in his explanation of Catholic ceremonial, and its

grace and comeliness compared with the stiffness and materialism of the

Protestant service.

From the sacristy they went to the boys' library. John pointed out the

excellent supply of light literature that the bookcases contained.

"We take travels, history, fairy-tales--romances of all kinds, so long

as sensual passion is not touched upon at any length. Of course we

don't object to a book in which just towards the end the young man falls

in love and proposes; but there must not be much of that sort of thing.

Here are Robert Louis Stevenson's works, 'Treasure Island,' 'Kidnapped,'

&c., charming writer--a neat pretty style, with a pleasant souvenir of

Edgar Poe running through it all. You have no idea how the boys enjoy

his books."

"And don't you?"

"Oh no; I have just glanced at him: for my own reading, I can admit none

who does not write in the first instance for scholars, and then to the

scholarly instincts in readers generally. Here is Walter Pater. We have

his Renaissance; studies in art and poetry--I gave it myself to the

library. We were so sorry we could not include that most beautiful book,

'Marius the Epicurean.' We have some young men here of twenty and three

and twenty, and it would be delightful to see them reading it, so

exquisite is its hopeful idealism; but we were obliged to bar it on

account of the story of Psyche, sweetly though it be told, and sweetly

though it be removed from any taint of realistic suggestion. Do you know

the book?"

"I can't say I do."

"Then read it at once. It is a breath of delicious fragrance blown back

to us from the antique world; nothing is lost or faded, the bloom of

that glad bright world is upon every page; the wide temples, the lustral

water--the youths apportioned out for divine service, and already happy

with a sense of dedication, the altars gay with garlands of wool and the

more sumptuous sort of flowers, the colour of the open air, with the

scent of the beanfields, mingling with the cloud of incense."

"But I thought you denied any value to the external world, that the

spirit alone was worth considering."

"The antique world knew how to idealise, and if they delighted in the

outward form, they did not leave it gross and vile as we do when we

touch it; they raised it, they invested it with a sense of aloofness

that we know not of. Flesh or spirit, idealise one or both, and I will

accept them. But you do not know the book. You must read it. Never did I

read with such rapture of being, of growing to spiritual birth. It

seemed to me that for the first time I was made known to myself; for the

first time the false veil of my grosser nature was withdrawn, and I

looked into the true ethereal eyes, pale as wan water and sunset skies,

of my higher self. Marius was to me an awakening; the rapture of

knowledge came upon me that even our temporal life might be beautiful;

that, in a word, it was possible to somehow come to terms with life....

You must read it. For instance, can anyone conceive anything more

perfectly beautiful than the death of Flavian, and all that youthful

companionship, and Marius' admiration for his friend's poetry?... that

delightful language of the third century--a new Latin, a season of

dependency, an Indian summer full of strange and varied cadences, so

different from the monotonous sing-song of the Augustan age; the school

of which Fronto was the head. Indeed, it was Pater's book that first

suggested to me the idea of the book I am writing. But perhaps you do

not know I am writing a book.... Did my mother tell you anything about

it?"

"Yes; she told me you were writing the history of Christian Latin."

"Yes; that is to say, of the language that was the literary, the

scientific, and the theological language of Europe for more than a

thousand years."

And talking of his book rapidly, and with much boyish enthusiasm, John

opened the doors of the refectory. The long, oaken tables, the great

fireplace, and the stained glass seemed to delight him, and he alluded

to the art classes of monastic life. The class-rooms were peeped into,

the playground was viewed through the lattice windows, and they went to

John's room, up a staircase curiously carpeted with lead.

John's rooms! a wide, bright space of green painted wood and straw

matting. The walls were panelled from floor to ceiling. In the centre of

the floor there was an oak table--a table made of sharp slabs of oak

laid upon a frame that was evidently of ancient design, probably early

German, a great, gold screen sheltered a high canonical chair with

elaborate carvings, and on a reading-stand close by lay the manuscript

of a Latin poem.

"And what is this?" said Mr Hare.

"Oh! that is a poem by Milo, his 'De Sobricate.' I heard that the

manuscript was still preserved in the convent of Saint Amand, near

Tournai, and I sent and had a copy made for me. That was the simplest

way. You have no idea how difficult it is to buy the works of any Latin

authors except those of the Augustan age. Milo was a monk, and he lived

in the eighth century. He was a man of very considerable attainments,

if he were not a very great poet. He was a contemporary of Floras, who,

by the way, was a real poet. Some of his verses are delightful, full of

delicate cadence and colour. The MS. under your hand is a poem by him--

"'Montes et colles, silvaeque et flumina, fontes,

Praeruptaeque rupes, pariter vallesque profondae

Francorum lugete genus: quod munere christi,

Imperio celsum jacet ecce in pulvere mersum.'

"That was written in the eighth century when the language was becoming

terribly corrupt; when it was hideous with popular idiom barbarously and

recklessly employed. But even in that time of autumnal decay and pallid

bloom, a real poet such as Walahfrid Strabat could weave a garland of

grace and beauty; one, indeed, that lived through the chance of

centuries in the minds of men. It found numberless imitators and favour

even with the Humanists, and it was reprinted eight times in the

seventeenth century. This poem is of especial interest to me on account

of the illustration it affords of a theory of my own concerning the

unconsciousness of the true artist. For breaking away from the literary

habitudes of his time, which were to do the gospels or the life of

a favourite saint into hexameters, he wrote a poem, 'Hortulus,'

descriptive of the garden of the monastery. The garden was all the world

to the monks; it furnished them at once with the pleasures and the

necessaries of their lives. Walahfrid felt this; he described his

feelings, and he produced a chef d'oeuvre." Going over to the bookcase,

John took down a volume. He read:--

"'Hoc nemus umbriferum pingit viridissima Rutae

Silvula coeruleae, foliis quae praedita parvis,

Umbellas jaculata brevis, spiramina venti

Et radios Phoebi caules transmittit ad imos,

Attactuque graves leni dispergit odores,

Haec cum multiplici vigeat virtute medelae,

Dicitur occultis apprime obstare venenis,

Toxicaque invasis incommoda pellere fibris.'

"Now, can anything be more charming? True it is that pingit in the first

line does not seem to construe satisfactorily, and I am not certain that

the poet may not have written _fingit_. Fingit would not be pure Latin,

but that is beside the question."

"Indeed it is. I must say I prefer the Georgics. I have known many

strange tastes, but your fancy for bad Latin is the strangest of all."

"Classical Latin, with the exception of Tacitus, is cold-blooded and

self-satisfied. There is no agitation, no fever; to me it is utterly

without interest."

To the books and manuscripts the pictures on the walls afforded an

abrupt contrast. No. 1. "A Japanese Girl," by Monet. A poppy in the pale

green walls; a wonderful macaw! Why does it not speak in strange

dialect? It trails lengths of red silk. Such red! The pigment is twirled

and heaped with quaint device, until it seems to be beautiful embroidery

rather than painting; and the straw-coloured hair, and the blond light

on the face, and the unimaginable coquetting of that fan....

No. 2. "The Drop Curtain," by Degas. The drop curtain is fast

descending; only a yard of space remains. What a yardful of curious

comment, what satirical note on the preposterousness of human

existence! what life there is in every line; and the painter has made

meaning with every blot of colour! Look at the two principal dancers!

They are down on their knees, arms raised, bosoms advanced, skirts

extended, a hundred coryphées are clustered about them. Leaning hands,

uplifted necks, painted eyes, scarlet mouths, a piece of thigh, arched

insteps, and all is blurred; vanity, animalism, indecency, absurdity,

and all to be whelmed into oblivion in a moment. Wonderful life;

wonderful Degas!

No. 3. "A Suburb," by Monet. Snow! the world is white. The furry fluff

has ceased to fall, and the sky is darkling and the night advances,

dragging the horizon up with it like a heavy, deadly curtain. But the

roof of the villa is white, and the green of the laurels shaken free of

the snow shines through the railings, and the shadows that lie across

the road leading to town are blue--yes, as blue as the slates under the

immaculate snow.

No. 4. "The Cliff's Edge," by Monet. Blue? purple the sea is; no, it is

violet; 'tis striped with violet and flooded with purple; there are

living greens, it is full of fading blues. The dazzling sky deepens as

it rises to breathless azure, and the soul pines for and is fain of God.

White sails show aloft; a line of dissolving horizon; a fragment of

overhanging cliff wild with coarse grass and bright with poppies, and

musical with the lapsing of the summer waves.

There were in all six pictures--a tall glass filled with pale roses, by

Renoir; a girl tying up her garter, by Monet.

Through the bedroom door Mr Hare saw a narrow iron bed, an iron

washhand-stand, and a prie-dieu. A curious three-cornered wardrobe stood

in one corner, and facing it, in front of the prie-dieu, a life-size

Christ hung with outstretched arms. The parson looked round for a seat,

but the chairs were like cottage stools on high legs, and the angular

backs looked terribly knife-like.

"Sit in the arm-chair. Shall I get you a pillow from the next room?

Personally I cannot bear upholstery; I cannot conceive anything more

hideous than a padded arm-chair. All design is lost in that infamous

stuffing. Stuffing is a vicious excuse for the absence of design. If

upholstery was forbidden by law to-morrow, in ten years we should have

a school of design. Then the necessity of composition would be

imperative."

"I daresay there is a good deal in what you say; but tell me, don't you

find these chairs very uncomfortable. Don't you think that you would

find a good comfortable arm-chair very useful for reading purposes?"

"No, I should feel far more uncomfortable on a cushion than I do on this

bit of hard oak. Our ancestors had an innate sense of form that we have

not. Look at these chairs, nothing can be plainer; a cottage stool is

hardly more simple, and yet they are not offensive to the eye. I had

them made from a picture by Albert Durer. But tell me, what will you

take to drink? Will you have a glass of champagne, or a brandy and

soda, or what do you say to an absinthe?"

"'Pon my word, you seem to look after yourself. You don't forget the

inner man."

"I always keep a good supply of liquor; have a cigar?" And John passed

to him a box of fragrant and richly coloured Havanas.... Mr Hare took a

cigar, and glanced at the table on which John was mixing the drinks. It

was a slip of marble, rested, café fashion, on iron supports.

"But that table is modern, surely?--quite modern!"

"Quite; it is a café table, but it does not offend my eye. You surely

would not have me collect a lot of old-fashioned furniture and pile it

up in my rooms, Turkey carpets and Japaneseries of all sorts; a room

such as Sir Fred. Leighton would declare was intended to be merely

beautiful."

Striving vainly to understand, Mr Hare drank his brandy and soda in

silence. Presently he walked over to the bookcases. There were two: one

was filled with learned-looking volumes bearing the names of Latin

authors; and the parson, who prided himself on his Latinity, was

surprised, and a little nettled, to find so much ignorance proved upon

him. With Tertullian, St Jerome, and St Augustine he was of course

acquainted, but of Lactantius, Prudentius, Sedulius, St Fortunatus, Duns

Scotus, Hibernicus exul, Angilbert, Milo, &c., he was obliged to admit

he knew nothing--even the names were unknown to him.

In the bookcase on the opposite side of the room there were complete

editions of Landor and Swift, then came two large volumes on Leonardo da

Vinci. Raising his eyes, the parson read through the titles of Mr

Browning's work. Tennyson was in a cheap seven-and-six edition; then

came Swinburne, Pater, Rossetti, Morris, two novels by Rhoda Broughton,

Dickens, Thackeray, Fielding, and Smollett; the complete works of

Balzac, Gautier's Emaux et Camées, Salammbo, L'Assommoir; add to this

Carlyle, Byron, Shelley, Keats, &c.

At the end of a long silence, Mr Hare said, glancing once again at the

Latin authors, and walking towards the fire:

"Tell me, John, are those the books you are writing about? Supposing you

explain to me in a few words the line you are taking. Your mother tells

me that you intend to call your book the History of Christian Latin."

"Yes, I had thought of using that title, but I am afraid it is a little

too ambitious. To write the history of a literature extending over at

least eight centuries would entail an appalling amount of reading; and

besides only a few, say a couple of dozen writers out of some hundreds,

are of the slightest literary interest, and very few indeed of any real

aesthetic value. I have been hard at work lately, and I think I know

enough of the literature of the Middle Ages to enable me to make a

selection that will comprise everything of interest to ordinary

scholarship, and enough to form a sound basis to rest my own literary

theories upon. I begin by stating that there existed in the Middle Ages

a universal language such as Goethe predicted the future would again

bring to us....

"Before the formation of the limbs, that is to say before the German and

Roman languages were developed up to the point of literary usage, the

Latin language was the language of all nations of the western world.

But the day came, in some countries a little earlier, in some a little

later, when it was replaced by the national idioms. The different

literatures of the West had therefore been preceded by a Latin

literature that had for a long time held out a supporting hand to each.

The language of this literature was not a dead language, It was the

language of government, of science, of religion; and a little

dislocated, a little barbarised, it had penetrated to the minds of the

people, and found expression in drinking songs and street ditties.

"Such is the theme of my book; and it seems to me that a language that

has played so important a part in the world's history is well worthy of

serious study.

"I show how Christianity, coming as it did with a new philosophy, and a

new motive for life, invigorated and saved the Latin language in a time

of decline and decrepitude. For centuries it had given expression, even

to satiety, to a naive joy in the present; on this theme, all that

could be said had been said, all that could be sung had been sung,

and the Rhetoricians were at work with alliteration and refrain when

Christianity came, and impetuously forced the language to speak the

desire of the soul. In a word, I want to trace the effect that such a

radical alteration in the music, if I may so speak, had upon the

instrument--the Latin language."

"And with whom do you begin?"

"With Tertullian, of course."

"And what do you think of him?"

"Tertullian, one of the most fascinating characters of ancient or modern

times. In my study of his writings I have worked out a psychological

study of the man himself as revealed through them. His realism, I might

say materialism, is entirely foreign to my own nature, but I cannot

help being attracted by that wild African spirit, so full of savage

contradictions, so full of energy that it never knew repose: in him you

find all the imperialism of ancient times. When you consider that he

lived in a time when the church was struggling for utterance amid the

horrors of persecution, his mad Christianity becomes singularly

attractive; a passionate fear of beauty for reason of its temptations, a

fear that turned to hatred, and forced him at last into the belief that

Christ was an ugly man."

"I know nothing of the monks of the eighth century and their poetry,

but I do know something of Tertullian, and you mean to tell me that

you admire his style--those harsh chopped-up phrases and strained

antitheses."

"I should think I did. Phrases set boldly one against the other; quaint,

curious, and full of colour, the reader supplies with delight the

connecting link, though the passion and the force of the description

lives and reels along. Listen:

"'Quae tunc spectaculi latitudo! quid admirer? quid rideam? ubi gaudeam?

ubi exultem, spectans tot ac tantos reges, qui in coelum recepti

nuntiabantur, cum ipso Jove et ipsis suis testibus in imis tenebris

congemiscentes!--Tunc magis tragoedi audiendi, magis scilicet vocales in

sua propria calamitate; tunc histriones cognoscendi, solutiores multo

per ignem; tunc spectandus auriga, in flammea rota totus rubens, &c.'

"Show me a passage in Livy equal to that for sheer force and glittering

colour. The phrases are not all dove-tailed one into the other and

smoothed away; they stand out."

"Indeed they do. And whom do you speak of next?"

"I pass on to St Cyprian and Lactantius; to the latter I attribute the

beautiful poem of the Phoenix."

"What! Claudian's poem?"

"No, but one infinitely superior. After Lactantius comes St Ambrose, St

Jerome, and St Augustine. The second does not interest me, and my notice

of him is brief; but I make special studies of the first and last. It

was St Ambrose who introduced singing into the Catholic service. He took

the idea from the Arians. He saw the effect it had upon the vulgar mind,

and he resolved to combat the heresy with its own weapons. He composed a

vast number of hymns. Only four have come down to us, and they are as

perfect in form as in matter. You will scarcely find anywhere a false

quantity or a hiatus. The Ambrosian hymns remained the type of all the

hymnic poetry of succeeding centuries. Even Prudentius, great poet as he

was, was manifestly influenced in the choice of metre and the

composition of the strophe by the Deus Creator omnium....

"St Ambrose did more than any other writer of his time to establish

certain latent tendencies as characteristics of the Catholic spirit.

His pleading in favour of ascetic life and of virginity, that entirely

Christian virtue, was very influential. He lauds the virgin above the

wife, and, indeed, he goes so far as to tell parents that they can

obtain pardon of their sins by offering their daughters to God. His

teaching in this respect was productive of very serious rebellion

against what some are pleased to term the laws of Nature. But St Ambrose

did not hesitate to uphold the repugnance of girls to marriage as not

only lawful but praiseworthy."

"I am afraid you let your thoughts dwell very much on such subjects."

"Really, do you think I do?" John's eyes brightened for a moment, and he

lapsed into what seemed an examination of conscience. Then he said,

somewhat abruptly, "St Jerome I speak of, or rather I allude to him, and

pass on at once to the study of St Augustine--the great prose writer, as

Prudentius was the great poet, of the Middle Ages.

"Now, talking of style, I will admit that the eternal apostrophising of

God and the incessant quoting from the New Testament is tiresome to the

last degree, and seriously prejudices the value of the 'Confessions' as

considered from the artistic standpoint. But when he bemoans the loss of

the friend of his youth, when he tells of his resolution to embrace an

ascetic life, he is nervously animated, and is as psychologically

dramatic as Balzac."

"I have taken great pains with my study of St Augustine, because in him

the special genius of Christianity for the first time found a voice. All

that had gone before was a scanty flowerage--he was the perfect fruit. I

am speaking from a purely artistic standpoint: all that could be done

for the life of the senses had been done, but heretofore the life of the

soul had been lived in silence--none had come to speak of its suffering,

its uses, its tribulation. In the time of Horace it was enough to sit in

Lalage's bower and weave roses; of the communion of souls none had ever

thought. Let us speak of the soul! This is the great dividing line

between the pagan and Christian world, and St Augustine is the great

landmark. In literature he discovered that man had a soul, and that man

had grown interested in its story, had grown tired of the exquisite

externality of the nymph-haunted forest and the waves where the Triton

blows his plaintive blast.

"The whole theory and practice of modern literature is found in the

'Confessions of St Augustine;' and from hence flows the great current of

psychological analysis which, with the development of the modern novel,

grows daily greater in volume and more penetrating in essence.... Is not

the fretful desire of the Balzac novel to tell of the soul's anguish an

obvious development of the 'Confessions'?"

"In like manner I trace the origin of the ballad, most particularly the

English ballad, to Prudentius, a contemporary of Claudian."

"You don't mean to say that you trace back our north-country ballads

to, what do you call him?"

"Prudentius. I show that there is much in his hymns that recalls the

English ballads."

"In his hymns?"

"Yes; in the poems that come under such denomination. I confess it is

not a little puzzling to find a narrative poem of some five hundred

lines or more included under the heading of hymns; it would seem that

nearly all lyric poetry of an essentially Christian character was so

designated, to separate it from secular or pagan poetry. In Prudentius'

first published work, 'Liber Cathemerinon,' we find hymns composed

absolutely after the manner of St Ambrose, in the same or in similar

metres, but with this difference, the hymns of Prudentius are three,

four, and sometimes seven times longer than those of St Ambrose. The

Spanish poet did not consider, or he lost sight of, the practical usages

of poetry. He sang more from an artistic than a religious impulse. That

he delighted in the song for the song's own sake is manifest; and this

is shown in the variety of his treatment, and the delicate sense of

music which determined his choice of metre. His descriptive writing is

full of picturesque expression. The fifth hymn, 'Ad Incensum Lucernae,'

is glorious with passionate colour and felicitous cadence, be he

describing with precious solicitude for Christian archaeology the

different means of artistic lighting, flambeaux, candles, lamps, or

dreaming with all the rapture of a southern dream of the balmy garden

of Paradise.

"But his best book to my thinking is by far, 'Peristephanon,' that is

to say, the hymns celebrating the glory of the martyrs.

"I was saying just now that the hymns of Prudentius, by the dramatic

rapidity of the narrative, by the composition of the strophe, and by

their wit, remind me very forcibly of our English ballads. Let us take

the story of St Laurence, written in iambics, in verses of four lines

each. In the time of the persecutions of Valerian, the Roman prefect,

devoured by greed, summoned St Laurence, the treasurer of the church,

before him, and on the plea that parents were making away with their

fortunes to the detriment of their children, demanded that the sacred

vessels should be given up to him. 'Upon all coins is found the head of

the Emperor and not that of Christ, therefore obey the order of the

latter, and give to the Emperor what belongs to the Emperor.'

"To this speech, peppered with irony and sarcasm, St Laurence replies

that the church is very rich, even richer than the Emperor, and that he

will have much pleasure in offering its wealth to the prefect, and he

asks for three days to classify the treasures. Transported with joy, the

prefect grants the required delay. Laurence collects the infirm who have

been receiving charity from the church; and in picturesque grouping the

poet shows us the blind, the paralytic, the lame, the lepers, advancing

with trembling and hesitating steps. Those are the treasures, the

golden vases and so forth, that the saint has catalogued and is going to

exhibit to the prefect, who is waiting in the sanctuary. The prefect is

dumb with rage; the saint observes that gold is found in dross; that the

disease of the body is to be less feared than that of the soul; and he

developes this idea with a good deal of wit. The boasters suffer from

dropsy, the miser from cramp in the wrist, the ambitious from febrile

heat, the gossipers, who delight in tale-bearing, from the itch; but

you, he says, addressing the prefect, you who govern Rome,[1] suffer

from the _morbus regius_ (you see the pun). In revenge for thus

slighting his dignity, the prefect condemns St Laurence to be roasted on

a slow fire, adding, 'and deny there, if you will, the existence of my

Vulcan.' Even on the gridiron Laurence does not lose his good humour,

and he gets himself turned as a cook would a chop.

"Now, do you not understand what I mean when I say that the hymns of

Prudentius are an anticipation of the form of the English ballad?... And

in the fifth hymn the story of St Vincent is given with that peculiar

dramatic terseness that you find nowhere except in the English ballad.

But the most beautiful poem of all is certainly the fourteenth and last

hymn. In a hundred and thirty-three hendecasyllabic verses the story of

a young virgin condemned to a house of ill-fame is sung with exquisite

sense of grace and melody. She is exposed naked at the corner of a

street. The crowd piously turns away; only one young man looks upon her

with lust in his heart. He is instantly struck blind by lightning, but

at the request of the virgin his sight is restored to him. Then follows

the account of how she suffered martyrdom by the sword--a martyrdom

which the girl salutes with a transport of joy. The poet describes her

ascending to Heaven, and casting one last look upon this miserable

earth, whose miseries seem without end, and whose joys are of such short

duration.

"Then his great poem 'Psychomachia' is the first example in mediaeval

literature of allegorical poetry, the most Christian of all forms of

art.

"Faith, her shoulders bare, her hair free, advances, eager for the

fight. The 'cult of the ancient gods,' with forehead chapleted after the

fashion of the pagan priests, dares to attack her, and is overthrown.

The legion of martyrs that Faith has called together cry in triumphant

unison.... Modesty (Pudicitia), a young virgin with brilliant arms, is

attacked by 'the most horrible of the Furies' (Sodomita Libido), who,

with a torch burning with pitch and sulphur, seeks to strike her eyes,

but Modesty disarms him and pierces him with her sword. 'Since the

Virgin without stain gave birth to the Man-God, Lust is without rights

in the world.' Patience watches the fight; she is presently attacked

by Anger, first with violent words, and then with darts, which fall

harmlessly from her armour. Accompanied by Job, Patience retires

triumphant. But at that moment, mounted on a wild and unbridled steed,

and covered with a lionskin, Pride (Superbia), her hair built up like a

tower, menaces Humility (Mens humilis). Under the banner of Humility are

ranged Justice, Frugality, Modesty, pale of face, and likewise

Simplicity. Pride mocks at this miserable army, and would crush it under

the feet of her steed. But she falls in a ditch dug by Fraud. Humility

hesitates to take advantage of her victory; but Hope draws her sword,

cuts off the head of the enemy, and flies away on golden wings to

Heaven.

"Then Lust (Luxuria), the new enemy, appears. She comes from the extreme

East, this wild dancer, with odorous hair, provocative glance and

effeminate voice; she stands in a magnificent chariot drawn by four

horses; she scatters violet and rose leaves; they are her weapons; their

insidious perfumes destroy courage and will, and the army, headed by the

virtues, speaks of surrender. But suddenly Sobriety (Sobrietas) lifts

the standard of the Cross towards the sky. Lust falls from her chariot,

and Sobriety fells her with a stone. Then all her saturnalian army is

scattered. Love casts away his quiver. Pomp strips herself of her

garments, and Voluptuousness (Voluptas) fears not to tread upon thorns,

&c. But Avarice disguises herself in the mask of Economy, and succeeds

in deceiving all hearts until she is overthrown finally by Mercy

(Operatica). All sorts of things happen, but eventually the poem winds

up with a prayer to Christ, in which we learn that the soul shall fall

again and again in the battle, and that this shall continue until the

coming of Christ."

"'Tis very curious, very curious indeed. I know nothing of this

literature."

"Very few do."

"And you have, I suppose, translated some of these poems?"

"I give a complete translation of the second hymn, the story of St

Laurence, and I give long extracts from the poem we have been speaking

about, and likewise from 'Hamartigenia,' which, by the way, some

consider as his greatest work. And I show more completely, I think, than

any other commentator, the analogy between it and the 'Divine Comedy,'

and how much Dante owed to it.... Then the 'terza rima' was undoubtedly

borrowed from the fourth hymn of the 'Cathemerinon.'"...

"You said, I think, that Prudentius was a contemporary of Claudian.

Which do you think the greater poet?"

"Prudentius by far. Claudian's Latin was no doubt purer and his verse

was better, that is to say, from the classical standpoint it was more

correct."

"Is there any other standpoint?"

"Of course. There is pagan Latin and Christian Latin: Burns' poems are

beautiful, and they are not written in Southern English; Chaucer's

verse is exquisitely melodious, although it will not scan to modern

pronunciation. In the earliest Christian poetry there is a tendency to

write by accent rather than by quantity, but that does not say that

the hymns have not a quaint Gothic music of their own. This is very

noticeable in Sedulius, a poet of the fifth century. His hymn to Christ

is not only full of assonance, but of all kinds of rhyme and even

double rhymes. We find the same thing in Sedonius, and likewise in

Fortunatus--a gay prelate, the morality of whose life is, I am afraid,

open to doubt...

"He had all the qualities of a great poet, but he wasted his genius

writing love verses to Radegonde. The story is a curious one. Radegonde

was the daughter of the King of Thuringia; she was made prisoner by

Clotaire I., son of Clovis, who forced her to become his wife. On the

murder of her father by her husband, she fled and founded a convent at

Poictiers. There she met Fortunatus, who, it appears, loved her. It is

of course humanly possible that their love was not a guilty one, but it

is certain that the poet wasted the greater part of his life writing

verses to her and her adopted daughter Agnes. In a beautiful poem in

praise of virginity, composed in honour of Agnes, he speaks in a very

disgusting way of the love with which nuns regard our Redeemer, and the

recompence that awaits them in Heaven for their chastity. If it had not

been for the great interest attaching to his verse as an example of the

radical alteration that had been effected in the language, I do not

think I should have spoken of this poet. Up to his time rhyme had

slipped only occasionally into the verse, it had been noticed and had

been allowed to remain by poets too idle to remove it, a strange

something not quite understood, and yet not a wholly unwelcome intruder;

but in St Fortunatus we find for the first time rhyme cognate with the

metre, and used with certainty and brilliancy. In the opening lines of

the hymn, 'Vexilla Regis,' rhyme is used with superb effect....

"But for signs of the approaching dissolution of the language, of its

absorption by the national idiom, we must turn to St Gregory of Tours.

He was a man of defective education, and the _lingua rustica_ of France

as it was spoken by the people makes itself felt throughout his

writings. His use of _iscere_ for _escere_, of the accusative for the

ablative, one of St Gregory's favourite forms of speech, _pro or quod_

for _quoniam_, conformable to old French _porceque_, so common for

_parceque_. And while national idiom was oozing through grammatical

construction, national forms of verse were replacing the classical

metres which, so far as syllables were concerned, had hitherto been

adhered to. As we advance into the sixth and seventh centuries, we find

English monks attempting to reproduce the characteristics of Anglo-Saxon

alliterative verse in Latin; and at the Court of Charlemagne we find an

Irish monk writing Latin verse in a long trochaic line, which is native

in Irish poetry.

"Poets were plentiful at the court of Charlemagne. Now, Angilbert was a

poet of exquisite grace, and surprisingly modern is his music, which is

indeed a wonderful anticipation of the lilt of Edgar Poe. I compare it

to Poe. Just listen:--

"'Surge meo Domno dulces fac, fistula versus:

David amat versus, surge et fac fistula versus.

David amat vates, vatorum est gloria David

Qua propter vates cuncti concurrite in unum

Atque meo David dulces cantate camoenas.

David amat vates, vatorum est gloria David.

Dulcis amor David inspirat corda canentum,

Cordibus in nostris faciat amor ipsius odas:

Vates Homerus amat David, fac, fistula, versus.

David amat vates, vatorum est gloria David.'"

"I should have flogged that monk--'ipsius,' oh, oh!--'vatorum.'... It

really is too terrible."

John laughed, and was about to reply, when the clanging of the college

bell was heard.

"I am afraid that is dinner-time."

"Afraid, I am delighted; you don't suppose that every one can live,

chameleon-like, on air, or worse still, on false quantities. Ha, ha, ha!

And those pictures too. That snow is more violet than white."

When dinner was over, John and Mr Hare walked out on the terrace. The

carriage waited in the wet in front of the great oak portal; the grey,

stormy evening descended on the high roofs, smearing the red out of the

walls and buttresses, and melancholy and tall the red college seemed

amid its dwarf plantation, now filled with night wind and drifting

leaves. Shadow and mist had floated out of the shallows above the crests

of the valley, and the lamps of the farm-houses gleamed into a pale

existence.

"And now tell me what I am to say to your mother. Will you come home for

Christmas?"

"I suppose I must. I suppose it would seem so unkind if I didn't. I

cannot account even to myself for my dislike to the place. I cannot

think of it without a revulsion of feeling that is strangely personal."

"I won't argue that point with you, but I think you ought to come home."

"Why? Why ought I to come to Sussex, and marry my neighbour's daughter?"

"There is no reason that you should marry your neighbour's daughter,

but I take it that you do not propose to pass your life here."

"For the present I am concerned mainly with the problem of how I may

make advances, how I may meet life, as it were, half-way; for if

possible I would not quite lose touch of the world. I would love to live

in its shadow, a spectator whose duty it is to watch and encourage, and

pity the hurrying throng on the stage. The church would approve this

attitude, whereas hate and loathing of humanity are not to be justified.

But I can do nothing to hurry the state of feeling I desire, except of

course to pray. I have passed through some terrible moments of despair

and gloom, but these are now wearing themselves away, and I am feeling

more at rest."

Then, as if from a sudden fear of ridicule, John said, laughing:

"Besides, looking at the question from a purely practical side, it must

be hardly wise for me to return to society for the present. I like

neither fox-hunting, marriage, Robert Louis Stevenson's stories, nor Sir

Frederick Leighton's pictures; I prefer monkish Latin to Virgil, and I

adore Degas, Monet, Manet, and Renoir, and since this is so, and alas, I

am afraid irrevocably so, do you not think that I should do well to keep

outside a world in which I should be the only wrong and vicious being?

Why spoil that charming thing called society by my unlovely presence?

"Selfishness! I know what you are going to say--here is my answer. I

assure you I administer to the best of my ability the fortune God gave

me--I spare myself no trouble. I know the financial position of every

farmer on my estate, the property does not owe fifty pounds;--I keep the

tenants up to the mark; I do not approve of waste and idleness, but when

a little help is wanted I am ready to give it. And then, well, I don't

mind telling you, but it must not go any further. I have made a will

leaving something to all my tenants; I give away a fixed amount in

charity yearly."

"I know, my dear John, I know your life is not a dissolute one; but your

mother is very anxious, remember you are the last. Is there no chance

of your ever marrying?"

"I don't think I could live with a woman; there is something very

degrading, something very gross in such relations. There is a better and

a purer life to lead ... an inner life, coloured and permeated with

feelings and tones that are, oh, how intensely our own, and he who may

have this life, shrinks from any adventitious presence that might jar or

destroy it. To keep oneself unspotted, to feel conscious of no sense of

stain, to know, yes, to hear the heart repeat that this self--hands,

face, mouth and skin--is free from all befouling touch, is all one's

own. I have always been strongly attracted to the colour white, and I

can so well and so acutely understand the legend that tells that the

ermine dies of gentle loathing of its own self, should a stain come upon

its immaculate fur.... I should not say a legend, for that implies that

the story is untrue, and it is not untrue--so beautiful a thought could

not be untrue."

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: Qui Romam regis.]

A Mere Accident · 第 2 / 10 章