CHAPTER III

THE PENTATEUCH

The Old Testament begins with a comprehensive historical work,

reaching from the creation of the world to the fall of the kingdom of

Judah (586 B.C.), which in the Hebrew Bible is divided into nine books

(Genesis-Kings). The Jews made a greater division at the end of the

fifth book (Deuteronomy) and treated the first five books (the

Pentateuch) as a unit, with a character and name of its own, the Law.

The names of the several books in our Bibles are derived from the

Greek version, and indicate in a general way the subject of the book,

or, more exactly, the subject with which it begins: Genesis, the

creation of the world; Exodus, the escape from Egypt; Leviticus, the

priests' book; Numbers, the census of the tribes; Deuteronomy, the

second legislation, or the recapitulation of the law.

The three middle books of the Pentateuch (Exodus-Numbers) are more

closely connected with one another than with the preceding and

following books (Genesis, Deuteronomy); in fact, they form a whole

which is only for convenience in handling divided into parts. In these

books narrative and legislation are somewhat unequally represented.

Exod. 1-19 is almost all narrative, as are also c. 24, and cc. 32-34;

the story is picked up again in Num. 10, what lies between is wholly

legislative; in Num. 10-27, 28-36, narrative and laws alternate, the

latter predominating. It is evident that from the author's point of

view the narrative was primarily a historical setting for the Mosaic

legislation.

Deuteronomy begins with a brief retrospect (Deut. 1-3) of the

movements of the Israelites from the time they left the Mount of God

till they arrived in the Plains of Moab, the lifetime of a whole

generation. There, as they are about to cross the Jordan to possess

the Land of Promise, Moses delivers to them the law which they shall

observe in the land, and with many exhortations and warnings urges

them to be faithful to their religion with its distinctive worship and

morals. Thus Deuteronomy also presents itself essentially as

legislation.

The history of the Israelite tribes opens with the account of the

oppression in Egypt, the introduction to the story of deliverance. Its

antecedents are found in the Book of Genesis, the migration of Jacob

and his sons from Palestine to Egypt several generations earlier in a

time of famine; and this in turn is but the last chapter in the

patriarchal story which begins with the migration of Abraham from

Syria or Babylonia to Palestine. Gen. 1-11 tells of creation and first

men; the great flood; the dispersion of the peoples, with a

genealogical table showing the affinities of the several races and

another tracing the descent of Abraham in direct line from Shem the

son of Noah. But even in Genesis the interest in the law manifests

itself in various ways, such as the sanction of the sabbath, the

prohibition of blood, and the introduction of circumcision.

In regarding the whole Pentateuch as Law, or, to express it more

accurately, as a revelation of the principles and observances of

religion, the Jews were, therefore, doing no violence to the character

and spirit of these books; and in ascribing them to Moses they were

only extending to the whole the authorship which is asserted in

particular of many of the laws, and especially of the impressive

exhortations in Deuteronomy which form the climactic close of his work

as a legislator.

It was early observed, however, that there are numerous expressions in

the Pentateuch which assume the settlement of Israel in Canaan and

look back to the age of Moses as to a somewhat remote past: Gen.

xxxvi. 31, for example, implies the existence of the Israelite

monarchy. In the seventeenth century such anachronisms were bandied

about a good deal, but, inasmuch as they were all brief clauses which

might well be notes or glosses by scribes, they proved nothing about

the age of the main text. The controversy sharpened the eyes of the

critics, and many more conclusive facts were brought to light, which

proved that the Pentateuch was not the product of one author nor of

one age, and that, whatever part Moses may be conceived to have had in

it, much must be ascribed to later writers. No methodical attempt had

been made, however, to distinguish its different strata, or to

discover the sources from which it was compiled. This was first

undertaken by an eminent French physician, Jean Astruc, who in 1753

published the results of his investigations under the modest title

"Conjectures concerning the Original Memoirs which it appears that

Moses used in compiling the Book of Genesis." Astruc's analysis was

suggested by peculiar phenomena in the use of the divine names in

Genesis, and he was led to the hypothesis that Moses had for the

primeval and patriarchal history two principal sources, one of which

employed consistently the proper name Jehovah, the other the

appellative Elohim (God). The two narratives were in large part

parallel, and when they were united in one continuous narrative,

repetitions, contradictions, and chronological difficulties were

created which disappear when the sources are separated and recombined

in their original sequence.

This is not the place for a history of criticism: it must suffice to

say that, as the result of the labours of many scholars in the last

century and a half upon the problem of the sources and composition of

the Pentateuch, historians are now generally agreed that four main

sources are to be recognized, of which three run, in varying

proportion, from Genesis to Numbers and reappear in Joshua, while the

fourth is found in Deuteronomy and Joshua only.

The Literature of the Old Testament · 第 3 / 20 章