Cahn (1937:180, 189) stated that the burrowing process consists of

"flipping" the loose sand or silt over the back, whereas Conant

(1951:159) described the process as a rapid lateral movement of the

body. My observations of captives agree essentially with Conant's

observations. The initial movement, directed at a slight angle, is

principally with the forelegs although complemented by lateral movements

of the body. When the turtle is approximately half buried, it makes

rapid lateral movements of the body, which completely bury the turtle

and orient its body in a horizontal position.

_Behavior and Adaptations_

Some characteristics of softshells that are often mentioned in the

literature are: extreme shyness or wariness, ferociousness as captives,

dazzling speed and agility on land and in water, and great dependence on

aquatic environment. Certainly they are wary; and this wariness may

account, in part, for the scarcity of observations of basking, and

statements attesting to their great speed on land. To my mind, their

reported ferociousness and savage disposition as captives is overrated;

of the many softshells that I have collected, only a few attempted to

bite. The extensibility of their long neck does warrant more careful

handling than needs to be employed with other species. Holbrook (_in_

Hay, 1892:145) even wrote that they "will sometime leap up and give a

loud hiss," and Newman (1906:130) wrote that "they hiss violently and

thrust out the head." Wright and Funkhouser (1915:120) reported a

captive _ferox_ that "could jump forward practically its own length." I

have been bitten by individuals of _Kinosternon_, _Sternothaerus_,

_Pseudemys_ and _Graptemys_, and cannot support the contention that

softshells are more prone to bite than those species, a view shared by

LeConte (_in_ DeKay, 1842:7); many softshells on initial capture will

tend to withdraw the head completely for a short time. Newman (_loc.

cit._) also wrote that recently captured specimens exude a thick,

yellow, semi-fluid resembling yolk of an egg from the inguinal glands;

the substance, however, is odorless but "undoubtedly homologous with the

emission of the inguinal glands of the musk and snapping tortoises."

Perhaps there is a difference in aggressiveness associated with

geographic location, the age of the turtle or individual temperament.

Smith (1956:159), referring to _muticus_, wrote that they are the best

swimmers of all fresh-water turtles, and perhaps of any turtles.

Corresponding statements of other authors attesting to their speed and

agility (including _spinifer_ and _ferox_) in water and on land are

based principally on the published comments of Muller (1921:181), who

observed that females disturbed while laying eggs "about fifty feet from

water ... covered the distance faster than a man can run." Cahn

(1937:180) also stated that _muticus_ on a "level, unobstructed sand

beach ... can outrun a man," and (_op. cit._:181) can "capture fish with

ease"; Cahn supported the latter statement by relating his observation

of a _muticus_ that captured a small brook trout in a large tank. Smith

(_op. cit._:162) wrote that _spinifer_ is "said to overtake bass."

Doubtless they are good swimmers and they do scurry rapidly on land.

Published statements relating to the strictly aquatic existence of

softshells especially _muticus_, are based on recognition of "its

drastic adaptations to aquatic existence" (Carr, 1952:428); these

adaptations presumably include pharyngeal respiration and the marked

depression of body form. Pharyngeal respiration was demonstrated for

_muticus_ and _spinifer_ (Gage, 1884; Gage and Gage, 1886), and was

considered the principal type of aquatic respiration (some dermal and

some cloacal) in _Trionyx spinifer asper_ by Dunson (1960). Cloacal

bursae (anal respiration) are lacking in trionychids (Smith and James,

1955:88). Accessory pharyngeal respiration is meaningful in light of the

information furnished by Agassiz (1857:282-83), who found that _Trionyx_

has a smaller lung capacity (weight of body in ounces/capacity of lungs

in cubic inches = 16.9) than do some other genera (_Pseudemys_, 2.8;

_Testudo_, 2.7; _Terrapene_, 1.1); corresponding values for more aquatic

species were _Chelydra_, 9.3 and _Kinosternon_, 16.0. Cahn (1937:181),

however, wrote that he has demonstrated pharyngeal respiration in

individuals of _Pseudemys_, _Chrysemys_ and _Sternothaerus_, and Allen

and Neill (1950:13) suggested that it occurs in _Macroclemys_. More

conclusive data are required to detect a positive correlation between

small lung capacity, pharyngeal respiration, and degree of restriction

to an aquatic habitat.

The depressed, soft-margined carapace of softshells has been mentioned

as an adaptation to facilitate burrowing in soft sand or mud, and more

suited for concealment than for speed in aquatic locomotion (Carr,

1952:429; Smith, 1956:162). Nielsen (1951:264-65), commented that in

various lotic invertebrates, dorsoventral flattening of the body was no

commoner than in lentic invertebrates; he wrote that a dorsoventral

flattening is a disadvantage to an animal in a strong current and is an

adaptation "probably ... not to withstand the current directly, but to

avoid it by seeking shelter in narrow crevices." Probably another aid to

concealment, mentioned by Williams and McDowell (1952:272), is the

plastral hinge.

Concealment of softshells is not enhanced by growths of algae on the

carapace. Proctor (1958:637-38) reported that the common, epizoöphytic

alga of chelonians, _Basicladia_, has never been reported from

_Trionyx_; the same author recorded a large amount of filamentous algae,

principally _Stigeoclonium_, but the algae could be easily wiped from

the turtle, and Vinyard (1955:64) recorded an alga, _Dermatophyton

radians_, attached to the skin of the legs of _Trionyx_. I noted a small

patch of greenish scum growing near the insertion of the neck on a

softshell (_spinifer_ from Lake Texoma); cursory examination by Dr. R.

H. Thompson, disclosed one of the colonial ciliate protozoans

(resembling _Opercularia_) with enmeshed green or blue-green algae.

Evermann and Clark (1920:592) mention a _spinifer_ from Lake

Maxinkuckee, Indiana, having a growth of _Opercularia_, covering the

plastron.

_Movement_

The reported proclivity of softshells for a strictly aquatic existence

has been over-emphasized; they are no more confined to aquatic habitats

than some chelydrids (including kinosternids). In fact, there is a

general parallel in habits between members of the two families, namely,

a tendency toward a bottom-dwelling existence, and a burrowing habit.

The alligator snapping turtle (_Macroclemys_) is probably the most

aquatic fresh-water turtle in the United States. The common snapping

turtle and some kinosternids are known to migrate overland. Kinosternids

and trionychids bask frequently, and trionychids have been observed

moving overland. Cox (1894:50) reported a _spinifer_ attempting to climb

a narrowly-stepped, 12-foot dam on Mud Creek at Ravenna, Nebraska; the

turtle failed after repeated struggles, once reaching a height four

inches shy of the brim before tumbling back into the water. Duellman and

Schwartz (1958:271) commented that adults of _ferox_ are often seen on

roads bordering canals, and informants have told me verbally of similar

observations. Conant (1930:61) reported an individual of _ferox_ that

was "... walking across the main street in Venice [Sarasota County,

Florida]." Softshells will travel overland in search for suitable

nesting sites; Newman (1906:130) wrote that _spinifer_ will climb "steep

railway embankments with considerable ease, in order to reach a sand pit

some fifty yards from the water."

From an analysis of species-composition of large reservoirs and lakes

and their adjacent smaller ponds in southern Illinois, Cagle (1942:162)

concluded that softshells "travel overland far less often than do ..."

other species, but that they are "probably the first to move as the

water level falls." On the basis of further observations in the same

region, Cagle (1944:15) wrote that softshells rarely move overland, and

once trapped in a pool of water, they bury themselves and remain there.

He related instances of several individuals having been dug from dried

mud where the last remnants of a water pool had evaporated and he

concluded that the home range is probably confined to one body of water.

That fluctuations in water level affect the movement of softshells is

suggested by Mr. William E. Brode's comment that a commercial fisherman

trapped numerous softshells in the Pearl River, south of Monticello,

Mississippi, in unbaited hoop-nets in late May and June when the water

level was receding after heavy rains.

The meager data available concerning the aquatic movements of softshells

indicate that individuals wander but little. Breckenridge (1955:6,

table 1) found that among 30 recaptured turtles that had been marked,

the greatest distance traveled was 600 yards over a two-year interval;

after a three-month interval one originally captured 30 miles distant,

moved only 200 yards. The statement of a professional turtle trapper

mentioned by Breckenridge (_loc. cit._) and data previously presented

(see page 436), to the effect that over-trapping results in increasingly

diminished returns, tends to support the idea that there is little

aquatic movement in soft-shelled turtles.

Breckenridge (_loc. cit._) mentioned methods of marking softshells and

found that notching the edge of the carapace with a leather punch was

satisfactory; the notches healed but were discernible as shallow

sinuses. The same author mentioned a tattooing device (mentioned also by

Cagle, 1939:171), but no turtles so marked were ever recognized as

recovered. Tagging with a radioactive isotope and detection with

suitable instruments should prove applicable to turtles (see Karlstrom,

1957).

_Nocturnal Habits_

Anderson (1958:212) wrote that hatchlings (_muticus_) leave nests within

the first three hours after sunset, and are active on the surface of the

sand at night. Muller (1921:183) reported hatchlings (_muticus_) leaving

nests at night or early in the morning. Lagler (1954) stated that

_spinifer_ is nocturnal. To my knowledge there are no other published

statements concerning nocturnal activity of soft-shelled turtles. I have

noted them at night on only four different occasions. In two instances

(Clear Fork Brazos River, Texas, and Lake Concordia, Louisiana), the

turtles were resting immediately below the surface of the water on

submerged branches, as one would expect _Pseudemys_ and _Graptemys_ to

do. Another individual was seen swimming near the surface (Ocmulgee

River, 1-1/2 mi. S Jacksonville, Georgia); this observation possibly

represents nocturnal activity, or inquisitiveness owing to the

disturbances caused by the motor of the boat and/or our head lights. A

final observation tends to support the view of nocturnal habits. My

field notes record at least four softshells collected by hand, and a few

other seen in a shallow (approximately four feet deep), quiet, clear

water side channel of the White River (Cotter, Arkansas); the turtles

were seen resting and slowly moving on the bottom or swimming.

_Seasonal Occurrence_

The length of the season of activity increases with decrease in

latitude. Aquatic species in general have longer periods of activity

than terrestrial species at the same northern temperate latitudes. The

southernmost populations of all species of softshells may be active

throughout the year, assuming temperature to be the limiting factor.

There are few published statements relative to the length of the annual

period of activity; all records refer to _spinifer_. In Lake

Maxinkuckee, northern Indiana, Newman (1906:128) wrote that individuals

were first seen in early April on the lake shore in a weak condition

with neck and legs extended, and were easily captured. Lesueur

(1827:262) wrote that _spinifer_ in Indiana appears toward the end of

April. Observations of Evermann and Clark (1920:592) in Lake

Maxinkuckee, and Butler (1894:224) in east central Indiana concurred in

finding that of all kinds of turtles there, softshells appeared last in

spring and disappeared first in fall. Evermann and Clark found small

softshells, benumbed or dead, along the shore as early as March 18 and

also late in fall. The earliest observation for large softshells was

April 29, and the latest was September 7; Butler found that these

turtles rarely appear before April 15 and sometimes not until May 1.

Cahn (1937:191) stated that softshells in Illinois hibernate toward the

end of October and emerge in May or the latter part of April; the same

author mentioned that in southern Illinois the species might remain

sluggishly active all winter. In Ohio, Conant (1951:160) wrote that

individuals were collected every month from March to October, and one

was even taken in December, 1929, in northwestern Ohio. Wright (1919:8)

mentioned observing softshells on April 20 and September 20 (presumably

these were the earliest and latest observations of them) in Monroe and

Wayne counties, New York. Blatchley (1891:34) listed dates of early and

late activity as March 19 and December 11 for Vigo County, Indiana.

Webster (1936:22) recorded the earliest and latest dates of collection

of _spinifer_ in central Oklahoma as June 10 and November 8.

Moore and Rigney (1942:80) found an individual of _muticus_ under six

inches of ice in water about one foot deep on January 31, 1940 (Cimarron

River, Payne County, Oklahoma).

The published information suggests that the length of the normal annual

period of activity of _spinifer_ in latitudes of about 40° and 43° is

approximately five months, from April into September, depending upon the

weather. There are numerous published statements to the effect that the

period of hibernation is passed under a shallow covering of mud in deep

water. Evermann and Clark (_op. cit._: 593) found a softshell

(presumably in a quiescent state) on September 6 that was "buried up to

its eyes in mud at the edge of Lost Lake." Softshells possibly hibernate

in shallow water or in soft mud flats. Conant (_loc. cit._) found that

captives would not hibernate in a pond in a zoo having a bottom of

leaves.

Food Habits

Previous authors, most of whom allude to published statements preceding

their own, characterize soft-shelled turtles as carnivorous and mention

such food items as crawfish, insects, worms, snails, clams, frogs,

tadpoles, fish, and occasional vegetable matter. Stockwell (1878:403)

wrote that the relative lengths of portions of the digestive tract

indicate "a purely carnivorous diet."

In an examination of the contents of 11 stomachs of _spinifer_ from

Michigan, Lagler (1943:304) found that crawfish (47%) and insects

(52%), principally burrowing mayfly naiads (_Hexagenia_), and

dragonfly naiads, comprised the bulk of the diet with cryptogams,

vegetable débris, snails and fish remains present in small amounts.

Breckenridge (1944:186) wrote that 18 specimens of _spinifer_ in

Minnesota contained 44 per cent crawfish, 29 per cent aquatic insects,

8 per cent fish, and 19 per cent unidentified material. Surface

(1908:123) found crawfish in the only two stomachs of specimens he

examined from Pennsylvania. Penn (1950) summarized the results of

those authors, and estimated that crawfishes comprised 58 per cent

(46% by volume) of the diet of softshells. In Indiana, three stomachs

examined by Newman (1906:131) in late June contained: 1) nine

crawfish, 2) four crawfish, 22 dragonfly naiads, 3) nine dragonfly

naiads, few plant buds. Neill (1951a:765) found crawfishes in the

stomachs of five _spinifer_ from the Savannah River, Georgia. Evermann

and Clark (1920:595) wrote that _spinifer_ in Lake Maxinkuckee feeds

principally on crawfishes. Shockley (1949:257) mentioned bottom

organisms and small fishes as food. Clark and Southall (1920:16)

stated that "Its principal food, to judge from a few specimens

examined, consists of crayfishes."

Cahn (1937:183) wrote that the food of _muticus_ in Illinois consists

principally of crawfish, fish, frogs, tadpoles, larger insect larvae

and nymphs, and aquatic mollusks. The kinds of fish eaten were

_Notropis heterolepis_, _N. spilopterus_, _N. hudsonius_, _Lepomis

machrochirus_, _Morone chrysops_, _Perca flavescens_, _Catostomus

commersonnii_, and _Hypentelium nigricans_; Cahn (_loc. cit._) also

stated that the mollusks eaten by _muticus_ are both gastropods and

small, thin-shelled bivalves. In regard to the feeding habits of

_spinifer_ in Illinois, Cahn (_op. cit._:193) listed the following

items in decreasing order of abundance as revealed by examinations of

stomachs: crawfish, minnows, fry of larger fish, frogs, tadpoles,

earthworms, insects (often beetles), and mollusca (_Pisidium_,

_Viviparus_, planorbids). The kinds of fish mentioned were: _Notropis

heterodon_, _N. heterolepis_, _N. hudsonius_, _Catostomus

commersonnii_, _Lepomis humilis_, _L. macrochirus_, _Semotilus

atromaculatus_, _Notemigonus crysoleucas_, _Umbra limi_, and

_Micropterus salmoides_. Cahn (_loc. cit._) also found the remains of

a six-inch brook trout (_Salvelinus_) in the stomach of a 13-inch

_spinifer_ from Wisconsin.

Agassiz (1857:399) found larvae of neuropterous insects in the stomach

of one specimen of _muticus_, and fragments of _Anodonta_ and

_Paludina_ (= _Campeloma_) in the stomach of one _ferox_. The expanded

crushing surfaces of the jaws in some large individuals of _ferox_ may

be an adaptation to mollusc-feeding (Schmidt and Inger, 1957:36).

Surface (1908:123) found _spinifer_ to have fragments of beetles in

one of two specimens examined, and large quantities of corn in another

from Ohio. Webb and Legler (1960:27) reported 23 chrysomelid beetle

larvae (_Donacia_) in one specimen of _T. ater_. Evermann and Clark

(1920:595) reported several _spinifer_ taken on hooks baited with

grasshoppers in water 14 feet deep in Lake Maxinkuckee, Indiana. Hay

(1892:144) wrote of _muticus_ that "If there are potatoes growing near

the water the turtles find their way to them and devour the stems, of

which they are very fond." Wright and Funkhouser (1915:123) stated

that young _ferox_ in the Okefinokee Swamp feed on fish and frogs, and

according to the natives, larger specimens take waterfowl, a statement

that Smith (1956:159) was probably reiterating when he mentioned that

the diet included "perhaps young birds." Parker (1939:88) wrote that

of two _spinifer_ from Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee, one contained

coleopteran remains, and the other an aquatic beetle and two large

tipulid larvae. Wied-Neuwied (1865:54) wrote that Lesueur found worms,

snails, remains of _Paludina_ (= _Campeloma_), fruits and even hard

nuts in stomachs of _muticus_.

Holbrook (_in_ Hay, 1892:145) mentioned that _spinifer_ feeds on fish

and such reptiles as it can secure. There are no published statements

known to me that report reptiles in the diet of American softshells.

Carr (1952:425) erroneously cited Strecker (1927:9) and attributed "a

young lined snake" to the diet of _T. s. emoryi_; Strecker, however,

referred to _Kinosternon flavescens_. In conjunction with raising

softshells on turtle farms, Mitsukuri (1905:261) mentioned that first

and second year-old turtles (_Trionyx sinensis_) must be transferred

to separate ponds or they will be eaten by adults; perhaps

corresponding cannibalistic tendencies exist in confined, natural

habitats in American softshells.

Captives eat essentially the same things that free-living individuals

do, plus scraps of meat (Strecker, 1927:9; Gloyd, 1928:135; Pope,

1949; Conant, 1951:156, 160). Lagler (1943:303) mentioned a young

_spinifer_ that fed on water fleas (_Daphnia_) and canned fish. Conant

(_op. cit._:160) wrote that no captive was observed to take vegetable

matter.

Food, mostly in intestines, of two adult females of _T. s. emoryi_

collected on June 12-14, 1959, from the Río Grande at Lajitas,

Brewster County, Texas, was examined. One female, KU 51961, contained

little food and mostly plant fragments; because the stomach or

intestine was not full of plant fragments, this food probably was

ingested incidentally to the few insects present. Another female, KU

51955, contained insects, which were identified by Dr. George W.

Byers, Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, as follows: 1)

Coleoptera, Dryopidae, genus _Helichus_, most numerous, 350 to 400

individuals; 2) Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, genus _Phyllophaga_, one

individual; 3) Odonata, Coenagrionidae, fragments, probably one

individual; 4) Hymenoptera, Sphecidae, subfamily Bembicinae, one

individual; 5) Ephemeroptera; fragments of naiad; and 6) a few plant

seeds, pieces of slender roots, weed stems and a couple of fragments

of tree bark. The scarab and wasp probably fell into the water and

were eaten.

TABLE 6. Kinds of Insects Found in Stomachs and Intestines of 11

Specimens of Trionyx m. muticus (Eight Adult Males and Three

Immature Females, 9.0 to 12.5 cm. in Plastral Length) From Douglas

County, Kansas. Frequency of Occurrence (Approximate Number of

Individual Insects/Number of Stomachs in Which Found) Is Given for

Each Item Listed. Fragments of Insects Represent Adults Unless

Otherwise Noted.

==========================================================+===========

FOOD ITEM | Frequency

----------------------------------------------------------+-----------

Orthoptera |

Locustidae | 1

|

Ephemeroptera |

Unknown (naiad) | 1

|

Odonata |

Anisoptera (naiad) | 3/3

Zygoptera (naiad) | 4/2

|

Plecoptera |

Unknown (naiad) | 2/1

|

Homoptera |

Cicadellidae | 20/7

|

Hemiptera |

Lygaeidae | 1

|

Neuroptera |

Corydalidae (_Corydalis_ larva) | 1

|

Trichoptera |

Hydropsychidae? (incl. 18 larvae and 4 pupae) | 23/9

Unknown (incl. 1 larva) | 4/4

|

Lepidoptera |

Noctuidae? (larvae) | 2/1

Pyralidoidea (larva) | 1

Unknown | 1

|

Coleoptera |

Carabidae (incl. 1 larva) | 3/3

Cerambycidae? | 1

Chrysomelidae | 1

Cicindelidae (larva) | 1

Elateridae (larva) | 1

Hydrophilidae? (larvae) | 4/2

Scarabaeidae (incl. _Phyllophaga_) | 9/6

|

Diptera |

Anthomyiidae | 1

Asilidae | 1

Bibionidae (_Bibio_) | 5/2

Calliphoridae (puparium) | 1

Empididae | 1

Mycetophilidae | 1

Tipulidae (incl. _Tipula bicornis_ and _T. triplex_?) | 9/4

Unknown (5 muscoid, 3 acalyptrate, and 1 cyclorrhaphous |

types) | 9/4

|

Hymenoptera |

Apoidea | 1

Formicidae (incl. _Camponotus_) | 11/4

Ichneumonidae (one questionable) | 4/3

Tenthredinidae | 1

Unknown (small wasps) | 3/2

----------------------------------------------------------+-----------

Food from the digestive tracts of 11 specimens of _T. m. muticus_ from

the Kansas River at Lawrence, Douglas County, Kansas, were examined

(Table 6). The turtles (KU 55296-306, eight adult males and three

immature females, ranging in plastral length from 9.0 to 12.5 cm.)

were collected in June, 1958, by Mr. Robert R. Patterson. All turtles

were caught on hook and line in a period of about four or five hours

at dusk. Patterson frequently fished below the bridge at Lawrence and

observed that heads of softshells were often seen there about dusk and

that the turtles seemed to prefer a rather shallow, quiet-water area

of swirls and eddies for feeding. The stomachs, and to a lesser

degree, the intestines, were nearly full. Some turtles contained plant

fragments, principally elm seeds. The kinds of food in this sample

were also identified by Dr. Byers and were mostly insects, the most

frequent item being trichopterans; many of the insects eaten

undoubtedly fell into the water. The remains of spiders were found in

four stomachs and crawfish fragments in five.

North American Recent Soft-Shelled Turtles (Family Trionychidae) · 第 15 / 23 段