NO FAITH WITH HERETICS.

During the Crusades, when the Christians were wantonly fighting

against their superiors in civilisation and humanity, the doctrine, was

promulgated and obeyed that no faith should be kept with infidels,

and this was subsequently put in force against heretics. Thousands of

Mohammedan prisoners were butchered in cold blood, although their safety

had been confirmed by an oath; and this infamous practice was afterwards

pursued with respect to the "heretical" sects when the Papal troops

desolated some of the fairest parts of Europe. Not only was there

no salvation outside the Church, but even the ordinary laws of human

society were held to be abrogated. This wickedness, perhaps, reached

its culmination in the Spanish conquest of America. Few Christians were

civilised enough to condemn these purjured banditti, but Montaigne in

France, and Raleigh in England, were glorious exceptions, and both of

them were under a just suspicion of heterodoxy.

Protestants as well as Catholics were infected with this infamous

bigotry. Luther himself was not free from taint, and Calvin's treachery

against Servetus is an eternal blot on his character.

"No faith with heretics" took a new form when the downright violation of

an oath became too dissonant to the spirit of an improved civilisation.

It found expression in robbing the heretic of political and social

rights, and above all in treating him as outside the pale of honor.

Slandering him was no libel. Every bigot claimed the right to say

anything against his character, for the purpose of bringing his opinions

into hatred and contempt. All the dictates of charity were cast aside;

his good actions were misrepresented, and his failings maliciously

exaggerated. If Voltaire spent thousands in charity, he did it for

notoriety; if he wrote odes to beautiful or accomplished ladies, he was

a wretched debauchee. If Thomas Paine made sacrifices for liberty,

he did it because he had a private grudge against authority; if he

befriended the wife and family of a distressed Republican, he only

sought to gratify his lust; if he spent a convivial hour with a friend,

he was an inveterate drunkard; and if he contracted a malignant abscess

by lying for months in a damp, unwholesome dungeon, his sufferings were

the nemesis of a wicked, profligate life.

An English precursor of Voltaire and Paine wrote _A Discourse on

Freethinking_. His name was Anthony Collins, and in a certain sense he

was the father of English Freethought. He was a man of exemplary life

and manners, yet the saintly Bishop Berkeley said he "deserved to

be denied the common benefit of air and water." One of Collins's

antagonists was the famous Dr. Bentley; and although Collins was a

man of fortune, the ridiculous calumny was started that he sought and

obtained Bentley's assistance in adversity. The author of this calumny

was Richard Cumberland, a grandson of Bentley, and in other respects an

estimable man. His mistake was pointed out by Isaac D'Israeli, who told

him the person he meant was _Arthur_ Collins, the historical compiler.

But Cumberland perpetuated the calumny, remarking that "it should stand,

because it could do no harm to any but to Anthony Collins, whom he

considered little short of an Atheist."

Another story about Collins, which has frequently done duty in Christian

publications, is that a visitor found him reading the New Testament,

and that he remarked, "I have but one book, but that is the best."

Fortunately I am able to give the origin of this story. It is told of

_William_ Collins, the poet, by Dr. Johnson, and may be found in the

second volume (p. 239) of that writer's "Miscellaneous and Fugitive

Pieces," published by Davies in Johnson's lifetime. It was not Anthony

Collins, therefore; but what does that matter? It was a gentleman named

_Collins_; his other name is indifferent. Besides, the story is so much

more affecting when told of _Anthony_.

Look at the lying stories of infidel death-beds; glance at the

scurrilities of an outcast minister which are gratuitously circulated

by the enemies of Colonel Ingersoll; observe on how many platforms Mr.

Brad-laugh has pulled out his watch and given the Almighty five minutes

to strike him dead; listen to the grotesque libels on every leading

Freethinker which are solemnly circulated by Christian malice; and

you will behold the last fruit of a very old tree, which is slowly but

surely perishing. It once bore scaffolds, stakes, prisons and torture

rooms; it now bears but libels and insinuations.

Flowers of Freethought (First Series) · 第 38 / 57 题