CHAPTER XI.

HISTORY OF MEDICINE IN AMERICA.

_The Colonial Physicians. Medical Study under Preceptors. Inoculation

against Small-pox. Military Surgery during the Revolutionary War.

Earliest Medical Teaching and Teachers in this Country. The First

Medical Schools. Benjamin Rush. 1745-1813. The First Medical Journals.

Brief List of the Best-Known American Physicians and Surgeons._

The{276} history of medicine in America commences with the early

struggles of the physicians in the American colonies. One Dr. Wootton

came to Virginia in 1607 as Surgeon-General of the London Company. The

following year Dr. Russell was with Captain Smith in his exploration of

Chesapeake Bay. Neither of these men stayed long in the country, since,

in 1609, Captain Smith, after being wounded, was compelled to return to

England for treatment, for lack of medical aid.

When, in 1626. Peter Minuit _purchased the island of Manhattan for the

sum of twenty-four dollars_, there was probably no physician there at

the time. Undoubtedly the first physician, in what is now New York, was

Lamontagne,--a Huguenot, who arrived in 1637, and who seems to have been

a man of great capability for his time. It would appear that men of no

little eminence left the Old World for the New during the early days

of the American colonies, and that the medical services which the early

colonists received were on a par with those received by those whom they

left behind in their old homes. During the seventeenth century a number

of reputable physicians emigrated to this country, among them Dr. John

Clark, of Boston, in 1638, whose son and grandson followed him in his

profession and became prominent in their chosen calling. In 1644 came

Dr. Child, a graduate of Padua, who seems to have been a man of great

learning.

A number of younger Americans also went abroad to{277} study,--Leyden,

Paris, Padua, and the British universities being those most eagerly

sought. In Virginia, so early as 1619, the Colonial Assembly discussed

the erection of a university or college. In 1637 a public college was

established in Cambridge, and in 1638 the Rev. John Harvard left to

it his library and half his fortune, after which it was called Harvard

College. William and Mary College was chartered in Virginia in 1693.

Probably the first lectures in anatomy given in this countrv were those

of Giles Firman, which were given previous to 1647 at Harvard College.

It was in this early day that arose the custom, continued until very

recently, of studying medicine with a preceptor. This was necessary at

that time, and until comparatively recently, because of the scarcity of

institutions of learning and the expense connected with an education.

The form of apprenticeship was often gone through with for a term of

years varying from three to seven, during which time the young student

performed the most menial duties, had very meagre opportunity for

anatomical study, and acquired his knowledge rather by contact with and

absorption from his preceptor than in any other way. In this method

of teaching the personal element was so pronounced that everything, in

fact, depended upon the preceptor, save what natural talent and industry

might accomplish, With such meagre opportunities the means for doing

were equally scant. Nevertheless, emergency made many of these early

American practitioners self-reliant and competent to treat, according to

the knowledge of that day, the various accidents then so common. In

1636 the Assembly of Virginia passed a fee-bill for surgeons and

apothecaries, fees, however, being often paid in tobacco, powder, lead,

wampum, etc. Not a few combined ministry of the body and the soul, and

a number of eminent physicians were also preachers of more or less

renown,--among them John Rogers, John Fisk, and others.

Probably{278} the only medical work published in America during the

seventeenth century was _A Brief Rule to Guide the Common People of

New England how to Treat Them-selves and Others in the Small-pocks or

Measels_. This was printed and sold in 1677, by John Foster, of Boston.

It was printed upon one side of a single sheet in double columns, and

described both of these diseases as due to the blood endeavoring to

recover a new form and state.

The old English distinction between physician and surgeon was for many

years quite generally preserved, but could not persist, because of the

different conditions under which men practiced. During this century,

also, a number of midwives made excellent practitioners,--among them

the wife of Dr. Fuller, one of the _May Flower_ pilgrims. Those colonial

days, however, seem to have been free from the ravages of itinerant

specialists and charlatans, who so abundantly infested Europe at the

time. It is also to the everlasting credit of the American profession

that it took no part in the horrible delusions and scandalous

transactions connected with the Salem witchcraft.

By the beginning of the eighteenth century the population of the United

States was about three hundred thousand whites; by the end of the

century it had increased to a total of about four millions. During this

century a larger proportion of educated medical men came from abroad

and settled in various parts of the country, while the Colonial and the

Revolutionary Wars offered ample opportunity for the development

and study of military medicine and surgery. Commerce between the two

continents increased; communication became more free, and the people of

the Old World and the New were constantly brought into closer relation.

The most lively medical controversy of the century was, probably, that

excited over the introduction of vaccination against small-pox. In

previous sketches I have had to intimate that the greatest enemy of

the medical profession in time past has been the clergy. In this{279}

particular instance, however, it was to the Rev. Cotton Mather, of

Boston, that the profession is largely indebted for the favor with

which the new method was received in this country. In 1721 he called the

attention of various American physicians to the method, then in vogue in

Turkey, of inoculation with virus from the active disease. Dr. Boylston,

of Brookline, Mass., who settled in Boston, corresponded with members

of the British Royal Society and finally determined to put the method

to actual proof. In 1721 he inoculated his own son with the virus of

natural small-pox, and within the next year had inoculated two hundred

and forty-seven persons, of whom about two per cent, died of the

disease; while, of nearly six thousand persons attacked by the disease

in the natural way, more than fourteen per cent. died. In spite of this,

the man and the method were violently attacked by the people and the

profession, and found their warmest defenders among the ranks of the

clergy. Benjamin Franklin, then only sixteen years of age, joined with

the rabble in opposing the inoculation method. Boylston was threatened

with hanging, and had even to hide himself for a time, he died in 1766.

After the great discovery of Edward Jenner societies were formed for the

promotion of vaccination all over the world. The earliest vaccination

in the United States was performed by Dr. Waterhouse (born 1754, died

1846), who operated upon four of his own children in 1800.

[Illustration: 0300]

It was during the eighteenth century that a number of our best-known

educational institutions were founded in the different colonies,--among

them, Yale College, in 1701; Princeton (College of New Jersey), in 1746;

University of Pennsylvania, in 1749; Columbia (King's College), in

1754; and others, only a little less known. In most of these latter were

established medical departments, but the method of apprenticing students

to physicians was still in general observance, no preliminary education

whatever, as a rule, being demanded. In 1766, however{280}, the

New Jersey Medical Society ordained that no student be taken as

an apprentice by any member of the society unless he had competent

knowledge of Latin and some initiation in the Greek. About the middle of

the century Drs. Bard and Middleton, in New York, and Dr. Cadwallader,

in Philadelphia, began giving lectures in anatomy, while at Newport,

Rhode Island, Dr. William Hunter, between 1754 and 1756,--a near

relative of the famous Hunters of London, and a pupil of the elder

Monro,--gave a course of lectures on human and comparative anatomy. Dr.

William Shippen. Jr. (1736-1808),--a student of John Hunter's,--returned

in 1762 to America, and gave his first course of lectures on anatomy and

midwifery during the years immediately following. His lectures led to

the formation of a Medical Department of the College of Philadelphia,

in 1765, in which lectures were continued regularly until the winter of

1775, when the{281} War of the Revolution interfered. In July of 1776

Shippen was made Chief-Physician of the Continental Army, and in

the following year was elected by the Provincial Congress

Director-in-General of army hospitals. During the latter years of the

war he returned to Philadelphia each winter, and delivered a course

of lectures, shortened by the necessities of the case. Thus he was the

first public teacher of midwifery in this country. He was ably seconded

in his work by Dr. John Morgan (1735-1789),--also a pupil of Hunter and

Monro, who received a prominent army appointment in 1775, but who, two

years later, was unfortunately dismissed on charges{282} subsequently

proved false. Shippen and Morgan were for some time the only professors

in the Medical Department of the College of Philadelphia. In 1768

Kuhn--a pupil of Linnæus--was made Professor of Materia Medica and

Botany; and Benjamin Bush, a year later, was given the Chair of

Chemistry. The commencement of this institution occurred in 1768, when

the degree of M.B. was given to seventeen graduates. In 1779 political

reasons led to the abolition of the College of Philadelphia, the

University of Pennsylvania taking its place. Ten years later the former

institution was restored, and in 1791 the two institutions were united.

The present Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania is,

therefore, the legitimate continuation of the first medical school in

America.

[Illustration: 0301]

The Medical Department of King's College, New York, now Columbia

College, was organized in 1767, by Clossey, an Irishman; Middleton,

a Scotchman; James Smith, a graduate of Leyden; Tenant, an alumnus of

Princeton College; and Bard, who was by far the most eminent of the

group, a Philadelphian by birth, who had studied under the best masters

in England.

The Medical Department of Harvard University was organized in 1783. Most

prominent in connection with it was Dr. John Warren, the first teacher

of anatomy and surgery, and the founder of a family of eminent medical

men, whose descendant, Dr. J. Collins Warren, is to-day an occupant

of the chair of surgery in the same school. The Medical Department of

Dartmouth College was organized in 1798 by Dr. Nathan Smith,--a man of

great energy and unusual versatility.

While these medical colleges were developing their strength the medical

profession were not idle, and institutions and libraries sprang up in

various places. The Pennsylvania Hospital, for instance, founded in

1762, is to be credited with the oldest medical library in this country,

many{283} of its volumes having been selected especially for it by

Louis, of Paris, and the famous Lettsom, of London. It now contains

nearly fifteen thousand volumes. The library of the New York Hospital,

not quite so large, was founded in 1776; that of the College of

Physicians, in Philadelphia, in 1788. The profession of New Jersey

organized the State Medical Society in 1765. In 1781 was founded the

Massachusetts Medical Society. In 1787 arose the College of Physicians

of Philadelphia.

In 1789 the profession of Maryland organized the so-called Medical

and Chirurgical Faculty of Maryland, constituting thereby the same

organization as the societies of other States. Before the close of the

century, Delaware, New Hampshire, and South Carolina had also

organized societies. In the larger cities extensive hospitals were also

founded,--the Pennsylvania Hospital, in Philadelphia, in 1751, inside

of which the first clinical instruction in this country was given by Dr.

Thomas Bond. The New York Hospital began in 1769, simultaneously with

the organization of the Medical Department of King's College. The first

insane-asylum in America was built at Williamsburgh, Va., in 1773,

although the charter of the Pennsylvania Hospital, dated 1751, provided

for the care of lunatics, though not at that time in a separate

institution.

[Illustration: 0304]

The most conspicuous medical character of the century in American

history was undoubtedly Benjamin Rush (1745-1813). He was one of

Shippen's earliest students in anatomy, studied widely abroad, was

a member of the Continental Congress, and one of the signers of the

Declaration of Independence. After him is named Rush Medical College of

Chicago. He was an extensive writer on a variety of subjects, not only

professional, but political, philosophical, etc. He recognized but two

kinds of remedies,--stimulants and depressants,--and held it to be

the principal duty of the physician to decide as to which were most

advisable in a given case. He called calomel the "Samson"{284} of the

materia medica, and his opponents contended that he was right, since it

had undoubtedly slain its thousands. As an accurate observer of disease,

he was correct and exact, and his descriptions are to-day both classic

and reliable.

The study of practical anatomy lias always been carried on in this

country under great disadvantages. At first only the bodies of executed

criminals were sparingly furnished.

In 1788, in New York, occurred the celebrated "doctor's mob," which

attested the vehemence of public objection to dissection, and which for

two days defied the control of all the authorities. Secret dissections

had been practiced in Harvard College so early as 1771, but the practice

was against the law even for sixty years later in Massachusetts.

Physiology, as such, was not taught in any medical school in this

country during the century, and experimental{285} physiology was

practically unknown. Surgery was eagerly studied, especially during war

times, and Dr. John Jones (1729-1791), of the King's College School,

was, perhaps, the most eminent of the surgeons of his day. Others who

vied with him were William Shippen, Jr., the first teacher of surgery in

the College of Philadelphia; John Warren, of Boston; Richard Bayley, of

Connecticut; Baynham, of Virginia; and McKnight, of New York.

The position of midwifery during the earlier years of the country may

be, perhaps, understood by the following extract from the _New York

Weekly Post-Boy_, of July, 1745:--

"Last night died, in the prime of life, to the almost universal regret

and sorrow of this city, Mr. John du Puy, M.D., man-midwife," etc.

The first practitioner of obstetrics in New England was Dr. Lloyd

(1723-1810), a pupil of Hunter and Smelley; while Dr. Shippen, in

Philadelphia, endeavored to organize a school for the instruction of

midwives, in which, however, he met with insuperable difficulties.

The first attempt to regulate practice in colonial times was an act

passed by the General Assembly of 1760, providing for at least a form of

examination in physic and surgery, registration, etc. The first medical

journal to appear in the United States appeared about 1790. It was

entitled _A Journal of the Practice of Medicine and Surgery and Pharmacy

in the Military Hospitals of France_, consisting merely of translations

from the French journals of military medicine. The first real American

medical journal was the _Medical Repository_, begun in 1797 and

discontinued in 1824.

The present century, now drawing to its close, saw in its earlier half

the rise of a large number of American physicians and surgeons who have

made their names illustrious for all time by their teachings, their

writings, and their invention and originality. While it is, of course,

invidious to{286} select names, the following certainly deserve

honorable mention in this list, without the slightest disrespect or

intentional slight to many others whose names must be omitted for want

of space.

John R. Cox (1773-1864), an early student of Benjamin Rush, filled the

chair of Materia Medica and Pharmacy in the University of Pennsylvania,

and published the _American Dispensatory_ in 1806. Caspar Wistar

(1761-1818) was the author of a _System of Anatomy_,--held in great

favor in his day as a text-book. Nathaniel Chapman (1780-1853) was

Professor of Theory and Practice in the University of Pennsylvania until

1850. John Eberle held the similar chair of the Jefferson School from

1825-1831. The former wrote on _Materia Medica and Therapeutics_, the

latter on the _Practice of Medicine_, both works being exceedingly

popular. John W. Francis (1789-1861) taught{287} obstetrics in the

College of Physicians and Surgeons from 1826-1830. Franklin Bache

(1792-1864) was one of the authors of the _Dispensatory of the United

States of America_, published in conjunction with George B. Wood, who

was Professor of Materia Medica in the University of Pennsylvania, and

who wrote also extensively on his chosen subject in monographs and large

works.

[Illustration: 0306]

Robley Dunglison (1789-1869) taught for a number of years in the

University of Virginia, but removed later to the Jefferson School in

Philadelphia. He was a man of great industry and versatility, and

wrote on a variety of subjects, his best-known work being his _Medical

Dictionary._

[Illustration: 0307]

W. E. Horner (1793-1853) taught anatomy and histology in the University

of Pennsylvania, and will long be remembered for his researches in these

branches. John W. Draper (1811-1882) made himself eminent as well by

his researches in photography{288} and in general science, as by the

publication of his treatise on _Human Physiology_, which first appeared

in 1853. Better known as physiologist was John C. Dalton (18251889),

whose text-book is to-day studied in many colleges and who first

introduced the method of vivisectional classroom demonstrations in our

own school here in Buffalo.

Alonzo Clark (1807-1887) was one of the most eminent teachers of

medicine that this country has produced. Austin Flint (1812-1886)

was also a famous teacher of medicine in New York, who made his first

reputation in the then small school in Buffalo.

[Illustration: 0308]

His text-book on _Practice_ is the most popular American work on the

subject that has ever appeared, and is still in general use. William P.

Dewees (1768-1841){289} was the author of a treatise upon _Diseases of

Children_, which reached a tenth edition and which rivaled the similar

treatise of John Forsyth Meigs. The best-known teacher of dermatology

and venereal diseases was Freeman J. Bumstead (1826-1879), author of the

most popular work upon the latter subject that has been issued from the

medical press. He wras professor of these diseases at the College of

Physicians in New York. His text-book vied with that produced by William

H. Van Buren (1819-1883), who, in connection with Dr. Keyes (still

living), wrote a treatise upon the _Surgical Diseases of the

Genito-Urinary Organs_, including syphilis, which has been, since its

appearance, exceedingly popular with the medical profession.

Among the best-known neurologists and alienists of the century since

Benjamin Rush wrote his _Inquiries and Observations upon Diseases of the

Mind_ (1812){290} was Dr. Isaac Ray, who, in 1838. published a work upon

the medical jurisprudence of insanity.

[Illustration: 0309]

Dr. Brigham ( 1798-1849) was superintendent of the Utica Insane-asylum

for some years before his death; and Dr. Kirkbride, who died in 1883,

had been superintendent of the Philadelphia Asylum for over forty years.

Dr. John P. Gray followed Brigham as superintendent of the Utica Asylum,

where he remained for thirty-two years, and founded the _Journal of

Insanity_.

The first independent writer upon diseases of the eye was Dr. Frick

(1793-1870), of Maryland. As illustrating how little our present

specialties were then separated, it is worth while to remark that Dr.

Edward Delafield (1794-1875), who, in 1826. was Professor of Obstetrics

and Diseases of Women and Children in the College of Physicians and

Surgeons, New York, delivered at the same time a special course of

lectures upon diseases of the eye. The first man in the United States

to make these diseases his exclusive specialty was Dr. Williams

(1822-1888), of Cincinnati.

It would be very wrong, in this connection, to omit the mention of the

name of Oliver Wendell Holmes, the genial "Autocrat of the Breakfast

Table," but recently dead at a ripe old age, who used to say that he was

"seventy years young." who was for a long time Professor of Anatomy at

Harvard Medical College, but who was much more widely known and

endeared to the English-speaking public by his beautiful poems and most

attractive prose writings.--who, as author of the _Chambered Nautilus_,

for instance, will be remembered so long as the English language has

a literature and is read, he rendered a great service to the medical

profession by first calling attention to the contagiousness of puerperal

fever. Of his prose writings, his medical essays--entitled _Currents and

Counter-currents_--make perhaps the most delightful reading.

Not{291} a few Americans deserve special mention as surgeons and

surgical teachers of eminence during the past hundred years. Without

being invidious, there must, nevertheless, be mentioned John Collins

Warren (1778-1856), first Professor of Anatomy and Surgery in the

Harvard School, under whose auspices ether was first administered for

the purpose of surgical anæsthesia, and who was the founder, in 1828, of

the _Boston Medical and Surgical Journal_. He wrote an extensive

treatise upon tumors, and, it is stated, first successfully tapped the

pericardium.

[Illustration: 0311]

Philip S. Physick (1768-1837), a pupil of Hunter, has been spoken of as

the "father of American surgery," which he taught in the University

of Pennsylvania. He was a tremendous worker, but wrote very little. He

employed animal ligatures made of buckskin. John Syng Dorsey (1783-1818)

was a nephew of Physick; taught anatomy in{292} the University of

Pennsylvania; wrote a treatise on surgery, which was the second surgical

text-book published in this country, and was the first in the United

States to tie the external iliac artery. He died at the age of

thirty-five, at a time when he was giving promise of exceeding eminence.

Nathan Smith taught in Dartmouth, Yale, and Bowdoin Colleges, and 'was

considered the best man of his day in New England.

[Illustration: 0312]

To him is justly due the great honor of having performed the first

rational and deliberate ovariotomy, which he did in 1809, his patient

living for thirty-two years. The operation was performed without an

anæsthetic, and considering the circumstances under which it was carried

out has shed a lustre upon his name and brain which nothing can ever

dim. By this performance he became practically the father of modern

abdominal surgery, and to him Americans and{293} Europeans alike are

delighted to render all the honor that is his due.

Perhaps the most eminent surgeon of the country was Valentine Mott

(1785-1865), a pupil of Cooper and Bell, who taught in the College of

Physicians and Surgeons, New York, until 1840, and in the University

Medical School until 1860. He was a man of exceeding boldness and

brilliancy, whose operations were performed at a time when anaesthesia

was unknown, or was in its infancy, and who probably did more work in

the surgery of the vascular system than any other surgeon who has ever

lived. He was the first to tie the arteria innominata,--in 1818. As

Gross wrote of him, he had a record of one hundred and thirty-eight

ligations of various large arteries,--a record probably never equaled.

He was also the first to do a successful extirpation of the clavicle for

tumor,--an operation which at that time was considered very formidable.

Though not a great writer himself, he is best known among students

as the translator and editor of Velpeau's large work upon operative

surgery.

Dr. George McClellan (1796-1847) was the founder of the Jefferson

Medical School, and its first Professor of Surgery. He was followed

later by Dr. Thomas D. Mutter, who left his surgical museum to the

College of Physicians of Philadelphia and endowed a lectureship there.

J. K. Rodger, of New York; John Rhea Barton, of Philadelphia; William

Gibson, of Philadelphia; Gurdon Buck, of New York; Willard Parker, of

New York; Frank H. Hamilton, of New York, who made his reputation while

teaching in our Buffalo school, author of a most popular and valuable

treatise upon fractures and dislocations; and Henry B. Sands, of New

York, were men of greatest prominence during the middle and latter

portion of the present century, each of whom has contributed in his

way either to the science or to the literature of surgery. The most

prominent figure in American surgery of the past forty{294} years was

Samuel D. Gross, of Philadelphia, professor in the Jefferson School,

to which he moved from Kentucky, where he laid the foundation for his

attainments and reputation.

[Illustration: 0314]

He was an early writer upon surgical pathology and anatomy, but is best

known for his elaborate _System of Surgery_, in two large volumes, which

has survived several editions and is still most highly esteemed. Among

others who ought to be mentioned are Nathan R. Smith, of Baltimore,

the inventor of the anterior splint; Paul F. Eve, of Nashville; John

T. Hodgen, of St. Louis; Daniel{295} Brainard, of Chicago, and his

successor, Moses Gunn; Alden March, of Albany; Henry J. Bigelow, of

Boston, who performed the first excision of the hip in this country, in

1852, and who invented the method of crushing and removing stone from

the bladder at a single operation, known as litholapaxy; and D. Hayes

Agnew, of Philadelphia, who finished, before his death, a large and

elaborate treatise on surgery, in three thick volumes.

Of obstetricians and gynaecologists America has had no lack, and, in

fact, the United States may almost be said to be the first home of

gynaecology. Dr. Bard was the first Professor of Midwifery in King's

College, now Columbia, New York, and the author of the first work upon

the subject published in this country. In Philadelphia, Dr. Thomas C.

James (1756-1835) was the first distinct teacher of obstetrics, his

chair falling later to Dewees, already mentioned, who wrote extensively

on midwifery and the diseases of children and of women. The same chair

in the University of Pennsylvania was filled later by Hugh L. Hodge

(1796-1873), a man of great originality and independence, who published

a most elaborate and beautiful work upon his branch, which will always

remain a classic. Charles D. Meigs, professor in the Jefferson School,

Philadelphia, was the first to direct attention to thrombosis as a

cause of sudden death in childbirth. He wrote both on gynaecology

and midwifery. Bedford, of Baltimore, was another popular teacher

and writer, with whom deserves to be mentioned William H. By ford, of

Chicago, who wrote on both obstetrics and gynaecology.

Gynaecology owes much to the efforts of American schools and

practitioners. The first successful attempt of McDowell's, already

alluded to, was imitated by Nathan Smith in 1821; and during the next

forty years thirty-six ovariotomies had been performed by eighteen

different surgeons,{296} with a record of twenty-one recoveries.

[Illustration: 0316]

Probably the most prominent passed figure in American gynaecology is

J. Marion Sims (1813-1883), born in the South, where he invented his

well-known speculum in 1852, whose introduction marked an epoch in

the treatment of the pelvic diseases of women. It was also in South

Carolina, among poor negro patients, that he perfected his method of

plastic operations in the vagina for the relief of vesical fistulæ,

which he later demonstrated in Paris to the astonishment of incredulous

Parisian surgeons, who had almost uniformly failed in their attempts,

and which he later successfully and brilliantly performed in all the

capitals of Europe, where, as in this country, he enjoyed the greatest

reputation. He was the founder of the great Woman's Hospital in New

York, in 1855, an institution from which has proceeded more good

gynæcological teaching than from any similar institution in the world

Other ovariotomists{297} and gynaecologists of great merit were John

L. Atlee, and his brother Washington Atlee, of Pennsylvania; Dunlap, of

Springfield, Ohio; Peaslee, of New York, who wrote the first American

treatise on ovarian tumors; Kimball, of Lowell, Massachusetts; and D. H.

Agnew, of Philadelphia, who is, perhaps, yet better known as a general

surgeon because of his _magnum opus_,--his _Treatise on Surgery_, in

three large volumes, already mentioned.

[Illustration: 0317]

After{298} this brief _résumé_ of the names and achievements of the

best-known American physicians and surgeons no longer living, it remains

only to say a few words with regard to the general character of their

work and attainments. It certainly was the case, during the earlier

and middle portions of this century, that men had much to gain, beside

addition to their vernacular, by study in foreign countries. Edinburgh

and London were, at first, the centres to which men flocked; during the

middle of the century they gathered in Paris, attracted by such men as

Broussais, Velpeau, and others; after which the tide of travel turned

toward Germany, where the government does more for the education of

medical men and the furnishing of distinct opportunities than is done in

any other part of the world. But, thanks to the influence of the foreign

schools and the receptivity and natural quickness of the American mind,

we have reached a point in this country when it is no longer necessary

for American students to visit the foreign centres for this purpose,

advantageous as these may be in many respects. The only feature in which

we are yet lacking is the matter of government aid and the government

control of medical institutions, by which better opportunities may be

afforded for pathological study. Aside from this, and the centralization

of cases which government control permits, it may be said that the

Americans are in all respects as good practitioners as--and in most

respects better than--their foreign colleagues. They evince more of

humanity, more of real interest and care in their patients, and more

consideration for their comfort and welfare; while, in all that pertains

to fertility of invention, to originality of performance, and accuracy

of work, they, as a rule, excel. Divested of glamour, American surgery,

both general and special, is ahead of most of that which one can see

abroad, and the therapeutics of the American profession certainly

surpass those of any other nationality. No one need feel, then, that it

is necessary to go abroad for any{299} purpose, unless it may be that

polish and wide range of general information that necessarily come from

travel and observation among other nations and peoples. In practical

medicine, then, as in practical living, America leads the world.

An Epitome of the History of Medicine · 第 11 / 14 章