OLD NICK.

This gentleman is of very ancient descent. His lineage dwarfs that of

the proudest nobles and kings. English peers whose ancestors came in

with the Conqueror; the Guelphs, Hapsburgs, and Hohenzollens of our

European thrones; are things of yesterday compared with his Highness the

Devil. The Cæsars themselves, the more ancient rulers of Assyria, and

even the Pharaohs of the first dynasty, are modern beside him. His

origin is lost in the impenetrable obscurity of primitive times. Nay,

there have been sages who maintained his eternity, who made him coeval

with God, and placed upon his head the crown of a divided sovereignty of

the infinite universe.

But time and change are lords of all, and the most durable things come

to an end. Celestial and infernal, like earthly, powers are subject to

the law of decay. Mutability touches them with her dissolving wand,

and strong necessity, the lord of gods and men, brings them to

the inevitable stroke of Death. Senility falls on all beings and

institutions--if they are allowed to perish naturally; and as our august

Monarchy is the joke of wits, and our ancient House of Lords is an

object of popular derision, so the high and mighty Devil in his palsied

old age is the laughing-stock of those who once trembled at the sound

of his name. They omit the lofty titles he was once addressed by, and

fearless of his feeble thunders and lightnings, they familiarly style

him Old Nick. Alas, how are the mighty fallen! The potentate who was

more terrible than an army with manners is now the sport of children

and a common figure in melodrama. Even the genius of Milton, Goethe, and

Byron, has not been able to save him from this miserable fate.

When this sobriquet of Old Nick first came into use is unknown.

Macaulay, in his essay on Machiavelli, says that "Out of his surname

they have coined an epithet for a knave, and out of his Christian name

a synonym for the Devil." A couplet from _Hudibras_ is cited to support

this view.

Nick Machiavel had ne'er a trick Tho' he gave his name to our Old Nick.

"But we believe," adds Macaulay, "there is a schism on this subject

among the antiquaries." The learned Zachary Gray's edition of _Hudibras_

shows that "our English writers, before Machiavel's time, used the word

Old Nick very commonly to signify the Devil," and that "it came from

our Saxon ancestors, who called him Old Nicka." No doubt Butler, whose

learning was so great that he "knew everything," was well acquainted

with this fact. He probably meant the couplet as a broad stroke of

humor. But there was perhaps a chronological basis for the joke. Our

Saxon ancestors did not speak of Old Nicka in a spirit of jest or

levity. The bantering sense of our modern sobriquet for the Devil

appears to have crept in during the decline of witchcraft. That

frightful saturnalia of superstition was the Devil's heyday. He was

almost omnipotent and omnipresent. But as witchcraft died out, partly

through the growth of knowledge, and partly through sheer weariness on

the part of its devotees, the Devil began to lose his power. His agency

in human affairs was seen to be less potent than was imagined. People

called him Old Nick playfully, as they might talk of a toothless old

mastiff whose bark was worse than his bite. At length he was regarded as

a perfect fraud, and his sobriquet took a tinge of contempt. He is now

utterly played out except in church and chapel, where the sky-pilots

still represent him as a roaring lion. Yet, as a curious relic of old

times, it may be noted that in the law-courts, where conservatism reigns

in the cumbrous wig on the judge's head, and in the cumbrous phraseology

of indictments, criminals are still charged with being instigated by

the Devil. Nearly all the judges look upon this as so much nonsense, but

occasionally there is a pious fossil who treats it seriously. We then

hear a Judge North regret that a prisoner has devoted the abilities God

gave him to the Devil's service, and give the renegade a year's leisure

to reconsider which master he ought to serve.

During the witch mania the world was treated to a great deal of curious

information about Old Nick. What Robert Burns says of him in _Tam

O'Shanter_ is only a faint reminiscence of the wealth of demonology

which existed a few generations earlier. Old Nick used to appear at

the witches' Sabbaths in the form of a goat, or a brawny black man,

who courted all the pretty young witches and made them submit to his

embraces. Some of these crazy creatures, under examination or torture,

gave the most circumstantial accounts of their intercourse with Satan;

their revelations being of such an obscene character that they must

be left under the veil of a dead tongue. It is, of course, absurd to

suppose that anything of the kind occurred. Religious hysteria and

lubricity are closely allied, as every physician knows, and the filthy

fancies of a lively witch deserve no more attention than those of many

females in our lunatic asylums.

Behind these tales of the Devil there was the pagan tradition of Pan,

whose upper part was that of a man and his lower part that of a goat.

The devils of one religion are generally the gods of its predecessor;

and the great Pan, whose myth is so beautifully expounded by Bacon,

was degraded by Christianity into a fiend. Representing, as he did,

the nature which Christianity trampled under foot, he became a fit

incarnation of the Devil. The horns and hooves and the goat thighs were

preserved; and the emblems of strength, fecundity and wisdom in the god

became the emblems of bestiality and cunning in the demon.

Heine's magnificent _Gods in Exile_ shows how the deities of Olympus

avenged themselves for this ill-treatment. They haunted the mountains

and forests, beguiling knights and travellers from their allegiance

to Christ. Venus wooed the men who were taught by an ascetic creed to

despise sexual love; and Pan, appearing as the Devil, led the women a

frightful dance to hell.

But as the Christian superstition declined, the gods of Paganism also

disappeared. Their vengeance was completed, and they retired with the

knowledge that the gods of Calvary were mortal like the gods of Olympus.

During the last two centuries the Devil has gradually become a subject

for joking. In Shakespeare's plays he is still a serious personage,

although we fancy that the mighty bard had no belief himself in any

such being. But, as a dramatist, he was obliged to suit himself to the

current fashion of thought, and he refers to the Devil when it serves

his purpose just as he introduces ghosts and witches. His Satanic

Majesty not being then a comic figure, he is spoken of or alluded to

with gravity. Even when Macbeth flies at the messenger in a towering

rage, and cries "the Devil damn thee black, thou cream-faced loon," he

does not lose his sense of the Devil's dignity. In Milton's great

epic Satan is really the central figure, and he is always splendid

and heroic. Shelley, in fact, complained in his preface to _Prometheus

Unbound_ that "the character of Satan engenders in the mind a pernicious

casuistry, which leads us to weigh his faults with his wrongs, and

to excuse the former because the latter exceed all measure." Goethe's

Mephistopheles is less dignified than Milton's Satan, but he is full of

energy and intellect, and if Faust eventually escapes from his clutches

it is only by a miracle. At any rate, Mephistopheles is not an object

of derision; on the contrary, the laugh is generally on his own side.

Still, Goethe is playing with the Devil all the time. He does not

believe in the actual existence of the Prince of Evil, but simply uses

the familiar old figure to work out a psychological drama. The same is

true of Byron. Satan, in the _Vision of Judgment_, is a superb presence,

moving with a princely splendor; but had it suited his purpose, Byron

could have made him a very different character.

The Devil is, indeed, treated with much greater levity by Coleridge and

Southey, and Shelley knocks him about a good deal in _Peter Bell the

Third_--

The Devil, I safely can aver,

Has neither hoof, nor tail, nor sting;

Nor is he, as some sages swear,

A spirit, neither here nor there,

In nothing--yet in everything.

He is--what we are! for sometimes

The Devil is a gentleman;

At others a bard bartering rhymes

For sack; a statesman spinning crimes;

A swindler, living as he can.

These and many other verses show what liberties Shelley took with the

once formidable monarch of hell. The Devil's treatment by the pulpiteers

is instructive. Take up an old sermon and you will find the Devil all

over it. The smell of brimstone is on every page, and you see the whisk

of his tail as you turn the leaf. But things are changed now. Satan is

no longer a person, except in the vulgar circles of sheer illiteracy,

where the preacher is as great an ignoramus as his congregation. If

you take up any reputable volume of sermons by a Church parson or a

Dissenting minister, you find the Devil either takes a back seat or

disappears altogether in a metaphysical cloud. None of these subtle

resolvers of ancient riddles, however, approaches grand old Donne,

who said in one of his fine discourses that "the Devil himself is only

concentrated stupidity." What a magnificent flash of insight! Yes,

the great enemy of mankind is stupidity; and, alas, against that,

as Schiller said, the gods themselves fight in vain. Yet time fights

against it, and time is greater than the gods; so there is hope after

all.

Gradually the Devil has dropped, until he has at last peached the lowest

depth. He is now patronised by the Salvation Army. Booth exhibits him

for a living, and all the Salvation Army Captains and Hallelujah Lasses

parade him about to the terror of a few fools and the amusement of

everyone else. Poor Devil! Belisarius begging an obolus was nothing

to this. Surely the Lord himself might take pity on his old rival, and

assist him out of this miserable plight.

Old Nick is now used to frighten children with, and by-and-bye he may

be employed like the old garden-god to frighten away the crows. Even his

scriptural reputation cannot save him from such a fate, for the Bible

itself is falling into disbelief and contempt, and his adventures from

Genesis to Revelation are become a subject of merriment. Talking to Mrs.

Eve about apples in the form of a serpent; whispering in David's ear

that a census would be a good thing, while Jehovah whispers a similar

suggestion on the other side; asking Jesus to turn pebbles into penny

loaves, lugging him through the air, perching him on a pinnacle, setting

him on the top of a mountain whence both squinted round the globe, and

playing for forty days and nights that preposterous pantomime of the

temptation in the desert; getting miraculously multiplied, bewildering

a herd of swine, and driving them into a watery grave; letting seven of

himself occupy one lady called Magdalen, and others inhabit the bodies

of lunatics; going about like a roaring lion, and then appearing in

the new part of a dragon who lashes the stars with his tail; all

these metamorphoses are ineffably ludicrous, and calculated to excite

inextinguishable laughter. His one serious appearance in the history of

Job is overwhelmed by this multitude of comic situations.

Poor Old Nick is on his last legs and cannot last much longer. May his

end be peace! That is the least we can wish him. And when he is dead,

let us hope he will receive a decent burial. Those to whom he has been

the best friend should follow him to the grave. His obsequies, in that

case, would be graced by the presence of all the clergy, and the Burial

Service might be read by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Fancy them,

burying their dear departed brother the Devil, in the sure and certain

hope of a glorious resurrection!

Flowers of Freethought (First Series) · 第 6 / 57 题