DAVY

Where the length of the memoir necessarily bears a small proportion to

the quantity of matter which presses on the biographer’s attention, two

courses lie open to his choice; either to select a few remarkable

passages in his subject’s life for full discussion, or to give a general

and popular sketch of his personal history. The latter plan seems here

the more advisable. To many readers a minute analysis of Davy’s physical

researches would be unintelligible, without full explanations of the

very instruments and objects with, and upon which, he worked. We shall

therefore make it our chief object to trace his private history,

interspersing notices of his labours and discoveries, but leaving to

publications of expressly scientific character the task of doing justice

to his scientific fame. Both departments have been fully treated in the

Life published by Dr. Paris.

Humphry Davy was born near Penzance in Cornwall, December 17, 1778, of a

family in independent, though humble circumstances, which for a century

and a half had possessed and resided upon a small estate situated in

Mount’s Bay. Though no prodigy of precocious intellect, his childhood

gave reasonable promise of future talent; and especially manifested the

dawning of a vivid imagination, united with a strong turn for

experiments in natural philosophy. One of his favourite amusements was

to exhibit to his playfellows the operation of melting in a candle

scraps of tin; or to make and explode detonating balls. Another was the

inventing and repeating to them fairy tales and romances. At times,

however, he would exercise his eloquence upon graver subjects; and, when

no better could be obtained, the future lecturer is said to have found a

staid, if not attentive, audience in a circle of chairs. At an early age

he was placed at school at Penzance, where, in the usual acceptation of

the words, he profited little: his own opinion, however, was different.

“I consider it fortunate,” he wrote to a member of his family, “that I

was left much to myself as a child, and put upon no particular plan of

study, and that I enjoyed much idleness at Mr. Coryton’s school. I

perhaps owe to these circumstances the little talents that I have, and

their peculiar application: what I am, I have made myself. I say this

without vanity, and in pure simplicity of heart.” He was soon removed to

the school at Truro, where he remained two years, undistinguished except

by a love of poetry, which manifested itself in composition at an early

age. This, indeed, continued to be a favourite amusement, until, in

mature life, he became absorbed in scientific pursuits: and it has been

said upon high authority, that if Davy had not been the first chemist,

he would have been the first poet of his age. This opinion must look for

support, not to his metrical productions, which in truth nowise justify

it, but to the vivid imagination and high powers of eloquence, which, in

the vigour and freshness of youth, delighted the fashionable, as much as

his discoveries amazed the scientific world.

In 1794 his father died, and his mother in consequence removed from

Varfell, the patrimonial estate, to Penzance, where Davy was apprenticed

to Mr. Borlase, a surgeon in that town. For the medical part of his new

profession he showed distaste; but his attention was at once turned to

the study of chemistry, which he pursued thenceforward with undeviating

zeal. Akin to this pursuit, and fostered by the natural features of his

native country, was his early taste for geology. “How often,” said Davy

to his friend and biographer on being shown a drawing of Botallack

mine,—“how often when a boy have I wandered about these rocks in search

of new minerals, and when fatigued, sat down upon the turf, and

exercised my fancy in anticipations of scientific renown.” The notoriety

which, in a small town, he readily acquired as the boy who was “so fond

of chemical experiments,” introduced him to a valuable friend, Mr.

Davies Gilbert, in early life his patron, in mature age his successor in

the chair of the Royal Society. By him the young man was introduced to

Dr. Beddoes, who was at that time seeking an assistant in conducting the

Pneumatic Institution, then newly established at Bristol, for the

purpose of investigating the properties of aeriform fluids, and the

possibility of using them as medical agents. It was not intended that,

in forming this engagement, Davy should give up the line of life marked

out for him; on the contrary, his abode at Bristol was considered part

of his professional education. But his genius led him another way, and

this lucky engagement opened a career of usefulness and fame, which

under other circumstances might have been long delayed. The arrangement

was concluded upon liberal terms, and in October, 1798, before he was

twenty years old, he left his home in high spirits to enter upon

independent life. It is to his honour, that as soon as a competent,

though temporary provision was thus secured, he resigned, in favour of

his mother and sisters, all his claims upon the paternal estate.

Soon after removing to Bristol, he published, in a work entitled

‘Contributions to Medical and Physical Knowledge,’ edited by Dr.

Beddoes, some essays on heat, light, and respiration. Of these it will

be sufficient to say, that with much promise of future excellence, they

show a most unbridled imagination, and contain many speculations so

unfounded and absurd, that in after-life he bitterly regretted their

publication. During his engagement, his zeal and intrepidity were

signally displayed in attempts to breathe different gases, supposed, or

known, to be highly destructive to life, with a view to ascertain the

nature of their effects. Two of these experiments, the inhaling of

nitrous gas and carburetted hydrogen are remarkable, because in each he

narrowly escaped death. But his attention was especially turned to the

gas called nitrous oxide, which, upon respiration, appeared to transport

the breather into a new and highly pleasurable state of feeling, to

rouse the imagination, and give new vigour to the most sublime emotions

of the soul. The effects produced, exaggerated by the enthusiasm of the

patients, were in fact closely analogous to intoxication; and many

persons still remember the curiosity and amusement, excited by the

freaks of poets and grave philosophers, while under the operation of

this novel stimulus. In 1800 he published ‘Researches Chemical and

Philosophical, respecting Nitrous Oxide and its Respiration.’ The

novelty of the results announced, combined with the ability shown in

their investigation, and the youth of the author, produced a great

sensation in philosophical circles; and through the celebrity thus

acquired, and the favourable opinion of him formed upon personal

acquaintance by several eminent philosophers of the day, he was offered

by the conductors of the Royal Institution, the office of Assistant

Lecturer in Chemistry, with the understanding that ere long he should be

made sole Professor. This negotiation took place in the spring of 1801,

and on May 31, 1802, he was raised to the higher appointment.

To Davy, the quitting Bristol for London was the epoch of a

transformation—an elevation from the chrysalis to the butterfly state.

In youth his person, voice, and address were alike uncouth; and at first

sight they produced so unfavourable an impression upon Count Rumford,

that he expressed much regret at having sanctioned so unpromising an

engagement. The veteran philosopher soon found reason to change his

opinion. Davy’s first course of lectures, which was not delivered till

the spring of 1802, excited a sensation unequalled before or since. Not

only the philosophical but the literary and fashionable world crowded to

hear him; and his vivid imagination, fired by enthusiastic love for the

science which he professed, gave, to one of the most abstruse of

studies, a charm confessed by persons the least likely to feel its

influence. The strongest possible testimony to his richness of

illustration is supplied by Mr. Coleridge:—“I go,” he said, “to Davy’s

lectures to increase my stock of metaphors.” Had this been all, the

young prodigy would soon have ceased to dazzle; but his fame was

maintained and increased by the success which waited on his

undertakings; and, in a word, Davy became the lion of the day. The

effect of this sudden change was by no means good. Sought and caressed

by the highest circles of the metropolis, he endeavoured to assume the

deportment of a man of fashion; but the strange dress sat awkwardly, and

ill replaced a natural candour and warmth of feeling, which had

singularly won upon the acquaintance of his early life. It is but

justice, however, to add that his regard for his family and early

friends was not cooled by this alteration in his society and prospects.

Our limits are too narrow to admit even a sketch of the various trains

of original investigation pursued by Davy, during his connection with

the Institution. Of these, the most important is that series of

electrical inquiries pursued from 1800 to 1806, the results of which

were developed in his celebrated first Bakerian Lecture, delivered in

the autumn of the latter year, before the Royal Society, which received

from the French Institute the prize of 3000 francs, established by the

First Consul, for the best experiment in electricity or galvanism. In it

he investigated the nature of electric action, and disclosed a new class

of phenomena illustrative of the power of the Voltaic battery in

decomposing bodies; which, in the following year, led to the most

striking of his discoveries, the resolution of the fixed alkalies,

potash and soda, into metallic bases. This discovery took place in

October, 1807, and was published in his second Bakerian Lecture,

delivered in the following November. The novelty and brilliancy of the

view thus opened, raised public curiosity to the highest pitch: the

laboratory of the Institution was crowded with visitors, and the high

excitement thus produced, acting upon a frame exhausted by fatigue,

produced a violent fever, in which for many days, he lay between life

and death. Not until the following March was he able to resume his

duties as a lecturer.

During the next four years he was chiefly employed in endeavouring to

decompose other bodies, in prosecuting his inquiries into the nature of

the alkalies and in obtaining similar metallic bases from the earths, in

which he partially succeeded. The resolution of nitrogen was attempted

without success. In tracing the nature of muriatic and oxymuriatic acid,

he was more fortunate; and proved the latter to be an undecompounded

substance, in direct opposition to his own opinion, recorded at an

earlier period. This discovery is the more honourable, for nothing

renders the admission of truth so difficult, as having advocated error.

On the 8th April, 1812, he received the honour of knighthood from the

Prince Regent, in testimony of his scientific merits. This was the more

welcome, because he was on the eve of exchanging a life of professional

labour for one, not of idleness, for he pursued his course of discovery

with unabated zeal, but of affluence and independence. On the 11th of

the same month, he married Mrs. Apreece, a lady possessed of ample

fortune; previous to which he delivered his farewell lecture to the

Royal Institution. At the same time he appears to have resigned the

office of Secretary to the Royal Society, to which he had been appointed

in 1807. Two months afterwards he published ‘Elements of Chemical

Philosophy,’ which he dedicated to Lady Davy, “as a pledge that he

should continue to pursue science with unabated ardour.” In March, 1813,

appeared the ‘Elements of Agricultural Chemistry,’ containing the

substance of a course of lectures delivered for ten successive seasons

before the Board of Agriculture.

That part of the Continent which was under French influence, being

strictly closed against the English at this time, it is much to the

credit of Napoleon, that he immediately assented to a wish expressed by

Davy, and seconded by the Imperial Institute, that he might be allowed

to visit the extinct volcanoes in Auvergne, and thence proceed to make

observations on Vesuvius while in a state of action. He reached Paris,

Oct. 27th, 1813. The French philosophers received him with enthusiasm:

it is to be regretted that at the time of his departure their feelings

were much less cordial. There was a coldness, and pride, or what seemed

pride, in his manner, which disgusted a body of men too justly sensible

of their own merit to brook slights; especially when, in spite of

national jealousy, they had done most cordial and unhesitating justice

to the transcendent achievements of the British philosopher. Nor was

this the only ground for dissatisfaction. Iodine had been recently

discovered in Paris, but its nature was still unknown. Davy obtained a

portion, and proceeded to experiment upon it. This was thought by many

an unfair interference with the fame and rights of the original

investigators. Davy himself felt that some explanation at least was due,

in a paper which he transmitted to the Royal Society; and as the passage

in question contained what, though perhaps not meant to be such, might

easily be construed into an insinuation, that but for him, the results

communicated in that paper might not have been obtained, it was not

likely to conciliate. There is probably much truth in the excuse offered

by his biographer, for the superciliousness charged against him upon

this, and other occasions, that it was merely the cloak of a perpetual

and painful timidity.

It is remarkable that, with a highly poetical temperament, he seems to

have been senseless to the beauties of art. The wonders of the Louvre

extracted no sign of pleasure: he paced the rooms with hurried steps, in

apathy, roused only by the sight of an Antinous sculptured in alabaster,

“Gracious Heaven!” he then exclaimed, “what a beautiful stalactite.”

From Paris, Dec. 29th, he proceeded without visiting Auvergne, to

Montpellier, Genoa, Florence, Rome, and Naples, which he reached May

8th, 1814. At various places he prosecuted his researches upon iodine;

and at Florence, he availed himself of the great burning lens to

experiment upon the combustion of the diamond, and other forms of

carbon. At Naples and Rome he instituted a minute and laborious inquiry

into the colours used in painting by the ancients; the results of which

appeared in the Philosophical Transactions for 1815.

The autumn of 1815 is rendered memorable by the discovery of the

safety-lamp, one of the most beneficial applications of science to

economical purposes yet made, by which hundreds, perhaps thousands, of

lives have been preserved. Davy was led to the consideration of this

subject by an application from Dr. Gray, now Bishop of Bristol, the

Chairman of a Society established in 1813, at Bishop-Wearmouth, to

consider and promote the means of preventing accidents by fire in

coal-pits. Being then in Scotland, he visited the mines on his return

southward, and was supplied with specimens of fire-damp, which, on

reaching London, he proceeded to examine. He soon discovered that the

carburetted hydrogen gas, called fire-damp by the miners, would not

explode when mixed with less than six, or more than fourteen times its

volume of air; and further, that the explosive mixture could not be

fired in tubes of small diameters and proportionate lengths. Gradually

diminishing their dimensions, he arrived at the conclusion that a tissue

of wire, in which the meshes do not exceed a certain small diameter,

which may be considered as the ultimate limit of a series of such tubes,

is impervious to the inflamed air; and that a lamp covered with such

tissue, may be used with perfect safety even in an explosive mixture,

which takes fire, and burns within the cage, securely cut off from the

power of doing harm. Thus when the atmosphere is so impure that the

flame of the lamp itself cannot be maintained, the _Davy_ still supplies

light to the miner, and turns his worst enemy into an obedient servant.

This invention, the certain source of large profit, he presented with

characteristic liberality to the public. The words are preserved, in

which when pressed to secure to himself the benefit of it by a patent,

he declined to do so, in conformity with the high-minded resolution

which he formed upon acquiring independent wealth, of never making his

scientific eminence subservient to gain:—“I have enough for all my views

and purposes, more wealth might be troublesome, and distract my

attention from those pursuits in which I delight. More wealth could not

increase my fame or happiness. It might undoubtedly enable me to put

four horses to my carriage, but what would it avail me to have it said,

that Sir Humphry drives his carriage and four?” He who used wealth and

distinction to such good purpose, may be forgiven the weakness if he

estimated them at too high a value.

The coal-owners of the north presented to him a service of plate, in

testimony of their gratitude. He underwent, however, considerable

vexation from claims to priority of invention, set up by some persons

connected with the collieries, whose attention had been turned with very

imperfect success to the same end. The controversy has long been settled

in his favour, by the decision of the most eminent names in British

science, and the general voice of the owners of the Newcastle

coal-field: and while the pits are worked, the name of Davy, given by

the colliers to the safety-lamp, cannot be forgotten.

In 1818 he again visited Naples, with a view of applying the resources

of chemistry to facilitate the unrolling of the papyri found in

Herculaneum. These, it is well known, are generally in a state

resembling charcoal, often cemented into a solid mass, and the texture

so entirely destroyed, that it is hardly possible to separate the

layers. Examination of some specimens transmitted to England satisfied

him that they had not been subjected to heat, and that instead of being

a true charcoal, they were analogous to peat or to the lignite called

Bovey coal. He concluded, therefore, that the rolls were cemented into

one mass by a substance produced by fermentation in their vegetable

substance, and hoped to be able so far to destroy this, as to facilitate

the detaching one layer from another, without obliterating the writing.

With this view he submitted fragments to the operation of chlorine and

iodine, with such fair hope of success, that he was encouraged to

proceed to Naples; the Government furnishing him with every

recommendation, and defraying the expenses of such assistants as he

thought it necessary to take out. His success, however, fell short of

his hopes; and partly from disappointment, partly from a belief that

unfair obstacles were thrown in his way by interested persons, he

abandoned the undertaking at the end of two months, having partially

unrolled twenty-three MSS. and examined about one hundred and twenty,

which offered no prospect of success. His visit to Naples led, however,

to one conclusion of interest to geologists, that the strata which cover

Herculaneum are not lava, but a tufa consolidated by moisture, and

resembling that at Pompeii except in its hardness.

In October, 1818, Sir Humphry Davy was created a baronet, as a reward

for his scientific services. Soon after his return to England in 1820,

died Sir Joseph Banks, the venerable President of the Royal Society.

Davy succeeded to the chair, which he retained till forced to quit it by

ill health, zealous in fulfilling its duties, without relaxing in his

private labours. It would have been better had he not obtained this

honour. His scientific pride disgusted some; his aristocratic airs,

unpardonable in one so humbly born, excited the ridicule of others. Much

of this weakness may be traced to the pernicious effects of early

flattery. Had he been content with chemical fame, he would have spared

some mortifications and heart-burnings both to himself and others. His

demeanour changed, immediately after the delivery of his first lecture.

On the following day he dined with his early friend and patron, Sir

Henry Englefield, who, speaking of his behaviour on that day after

eighteen years had elapsed, said, “It was the last effort of expiring

nature.” Such frailties, though just grounds of censure and regret to

his contemporaries, will be lost in the splendour of his discoveries.

Yet is the observation of them not useless as a warning to others: for

the higher the station, the more closely will the actions of him who

fills it be scrutinised, especially if his elevation be the work of his

own hands.

In 1823 he undertook, in consequence of an application from Government

to the Royal Society, an inquiry into the possibility of preventing the

rapid decay of the copper sheathing of ships. His former Voltaic

discoveries at once explained the cause and suggested a remedy. When two

metals in contact with each other are exposed to moisture, the more

oxidable rapidly decays, while on the less oxidable no effect is

produced. Thus a very small piece of iron or zinc was found effectually

to stop the solution of a very large surface of copper. Several ships

were accordingly fitted with _protectors_, as they were called, which

succeeded perfectly in preserving the copper; but their use was found to

be attended by an evil greater than that which they remedied. The ships’

bottoms grew foul with unexampled rapidity; and the protectors were

finally abandoned by the Admiralty in 1828. This failure was a source of

much ill-natured remark to the many whom Davy had offended, or who were

jealous of his reputation, and of deep mortification to himself. Indeed

he displayed an impatience of censure, and irritability of temper, far

from dignified: the spoilt child of fortune, he could not bear the

feeling of defeat, still less the triumph of his enemies. This weakness

may perhaps be partly ascribed to declining health, which must always

more or less overcloud the mind, especially of one whose amusements as

well as his employments were of an active and stirring kind. To the

sports of fly-fishing and shooting he was devotedly attached; and

jealous, even to a ludicrous degree, of his reputation and success,

which it is said not always to have been so great as he would willingly

have had it believed. But his failing health gradually curtailed his

enjoyment of these pleasures, and towards the end of 1825, the

indisposition which his friends had long seen stealing on him reached

its crisis in the form of an apoplectic attack. All immediate cause of

alarm was soon removed; but the traces of his illness remained in a

slight degree of paralysis, which impaired, though without materially

affecting, his muscular powers. By the advice of his physicians he

hastened abroad, and passed the rest of the winter, and the spring, at

Ravenna. In the summer he visited the Tyrol and Illyria, and finding his

health still precarious, resigned the chair of the Royal Society. In the

autumn he returned to England, having gained little strength. The early

winter he spent in Somersetshire, at the house of an old and valued

friend, too weak for severe mental exertion, or to pursue successfully

his favourite sports. Yet the ruling passion was still shown in the

amusement of his sick hours, which were chiefly devoted to the

preparation of ‘Salmonia.’ Of the merits of this book as a manual for

the fly-fisher, we presume not to speak. To the general reader it may be

safely recommended, as containing many eloquent and poetical passages,

with much amusing information respecting the varieties and habits of the

trout and salmon species, and of the insect tribes on which they feed.

In the spring of 1828, Davy once more sought the Continent in search of

health. His steps were turned to that favourite district, of which he

speaks as the “most glorious country in Europe, Illyria and Styria;”

where he solaced the weary hours of sickness, by such field-sports as

his failing health enabled him to pursue, in the revision of an improved

edition of ‘Salmonia,’ and in the composition of the ‘Last Days of a

Philosopher.’ Of this he says, in a letter dated Rome, February 6, 1829,

“I write and philosophise a good deal, and have nearly finished a work

with a higher aim than ‘Salmonia.’ It contains the essence of my

philosophical opinions, and some of my poetical reveries.” Under this

sanction, the reader will peruse with pleasure the sketch contained in

the third dialogue of a geological history of the earth, and the other

questions of natural philosophy which are discussed. A large portion of

the work is occupied by metaphysical and religious disquisitions. As a

moral philosopher, his opinions do not seem entitled to peculiar weight.

Of his visionary excursion to the limits of the solar system, it is not

fair to speak but as the play of an exuberant imagination, mastering the

sober faculties of the mind. The work contains many passages, reflective

and descriptive, of unusual beauty; and is a remarkable production to

have been composed under the wasting influence of that disease, which,

of all others, usually exerts the most benumbing influence.

The winter of 1828–9 he spent at Rome; with returning spring he

expressed a wish to visit Geneva, but his hours were numbered. He

reached that city on May 28, unusually cheerful; dined heartily on fish,

and desired to be daily supplied with every variety which the lake

afforded: a trifling circumstance, yet interesting from its connection

with his love of sport. In the course of the night he was seized with a

fresh attack, and expired early in the morning without a struggle. His

remains were honoured by the magistrates with a public funeral, and

repose in the cemetery of Plain Palais. He died without issue, and the

baronetcy is in consequence extinct.

[Illustration]

[Illustration:

_Engraved by W. Holl._

The Gallery of Portraits: with Memoirs. Volume 1 (of 7) · 第 16 / 64 题