CHAPTER V

1846

After Lord John's failure to form a Ministry, Peel returned to power;

Gladstone replaced Stanley at the War and Colonial Office, and Stanley

became the acknowledged leader of the protectionist Opposition. Having Lord

John's assurance that the Whigs would support anti-Corn Law legislation,

Peel set about preparing his famous measure. But before it could be

discussed in Parliament, the usual explanations with regard to resignation

and resumption of office had to be gone through. In his speech on this

occasion, Lord John tried to shield Lord Grey as far as possible from the

unpopularity which he had incurred by refusing to work with Palmerston in

the same Cabinet. Feeling on both sides of the House was against Lord Grey;

for both Free Traders and Protectionists thought that Repeal ought to have

come from the Whigs, and that it was Lord Grey who had made this

impossible.

Lady John remained in Edinburgh, too ill to move. While her husband was

helping Peel at Westminster, the following letters passed between them:

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

LONDON, _January 23,_ 1846

I did not write to you last night, as I thought I could give you a

clearer account to-day. Sir Robert Peel gave up Protection

altogether on the ground that he had changed his opinion.... I dine

with the Fox Club [to-day?] and at Lansdowne House to-morrow. I

have rather startled Lord Lansdowne this morning by some of my

views about Ireland.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

EDINBURGH, _January_ 25, 1846

I never doubted that you were as noble by nature as by name; and I

am now more happily convinced of it than ever. Your whole speech

was plain and excellent, but the part that I dwell upon with the

greatest pleasure is that about Lord Grey.... I generally think

your speeches a curious contrast to Sir Robert's, and it does not

fail on this occasion. His humble confession of former errors, his

appeal to our sympathies, and his heroic tone at the close, all got

rather the better of my reason while I read; but the more I think

over his conduct, the less becomes the effect of his words. Yours,

on the contrary, as usual, only gain in force the more they are

reflected on, simply because they are true. And now, having

congratulated you quite as much as is good for your vanity, I must

praise myself a little for the way in which I have hitherto borne

your absence. What with its present pain, the uncertainty as to

when it may end, and my varying and wearying state of health, I

have many a time been inclined to lie and cry; and if ever I

allowed myself to dwell in thought on the happy days which sad

memory brings to light, I _should_ lie and cry; those days

when neither night nor day could take me from your side, and when

it was as difficult to look forward to sickness or sorrow as it now

is to believe that health and happiness--such happiness as

that--are in store for us. But I do _not_ dwell upon past

enjoyments, but upon present blessings, and I _do_ lie and

talk and read and write and think cheerfully and gratefully.

Dearest, I know you cannot see much of the children, but when you

do, pray be both Papa and Mama to them. Do not let their little

minds grow reserved towards you, or your _great_ mind towards

them. Help them to apply what they hear you read from the Bible to

their own little daily pleasures and cares, and you will find how

delightfully they take it all in.

God bless you, my dearest. Pray go out every day, and take Isabel

and Bessy or one of the small ones with you sometimes to enliven

you.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

EDINBURGH, _January_ 26, 1846

Your mention of the dreams which you had had of happiness for

Ireland made me sad, and you know how I shared in those dreams....

I like the way in which politics are talked here, it is far enough

from the scene of action for them to lose much of their

personality, and for all the little views to be lost in the

greater--and yet the interest is as great as in London.

_Lady John Russell to Lady Mary Abercromby_

EDINBURGH, _January 28_, 1846

Well, I wonder what you will say to the debate or rather the

explanations in Parliament. Are not John's and Sir Robert's

speeches a curious contrast? and is not John a generous man? and is

not Sir Robert a puzzling one? and was there ever such a strange

state of parties? What an unhappy being a real Tory must be, at

least in England, battling so vainly against time and tide, and

doomed to see the idols of his worship crumbled to dust one after

another. In _your_ benighted country [Italy] their end is

further off; but still it must come. I am reading a book on Russia

that makes my blood boil at every page. It is called "Eastern

Europe and the Emperor Nicholas," and I am positively ashamed of

the reception we gave that wholesale murderer in our free country.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

CHESHAM PLACE, _February_ 1, 1846

The Ministry will carry their Corn Measure, but will hardly last a

month after it. What next? I think the next Government will be

Whig, as the Protection party have no corps of officers in the

House of Commons. So that their only way of avenging themselves

upon Peel is to bring in a Liberal Ministry.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

MINTO, _February_ 7, 1846

I am glad you have a satisfactory letter from the doctor. A

volunteered letter from him, as this was, must be a good sign.... I

shall all my life regret not having been with you at this most

interesting period in our political history; for the longest

letters can but barely make up for the loss of the hourly chats

upon each event with all its variations which are only known in

London. Then, I think how sad it is for you to have nobody to care,

as I should care, whether you had spoken well or ill. But all this

and much more we must bear as cheerfully as we can; and I am glad

to think that though _one wife_ is far from you, your other

wife, the House of Commons, leaves you little time to spend in

pining for her. I think you quite right in your intention of voting

for Sir Robert's measure as it is, in preference to any amendment

which would not be carried, and might delay the settlement of the

question. Not, as you well know, because I am not heart and soul a

Free Trader, but because I think it a more patriotic, as well as a

more consistent, course for you to take. Then if you come into

office, as seems probable, you may make what improvements you like,

and especially put an end to the miserable trifling about

slave-grown sugar; a question in which I take a sentimental

interest, as your first gift to me was your great sugar speech in

1841.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

HOUSE OF COMMONS, _February_ 9, 1846

Here I am in the House of Commons, on the important night of Corn,

having just introduced Morpeth as a new Member. It all makes me

very nervous--I mean to speak to-night, and I must take care not to

join in the bitterness of the Tories, and at the same time to avoid

the praise of the Ministry, which I see is the fashion. ... I am

glad you all take such interest in the present struggle--it would

be difficult not to do so. Our majority will, I hope, be eighty. As

matters stand at present no one feels sure of the Lords.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

CHESHAM PLACE, _February_ 16, 1846

The events of the last few days have been remarkable. There has

been no move, no agitation in the counties; but wherever a contest

is announced the Protection party carry it hollow.... In London the

Protectionists have created in a fortnight a very strong and

compact party, from 220 to 240, in the Commons, and no one knows

how many in the Lords--thus we are threatened with a revival of the

real old Tory party. Of course they are very civil to us, and they

all say that we ought to have settled this question and not Sir

Robert. But how things may turn out no one can say.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

CHESHAM PLACE, _February_ 21, 1846

I trust the feelings you have, and the enjoyment you seem to take

in the flowers and buds of the garden, show that you have before

you the opening Paradise of good health.

Baby's letter is very merry indeed. I long to see his little face

and curly locks again.

I am going to have a meeting at twelve and of twelve on the affairs

of Ireland. It is a thorny point, and vexes me more than the Corn

Laws. Lord Bessborough and Lansdowne are too much inclined to

coercion, and I fear we shall not agree. But on the other hand, if

we show ourselves for strong measures without lenitives, I fear we

shall entirely lose the confidence of Ireland.

_February_ 22, 1846

We are much occupied with the affairs of Ireland--I am engaged in

persuading Lansdowne to speak out upon the affairs of that unhappy

country, where a Bill called an Insurrection Act seems the ordinary

medicine.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

Minto, _February_ 23, 1846

You were quite right to send the children out in spite of the

remains of their coughs, but how hard it is for you to have all

those domestic responsibilities added to your numerous public ones.

It is more than your share, while I linger away my hours on the

sofa, without so much as a dinner to order for anybody. Your

Coercive measures for Ireland frighten me. I do not trust any

Englishman on the subject except yourself, and you cannot keep to

your own opinion in favour of leniency and act upon it. I often

think how unfortunate it is that there should be that little

channel of sea between England and Ireland. It prevents each

country from considering itself a part of the other, and a bridge

across it would make it much more difficult for Orange or Repeal

bitterness to be kept up. I send you Lord William's [26] letter.

But first I must tell you that in a former letter from him he

compared you to Antony throwing away the world for Cleopatra.... I

read one of Lord Campbell's Lives aloud yesterday evening--Sir

Christopher Hatton--a short and entertaining one; but from which it

would appear that a man can make a respectable Lord Chancellor

without having seriously studied anything except dancing....

[26] Lord John Russell's brother.

_Lord William Russell to Lady John Russell_

Genoa, _February_ 12, 1846

My dear Sister--I thank you much for your letter of the 4th from

Minto, but regret to find my letters make you not only angry, but

very angry. If I was within reach I should have my ears well

cuffed, but at this distance I am bold.... You will not have to get

into a towering passion in defending your husband from my

accusation of loving you too much and dashing the world aside and

bid it pass, that he might enjoy a quiet life with his Fanny. I

begin by obeying you and asking pardon and saying you did quite

right not to think me in earnest, and to "know that I often write

what I do not mean," a fault unknown to myself, and one to be

corrected, for it is a great fault, if not worse. The letter just

received pleases me much, for I find in it a high tone of moral

rectitude, a noble feeling of devotion to your husband's calling,

an unselfish determination to fulfil your destiny, an abnegation of

domestic comfort, a latent feeling of ambition tempered with

resignation, such as becomes a woman, that do you the highest

honour.... I think the crisis we are going through in England very

alarming ... a frightful system of political immorality is

stalking through the land--the Democracy is triumphant, the

Aristocracy is making a noble and last effort to hold its own,

unfortunately in so bad, so unjust, so selfish, so stupid a cause,

that it must fall covered with shame.... The hero of the day,

Cobden, is a great man in his way, the type of an honest

manufacturer, but for the moment all-powerful. I am domiciled with

your brother and sister, [27] under the same roof, dine daily at

their hospitable table, sit over the fire and cose and prose with

them, sometimes alone with your sister, who thinks and talks very

like you, that is, not only well but very well.

I am very affectionately yours,

W.R.

P.S.--You say it would be unworthy of John to _pine_ for

office. I think the difficulties of a Prime Minister so great and

the toil so irksome that the country ought to be full of gratitude

to any man that will undertake it. I am full of gratitude to Sir

Robert Peel for having sacrificed his ease and enjoyment for the

good of his country, and to enable us to sit in the shade under our

own fig-trees. Glory and gratitude to Peel.

[27] Lady Mary Abercromby.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

CHESHAM PLACE, _February_ 15, 1846

I have been to St. Paul's to-day. Mr. Bennett enforced still

further obedience to the Church, and what was strange, he said

Papists and Dissenters were prevented by the prejudices of

education from seeing the truth--as if the same thing were not just

as true of his own Church. I do not see how it is possible to be

out of the Roman Catholic pale and not use one's own faculties on

the interpretation of the Bible. That tells us that our Saviour

said, he who knew that to love God with all our soul and to love

our neighbour as ourself were the two great commandments, was not

far from the kingdom of God. This surely can be known and even

followed without a priest at all.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

MINTO, _February_ 27, 1846

You seem to have had a very pleasant dinner at the Berrys, and I

wish I had been at it. I wonder sometimes whether the social

enjoyments of life are for ever at an end for me: and in my hopeful

moods I plan all sorts of pleasant little _teas_ at Chesham

Place--at home from nine to eleven on certain days, in an easy way,

without smart dressing and preparation of any sort beyond a few

candles and plenty of tea. I feel and always have felt ambitious to

establish some more popular and rational kind of society than is

usual in London. But the difficulty in our position would be to

limit the numbers: however, limiting the hours would help to do

this; and I do not think one need be very brilliant or agreeable

oneself to make such a thing succeed well. But what a foolish

presumptuous being I am, lying here on my sofa, not even able to

share in the quiet amusements of Minto, making schemes for the

entertainment of all the London world! However, these dreams and

others of a more serious nature as to my future life, if God should

restore me to health, help to while away my hours of separation

from you, and make me forget for awhile how long I have been

debarred from fulfilling my natural duties, either to you, the

children, or the world. This, believe me, is the hardest of the

many hard trials that belong to illness, or at least, such an

illness as mine, in which I have mercifully but little physical

suffering.

_Lady John Russell to Lady Mary Abercromby_

MINTO, _March_ 1, 1846

What pleasant times we live in, when the triumph of right

principles brings about one great and peaceful change after another

in our country; each one (this from Free Trade in a great degree)

promising an increase of happiness and diminution of war and

bloodshed to the whole world. No doubt, however, its good effects

will be but slowly perceived, and I fear there is much

disappointment in store for the millions of poor labourers, who

expect to have abundance of food and clothing the moment the Bill

becomes a law. Poor creatures, their state is most deplorable and

haunts me day and night. The very best of Poor Laws must be quite

insufficient. Indeed, wherever there is a necessity for a Poor Law

at all there must be something wrong, I think; for if each

proprietor, farmer and clergyman did his duty there would be no

misery, and if they do _not_, no Poor Law can prevent it. You

cannot think how I long for a few acres of _our own_, in order

to know and do what little I could for the poor round us. It would

not lessen one's deep pity for the many in all other parts of the

country, but one's own conscience would be relieved from what,

rightly or wrongly, I now feel as a weight upon it; and without a

permanent residence one does not become really acquainted with poor

people in their prosperity as well as adversity; one only does a

desultory unsatisfactory sort of good. I have not seen Dickens's

letter about the ragged schools of which you speak. What you say of

the devotion of the Roman Catholic priests to the charities of

religion reflects shame on ours of a purer faith, but is what I

have always supposed. The Puseyites are most like them in that as

well as in their mischievous doctrines; but then a new sect is

always zealous for good as well as for evil.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

CHESHAM PLACE, _March_ 3, 1846

I am so happy to find you have had a good night and are stronger in

feeling. If you had not told me how weak and ill you have been I

should have been beyond measure anxious; but, as it is, and with

your letters, I have been very unhappy and exceedingly

disappointed. For my hopes are often extravagant, and I love to

look forward to days of health and happiness and gratitude to God

for His blessings.... Need I say after all I have suffered on your

account that while I am conducting my campaign in Italy [28] my

thoughts are always with you? ... I cannot bear your absence. The

interest of a great crisis, and the best company of London cannot

make me tolerably patient under the misfortune of your being away;

and it is you, and you alone who could inspire me with such deep

love.

[28] An allusion to Napoleon's letters to Josephine from Italy, which she

had been reading.

Peel had taken the first step towards feeding the poor at home. He had also

done his best to relieve the immediate distress of Ireland. Shiploads of

Indian corn had been landed, and public works for the help of the destitute

established up and down the country. But the chief grievance of the Irish,

which was at the bottom of half the agrarian crime, had not been remedied.

The House of Lords, by having thrown out Peel's Bill for compensating

outgoing tenants for improvements their own money or exertions had created,

was largely responsible for the violence and sedition now threatening life

and property throughout Ireland. The true remedy having been rejected by

the Lords, the Government had to meet violence by violence. No sooner had

the Corn Bill been passed in the House of Commons than Peel brought in a

stringent Sedition Bill for Ireland. Lord John and the Whigs disliked the

Bill because it was extremely harsh.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

EDINBURGH, _March_ 12, 1846

Nothing that I read in the speeches in favour of the Coercion Bill

convinced me that it would do the slightest good.... It must

embitter the Irish against England, for which there is no need.

Nothing can be more shocking than the continual outrages and

murders in Ireland; but it is the penalty we pay for a long course

of misgovernment, and from which nothing but a long course of mild

and good government can set us free; certainly not severe

indiscriminate measures which mark out Ireland still more as an

unhappy conquered province, instead of a part of the nation. Such

are my sentiments, dearest, on this subject, which always makes my

blood boil.... I read the "Giaour" two nights ago to Addy--it has

as great and as numerous beauties as any poem Byron ever wrote--but

I find I am not old enough, or wise enough, or good enough to

_bear_ Byron, and left off feeling miserable, as he always

contrives to make one; despair is what he excels in, and he makes

it such beautiful despair that all sense of right or wrong is

overwhelmed by it. I said to Addy that one always requires an

antidote after reading Byron, and that she and I ought instantly to

go and hem pocket-handkerchiefs, or make a pudding--and that is

what she has illustrated in the newspaper I send.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

HOUSE OF COMMONS, _March_, 1846

Your views about the Irish Coercion Bill are very natural; but

Bessborough, who is the best authority we have about Irish matters,

thinks it will tend to stop crime--and especially the crime of

murder. I should be loath to throw out a Bill which may have this

good effect; but I shall move a resolution which will pledge the

House to measures of remedy and conciliation. This may lead to a

great debate.... The little girls look very nice, but Toza [29] is,

if possible, thinner than ever. However, she laughs and dances like

a little fairy. I dined with Mrs. Drummond yesterday. Macaulay [30]

was there--entertaining, and not too much of a monopolist--I mean

of talk--which, like other monopolies, is very disagreeable.

[29] Victoria.

[30] Lord John had written to his wife in April, 1845: "Macaulay

made one of his splendid speeches again last night.... He is a

wonderful man, and must with the years before him be a great

leader."

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

EDINBURGH, _March_ 19, 1846

After dinner we drove to Portobello sands and there got out and

walked for an hour; the sea was of the brightest blue, covered with

sails; Inchkeith and the opposite coast so clear that every

inequality of hill or rock was seen; Arthur's Seat, grand and

snowy, was behind us, and the glittering sands under our feet--the

whole beautiful far beyond description and beyond what I have yet

seen it in any weather; for the east wind and bright sun are what

it requires. How I did wish for you! I need not say that I only

half enjoyed it, as I only half enjoy anything without you. My

comfort in your absence is to think that you are not taken from me

for nothing, but for your country's service; and that even if we

could have foreseen four years ago all the various anxieties and

trials that awaited us, we should have married all the same. As it

was, we knew that ours could not be a life of quiet ease; and it

was for me to decide whether I was able to face the reverse--and I

_did_ decide, and I _am_ able--

"Io lo cercai, fui preso

Dall' alta indole sua, dal suo gran nome;

Pensai dapprima, oh pensai che incarco

E l'amor d'un uomo che a gli' altri e sopra!

Perchè allor correr, solo io nol lasciai

La sua splendida via, s' io non potea

Seguire i passi suoi?"

Now I am sure you do not know where those lines are from. They are

a wee bit altered from Manzoni's "Carmagnola"; and they struck me

so much, when I read them to-day, as applicable to you and me, and

made me think of your "splendida via" and all its results.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

EDINBURGH, _March_ 23, 1846

Thanks for your precious letter of Saturday. You need not grieve at

having brought cares and anxieties ... upon me. You have given me

a love that repays them all; and such words as you write in that

letter strengthen me for all that our "splendida via" may entail

upon us, however contrary to my natural tastes or trying to my

natural feelings. What a delightful hope you give of your getting

away on the 2nd--but I am too wise to build upon it.

_Lady John to Lord John Russell_

EDINBURGH, _March_ 25, 1846

.... There is a calmness and fairness and _depth_ in

conversation here which one seldom meets with in London, where

people are too much taken up by the present to dwell upon the past,

or look forward to the future--and where consequently passion and

prejudice are mixed up with most that one hears. Dante, and Milton,

and Shakespeare, etc., have little chance amid the hubbub of the

great city--but with all its faults, the great city is the place in

the world I most wish to see again.... At poor Lady Holland's one

_did_ hear the sort of conversation I find here, and surely

you must miss not only her but her house very much.

_Lord John to Lady John Russell_

_April_ 3, 1846

At all events pray do not distress yourself with the reflexion that

you will not be a companion to me during my political trials. You

have been feeling strong, ... that strength will, I trust, return.

I see no reason why it should not--and there is no one in existence

who can think so well with my thoughts and feel so truly with my

feelings as yourself. So in sickness and in sorrow, so in joy and

prosperity, we must rely on each other and let no discouraging

apprehensions shake our courage.

Meanwhile in Parliament the Irish Coercion Bill was dragging on. Lord

Bessborough and other Whig peers had changed their mind about its value,

and Lord John, instead of proposing an amendment, definitely opposed it.

The Protectionists, eager to revenge themselves upon Peel, who, they felt,

had betrayed them, caught at the opportunity and voted with the Whigs. The

Government was defeated by a large majority on the very day the Repeal of

the Corn Laws passed the House of Lords, and the Queen sent for Lord John,

who became Prime Minister in July, 1846.

This time, beyond the usual troubles in the distribution of offices, he had

no difficulty in forming a Ministry; but when formed it was in an unusually

difficult position. They were in power only because the Protectionists had

chosen to send Peel about his business, and the Irish problem was growing

more and more acute. The potato crop of 1846 was even worse than that of

1845, and Peel's system of public works had proved an expensive failure,

more pauperising than almsgiving. The Irish population fell from eight

millions to five, and those who survived handed down an intensified hatred

of England, which lives in some of their descendants to this day.

In the autumn of 1846 Lord John, little thinking that a home would soon be

offered to him by the Queen, bought a country place, Chorley Wood, near

Rickmansworth.

_Lady John Russell to Lady Mary Abercromby_

CHORLEY WOOD, RICKMANSWORTH, _December_ 12, 1846

About the 10th January we all go back to town for good, as John

must be there some time before the meeting of Parliament. Oh that

meeting of Parliament! It is so different from any I have ever

looked forward to; and though it has always been awful, this is so

much _more_ so. I shall then first really feel that John is

Minister, and find out the _pains_ of the position, having as

yet little experience of anything but the pleasures of it. Then

will come the daily toil beyond his strength, the daily abuse to

reward him, and the daily trial to us both of hardly meeting for a

quarter of an hour between breakfast and bedtime. In short, I had

better not begin to enumerate the evils that await us, as they are

innumerable. However, I feel very courageous and that they will

appear trifles if he succeeds; and if he is turned out before the

end of the session, I shall never regret that he has made the

attempt. It is a fearful time to have the government in his hands;

but for that very reason I am glad that _he_ and no other has

it. The accounts from Ireland are worse and worse, and what with

the extreme misery of the unfortunate poor and the misbehaviour of

the gentry, he is made very miserable. As he said this morning, at

times they almost drive him mad.

During Lady John's long illness in Edinburgh, Francis Lord Jeffrey had been

one of her kindest friends, and had helped to brighten many a weary hour by

his visits and conversation.

_Lord Jeffrey to Lady John Russell_

EDINBURGH, _December_ 21, 1846

It is very good in you to remember my sunset visits to you in the

hotel. I never pass by its windows in these winter twilights

without thinking of you, and of the lessons of cheerful magnanimity

(as well as other things) I used to learn by the side of your

couch. The Murrays and Rutherfords are particularly well; the

latter will soon be up among you, and at his post for the opening

of a campaign of no common interest and anxiety. For my part, I am

terribly frightened--for the first time, I believe I may say, in my

life. Lord John, I believe, does not know what fear is! _sans

peur_ as _sans reproche_. But it would be a comfort to know

that even he thinks we can get out of the mess in Ireland without

some dreadful calamity. And how ugly, in fact, do things look all

round the world!

One of the first acts of Lord John's Government was to vote £10,000,000 for

the relief of Ireland. In July, 1847, Parliament was dissolved. When it met

again Lord John was reluctantly compelled to ask for its votes in support

of an Irish Bill resembling the one on which the Liberals had defeated Peel

the year before.

A bare enumeration of the difficulties which beset the new Prime Minister

brings home a sense of his unenviable position. Ireland was on the verge of

starvation and revolt; everywhere in Europe the rebellions which culminated

in 1848 were beginning to stir, seeming then more formidable than they

really were in their immediate consequences; in England the Chartist

movement was thought to threaten Crown and Constitution; and, in addition,

the country had taken alarm at the weakness of its military defences.

Lastly, for power to meet all these emergencies Lord John was dependent, at

every juncture, upon the animosity between the Protectionists and Peelites

proving stronger than the dislike which either party felt for the

Government. There were 325 Liberals in the House; the Protectionists

numbered 226; the Conservative Free Traders 105; so the day Protectionists

and Peelites came to terms would be fatal to the Government. Such were the

troubles of the Prime Minister, who was a man to take them hard. As for his

wife, her diaries and letters show that, however high her spirit and firm

her principles, her nature was an intensely anxious one.

In December, 1846, they both went down for a short holiday to Chorley Wood,

where, on the last night of the year, they held a "grand ball for children

and servants. All very merry. John danced a great deal, and I not a little.

Darling Johnny danced the first country dance, holding his Papa's hand and

mine."

Lady John Russell: A Memoir with Selections from Her Diaries and Correspondence · 第 5 / 14 章