CHAPTER V--PTOLEMY PHILOMETOR AND PTOLEMY EUERGETES II.

_The Syrian Invasion: The Jews and the Bible: Relations with Rome:

Literature of the Age._

At the beginning of the last reign the Alexandrians had sadly felt the

want of a natural guardian to the young king, and they were now glad to

copy the customs of the conquered Egyptians. Epiphanes had left behind

him two sons, each named Ptolemy, and a daughter named Cleopatra; and

the elder son, though still a child, mounted the throne under the able

guardianship of his mother, Cleopatra, and took the very suitable name

of Philometor, or _mother-loving_. The mother governed the kingdom for

seven years as regent during the minority of her son. “When Philometor

reached his fourteenth year, the age at which his minority ceased, his

coronation was celebrated with great pomp. Ambassadors from several

foreign states were sent to Egypt to wish the king joy, to do honour to

the day, and to renew the treaties of peace with him: Caius Valerius and

four others were sent from Rome; Apollonius, the son of Mnestheus, was

sent from Judæa; and we may regret with Polybius that he himself was not

able to form part of the embassy then sent from the Achaians, that he

might have seen the costly and curious ceremony, and given us an account

of it.

While Cleopatra lived, she had been able to keep her son at peace with

her brother, Antiochus Epiphanes, but upon her death, Leneus and the

eunuch Eulaius, who then had the care of the young king, sought to

reconquer Coele-Syria; and they embroiled the country in a war, at a

time when weakness and decay might have been seen in every part of

the army and navy, and when there was the greatest need of peace.

Coele-Syria and Phoenicia had been given to Ptolemy Epiphanes as his

wife’s dower; but, when Philometor seemed too weak to grasp them,

Antiochus denied that his father had ever made such a treaty, and got

ready to march against Egypt, as the easiest way to guard Coele-Syria.

By this time the statesmen of Egypt ought to have learned the mistake

in their foreign policy. By widening their frontier they always weakened

it. They should have fortified the passes between the Red Sea and the

Mediterranean, not cities in Asia. When Antiochus entered Egypt he was

met at Pelusium by the army of Philometor, which he at once routed in

a pitched battle. The whole of Egypt was then in his power; he marched

upon Memphis with a small force, and seized it without having to strike

a blow, helped perhaps by the plea that he was acting on behalf of his

nephew, Ptolemy Philometor, who then fell into his hands.

On this, the younger Ptolemy, the brother of Philometor, who was with

his sister Cleopatra in Alexandria, and was about fifteen years old,

declared himself king, and sent ambassadors to Rome to ask for help

against Antiochus; and taking the name of the most popular of his

forefathers, he called himself Euergetes. He is, however, better known

in history as Ptolemy Physcon, or _bloated_, a nickname which was

afterwards given to him when he had grown fat and unwieldy from the

diseases of luxury.

Comanus and Cineas were the chief advisers of the young Euergetes; and

in their alarm they proposed to send the foreign ambassadors to meet the

invader on his march from Memphis, and to plead for peace. This task

the ambassadors kindly undertook. There were then in Alexandria two

embassies from the Achaians, one to renew the treaty of peace, and one

to settle the terms of the coming wrestling match. There were there

three embassies from Athens, one with gifts from the city, one about the

Panathenaic games, and one about the celebration of the mysteries. There

was also an embassy from Miletus, and one from Clazomenæ. On the day of

their arrival at Memphis, Antiochus feasted these numerous ambassadors

in grand state, and on the next day gave them an audience. But their

arguments for peace carried no weight with him; and he denied that his

father, Antiochus the Great, had ever given Coele-Syria as a dower

with his daughter Cleopatra to Epiphanes. To gain time he promised

the ambassadors that he would give them an answer as soon as his own

ambassadors returned from Alexandria; and in the meanwhile he carried

his army down the Nile to Naucratis, and thence marched to the capital

to begin the siege.

Antiochus, however, was defeated in his first assault upon Alexandria,

and finding that he should not soon be able to bring the siege to an

end, he sent off an embassy to Rome with a hundred and fifty talents of

gold, fifty as a present to the senate, and the rest to be divided among

the states of Greece, whose help he might need. At the same time, also,

an embassy from the Rhodians arrived in the port of Alexandria, to

attempt to restore peace to the country of their old allies. Antiochus

received the Rhodian ambassadors in his tent, but would not listen to

the long speech with which they threatened him, and shortly told them

that he came as the friend of his elder nephew, the young Philometor,

and if the Alexandrians wished for peace they should open the gates

to their rightful king. Antiochus was, however, defeated in all his

assaults on the city, and he at last withdrew his army and returned

to Syria. He left Euergetes, King of the Greeks, at Alexandria, and

Philometor at Memphis, King of the rest of Egypt. But he kept Pelusium,

where he placed a strong garrison that he might be able easily to

re-enter Egypt whenever he chose.

Ptolemy Macron, the Alexandrian governor of Cyprus, added to the

troubles of the country by giving up his island to Antiochus. But he

met with the usual fate of traitors, he was badly rewarded; and when he

complained of his treatment, he was called a traitor by the very men who

had gained by his treachery, and he poisoned himself in the bitterness

of his grief. Antiochus, like most invaders, carried off whatever

treasure fell into his hands. Egypt was a sponge which had not lately

been squeezed, and his court and even his own dinner-table then shone

with a blaze of silver and gold unknown in Syria before this inroad into

Egypt.

By these acts, and by the garrison left in Pelusium, the eyes of

Philometor were opened, and he saw that his uncle had not entered Egypt

for his sake, but to make it a province of Syria, after it had been

weakened by civil war. He therefore wisely forgave his rebellious

brother and sister in Alexandria, and sent offers of peace to them; and

it was agreed that the two Ptolemies should reign together, and turn

their forces against the common enemy. It was most likely at this

time, and as a part of this treaty, that Philometor married his sister

Cleopatra. It was mainly by her advice and persuasion that the quarrel

between the two brothers was for the time healed. On this treaty between

the brothers the year was called the twelfth of Ptolemy Philometor and

the first of Ptolemy Euergetes, and the public deeds of the kingdom were

so dated.

The next year Antiochus Epiphanes again entered Egypt, claiming the

island of Cyprus and the country round Pelusium as the price of his

forbearance; and, on his marching forward, Memphis a second time opened

its gates to him without a battle. He came down by slow marches towards

Alexandria, and crossed the canal at Leucine, four miles from the city.

There he was met by the Roman ambassadors, who ordered him to quit the

country. On his hesitating, Popilius, who was one of them, drew a circle

round him on the sand with his stick, and told him that, if he crossed

that line without promising to leave Egypt at once, it should be taken

as a declaration of war against Rome. On this threat Antiochus again

quitted Egypt, and the brothers sent ambassadors to Rome to thank the

senate for their help, and to acknowledge that they owed more to the

Roman people than they did to the gods or to their forefathers.

The treaty made on this occasion between Philometor and Antiochus

was written by Heraclides Lembus, the son of Serapion, a native of

Oxyrynchus, who wrote on the succession of the philosophers in the

several Greek schools, and other works on philosophy, but whose chief

work was a history named the Lembeutic History.

Four years afterwards, in B. c. 164, Antiochus Epiphanes died; and the

Jews of Judæa, who had been for some time struggling for liberty, then

gained a short rest for their unhappy country. Judas Maccabæus had

raised his countrymen in rebellion against the foreigners; he had

defeated the Syrian forces in several battles; and was at last able

to purify the temple and re-establish the service there as of old. He

therefore sent to the Jews of Egypt to ask them to join their Hebrew

brethren in celebrating the feast of tabernacles on that great occasion.

[Illustration: 219.jpg TEMPLE OF HERMONTHIS.]

The unhappy quarrels between the Egyptian kings soon broke out again;

and, as the party of Euergetes was the stronger, Philometor was driven

from his kingdom, and he fled to Rome for safety and for help. He

entered the city privately, and took up his lodgings in the house of

one of his own subjects, a painter of Alexandria. His pride led him

to refuse the offers of better entertainment which were made to him by

Demetrius, the nephew of Antiochus, who, like himself, was hoping to

regain his kingdom by the help of the Romans. The Kings of Egypt and

Syria, the two greatest kingdoms in the world, were at the same time

asking to be heard at the bar of the Roman senate, and were claiming the

thrones of their fathers at the hands of men who could make and unmake

kings at their pleasure.

As soon as the senate heard that Philometor was in Rome, they lodged him

at the cost of the state in a manner becoming his high rank, and soon

sent him back to Egypt, with orders that Euergetes should reign in

Cyrene, and that the rest of the kingdom should belong to Philometor.

This happened in the seventeenth year of Philometor and the sixth of

Euergetes, which was the last year that was named after the two kings.

Cassius Longinus, who was next year consul at Rome, was most likely

among the ambassadors who replaced Philometor on the throne; for he put

the Ptolemaic eagle and thunderbolt on his coins, as though to claim the

sovereignty of Egypt for the senate.

To these orders Euergetes was forced to yield; but the next year he

went himself to Rome to complain to the senate that they had made a

very unfair division of the kingdom, and to beg that they would add

the island of Cyprus to his share. After hearing the ambassadors from

Philometor, who were sent to plead on the other side, the senate granted

the prayer of Euergetes, and sent ambassadors to Cyprus, with orders to

hand that island over to Euergetes, and to make use of the fleets and

armies of the republic if these orders were disobeyed.

Euergetes, during his stay in Rome, if we may believe Plutarch, made an

offer of marriage to Cornelia, the mother of the Gracchi; but this offer

of a throne could not make the high-minded matron quit her children and

her country. He left Italy with the Roman ambassadors, and, in passing

through Greece, he raised a large body of mercenaries to help him to

wrest Cyprus from his brother, as it would seem that the governor,

faithful to his charge, would not listen to the commands of Rome. But

the ambassadors had been told to conquer Cyprus, if necessary, with the

arms of the republic only, and they therefore made Euergetes disband

his levies. They sailed for Alexandria to enforce their orders upon

Philometor, and sent Euergetes home to Cyrene. Philometor received the

Roman ambassadors with all due honours; he sometimes gave them fair

promises, and sometimes put them off till another day; and tried to spin

out the time without saying either yes or no to the message from the

senate. Euergetes sent to Alexandria to ask if they had gained their

point; but though they threatened to return to Rome if they were not at

once obeyed, Philometor, by his kind treatment and still kinder words,

kept them more than forty days longer at Alexandria.

At last the Roman ambassadors left Egypt, and on their way home they

went to Cyrene, to let Euergetes know that his brother had disobeyed the

orders of the senate, and would not give up Cyprus; and Euergetes then

sent two ambassadors to Rome to beg them to revenge their affronted

dignity and to enforce their orders by arms. The senate of course

declared the peace with Egypt at an end, and ordered the ambassadors

from Philometor to quit Rome within five days, and sent their own

ambassadors to Cyrene to tell Euergetes of their decree.

But while this was going on, the state of Cyrene had risen in arms

against Euergetes; his vices and cruelty had made him hated, they had

gained for him the nicknames of Kakergetes, or _mischief-maker_, and

Physcon, or _bloated_; and while wishing to gain Cyprus he was in danger

of losing his own kingdom. When he marched against the rebels, he was

beaten and wounded, either in the battle or by an attack upon his life

afterwards, and his success was for some time doubtful. When he had at

last put down this rising, he sailed for Rome, to urge his complaints

against Philometor, upon whom he laid the blame of the late rebellion,

and to ask for help. The senate, after hearing both sides, sent a small

fleet with Euergetes, not large enough to put him on the throne of

Cyprus, but gave him, what they had before refused, leave to levy

an army of his own, and to enlist their allies in Greece and Asia as

mercenaries under his standard.

The Roman troops seem not to have helped Euergetes; but he landed in

Cyprus with his own mercenaries, and was there met by Philometor, who

had brought over the Egyptian army in person. Euergetes, however, was

beaten in several battles, he was soon forced to shut himself up in

the city of Lapitho, and at last to lay down his arms before his elder

brother.

If Philometor had upon this put his brother to death, the deed would

have seemed almost blameless after the family murders already related

in this history. But, with a goodness of heart, he a second time forgave

his brother all that had passed, replaced him on the throne of Cyrene,

and promised to give him his daughter in marriage.

[Illustration: 223.jpg GARDEN NEAR HELIOPOLIS]

We are not told whether the firmness and forgiving mildness of

Philometor had turned the Roman senate in his favour, but their troops

seemed wanted in other quarters; at any rate they left off trying to

enforce their decree; Philometor kept Cyprus, and sent Euergetes a

yearly gift of grain from Alexandria.

During the wars in Syria between Philometor and Antiochus Epiphanes, at

the beginning of this reign, the Jews were divided into two parties, one

favouring the Egyptians and one the Syrians. At last the Syrian party

drove their enemies out of Jerusalem; and Onias, the high priest, with

a large body of Jews, fled to Egypt. There they were well received

by Philometor, who allowed them to dwell in the neighbourhood of

Heliopolis; and he gave them leave to build a temple and ordain priests

for themselves. Onias built his temple at On or Onion, a city about

twenty-three miles from Memphis, once the capital of the district of

Heliopolis. It was on the site of an old Egyptian temple of the goddess

Pasht, which had fallen into disuse and decay, and was built after the

model of the temple of Jerusalem. Though by the Jewish law there was to

be no second temple, yet Onias defended himself by quoting, as if meant

for his own times, the words of Isaiah, who says that in that day there

shall be an altar to the Lord in the midst of the land of Egypt. The

building of this temple, and the celebrating the Jewish feasts there,

as in rivalry to the temple of Jerusalem, were a never-failing cause

of quarrel between the Hebrew and the Greek Jews. They each altered the

words of the Bible to make it speak their own opinions. The Hebrew Bible

now says that the new temple was in the City of Destruction, and the

Greek Bible says that it was in the City of Righteousness; whereas, from

the Arabic version and some early commentaries, it seems that Isaiah was

speaking of the city of Heliopolis, where there had been of old an altar

to the Lord. The leaders of the Greek party wished the Jews to throw

aside the character of strangers and foreign traders; to be at home and

to become owners of the soil. “Hate not laborious work,” says the son of

Sirach; “neither husbandry, which the Most High hath ordained.”

About the same time the Jews brought before Ptolemy, as a judge, their

quarrel with the Samaritans, as to whether, according to the law of

Moses, the temple ought to have been built at Jerusalem, or on the green

and fertile Mount Gerizim, where the Samaritans built their temple, or

on the barren white crags of Mount Ebal, where the Hebrew Bible says

that it should be built; and as to which nation had altered their copies

of the Bible in the twenty-seventh chapter of Deuteronomy and eighth

chapter of Joshua. This dispute had lately been the cause of riots and

rebellion. Ptolemy seems to have decided the question for political

reasons, and to please his own subjects, the Alexandrian Jews; and

without listening to the arguments as to what the law ordered, he was

content with the proof that the temple had stood at Jerusalem for about

eight hundred years, and he put to death the two Samaritan pleaders, who

had probably been guilty of some outrage against the Jews in zeal for

Mount Gerizim, and for which they might then have been on their trial.

Onias, the high priest, was much esteemed by Philometor, and bore high

offices in the government; as also did Dositheus, another Jew, who had

been very useful in helping the king to crush a rebellion. Dositheus

called himself a priest and a Levite, though his title to that honour

seems to have been doubted by his countrymen. He had brought with him

into Egypt the book of Esther, written in Greek, which he said had been

translated out of the Hebrew in Jerusalem by Lysimachus. It contained

some additions for which the Hebrew has never been brought forward, and

which are now placed among the uncanonical books in the Apocrypha.

Since the Ptolemies had found themselves too weak to hold Ethiopia, they

had placed a body of soldiers on the border of the two countries, to

guard Egypt from the inroads of the enemy. This station, twelve miles

to the south of Syênê, had by degrees grown into a city, and was called

Parembole, or _The Camp_; and, as most of the soldiers were Greek

mercenaries, it was natural that the temple which Philometor built there

should be dedicated in the Greek language. Of the temples hitherto built

by the Ptolemies, in the Egyptian cities, every one seems to have had

the king’s name and titles, and its dedication to the gods, carved on

its massive portico in hieroglyphics; but this was in a Greek city, and

it was dedicated to Isis and Serapis, on behalf of Philometor and his

queen, in a Greek inscription.

[Illustration: 227.jpg TEMPLE OF APOLLONOPOLIS]

Philometor also built a temple at Antseopolis to Antaeus, a god of whom

we know little, but that he gave his name to the city; and another to

Aroëris at Ombos; and in the same way he carved the dedications on the

porticoes in the Greek language. This custom became common after that

time, and proves both the lessened weight which the native Egyptians

bore in the state, and that the kings had forgotten the wise rules of

Ptolemy Soter, in regard to the religious feelings of the people. They

must have been greatly shocked by this use of foreign writing in the

place of the old characters of the country, which, from having been used

in the temples, even for ages beyond the reach of history, had at last

been called sacred. In the temple at Antoopolis we note a marked change

in the style of building. The screen in front of the great portico is

almost removed by having a doorway made in it between every pair of

columns.

It is to this reign, also, that we seem to owe the great temple at

Apollinopolis Magna, although it was not finished till one or two

reigns later. It is one of the largest and least ruined of the Egyptian

temples. Its front is formed of two huge square towers, with sloping

sides, between which is the narrow doorway, the only opening in its

massive walls. Through this the worshipper entered a spacious courtyard

or cloister, where he found shade from the sun under a covered walk on

either side. In front is the lofty portico with six large columns, the

entrance to the body of the building. This last is flat-roofed, and far

lower than the grand portico which hid it from the eyes of the crowd in

the courtyard. The staircases in the towers are narrow. The sacred rooms

within were small and dark, with only a glimmering flame here and there

before an altar, except when lighted up with a blaze of lamps on a

feast-day. As a castle it must have had great strength; from the top

and loopholes of the two towers, stones and darts might be hurled at the

enemy; and as it was in the hands of the Egyptians, it is the strongest

proof that they were either not distrusted or not feared by their Greek

rulers. The city of Apollinopolis stands on a grand and lofty situation,

overlooking the river and the valley; and this proud temple, rising

over all, can only have been planned by military skill as a fortress to

command the whole.

At this time the Greeks in Egypt were beginning to follow the custom of

their Egyptian brethren, to take upon themselves monastic vows, and

to shut themselves up in the temples in religious idleness. But these

foreigners were looked upon with jealousy by the Egyptian monks as

intruders on their endowments, and we meet with a petition addressed

to Philometor by Ptolemy, the son of Glaucias, a monk in the temple of

Serapis at Memphis, who styles himself a Macedonian, complaining that

his cell had been violently entered and himself ill-treated because

he was a Greek; and reminding the king that last year, when the king

visited the Serapium, he had addressed the same petition to him through

the bars of his window. The priests in temples of Egypt were maintained,

partly by their own estates, and partly by the offerings of the pious;

and we still possess a deed of sale made in this reign by the Theban

priests, of one-half of a third of their collections for the dead who

had been buried in Thynabunum, the Libyan suburb of Thebes. This sixth

share of the collections consisted of seven or eight families of slaves;

the price of it was four hundred pieces of brass; the bargain was made

in the presence of sixteen witnesses, whose names are given; and the

deed was registered and signed by a public notary in the city of Thebes.

The custom of giving offerings to the priests for the good of the dead

would seem to have been a cause of some wealth to the temples. It was

one among the many Egyptian customs forbidden by the law of Moses.

From this deed of sale we also gain some knowledge of the state of

slavery in Egypt. The names of the slaves and of their fathers are

Koptic, and in some cases borrowed from the names of the gods; hence

the slaves were probably of the same religion, and spoke nearly the same

language as their masters. They sunk into that low state rather by their

own want of mind than by their masters’ power. In each case the slave

was joined in the same lot with his children; and the low price of four

hundred pieces of brass, perhaps about thirty-eight dollars for eight

families, or even if it be meant for the half of eight families, proves

that they were of the nature of serfs, and that the master, either by

law or custom, could have had no power of cruelly overworking them. On

the other hand, in the reign of Philadelphus, the prisoners taken in

battle, who might be treated with greater severity, were ransomed at

fifteen dollars each. We see by the monuments that there were also a

few negroes in the same unhappy state of slavery. They were probably not

treated much worse than the lowest class of those born on the soil,

but they were much more valuable. Other slaves of the Berber race were

brought in coasting vessels from Opone on the incense coast, near to the

island of Dioscorides.

Aristarchus, who had been the tutor of Euergetes II., and of a son of

Philometor, was one of the ornaments of this reign. He had been a pupil

of Aristophanes, the grammarian, and had then studied under Crates at

Pergamus, the rival school to Alexandria. He died at Cyprus, whither he

probably withdrew on the death of Philometor. He was chiefly known for

his critical writings, in which his opinions of poetry were thought

so just that few dared to disagree with them; and his name soon became

proverbial for a critic. Aristarchus had also the good fortune to be

listened to in his lecture-room by one whose name is far more known than

those of his two royal pupils. Moschus of Syracuse, the pastoral poet,

was one of his hearers; but his fame must not be claimed for Alexandria;

he can hardly have learned from the critic that just taste by which he

joined softness and sweetness to the rude plainness of the Doric muse.

Indeed in this he only followed his young friend Bion, whose death he

so beautifully bewails, and from whose poems he generously owns that he

learned so much. It may be as well to add that the lines in which he

says that Theocritus, who had been dead above one hundred years, joined

with him in his sorrow for the death of Bion are later additions not

found in the early manuscripts of his poems.

From our slight acquaintance with Bion’s life, we are left in doubt

whether he accompanied his friend Moschus to the court of Alexandria;

but it is probable that he did. In his beautiful lamentation for the

death of Adonis, we have an imitation of the melancholy chant of the

Egyptians, named _maneros_, which they sang through the streets in the

procession on the feast of Isis, when the crowd joined in the chorus,

“Ah, hapless Isis, Osiris is no more.” The tale has been a good deal

changed by the Sicilian muse of Bion, but in the boar which killed

Adonis, we have the wicked Typhon as carved on the monuments; we have

also the wound in the thigh, and the consolations of the priests,

who every year ended their mournful song with advising the goddess to

reserve her sorrow for another year, when on the return of the festival

the same lament would be again celebrated. The whole poem has a depth

and earnestness of feeling which is truly Egyptian, but which was very

little known in Alexandria.

To the Alexandrian grammarians, and more particularly to Aristophanes,

Aristarchus, and their pupil, Ammonius, we are indebted for our

present copies of Homer. These critics acted like modern editors, each

publishing an edition, or rather writing out a copy, which was then

re-copied in the museum as often as called for by the demands of the

purchasers of books. Aristophanes left perhaps only one such copy or

edition, while Aristarchus, in his efforts to correct the text of the

great epic poet, made several such copies. These were in the hands of

the later scholiasts, who appealed to them as their authority, and

ventured to make no further alterations; we therefore now read the Iliad

and Odyssey nearly as left by these Alexandrian critics. They no doubt

took some liberties in altering the spelling and smoothing the lines;

and, though we should value most highly a copy in the rougher form in

which it came into their hands, yet, on the whole, we must be great

gainers by their labours. They divided the Iliad and Odyssey into

twenty-four books each, and corrected the faulty metres; but one of

their chief tasks was to set aside, or put a mark against, those more

modern lines which had crept into the ancient poems. It had been

usual to call every old verse Homer’s or Homeric, and these it was the

business of the critic to mark as not genuine. Aristarchus was jocosely

said to have called every line spurious which he did not like; but

everything that we can learn of him leads us to believe that he executed

his task with judgment. From these men sprang the school of Alexandrian

grammarians, who for several centuries continued their minute and often

unprofitable studies in verbal criticism.

[Illustration: 234.jpg THE APOTHEOSIS OF HOMER]

These were the palmy days of criticism. Never before or since have

critics held so high a place in literature. The world was called upon to

worship and do honour to the poet, but chiefly that it might admire the

skill of the critic who could name the several sources of his beauties.

The critic now ranked higher than a priest at the foot of Mount

Parnassus. Homer was lifted to the skies that the critic might stand on

a raised pedestal among the Muses. Such seems to be the meaning of

the figures on the upper part of the well-known sculpture called the

Apotheosis of Homer. It was made in this reign; and at the foot Ptolemy

and his mother, in the characters of Time and the World, are crowning

the statue of the poet, in the presence of ten worshippers who represent

the literary excellences which shine forth in his poems. The figures

of the Iliad and Odyssey kneel beside his seat, and the Frogs and Mice

creep under his footstool, showing that the latter mock-heroic poem was

already written and called the work of Homer.

Other celebrities who flourished under the fifth Ptolemy were

Pamphilius, an Alexandrian physician who wrote on medical plants;

Meander, a poet and physician who studied poisons, and the great

Hipparchus, the founder of mathematical astronomy. Hero, also, in this

reign, invented a kind of primitive steam-engine.

[Illustration: 235.jpg HERO’S ROTATING STEAM ENGINE]

These men and their contemporaries were in the habit of writing their

scientific observations in the form of poetry, but it was verse without

earnestness and feeling, and such of it as survives is valued not for

its literary qualities or charms of diction, but for the side-lights it

throws upon the manners and education of the age.

The portrait of the king is known from those coins which bear the name

of “_King Ptolemy the mother-loving god_.” The eagle on the other side

of the coins has a phoenix or palm-branch on its wing or by its side,

which may be supposed to mean that they were struck in Phoenicia.

We have not before met with the title of “god,” on the coins of

the Ptolemies; but, as every one of them had been so named in the

hieroglyphical inscriptions, it can scarcely be called new.

When Philometor quitted the island of Cyprus after beating his brother

in battle, he left Archias as governor, who entered into a plot to give

it up to Demetrius, King of Syria, for the sum of five hundred talents.

But the plot was found out, and the traitor then put an end to his own

life, to escape from punishment and self-reproach. By this treachery of

Demetrius, Philometor was made his enemy, and he joined Attalus, King

of Pergamus, and Ariarathes, King of Cappadocia, in setting up Alexander

Balas as a pretender to the throne of Syria, who beat Demetrius in

battle, and put him to death. Philometor two years afterwards gave his

elder daughter, Cleopatra, in marriage to Alexander, and led her himself

to Ptolemaïs, or Acre, where the marriage was celebrated with great

pomp.

But even in Ptolemaïs, the city in which Alexander had been so covered

with favours, Philometor was near falling under the treachery of his new

son-in-law. He learned that a plot had been formed against his life by

Ammonius, and he wrote to Alexander to beg that the traitor might be

given up to justice. But Alexander acknowledged the plot as his own,

and refused to give up his servant. On this, Philometor recalled his

daughter, and turned against Alexander the forces which he had led into

Syria to uphold him. He then sent to the young Demetrius, afterwards

called Nicator, the son of his late enemy, to offer him the throne and

wife which he had lately given to Alexander Balas. Demetrius was equally

pleased with the two offers. Philometor then entered Antioch at the head

of his army, and there he was proclaimed by the citizens King of Asia

and Egypt; but with a forbearance then very uncommon, he called together

the council of the people, and refused the crown, and persuaded them to

receive Demetrius as their king.

[Illustration: 237.jpg COIN OF PTOLEMY V.]

It is interesting to note that Alexander Balas and Demetrius Nicator

each in his turn acknowledged his debt to the King of Egypt by putting

the Ptolemaic eagle on his coins, and adjusting them to the Egyptian

standard of weight: and in this they were afterwards followed by

Antiochus, the son of Demetrius. The Romans, on the other hand,

sometimes used the same eagle in boast of their power over Egypt; but we

cannot be mistaken in what was meant by these Syrian kings, who none of

them, when their coins were struck, were seated safely on the throne.

With them, as with some of the Greek cities of Asia Minor, the use of

the Egyptian eagle on the coins was an act of homage.

Philometor and Demetrius, as soon as the latter was acknowledged king at

Antioch, then marched against Alexander, routed his army, and drove him

into Arabia. But in this battle Philometor’s horse was frightened by the

braying of an elephant, and threw the king into the ranks of the enemy,

and he was taken up covered with wounds. He lay speechless for five

days, and the surgeons then endeavoured to cut out a piece of the broken

bone from his skull. He died under the operation: but not before the

head of Alexander had been brought to him as the proof of his victory.

Thus fell Ptolemy Philometor in the forty-second year of his age. His

reign began in trouble; before he reached the years of manhood the

country had been overrun by foreigners, and torn to pieces by civil war;

but he left the kingdom stronger than he found it, a praise which he

alone can share with Ptolemy Soter. He was alike brave and mild; he

was the only one of the race who fell in battle, and the only one whose

hands were unstained with civil blood. At an age and in a country when

poison and the dagger were too often the means by which the king’s

authority was upheld, when goodness was little valued, and when

conquests were thought the only measure of greatness, he spared the life

of a brother taken in battle, he refused the crown of Syria when offered

to him; and not only no one of his friends or kinsmen, but no citizen

of Alexandria, was put to death during the whole of his reign. We find

grateful inscriptions to his honour at the city of Citium in Cyprus, in

the island of Therse, and at Methone in Argolis.

Philometor had reigned thirty-five years in all; eleven years alone,

partly while under age, then six years jointly with his brother,

Euergetes II., and eighteen more alone while his brother reigned in

Cyrene. He married his sister Cleopatra, and left her a widow, with two

daughters, each named Cleopatra. The elder daughter we have seen offered

to Euergetes, then married to Alexander Balas, and lastly to Demetrius.

The younger daughter, afterwards known by the name of Cleopatra Cocce,

was still in the care of her mother. He had most likely had three sons.

One perhaps had been the pupil of Aristarchus, and died before his

father; as the little elegy by Antipator of Sidon, which is addressed to

the dead child, on the grief of his father and mother, would seem to be

meant for a son of Philometor. A second son was murdered, and a third

lived in Syria.

On the death of Philometor, his widow, Cleopatra, and some of the chief

men of Alexandria proclaimed his young son king, most likely under the

name of Ptolemy Eupator; but Euergetes, whose claim was favoured by

the mob, marched from Cyrene to Alexandria to seize the crown of Egypt.

Onias the Jew defended the city for Cleopatra; but a peace was soon made

by the help of Thermus, the Roman ambassador, and on this the gates of

Alexandria were opened. It was agreed that Euergetes should be king, and

marry Cleopatra, his sister and his brother’s widow. We may take it for

granted that one article of the treaty was that her son should reign on

the death of his uncle; but Euergetes, forgetting that he owed his own

life to Philometor, and also disregarding the Romans who were a party to

the treaty, had the boy put to death on the day of the marriage.

The Alexandrians, after the vices and murders of former kings, could not

have been much struck by the behaviour of Euergetes towards his family;

but he was not less cruel towards his people. Alexandria, which he

had entered peaceably, was handed over to the unbridled cruelty of the

mercenaries, and blood flowed in every street. The anger of Euergetes

fell more particularly on the Jews for the help which they had given to

Cleopatra, and he threatened them with utter destruction. The threat

was not carried into execution; but such was the Jews’ alarm, that they

celebrated a yearly festival in Alexandria for several hundred years, in

thankfulness for their escape from it. The population of the city, who

looked upon it less as a home than as a place of trade in which they

could follow their callings with the greatest gain, seemed to quit

Alexandria as easily as they had come there under Ptolemy Soter; and

Euergetes, who was afraid that he should soon be left to reign over a

wilderness, made new laws in favour of trade and of strangers who would

settle there.

In the lifetime of Philometor he had never laid aside his claim to the

throne of Egypt, but had only yielded to the commands of Rome and to his

brother’s forces, and he now numbered the years of his reign from his

former seizing of Alexandria. He had reigned six years with his brother,

and then eighteen years in Cyrene, and he therefore called the first

year of his real reign the twenty-fifth.

In the next year he went to Memphis to be crowned; and, while the pomps

and rites were there being performed, his queen and sister bore him a

son, whom, from the place and to please the people, he named Memphites.

But his queen was already in disgrace; and some of those very friends

who on his brother’s death had marched with him against Alexandria were

publicly put to death for speaking ill of his mistress Irene. He soon

afterwards put away his wife and married her younger daughter, his

niece, Cleopatra Cocce. The divorced Cleopatra was allowed to keep her

title; and, as she was the widow of the late king, she held a rank in

the state before the wife of the reigning king. Thus, the small temple

of Hâthor in the island of Philæ was dedicated to the goddess in the

name of King Ptolemy and Queen Cleopatra his sister, and Queen Cleopatra

his wife, designated as the gods Euergetæ.

[Illustration: 241.jpg TEMPLE OF HATHOR AT PHILAE]

The Roman senate, however, felt its authority slighted by this murder

of the young Eupator, and divorce of Cleopatra, both of whom were living

under its protection. The late ambassador, Thermus, by whose treachery

or folly Euergetes had been enabled to crush his rivals and gain the

sovereign power, was on his return to Rome called to account for his

conduct. Cato the Censor, in one of his great speeches, accused him of

having been seduced from his duty by the love of Egyptian gold, and of

having betrayed the queen to the bribes of Euergetes. In the meanwhile

Scipio Africanus the younger and two other Roman ambassadors were

sent by the senate to see that the kingdom of their ally was peaceably

settled. Euergetes went to meet him with great pomp, and received him

with all the honours due to his rank; and the whole city followed him in

crowds through the streets, eager to catch a sight of the conqueror of

Carthage, of the greatest man who had been seen in Alexandria, of one

who by his virtues and his triumphs had added a new glory even to the

name of Scipio. He brought with him, as his friend and companion (in

the case of a modern ambassador we should say, as his chaplain), the

philosopher, Pansetius, the chief of the Stoics, who had gained a great

name for his three books on the “Duty of Man,” which were afterwards

copied by Cicero.

[Illustration: 242b.jpg]

Euergetes showed them over the palace and the treasury; but, though the

Romans had already begun to run the down-hill race of luxury, in which

the Egyptians were so far ahead of them, yet Scipio, who held to the old

fashions and plain manners of the republic, was not dazzled by mere gold

and purple. But the trade of Alexandria, the natural harbour, the forest

of masts, and the lighthouse, the only one in the world, surpassed

anything that his well-stored mind had looked for. He went by boat to

Memphis, and saw the rich crops on either bank, and the easy navigation

of the Nile, in which the boats were sailing up the river by the force

of the wind and floating down by the force of the stream. The villages

on the river side were large and thickly set, each in the bosom of its

own grove of palm-trees; and the crowded population was well fed and

well clothed. The Roman statesman saw that nothing was wanting but a

good government to make Egypt what it used to be, the greatest kingdom

in the world.

Scipio went no higher than Memphis; the buildings of Upper Egypt, the

oldest and the largest in the world, could not draw him to Thebes, a

city whose trade had fallen off, where the deposits of bullion in the

temples had lessened, and whose linen manufacture had moved towards the

Delta. Had this great statesman been a Greek he would perhaps have gone

on to this city, famous alike in history and in poetry; but, as it was,

Scipio and his friends then sailed for Cyprus, Syria, and the other

provinces or kingdoms under the power of Rome, to finish this tour of

inspection.

For some time past, the Jews, taking advantage of the weakness of Egypt

and Syria, had been struggling to make themselves free; and, at the

beginning of this reign Simon Maccabæus, the high priest, sent an

embassy to Rome, with a shield of gold weighing one thousand _minae_, as

a present, to get their independence acknowledged by the Romans. On this

the senate made a treaty of alliance with the family of the Maccabees,

and, using the high tone of command to which they had for some time past

been accustomed, they wrote to Euergetes and the King of Syria, ordering

them not to make war upon their friends, the Jews. But in an after

decree the Romans recognise the close friendship and the trading

intercourse between Egypt and Judæa; and when they declared that they

would protect the Jews in their right to levy custom-house duties, they

made an exception in favour of the Egyptian trade. The people of Judæa

in these struggles were glad to forget the jealousy which had separated

them from their brethren in Egypt, and the old quarrel between the

Hebrews and the Hellenists; the Sanhedrim of Jerusalem wrote to the

Sanhedrim of Alexandria, telling them that they were going to keep the

Feast of the Tabernacles in solemn thanksgiving to the Almighty for

their deliverance, and begging for the benefit of their prayers.

The Jews, however, of Judæa, on their gaining their former place as a

nation, did not, as before, carry forward the chain of history in their

sacred books. While they had been under the yoke of the Babylonians, the

Persians, and the Syrians, their language had undergone some changes;

and when the Hebrew of the Old Testament was no longer the spoken

language, they perhaps thought it unworthy of them to write in any

other. At any rate, it is to their Greek brethren in Egypt that we

are indebted for the history of the bravery of the Maccabees. Jason

of Cyrene wrote the history of the Maccabees, and of the Jewish wars

against Antiochus Epiphanes and his son, Antiochus Eupator. This work,

which was in five books, is lost, and we now read only the short history

which was drawn from it by some unknown Greek writer, which, with the

letter from the Jews of Judaaa to their brethren of Egypt, forms the

second book of Maccabees.

In the list of Alexandrian authors, we must not forget to mention Jesus,

the son of Sirach, who came into Egypt in this reign, and translated

into Greek the Hebrew work of his grandfather Jesus, which is named the

Book of Wisdom, or Ecclesiasticus. It is written in imitation of the

Proverbs of Solomon; and though its pithy sayings fall far short of the

deep wisdom and lofty thoughts which crowd every line of that wonderful

work, yet it will always be read with profit and pleasure. In this

book we see the earliest example that we now possess of a Jewish writer

borrowing from the Greek philosophers; though how far the Greek thoughts

were part of the original Hebrew may be doubted, because the work

was left unfinished by Jesus the grandfather, and completed by the

Alexandrian translator, his grandson. Hereafter we shall see the

Alexandrian Jews engrafting on the Jewish theology more and more of the

Platonic philosophy, which very well suited the serious earnestness of

their character, and which had a most remarkable effect in making their

writings and opinions more fitted to spread into the ancient schools.

This and other writings of the Alexandrian Jews were by them added to

the list of sacred books which together made their Greek Bible; but they

were never acknowledged at Jerusalem. The Hebrew books of the law and

the prophets were first gathered together by Nehemiah after the return

of the Hebrews from Babylon; but his library had been broken up during

the Syrian wars. These Hebrew books, with some few which had since been

written, were again got together by Judas Maccabaeus; and after his time

nothing more seems to have been added to them, though the Alexandrian

Jews continued to add new books to their Greek Bible, while cultivating

the Platonic philosophy with a success which made a change in their

religious opinions. It was in Alexandria, and very much by the help

of the Jews, that Eastern and Western opinions now met. Each made some

change in the other, and, on the union of the two, Alexandria gave to

the world a new form of philosophy. The vices and cruelty of Euergetes

called for more than usual skill in the minister to keep down the angry

feelings of the people. This skill was found in the general Hierax,

who was one of those men whose popular manners, habits of business,

and knowledge of war, make them rise over every difficulty in times

of trouble. On him rested the whole weight of the government; his wise

measures in part made up for the vices of his master; and, when the

treasure of the state had been turned to the king’s pleasures, and the

soldiers were murmuring for want of pay, Hierax brought forward his own

money to quiet the rebellion. But at last the people could bear their

grievances no longer; the soldiers without pay, instead of guarding the

throne, were its greatest enemies, and the mob rose in Alexandria,

set fire to the palace, and Euergetes was forced to leave the city and

withdraw to Cyprus.

The Alexandrians, when free from their tyrant, sent for Cleopatra,

his sister and divorced queen, and set her upon the throne. Her son by

Philometor, in whose name she had before claimed the throne, had been

put to death by Euergetes; Memphites, one of her sons by Euergetes, was

with his father in the island of Cyprus; and Euergetes, fearing that his

first wife Cleopatra and her advisers might make use of his son’s

name to strengthen her throne, had the child at once put to death.

The birthday of Cleopatra was at hand, and it was to be celebrated in

Alexandria with the usual pomp; and Euergetes, putting the head, hands,

and feet of his son Memphites into a box, sent it to Alexandria by a

messenger, who had orders to deliver it to Cleopatra in the midst of

the feast, when the nobles and ambassadors were making their accustomed

gifts. The grief of Cleopatra was only equalled by the anger of the

Alexandrians, who the more readily armed themselves under Marsyas to

defend the queen against the invasion for which Euergetes was then

making preparations.

The queen’s forces shortly marched against the army of Euergetes that

was entering Egypt under the command of Hegelochus; but the Egyptian

army was beaten on the Syrian frontier. Marsyas was sent prisoner to

Euergetes; and the king then showed the only act of mercy which can

be mentioned to his praise, and spared the life of a prisoner whom

he thought he could make use of. Cleopatra then sent to Syria, to

her son-in-law Demetrius, to ask for help, which was at first readily

granted, but Demetrius was soon called home again by a rising in

Antioch. But great indeed must be the cruelty which a people will not

bear from their own king rather than call in a foreign master to relieve

them.

[Illustration: 249.jpg OBELISK AT HELIOPOLIS]

The return of the hated and revengeful Euergetes was not dreaded so much

by the Alexandrians as the being made a province of Syria. Cleopatra

received no help from Demetrius, but she lost the love of her people by

asking for it, and she was soon forced to fly from Alexandria. She

put her treasures on board a ship, and joined her son Ptolemy and her

son-in-law Demetrius in Syria, while Euergetes regained his throne.

As soon as Euergetes was again master of Egypt, it was his turn to

be revenged upon Demetrius; and he brought forward Zabbineus, a young

Egyptian, the son of Protarchus, a merchant, and sent him into Syria

with an army to claim the throne under the name of Alexander, the

adopted son of Antiochus. Alexander easily conquered and then put to

death Demetrius, but, when he found that he really was King of Syria, he

would no longer receive orders from Egypt; and Euergetes found that the

same plots and forces were then wanted to put down this puppet, which he

had before used to set him up. He began by making peace with his sister

Cleopatra, who was again allowed to return to Egypt; and we find her

name joined with those of Euergetes and his second queen in one of

the public acts of the priests. He then sent an army and his daughter

Tryphaena in marriage to Antiochus Grypus, one of the sons of Demetrius,

who gladly received his help, and conquered Alexander and gained the

throne of his father.

We possess a curious inscription upon an obelisk that once stood in the

island of Philæ, recording, as one of the grievances that the villagers

smarted under, the necessity of finding supplies for the troops on their

marches, and also for all the government messengers and public servants,

or those who claimed to travel as such. The cost of this grievance was

probably greater at Philæ than in other places, because the traveller

was there stopped in his voyage by the cataracts on the Nile, and he had

to be supplied with labourers to carry his luggage where the navigation

was interrupted. Accordingly the priests at Philæ petitioned the king

that their temple might be relieved from this heavy and vexatious

charge, which they said lessened their power of rightly performing their

appointed sacrifices; and they further begged to be allowed to set up a

monument to record the grant which they hoped for. Euergetes granted the

priests’ prayer, and accordingly they set up a small obelisk; and the

petition and the king’s answer were carved on the base of this monument.

The gold mines near the Nubian or Golden Berenicê, though not so rich

as they used to be, were worked with full activity by the unhappy

prisoners, criminals, and slaves, who were there condemned to labour in

gangs under the lash of their taskmasters. Men and women alike, even old

men and children, each at such work as his overstretched strength was

equal to, were imprisoned in these caverns tunnelled under the sea or

into the side of the mountain; and there by torchlight they suffered

the cruel tortures of their overseers without having power to make their

groans heard above ground. No lot upon earth could be more wretched than

that of these unhappy men; to all of them death would have been thought

a boon.

The survey of the coast of the Red Sea, which was undertaken in this or

the last reign, did not reach beyond the northern half of that sea. It

was made by Agatharcides, who, when the philosopher Heracleides Lembus

filled the office of secretary to the government under Philometor, had

been his scribe and reader. Agatharcides gives a curious account of the

half-savage people on these coasts, and of the more remarkable animals

and products of the country. He was a most judicious historian, and gave

a better guess than many at the true cause of why there was most water

in the Nile in the dry est season of the year; which was a subject of

never-ceasing inquiry with the travellers and writers on physics. Thaïes

said that its waters were held back at its mouths by the Etesian winds,

which blow from the north during the summer months; and Democritus of

Abdera said that these winds carried heavy rain-clouds to Ethiopia;

whereas the north winds do not begin to blow till the Nile has risen,

and the river has returned to its usual size before the winds cease.

Anaxagoras, who was followed by Euripides, the poet, thought that the

large supply of water came from the melting of snow in Ethiopia. Ephorus

thought that there were deep springs in the river’s bed, which gushed

forth with greater force in summer than in winter. Herodotus and

OEnopides both thought that the river was in its natural state when

the country was overflowed; and the former said that its waters were

lessened in winter by the attraction of the sun, then over Southern

Ethiopia; and the latter said that, as the earth grew cool, the waters

were sucked into its pores. The sources of the Nile were hidden by the

barbarism of the tribes on its banks; but by this time travellers had

reached the region of tropical rains; and Agatharcides said that the

overflow in Egypt arose from the rains in Upper Ethiopia. But the

Abyssinian rains begin to fall at midsummer, too late to cause the

inundation in Egypt; and therefore the truth seemed after all to lie

with the priests of Memphis, who said the Nile rises on the other side

of the equator, and the rain falling in what was winter on that side of

the globe made the Nile overflow in the Egyptian summer.

From the very earliest times, says Ebers, the Pharaohs had understood

the necessity of measuring exactly the amount or deficiency of the

inundations of the Nile, and Nilometers are preserved which were erected

high up the river in Nubia by kings of the Old Empire, by princes, that

is to say, who reigned before the invasion of the Hyksos. Herodotus

tells us that the river must rise sixteen ells for the inundation to be

considered a favourable one. If it remained below this mark, the higher

fields failed in obtaining a due supply of water, and a dearth was the

result. If it greatly exceeded it, it broke down the dykes, damaged the

villages, and had not retired into its bed by the time for sowing the

seed. Thus the peasant, who could expect no rain, and was threatened

neither by frosts nor storms, could have his prospects of a good or bad

harvest read off by the priests with perfect certainty by the scale of

the Nilometer, and not by the servants of the divinities only, but by

the officers of the realm, who calculated the amount of taxes to be paid

to them in proportion to the rising of the river.

[Illustration: 254.jpg NILOMETER AT RHODHA]

The standard was protected by the magic power of unapproachable

sanctity, and the husbandman has been strictly interdicted from the

earliest time to this very day from casting a glance at it during the

time when the river is rising; for what sovereign could bear to disclose

without reserve the decrees of Providence as to the most important of

his rights, that of estimating the amount of taxes to be imposed? In the

time of the Pharaohs it was the priesthood that declared to the king and

to the people their estimate of the inundations, and at the present day,

the sheik, who is sworn to secrecy, is under the control of the police

of Cairo, and has his own Nilometer, the zero point of which is said

to be somewhat below that of the ancient standard. The engineers of

the French expedition first detected the fraud, by means of which the

government endeavoured every year to secure the full amount of taxes.

When the Nile has reached a height of a little over fifteen old Arabic

ells, it exceeds its lowest level by more than eight ells, and has

reached the height requisite to enable it to irrigate the highest

fields. This happy event is announced to the people, who await it with

breathless anxiety, and the opening of the dykes may be proceeded with.

A festival to celebrate this occasion has been held from the remotest

times. At the present time customs prevail which can, it is alleged, be

traced by direct descent to the times of the Pharaohs, and yet during

the dominion of Christianity in Egypt, and later again under sovereigns

governing a nation wholly converted to Islam, the old worship of the

Nile, with all its splendour, its display, and its strange ceremonies,

was extirpated with the utmost rigour. But some portion of every

discarded religion becomes merged in the new one that has supplanted it

as a fresh form of superstition, and thus we discover from a Christian

document dating from the sixth century, that the rising of the Nile “in

its time” was no longer attributed to Osiris, but to a certain Saint

Orion, and, as the priest of antiquity taught that a tear of Isis led to

the overflowing of the Nile, so we hear the Egyptians of the present

day say that “a divine tear” has fallen into the stream and caused the

flood.

The trade of the Egyptians had given them very little knowledge of

geography. Indeed the whole trade of the ancients was carried on by

buying goods from their nearest neighbours on one side, and selling

them to those on the other side of them. Long voyages were unknown; and,

though the trading wealth of Egypt had mainly arisen from carrying the

merchandise of India and Arabia Felix from the ports on the Red Sea to

the ports on the Mediterranean, the Egyptians seem to have gained no

knowledge of the countries from which these goods came.

[Illustration: 256b.jpg SUK EL SALEH, CAIRO]

They bought them of the Arab traders, who came to Cosseir and the

Troglodytic Berenicê from the opposite coast; the Arabs had probably

bought them from the caravans that had carried them across the desert

from the Persian Gulf; and that these land journeys across the desert

were both easier and cheaper than a coasting voyage, we have before

learned, from Phila-delphus thinking it worth while to build watering

and resting-houses in the desert between Koptos and Berenicê, to save

the voyage between Berenicê and Cosseir. India seems to have been only

known to the Greeks as a country that by sea was to be reached by the

way of the Euphrates and the Persian Gulf; and though Scylax had, by

the orders of Darius, dropped down the river Indus, coasted Arabia,

and thence reached the Red Sea, this voyage was either forgotten or

disbelieved, and in the time of the Ptolemies it seems probable that

nobody thought that India could be reached by sea from Egypt. Arrian

indeed thought that the difficulty of carrying water in their small

ships, with large crews of rowers, was alone great enough to stop a

voyage of such a length along a desert coast that could not supply them

with fresh water.

The long voyages of Solomon and Necho had been limited to coasting

Africa; the voyage of Alexander the Great had been from the Indus to the

Persian Gulf; hence it was that the court of Euergetes was startled by

the strange news that the Arabian guards on the coast of the Red Sea had

found a man in a boat by himself, who could not speak Koptic, but who

they afterwards found was an Indian, who had sailed straight from India,

and had lost his shipmates. He was willing to show any one the route

by which he had sailed; and Eudoxus of Cyzicus in Asia Minor came to

Alexandria to persuade Euergetes to give him the command of a vessel for

this voyage of discovery. A vessel was given him; and, though he was but

badly fitted out, he reached a country, which he called India, by sea,

and brought back a cargo of spices and precious stones. He wrote an

account of the coasts which he visited, and it was made use of by Pliny.

But it is more than probable the unknown country called India, which

Eudoxus visited, was on the west coast of Africa. Abyssinia was often

called India by the ancients.

In these attempts at maritime discovery, and efforts after a cheaper

means of obtaining the Indian products, the Greek sailors of Euergetes

made a settlement in the island of Dioscorides, now called Socotara,

in the Indian Ocean, forty leagues eastward of the coast of Africa; and

there they met the trading vessels from India and Ceylon. This little

island continued a Greek colony for upwards of seven centuries, and

Greek was the only language spoken there till it fell under the Arabs

in the twilight of history, when all the European possessions in Africa

were overthrown. But the art of navigation was so far unknown that but

little use was made of this voyage; the goods of India, which were all

costly and of small weight, were still for the most part carried across

the desert on camels’ backs, and we may remark that at a later period

hardly more than twenty small vessels ever went to India in one year

during the reigns of the Ptolemies, and that it was not till Egypt was a

province of Rome that the trade-winds across the Arabian Sea were found

out by Hippalus, a pilot in the Indian trade. The voyage was little

known in the time of Pliny; even the learned Propertius seems to have

thought that silk was a product of Arabia; and Palmyra and Petra, the

two chief cities in the desert, whose whole wealth rested and whose very

being hung upon their being watering-places for these caravans, were

still wealthy cities in the second century of our era, when the voyage

by the Arabian Sea became for the first time easier and cheaper than the

journeys across the desert.

Euergetes had been a pupil of Aristobolus, a learned Jew, a writer of

the peripatetic sect of philosophers, one who had made his learning

respected by the pagans from his success in cultivating their

philosophy; and also of Aristarchus, the grammarian, the editor

of Homer; and, though the king had given himself up to the lowest

pleasures, yet he held with his crown that love of letters and of

learning which had ennobled his forefathers. He was himself an author,

and wrote, like Ptolemy Soter, his Memorabilia, or an account of what

he had seen most remarkable in his lifetime. We may suppose that his

writings were not of a very high order; they were quoted by Athengeus,

who wrote in the reign of Marcus Aurelius; but we learn little else from

them than the names of the mistresses of Ptolemy Philadelphus, and that

a flock of pheasants was kept in the palace of Alexandria. He also

wrote a commentary on Homer, of which we know nothing. When busy

upon literature, he would allow his companions to argue with him till

midnight on a point of history or a verse of poetry; but not one of them

ever uttered a word against his tyranny, or argued in favour of a less

cruel treatment of his enemies.

In this reign the schools of Alexandria, though not holding the rank

which they had gained under Philadelphus, were still highly thought of.

The king still gave public salaries to the professors; and Panaretus,

who had been a pupil of the philosopher Arcesilaus, received the very

large sum of twelve talents, or ten thousand dollars a year. Sositheus

and his rival, the younger Homer, the tragic poets of this reign, have

even been called two of the Pleiades of Alexandria; but that was a

title given to many authors of very different times, and to some of

very little merit. Such indeed was the want of merit among the poets of

Alexandria that many of their names would have been unknown to posterity

had they not been saved in the pages of the critics and grammarians, and

pieced together by the skill of nineteenth century investigators.

[Illustration: 260.jpg TEMPLE OF KOM OMBO.]

But, unfortunately, the larger number of the men of letters had in the

late wars taken part with Philome-tor against the cruel and luxurious

Euergetes. Hence, when the streets of Alexandria were flowing with the

blood of those whom he called his enemies, crowds of learned men left

Egypt, and were driven to earn a livelihood by teaching in the cities

to which they then fled. They were all Greeks, and few of them had been

born in Alexandria. They had been brought there by the wealth of the

country and the favour of the sovereign; and they now withdrew when

these advantages were taken away from them. The isles and coasts of the

Mediterranean were so filled with grammarians, philosophers, geometers,

musicians, schoolmasters, painters, and physicians from Alexandria that

the cruelty of Euergetes II., like the taking of Constantinople by the

Turks, may be said to have spread learning by the ill-treatment of its

professors.

The city which was then rising highest in arts and letters was Pergamus

in Asia Minor, which, under Eumenes and Attalus, was almost taking the

place which Alexandria had before held. Its library already held

two hundred thousand volumes, and raised a jealousy in the mind of

Euergetes. Not content with buying books and adding to the size of

his own library, he wished to lessen the libraries of his rivals; and,

nettled at the number of volumes which Eumenes had got together at

Pergamus, he made a law, forbidding the export of the Egyptian papyrus

on which they were written. On this the copiers employed by Eumenes

wrote their books upon sheepskins, which were called _charta pergamena_,

or parchment, from the name of the city in which they were written. Thus

our own two words, parchment from _Pergamus_, and paper from _papyrus_,

remain as monuments of the rivalry in book-collecting between the two

kings.

Euergetes was so bloated with disease that his body was nearly six feet

round, and he was made weak and slothful by this weight of flesh.

He walked with a crutch, and wore a loose robe like a woman’s, which

reached to his feet and hands. He gave himself up very much to eating

and drinking, and on the year that he was chosen priest of Apollo by

the Cyrenians, he showed his pleasure at the honour by a memorable feast

which he gave in a costly manner to all those who had before filled that

office. He had reigned six years with his brother, then eighteen years

in Cyrene, and lastly twenty-nine years after the death of his brother,

and he died in the fifty-fourth year of his reign, and perhaps the

sixty-ninth of his age. He left a widow, Cleopatra Cocce; two sons,

Ptolemy and Ptolemy Alexander; and three daughters, Cleopatra, married

to her elder brother; Tryphsena, married to Antiochus Grypus; and Selene

unmarried; and also a natural son, Ptolemy Apion, to whom by will he

left the kingdom of Cyrene; while he left the kingdom of Egypt to his

widow and one of his sons, giving her the power of choosing which should

be her colleague. The first Euergetes earned and deserved the name,

which was sadly disgraced by the second; but such was the fame of

Egypt’s greatness that the titles of its kings were copied in nearly

every Greek kingdom. We meet with the flattering names of Soter,

Philadelphus, Euergetes, and the rest, on the coins of Syria, Parthia,

Cappadocia, Paphlagonia, Pon-tus, Bactria, and Bithynia; while that

of Euergetes, _the benefactor_, was at last used as another name for a

tyrant.

History of Egypt From 330 B.C. To the Present Time, Volume 10 (of 12) · 第 5 / 7 章