NATIONAL AND IMPERIAL ASPECTS
I cannot conclude these imperfect suggestions as to how we may best
carry up the moral training of our children, and especially of our boys,
to a higher level, without touching on the wider and national aspect of
the problems we have been considering. Especially is this necessary in
relation to that attribute which, in common parlance, arrogates to
itself the name that covers the vast sweep of all moral obligation and
calls itself emphatically "morality." "Language," Dr. Martineau has
finely said, "is the great confessional of the human heart"; and it may
be in some instinctive sense that this question of personal purity or
the reverse is the determining force for good or evil to the nation, as
well as to the family, that has given this restricted sense to the words
"morality" and "immorality." Yet we are possessed with an inveterate and
almost irreclaimable tendency to look at the question of purity of life
from a purely individualistic standpoint, and to regard it as a matter
concerning the individual rather than the social organism. In electing a
member for the Legislature how often have we not been told that we are
only concerned with his public career, and have nothing whatever to do
with his private life, though the private life is only another
expression for the man himself; and how can we be called upon to entrust
the destinies of our country to a libertine who habitually violates the
obligations of his own manhood and does his best to lower and degrade
the womanhood of the people he is called as a member of the Legislature
to protect and to raise? When shall we learn that whatever touches the
higher life and well-being of the family still more vitally affects the
wider family of the State, and threatens its disintegration? The family
in some lower form will survive in the most corrupt form of society; but
the State, as an organized polity, capable of embodying, preserving, and
promoting the higher life of the nation, perishes.
I am the more led to dwell earnestly on these wider aspects, since that
great epoch-making commemoration which marked the sixtieth year of the
reign of our Queen, and which brought home to the consciousness of the
nation, as nothing else has ever done, its vast world-wide
responsibilities. That great national festival, with its proud imperial
note, in which we celebrated the rise and progress of that "larger
Venice with no narrow canals, but the sea itself for streets," will
forever form a landmark in English history. None who witnessed it will
ever forget that spectacle, of men of all races and color, of all creeds
and traditions, assembled together as brothers and fellow-subjects, to
do honor to a woman's gracious sway of sixty years. And is there not a
deep significance in the fact that these men of warring creeds and
opposed traditions came together to do homage to no commanding
personality, no Semiramis or Boadicea of old, no Catherine of Russia or
Elizabeth of England; but to a sovereign whose chief characteristic has
been that of being a true woman, with a true woman's instinctive
sagacity and wisdom of the heart: a woman with no glamour of youth and
beauty, but bowed with the weight of years and widowhood and cares of
State; a Queen who, on the morning of her crowning triumph, sent forth
no royal proclamation couched in set and pompous periods, but laid her
trembling hands on the bowed head of her people, and gave them a simple
mother's blessing: "Tell my beloved people that I pray from the bottom
of my heart that God may bless them"?
May I not take it as the very embodiment of all that I have been urging
on the women of this day, the immense possibilities of good that lie
latent in our womanhood, the vast issues of good to the nation, and
through it to the world, if that womanhood is only true to itself?
For let us clearly realize that this great moral question is no question
confined to the narrow limits of the home, but a question of the rise
and fall of nations. This is a truism of history. All history teaches us
that the welfare and very life of a nation is determined by moral
causes; and that it is the pure races that respect their women and guard
them jealously from defilement that are the tough, prolific, ascendant
races, the noblest in type and the most fruitful in propagating
themselves. You will never find a permanently progressive race where the
position of women is low, the men libertine, and the state of society
corrupt. What was it that made the most brilliant civilization the world
has ever seen--the civilization which still gives us the inexhaustible
wells of our intellectual life--what was it that made it the
shortest-lived? Few, I think, would deny that the rapid decadence of
Greece, despite her splendid intellectual life, was due to moral causes.
Not the pure, but the impure--the brilliant Hetairæ--were the companions
of men, and the men themselves were stained with nameless vices.
Speaking of the decay of the Athenian people, Mr. Francis Galton says:
"We know, and may guess something more, of the reason why this
marvellously gifted race declined. Social morality grew exceedingly lax;
marriage became unfashionable and was avoided; many of the more
ambitious and accomplished women were avowed courtesans, and
consequently infertile; and the mothers of the incoming population were
of a heterogeneous class."[38] What was it that made the Egyptian
civilization one of the longest-lived of ancient civilizations? Was it
not, as we now find by her monuments, that the position of women was
high; the wife was enthroned by the side of her husband, and impurity
was condemned by the moral sense of the nation? What was it that enabled
our barbaric ancestors, the Teutons, to overthrow the whole power of
civilized Rome? On the authority of Tacitus, we know that they were
singularly pure. Their women were held in the highest reverence, and
believed to have something divine about them, some breath of prophetic
insight. Their young men were not allowed to marry till they were
five-and-twenty--in other words, till their frame was thoroughly
matured. Impurity before marriage was strongly discountenanced in both
sexes. Therefore the whole power of Rome, honeycombed as it was by moral
corruption and sexual vice, could not stand before these pure
barbarians.
And if these mighty civilizations have perished from moral causes, do we
really think that the moral law--will
"Of which the solid earth and sky
Are but the fitful shadows cast on high"--
suspend its operation out of compliment to the greatness of the British
empire or of the American Republic, if they, too, become morally
corrupt; or will not those old vanished nations, in the magnificent
words of the Hebrew prophet, greet the phantom of their departed
greatness in the land of shadows: "What, art thou, also, become weak as
we? Art thou also like unto us? Thy pomp is brought down to the grave;
the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee."
"We talk of our greatness," says Mr. Froude; "do we really know in
what a nation's greatness consists? Whether it be great or little
depends entirely on what sort of men and women it is producing. A
sound nation is a nation that is made up of sound human beings,
healthy in body, strong of limb, true in word and deed, brave,
sober, temperate, and chaste, to whom morals are of more importance
than wealth or knowledge; where duty is first and the rights of man
are second; where, in short, men grow up, and live, and work,
having in them what our ancestors called 'the fear of God.' It is
to form a character of this kind that human beings are sent into
the world. Unless England's greatness in this sense has the
principle of growth in it, it were better for us that a millstone
were hanged about our neck, and that we were drowned in the midst
of the sea."
"I feel more and more," said Mrs. Fawcett in words addressed to a
great meeting of men in the Manchester Free Trade Hall--words that
I wish could be written upon every heart--" that the great question
whether the relations of men and women shall be pure and virtuous
or impure and vile lies at the root of all national well-being and
progress. The main requisite towards a better state of things than
now exists cannot be brought about by any outside agency. There is
no royal road to virtue and purity. Law can do something to punish
wickedness, but improvement in the law is mainly valuable as an
indication that the public standard of morality is raised. Let us
get good laws if we can; but there is only one way of really
obtaining a nobler national existence, and that is by each of us
individually learning to hate and detest the vile self-indulgence
that covers the life of those who are the victims of it with shame
and degradation. Self-control and respect for the rights of others
are the only cure for the terrible national danger which threatens
us. If men and women would learn never to take pleasure in what
brings pain, shame, misery, and moral death to others, earth would
be turned into a heaven. It would be incredible if it were not true
that for mere selfish indulgence thousands of men are willing to
drag women down to what even these men themselves recognize as the
lowest dregs of humanity. Where is their chivalry? Where is their
common humanity? Some would say that such men do not possess
either. For my part, I do not believe this. Let women thankfully
acknowledge that, so far as other matters are concerned, they are
constantly indebted to the chivalrous self-sacrifice of men.
Chivalry is not dead; generous self-sacrifice is not dead; but in
far too many cases, with regard to the all-important question of
personal purity, they are sleeping. Our efforts must be directed to
awakening them. We must try and make men realize the callous
cruelty of all actions which lower the womanhood of even the
poorest and most degraded of women."
And if we refuse, sunk in our own selfish interests and pleasures, and
content that the daughters of the people should perish as long as our
own are safe, then it will not be by an European coalition that the
British Empire will perish, it will be by moral decay from within; in
Blake's rough, strong words:
"The harlot's curse from street to street
Shall be old England's winding sheet."
The British Empire, the great American Republic, the two greatest
civilizing, order-spreading, Christianizing world-powers ever known, can
only be saved by a solemn league and covenant of their women to bring
back simplicity of life, plain living, high thinking, reverence for
marriage laws, chivalrous respect for all womanhood, and a high standard
of purity for men and women alike.
Suffer me to lay before you three considerations, which will prove to
you at once that this great moral question is more vital to our two
nations than to any other, and that we are peculiarly vulnerable to the
action of moral causes.
Firstly, England, and in one sense England alone, is the mighty mother
of nations. Three great nations have already sprung from her loins; a
fourth in Africa is already in process of consolidation. From the narrow
confines of our sea-girt island our people pour into all quarters of the
globe; and if we suffer England to know corruption we send forth
polluted waters into all lands. Your great Republic, on the other hand,
is a mother of nations in another sense, since she receives into her
mighty bosom vast numbers drawn from the suffering peoples of the old
world, and gives them a mother's welcome. According as your civilization
is high and pure, or low and corrupt, so will those naturalized citizens
be. Decay with great empires, as with fish, sets in at the head; and the
moral decadence of England and America will sensibly lower the moral
standard of nearly one-third of the population of the world.[39] The
heart of the two nations is still sound. It is not too late. We are at
least free from the continental system, by which the degradation of
women is reduced to a systematized slavery, to meet what is openly
called a necessity of nature. The comparative purity of Englishmen and
Americans is still a wonder, and often a derision to foreigners. Our
women are a greater power than in any other country. We still start from
a good vantage-ground.
England, certainly through no merit of her own, has been called by the
providence of God to lead in great moral causes. We led in the matter of
slavery--the open sore of the world. We English and American women are
now called to lead, in this its hidden sore, for the healing of the
nations.
Secondly, since you have elected to go beyond your own confines and have
dependencies, and so take up the white man's burden of civilizing and
Christianizing the world, your men as well as ours will be exposed to
that dangerously lowering influence, contact with lower races and alien
civilizations. An Englishman in India, if he be not a religious man, is
apt to blind himself to wrongs done to womanhood, because those wrongs
are often done to a pariah caste who are already set apart for infamy;
though I have not yet heard of an Englishman possessing himself of
slaves on the ground that they were slaves already to their native
masters. Worse still, in savage or semi-civilized countries the native
girl, far from feeling herself degraded, considers that she is raised by
any union, however illicit, with a white man. It is the native men who
are furious. Which of us in England did not feel an ache of shame in our
hearts over the plea of the Matabele to the white man: "You have taken
our lands, and our hunting-grounds are gone. You have taken our herds,
and we want for food. You have taken our young men, and made them slaves
in your mines. You have taken our women _and done what you like with
them_." How many of our native wars may not have had as their cause that
last sentence in the plaint of the Matabele, a cause carefully concealed
from the public eye? For God's sake, let mothers teach their sons that
first rudiment in manly character, the recognition that the girls of a
conquered race, or of a barbarian tribe inhabiting one of our spheres of
influence, from the very fact that they are a conquered race, or, if not
conquered, hopelessly and piteously in our power, are _ipso facto_ a
most sacred trust to us, which it is both unmanly and bestial to
violate. Especially I would plead with mothers to send us pure men for
our army--officers who will set their men a high example of chivalry
towards the weakest native woman, and who will so influence them by
example and personal influence that they may look upon voluntarily
disabling themselves from active service, while still taking the
government pay, as unmanly and unsoldierly. Give us men who can say with
a non-commissioned officer writing home to one of our White Cross
secretaries: "I have been out in India now eleven years and have never
had a day's illness; and I think the whole secret of my good health is
total abstinence from all that intoxicates, and that I honor all women
as I honor my mother or any of my sisters."
Thirdly, the hardest thing on earth is not to slay a sin, but to get it
buried; and the hardest of all sins to get under ground is the sin of
impurity. It is largely due to the low standard of purity among men that
we owe the almost insoluble problem presented by the existence of the
large Eurasian population in India, and of the half-caste generally.
"The universal unanimity of the popular verdict on the half-caste
is remarkable," says Olive Schreiner in some powerful articles
published in _Blackwood_ on the problems presented by our Colonial
Empire. "The half-caste, it is asserted in every country where he
is known, whether it be in America, Asia, or Africa, and whether
his ancestors be English and negroid Spanish and Indian, or Boer
and Hottentot,--the self-caste is by nature anti-social. It is
always asserted that he possesses the vices of both parent races
and the virtues of neither: that he is born especially with a
tendency to be a liar, cowardly, licentious, and without
self-respect."
Olive Schreiner herself is the first to admit that there are exceptions.
She says:
"The fact that amongst the most despised class of our laboring
half-castes we have all met individuals, not only of the highest
integrity, but of rare moral beauty and of heroic and fully
developed social feelings, does not impugn the theory of his
unfortunate position. If you should sow human seed inside the door
of hell, some of it would yet come up white lilies. But as a rule
the popular verdict on the half-caste is not overdrawn."
I strongly agree with Mrs. Schreiner that this lamentable result is not
due solely, or even chiefly, to the admixture of races, but far more to
the circumstances in which he has been born and bred. He has originated
in almost all cases, not from the union of average individuals of the
two races uniting under average conditions, but as the result of a
sexual union between the most helpless and enslaved females of the dark
race and the most recklessly dominant males of the white. "He enters a
world in which there was no place prepared for him." His father was
about as sensible of his parental obligations towards him as a toad
towards its spawn in the next ditch. To him he "was a broken wineglass
from last night's feast." "Often without a family, always without a
nation or race, without education or moral training, and despised by the
society in which he was born," is it any wonder that the half-caste is
the curse of the community in which he is found;--one of those whips, as
Shakespeare reminds us, that "heaven makes out of our pleasant vices" to
"scourge" us into some sense of their seriousness?
If you would not incur that curse, that insoluble problem of the
half-caste, then in both your civil and military services send out men
of clean hearts and lives into your dependencies, Alas! in your great
military camps during your Spanish war a moral laxity was allowed,
which, had it been attempted in the Egyptian campaign, Lord Kitchener
would have stamped out with a divine fury. I had it from an eyewitness,
but the details are wholly unfit for publication.
I do not hold with our "little Englanders" that the possession of an
empire is a disaster; on the contrary, I hold that it constitutes a
splendid school for the formation of strong character,--of men who are
the very salt of the earth,--and that the sense of a great mission to be
fulfilled tends to give a nobility of soul to the whole nation; while
even the wars it may involve prove the vultures of God swooping down on
the hidden social rottennesses which in prolonged peace may breed
unnoticed and unreproved. We have never forgotten the bitter lessons of
the Crimean war which laid bare our miserable incompetence in
organizing, and the moral rottenness of our English firms that could
supply our soldiers with paper-soled boots and bayonets that bent at a
thrust, when the very life of our brave fellows depended on their being
well armed and well shod.
America will never forget the sufferings of her wounded in the Spanish
war, sufferings caused by the like dishonesty in the goods supplied and
the like criminal incompetency which failed to provide them even with
necessaries.
But I do say that an empire presents many difficult problems, and that
the men who accept its responsibilities need a sound head, clean hands,
and above all a pure heart.
Let me in conclusion relate an incident which happened in the wreck of
the _Warren Hastings_, to which I have already alluded,--an incident
which I can never tell without a breaking voice and eyes full of tears.
In that awful night of storm and darkness and iminent shipwreck, the
officer in command, after ordering his men below to lighten the crowded
deck, stationed two of his men at a narrow gangway through which he
feared an ugly rush for life might be made, while the women and children
were being embarked, bidding them on no account to leave their post till
he gave them the word of command. At length the women and the sick had
all been saved in the boats. This done, and not till then, the men had
saved themselves, some by boats, some by life preservers; and last of
all the captain and officer in command were proceeding to leave the fast
foundering ship, when the latter heard a voice close to him, saying,
"Colonel, may we leave now?" It was the voice of one of his two
sentinels. In the stress and strain of the awful scenes of that night he
had for the moment forgotten that he had ordered them not to leave their
post until he gave the word of command. And he said that _the water was
almost up to their lips_!
Oh ye mothers of America and of our great Empire! send us such men as
these,--men who will mount guard over women and children in all lands,
and see, as far as in them lies, that they do not make shipwreck of
what is dearer than life;--men who, even with the bitter waters of
temptation up to their own lips, will still hold their post and see that
no man, to save himself, drives them down into that dread sea of
perdition which never gives up its dead.
Then East, West, North, South, the American flag will witness in the
face of all nations to the true manhood that steers its course by no
earth-born fires of passion and selfish lust, but by the eternal stars,
the heavenly lights of God, and mother, and duty, and home.
East, West, North, South, by its side our flag, twice scored with the
White Cross, will float wide in the face of all nations the Englishman's
faith, reverence for womanhood, self-giving manhood, and the pure heart
that sees God.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 38: _Hereditary Genius_, by Francis Galton, p. 331.]
[Footnote 39: Great Britain, since the conquest of the Soudan, rules
one-fourth of the population of the world.]