This method addresses itself to the question: How can a nurse, a
subjective-objective human being know self and the other and compare and
complementarily synthesize these known betweens?
Basic to this method is a belief system, a philosophy about the nature
of man explicitly commented on by thinkers throughout human history.
Plato said:
"I cannot be sure whether or not I see it as it really is; but
we can be sure there is some such reality which it concerns us
to see."[4]
Nurses are with other men in times of peak life experiences under the
most intimate circumstances. We, too, can not be certain about what we
come to know in our betweens. We can be sure that these realities of
human experience are worthy of exploration. Our opportunities are
unique, only we can describe man in the nursing situation.
In _Let Us Now Praise Famous Men_, James Agee voices a similar concern
about the need to describe man-in-his-world and the adequacy of human
description.[5] Aware of the wonders and complexities of man he
considers not trying to describe worse than the inadequacy of
description.
Thinkers have also acknowledged that we can come to know from others. A
poem by Goethe expresses an attitude about this:
"Somebody says: 'Of no school I am part,
Never to living master lost my heart;
Nor anymore can I be said
To have learned anything from the dead.'
{68}
That statement--subject to appeal--
Means: 'I'm a self-made imbecile.'"[6]
In nursing what better master than the nursing situation in which we
become through our relations with others. Each human person has
something unique to teach us if we can but hear.
About our inadequacies of expression, many things are, are true,
"all-at-once." The law of contradiction does not apply
in-the-lived-experienced-world. We each view the world through our
unique histories. Wisdom is many sided truth. Wisdom cannot be expressed
"all-at-once." Truths can be stated only in sequence or metaphorically.
If I were supercritical of my human limitations to express "all-at-once"
wisdom, I would say nothing. Jung points up the dangers of this, he
says:
"I must prevent my critical powers from destroying my
creativeness. I know well enough that every word I utter
carries with it something of myself--of my special and unique
self with its particular history and its particular world."[7]
Each nurse's uniqueness dictates then a responsibility to share her
particular knowing with fellow struggling human beings. Only through
each describing can there be correction and complementary synthesis to
movement beyond.
The nurse's world is an experiential place for becoming influenced by
each participant's "here and now" inclusive or origin, history, and
hopes, fears, and alternatives of the confronting future. Positivistic
science focuses on selected particulars. Henri Bergson says:
"... for us conscious beings, it is the units that matter, for
we do not count extremities of intervals, we feel and live the
intervals themselves."[8]
Each human participant in the nursing situation has a unique flow of
consciousness which is intersubjectively influential.
So as human nurses we are limited in our ability to express the reality
of our-lived worlds. Yet, also, this world depends on and demands that
we, as human nurses, give it meaning, understand it in accordance with
our {69} humanness. Will and Ariel Durant, historians, professionals
who are forced to selectively present the world for other humans, say:
"The historian will not mourn because he can see no meaning in
human existence except that which man puts into it: let it be
our pride that we ourselves may put meaning into our lives, and
sometimes a significance that transcends death."[9]
Humans are the only beings conscious of themselves. Nurses are human
beings. As such we are capable of looking at our existence, choosing our
values, giving our world meaning and of constantly transcending
ourselves, or becoming more. If we value and prize our human nursing
world and our human potential for consciousness and expression, we will
actuate our potential and conceptualize our human nurse-world. This
suggests questions to me. What do I want nursing to be? How can I
influence the meaning of the term, nursing? How committed am I? What
investment am I willing to make? Will I risk exploring and saying what I
see in my nursing world? Am I open to knowing? How can I actuate my
uniqueness to allow the realistic potential of my nursing profession to
become, become ever more? Am I contributing my "nursing here and now" to
nursing's history through a lasting form of expression? Of what
importance is what I think or say; do I make any difference? Hermann
Hesse says of each man's uniqueness:
"... every man is more than just himself; he also represents
the unique, the very special and always significant and
remarkable point at which the world's phenomena intersect, only
once in this way and never again."[10]
Or, a nurse might say:
"... every nurse is more than just herself, she also represents
the unique, the very special and always significant and
remarkable point at which the nursing world's phenomena
intersect, only once in this way and never again."
To me, human freedom means recognizing our unique potential,
responsibility, and limitations. Our singularity as a nurse among
nurses, then, confronts us with a responsibility that belongs to one
else. Martin Buber, philosophical anthropologist says:
"As we become free ... our responsibility must become personal
and solitary."[11]
Our unlikeness to other nurses is a lonely, very person conditioned
state. Only each nurse can be responsible for herself. The wonders of
freedom are {70} paradoxically, "all-at-once," both a delight and a
burden. In nursing it is important for us to understand freedom not as
opposing or agreeing: freedom is choosing--choosing and saying "yes" to
one's self.
Human endeavor between man and men in their-worlds, in this instance
professional clinical nursing, if explored and described is viewed as
contributing to man's human evolvement and to knowledge of the human
condition and how man becomes.
Integrally all the above statements are the bases and biases of this
human phenomenological method of nursology. In a phrase, I suppose what
all these _starting point_ statements say is: Nursing situations make
available human existence events significantly worthy of description.
Only human nurses can describe them. Humans' ability to describe reality
adequately has its limits. We should describe since pridefully we humans
are the only existing beings capable of giving meaning to, looking at,
and expressing our consciousness. In the long run this effort could
yield a nursing science.